Antonia Edel, Jo-Lâm Vuong, Sebastian Kaufmann, Olaf Hoos, Thimo Wiewelhove, Alexander Ferrauti
{"title":"精英羽毛球比赛和训练中的代谢情况。","authors":"Antonia Edel, Jo-Lâm Vuong, Sebastian Kaufmann, Olaf Hoos, Thimo Wiewelhove, Alexander Ferrauti","doi":"10.1002/ejsc.12196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Aim of the study was to analyze the metabolic profile of badminton matches and training drills. Therefore, 11 male (23.2 ± 3.8 years, 182 ± 7 cm, 74.4 ± 8.4 kg) and five female (19.3 ± 1.5 years, 170 ± 6 cm, 62.6 ± 9.2 kg) elite badminton players participated in either a training match (<i>T</i><sub><i>M</i></sub>; <i>n</i> = 7) and/or three protocols of multifeeding drills (<i>T</i><sub>10</sub>, <i>T</i><sub>30,</sub> <i>T</i><sub>50;</sub> <i>n</i> = 13), that varied in interval and rest durations (10 s/10 s, 30 s/30 s, 50 s/50 s). Absolute and relative energetic costs (<i>W</i><sub>tot</sub> and <i>E</i><sub>tot</sub>) and contribution to oxidative (<i>W</i><sub>Oxid</sub>), phosphagen (<i>W</i><sub>PCr</sub>), and anaerobic glycolytic (<i>W</i><sub>La</sub>) metabolism were calculated by the three-component PCr-La-O<sub>2</sub>-method based on an indirect calorimetric approach from oxygen consumption during exercise, post exercise, and net blood lactate concentration. A novel intermittent approach was used to consider replenishment of phosphocreatine during each resting phase. Results show that during <i>T</i><sub><i>M</i></sub>, <i>E</i><sub>tot</sub> was 676 ± 98J·kg<sup>−1</sup> min<sup>−1</sup>, while metabolic pathways contributed by 56.9 ± 8.6% (<i>W</i><sub>Oxid</sub>), 42.7 ± 8.7% (<i>W</i><sub>PCr</sub>), and 0.4 ± 0.6% (<i>W</i><sub>La</sub>). In the multifeeding drills <i>E</i><sub>tot</sub> was comparable between <i>T</i><sub>10</sub> (1020 ± 160J·kg<sup>−1</sup> min<sup>−1</sup>) and <i>T</i><sub>30</sub> (985 ± 173 J·kg<sup>−1</sup> min<sup>−1</sup>) but higher in <i>T</i><sub>50</sub> (1266 ± 194J·kg<sup>−1</sup> min<sup>−1</sup>) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Relative contribution of <i>W</i><sub>Oxid</sub> was lower in <i>T</i><sub>10</sub> (47.3 ± 7.7%) but similar in <i>T</i><sub>30</sub> (56.5 ± 6.2%) and <i>T</i><sub>50</sub> (57.3 ± 6.0%) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). <i>W</i><sub>PCr</sub> was highest in <i>T</i><sub>10</sub> (51.1 ± 8.3%) followed by <i>T</i><sub>30</sub> (42.2 ± 6.9%) and lowest in <i>T</i><sub>50</sub> (31.2 ± 7.7%) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). <i>W</i><sub>La</sub> was similar between <i>T</i><sub>10</sub> (1.6 ± 1.0%) and <i>T</i><sub>30</sub> (2.1 ± 1.0%) but higher in <i>T</i><sub>50</sub> (11.6 ± 4.8%) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Concludingly, metabolic costs in badminton are predominantly covered by oxidative and phosphagen energetic pathways. Metabolic profiles of the multifeeding drills differ depending on rally/interval duration, with increasing contribution of anaerobic glycolysis and decreasing phosphagen contribution in case of longer intervals.</p>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsc.12196","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Metabolic profile in elite badminton match play and training drills\",\"authors\":\"Antonia Edel, Jo-Lâm Vuong, Sebastian Kaufmann, Olaf Hoos, Thimo Wiewelhove, Alexander Ferrauti\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ejsc.12196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Aim of the study was to analyze the metabolic profile of badminton matches and training drills. Therefore, 11 male (23.2 ± 3.8 years, 182 ± 7 cm, 74.4 ± 8.4 kg) and five female (19.3 ± 1.5 years, 170 ± 6 cm, 62.6 ± 9.2 kg) elite badminton players participated in either a training match (<i>T</i><sub><i>M</i></sub>; <i>n</i> = 7) and/or three protocols of multifeeding drills (<i>T</i><sub>10</sub>, <i>T</i><sub>30,</sub> <i>T</i><sub>50;</sub> <i>n</i> = 13), that varied in interval and rest durations (10 s/10 s, 30 s/30 s, 50 s/50 s). Absolute and relative energetic costs (<i>W</i><sub>tot</sub> and <i>E</i><sub>tot</sub>) and contribution to oxidative (<i>W</i><sub>Oxid</sub>), phosphagen (<i>W</i><sub>PCr</sub>), and anaerobic glycolytic (<i>W</i><sub>La</sub>) metabolism were calculated by the three-component PCr-La-O<sub>2</sub>-method based on an indirect calorimetric approach from oxygen consumption during exercise, post exercise, and net blood lactate concentration. A novel intermittent approach was used to consider replenishment of phosphocreatine during each resting phase. Results show that during <i>T</i><sub><i>M</i></sub>, <i>E</i><sub>tot</sub> was 676 ± 98J·kg<sup>−1</sup> min<sup>−1</sup>, while metabolic pathways contributed by 56.9 ± 8.6% (<i>W</i><sub>Oxid</sub>), 42.7 ± 8.7% (<i>W</i><sub>PCr</sub>), and 0.4 ± 0.6% (<i>W</i><sub>La</sub>). In the multifeeding drills <i>E</i><sub>tot</sub> was comparable between <i>T</i><sub>10</sub> (1020 ± 160J·kg<sup>−1</sup> min<sup>−1</sup>) and <i>T</i><sub>30</sub> (985 ± 173 J·kg<sup>−1</sup> min<sup>−1</sup>) but higher in <i>T</i><sub>50</sub> (1266 ± 194J·kg<sup>−1</sup> min<sup>−1</sup>) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Relative contribution of <i>W</i><sub>Oxid</sub> was lower in <i>T</i><sub>10</sub> (47.3 ± 7.7%) but similar in <i>T</i><sub>30</sub> (56.5 ± 6.2%) and <i>T</i><sub>50</sub> (57.3 ± 6.0%) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). <i>W</i><sub>PCr</sub> was highest in <i>T</i><sub>10</sub> (51.1 ± 8.3%) followed by <i>T</i><sub>30</sub> (42.2 ± 6.9%) and lowest in <i>T</i><sub>50</sub> (31.2 ± 7.7%) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). <i>W</i><sub>La</sub> was similar between <i>T</i><sub>10</sub> (1.6 ± 1.0%) and <i>T</i><sub>30</sub> (2.1 ± 1.0%) but higher in <i>T</i><sub>50</sub> (11.6 ± 4.8%) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Concludingly, metabolic costs in badminton are predominantly covered by oxidative and phosphagen energetic pathways. Metabolic profiles of the multifeeding drills differ depending on rally/interval duration, with increasing contribution of anaerobic glycolysis and decreasing phosphagen contribution in case of longer intervals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of sport science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsc.12196\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of sport science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.12196\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.12196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Metabolic profile in elite badminton match play and training drills
Aim of the study was to analyze the metabolic profile of badminton matches and training drills. Therefore, 11 male (23.2 ± 3.8 years, 182 ± 7 cm, 74.4 ± 8.4 kg) and five female (19.3 ± 1.5 years, 170 ± 6 cm, 62.6 ± 9.2 kg) elite badminton players participated in either a training match (TM; n = 7) and/or three protocols of multifeeding drills (T10, T30,T50;n = 13), that varied in interval and rest durations (10 s/10 s, 30 s/30 s, 50 s/50 s). Absolute and relative energetic costs (Wtot and Etot) and contribution to oxidative (WOxid), phosphagen (WPCr), and anaerobic glycolytic (WLa) metabolism were calculated by the three-component PCr-La-O2-method based on an indirect calorimetric approach from oxygen consumption during exercise, post exercise, and net blood lactate concentration. A novel intermittent approach was used to consider replenishment of phosphocreatine during each resting phase. Results show that during TM, Etot was 676 ± 98J·kg−1 min−1, while metabolic pathways contributed by 56.9 ± 8.6% (WOxid), 42.7 ± 8.7% (WPCr), and 0.4 ± 0.6% (WLa). In the multifeeding drills Etot was comparable between T10 (1020 ± 160J·kg−1 min−1) and T30 (985 ± 173 J·kg−1 min−1) but higher in T50 (1266 ± 194J·kg−1 min−1) (p < 0.001). Relative contribution of WOxid was lower in T10 (47.3 ± 7.7%) but similar in T30 (56.5 ± 6.2%) and T50 (57.3 ± 6.0%) (p < 0.001). WPCr was highest in T10 (51.1 ± 8.3%) followed by T30 (42.2 ± 6.9%) and lowest in T50 (31.2 ± 7.7%) (p < 0.001). WLa was similar between T10 (1.6 ± 1.0%) and T30 (2.1 ± 1.0%) but higher in T50 (11.6 ± 4.8%) (p < 0.001). Concludingly, metabolic costs in badminton are predominantly covered by oxidative and phosphagen energetic pathways. Metabolic profiles of the multifeeding drills differ depending on rally/interval duration, with increasing contribution of anaerobic glycolysis and decreasing phosphagen contribution in case of longer intervals.