Adnan Calcuttawala, Abhishek Shinghal, Ashwini N Budrukkar, Monali Swain, Vedang Murthy, Sarbani G Laskar, Tejpal Gupta, Rituraj Upereti, Shrikant Kale, Jai Prakash Agarwal
{"title":"口咽癌患者能否避免吞咽困难吸入相关结构(DARS)?DARS 优化调强放射治疗前瞻性研究中的剂量评估。","authors":"Adnan Calcuttawala, Abhishek Shinghal, Ashwini N Budrukkar, Monali Swain, Vedang Murthy, Sarbani G Laskar, Tejpal Gupta, Rituraj Upereti, Shrikant Kale, Jai Prakash Agarwal","doi":"10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_166_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility of sparing the dysphagia-aspiration-related structures (DARS) in various head and neck cancer sites treated with definitive DARS-optimized intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and concurrent chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Target volumes, organs at risk, and in addition, individual DARS were delineated, including the superior, middle, and inferior pharyngeal constrictor muscles, supraglottic and glottic larynx, the base of the tongue, esophageal inlet muscles and cervical esophagus in 35 patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Volume-based dose constraints were applied to the DARS outside the planning target volume (PTV). An IMRT plan was then generated to limit doses to DARS without compromising PTV dose coverage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve (34.3%) patients had an oropharyngeal primary (OPX), 18 (51.4%) had a laryngeal, and 5 (14.3%) patients had hypopharyngeal primary. The mean dose to the DARS was 47.93 Gy for the entire group, while it was 54.6 Gy in oropharyngeal primaries and 44.4 Gy in laryngopharyngeal primaries. DARS mean dose of ≤45 Gy could be achieved in a significantly lesser number of patients with oropharyngeal primaries (P < 0.02). Similarly, DARS mean dose was 42.25 Gy in patients with N0 disease, 49.6 Gy with ipsilateral involved nodes, and 55 Gy with bilateral disease. Sparing of DARS was feasible when the volume of PTV was ≤150 cc (P < 0.025).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sparing of DARS structures appears to be challenging in patients with oropharyngeal cancers without compromising the dose to the PTVs while it is feasible in laryngopharyngeal cancers. DARS sparing is feasible when the PTV volume is < 150 cc and in patients with negative or unilateral nodal disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":94070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","volume":"20 5","pages":"1499-1506"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can dysphagia aspiration related structures (DARS) be spared in patients with oropharyngeal cancers? Dosimetric evaluation in a prospective study of DARS optimized intensity modulated radiation therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Adnan Calcuttawala, Abhishek Shinghal, Ashwini N Budrukkar, Monali Swain, Vedang Murthy, Sarbani G Laskar, Tejpal Gupta, Rituraj Upereti, Shrikant Kale, Jai Prakash Agarwal\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_166_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility of sparing the dysphagia-aspiration-related structures (DARS) in various head and neck cancer sites treated with definitive DARS-optimized intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and concurrent chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Target volumes, organs at risk, and in addition, individual DARS were delineated, including the superior, middle, and inferior pharyngeal constrictor muscles, supraglottic and glottic larynx, the base of the tongue, esophageal inlet muscles and cervical esophagus in 35 patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Volume-based dose constraints were applied to the DARS outside the planning target volume (PTV). An IMRT plan was then generated to limit doses to DARS without compromising PTV dose coverage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve (34.3%) patients had an oropharyngeal primary (OPX), 18 (51.4%) had a laryngeal, and 5 (14.3%) patients had hypopharyngeal primary. The mean dose to the DARS was 47.93 Gy for the entire group, while it was 54.6 Gy in oropharyngeal primaries and 44.4 Gy in laryngopharyngeal primaries. DARS mean dose of ≤45 Gy could be achieved in a significantly lesser number of patients with oropharyngeal primaries (P < 0.02). Similarly, DARS mean dose was 42.25 Gy in patients with N0 disease, 49.6 Gy with ipsilateral involved nodes, and 55 Gy with bilateral disease. Sparing of DARS was feasible when the volume of PTV was ≤150 cc (P < 0.025).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sparing of DARS structures appears to be challenging in patients with oropharyngeal cancers without compromising the dose to the PTVs while it is feasible in laryngopharyngeal cancers. DARS sparing is feasible when the PTV volume is < 150 cc and in patients with negative or unilateral nodal disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"20 5\",\"pages\":\"1499-1506\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_166_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_166_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评估在各种头颈部癌症部位采用明确的 DARS 优化调强放射治疗(IMRT)和同期化疗时保留吞咽困难-吸气相关结构(DARS)的可行性:对35例头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者的靶体积、危险器官以及单个DARS进行了划分,包括咽上、中、下收缩肌、声门上和声门喉、舌根、食管入口肌肉和颈食管。在计划目标容积(PTV)外的 DARS 上应用了基于容积的剂量限制。然后生成 IMRT 计划,在不影响 PTV 剂量覆盖范围的情况下限制 DARS 的剂量:12例(34.3%)患者为口咽原发灶(OPX),18例(51.4%)患者为喉原发灶,5例(14.3%)患者为下咽原发灶。全组患者的 DARS 平均剂量为 47.93 Gy,口咽原发患者为 54.6 Gy,喉咽原发患者为 44.4 Gy。口咽部原发癌患者的 DARS 平均剂量明显低于 45 Gy(P < 0.02)。同样,N0患者的DARS平均剂量为42.25 Gy,同侧受累结节患者为49.6 Gy,双侧患者为55 Gy。当PTV的体积≤150 cc时,可以保留DARS(P < 0.025):结论:在口咽癌患者中,在不影响PTV剂量的情况下保留DARS结构似乎具有挑战性,而在喉咽癌患者中则是可行的。当 PTV 容积小于 150 毫升,以及阴性或单侧结节病患者时,保留 DARS 是可行的。
Can dysphagia aspiration related structures (DARS) be spared in patients with oropharyngeal cancers? Dosimetric evaluation in a prospective study of DARS optimized intensity modulated radiation therapy.
Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of sparing the dysphagia-aspiration-related structures (DARS) in various head and neck cancer sites treated with definitive DARS-optimized intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and concurrent chemotherapy.
Materials and methods: Target volumes, organs at risk, and in addition, individual DARS were delineated, including the superior, middle, and inferior pharyngeal constrictor muscles, supraglottic and glottic larynx, the base of the tongue, esophageal inlet muscles and cervical esophagus in 35 patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Volume-based dose constraints were applied to the DARS outside the planning target volume (PTV). An IMRT plan was then generated to limit doses to DARS without compromising PTV dose coverage.
Results: Twelve (34.3%) patients had an oropharyngeal primary (OPX), 18 (51.4%) had a laryngeal, and 5 (14.3%) patients had hypopharyngeal primary. The mean dose to the DARS was 47.93 Gy for the entire group, while it was 54.6 Gy in oropharyngeal primaries and 44.4 Gy in laryngopharyngeal primaries. DARS mean dose of ≤45 Gy could be achieved in a significantly lesser number of patients with oropharyngeal primaries (P < 0.02). Similarly, DARS mean dose was 42.25 Gy in patients with N0 disease, 49.6 Gy with ipsilateral involved nodes, and 55 Gy with bilateral disease. Sparing of DARS was feasible when the volume of PTV was ≤150 cc (P < 0.025).
Conclusion: Sparing of DARS structures appears to be challenging in patients with oropharyngeal cancers without compromising the dose to the PTVs while it is feasible in laryngopharyngeal cancers. DARS sparing is feasible when the PTV volume is < 150 cc and in patients with negative or unilateral nodal disease.