用于气候政策和全球变化研究的生态分区

IF 25.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Nature Sustainability Pub Date : 2024-08-29 DOI:10.1038/s41893-024-01416-5
Philip Audebert, Eleanor Milne, Laure-Sophie Schiettecatte, Daniel Dionisio, Maidie Sinitambirivoutin, Carolina Pais, Clara Proença, Martial Bernoux
{"title":"用于气候政策和全球变化研究的生态分区","authors":"Philip Audebert, Eleanor Milne, Laure-Sophie Schiettecatte, Daniel Dionisio, Maidie Sinitambirivoutin, Carolina Pais, Clara Proença, Martial Bernoux","doi":"10.1038/s41893-024-01416-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As climate change accelerates, nations are moving towards meeting their nationally determined contributions and reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Reporting of this from the agriculture, forestry and other land use sector relies on data related to land use and management, climate and soil type. Where such data are unavailable, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) provides a set of default factors, based on an extensive literature review of likely GHG emission factors and carbon stock changes disaggregated by the Food and Agriculture Organization’s global ecological zones. As understanding of global ecological zones under environmental change improves, it becomes necessary to reassess such ecological zoning approaches to enable reporting of GHG emissions to support nationally determined contributions and global change studies. Here we propose a globally consistent ecological zoning approach based on Holdridge life zones using climatic data from the Climate Research Unit on a 0.5° grid, which tackles certain limitations found in the existing guidance provided by the IPCC. A set of three global ecological zone maps based on Holdridge life zones were devised using increasing levels of aggregation, which could support sustainability studies of global environmental change, specifically climate change, and be used as a zoning approach by the IPCC. Climate change policy and global change studies rely on maps that classify the world into different ecological zones. This study updates current approaches to ecological zoning of the world to ensure that consistent data are provided for such sustainability-related policy and studies.","PeriodicalId":19056,"journal":{"name":"Nature Sustainability","volume":"7 10","pages":"1294-1303"},"PeriodicalIF":25.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecological zoning for climate policy and global change studies\",\"authors\":\"Philip Audebert, Eleanor Milne, Laure-Sophie Schiettecatte, Daniel Dionisio, Maidie Sinitambirivoutin, Carolina Pais, Clara Proença, Martial Bernoux\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41893-024-01416-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As climate change accelerates, nations are moving towards meeting their nationally determined contributions and reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Reporting of this from the agriculture, forestry and other land use sector relies on data related to land use and management, climate and soil type. Where such data are unavailable, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) provides a set of default factors, based on an extensive literature review of likely GHG emission factors and carbon stock changes disaggregated by the Food and Agriculture Organization’s global ecological zones. As understanding of global ecological zones under environmental change improves, it becomes necessary to reassess such ecological zoning approaches to enable reporting of GHG emissions to support nationally determined contributions and global change studies. Here we propose a globally consistent ecological zoning approach based on Holdridge life zones using climatic data from the Climate Research Unit on a 0.5° grid, which tackles certain limitations found in the existing guidance provided by the IPCC. A set of three global ecological zone maps based on Holdridge life zones were devised using increasing levels of aggregation, which could support sustainability studies of global environmental change, specifically climate change, and be used as a zoning approach by the IPCC. Climate change policy and global change studies rely on maps that classify the world into different ecological zones. This study updates current approaches to ecological zoning of the world to ensure that consistent data are provided for such sustainability-related policy and studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Sustainability\",\"volume\":\"7 10\",\"pages\":\"1294-1303\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":25.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Sustainability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-024-01416-5\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-024-01416-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着气候变化的加速,各国都在努力实现本国确定的减排目标,减少温室气体 (GHG) 排放。农业、林业和其他土地利用部门的温室气体排放报告依赖于与土地利用和管理、气候和土壤类型相关的数据。在没有此类数据的情况下,政府间气候变化专门委员会 (IPCC) 根据对可能的温室气体排放因子和碳储量变化的广泛文献审查,提供了一套默认因子,并按联合国粮食及农业组织的全球生态区进行了分类。随着人们对环境变化下全球生态区的认识不断提高,有必要重新评估这种生态区划方法,以便报告温室气体排放,支持国家自主贡献和全球变化研究。在此,我们提出了一种全球一致的生态区划方法,该方法基于霍尔德里奇生命区,使用气候研究单位提供的 0.5° 网格气候数据,解决了 IPCC 现有指南中的某些局限性。基于霍尔德里奇生命区,我们设计了一套三个全球生态区地图,并将其聚合程度不断提高,这可以支持全球环境变化(尤其是气候变化)的可持续性研究,并被 IPCC 用作一种分区方法。气候变化政策和全球变化研究依赖于将世界划分为不同生态区的地图。本研究更新了当前的世界生态区划方法,以确保为此类可持续性相关政策和研究提供一致的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ecological zoning for climate policy and global change studies
As climate change accelerates, nations are moving towards meeting their nationally determined contributions and reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Reporting of this from the agriculture, forestry and other land use sector relies on data related to land use and management, climate and soil type. Where such data are unavailable, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) provides a set of default factors, based on an extensive literature review of likely GHG emission factors and carbon stock changes disaggregated by the Food and Agriculture Organization’s global ecological zones. As understanding of global ecological zones under environmental change improves, it becomes necessary to reassess such ecological zoning approaches to enable reporting of GHG emissions to support nationally determined contributions and global change studies. Here we propose a globally consistent ecological zoning approach based on Holdridge life zones using climatic data from the Climate Research Unit on a 0.5° grid, which tackles certain limitations found in the existing guidance provided by the IPCC. A set of three global ecological zone maps based on Holdridge life zones were devised using increasing levels of aggregation, which could support sustainability studies of global environmental change, specifically climate change, and be used as a zoning approach by the IPCC. Climate change policy and global change studies rely on maps that classify the world into different ecological zones. This study updates current approaches to ecological zoning of the world to ensure that consistent data are provided for such sustainability-related policy and studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Sustainability
Nature Sustainability Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
41.90
自引率
1.10%
发文量
159
期刊介绍: Nature Sustainability aims to facilitate cross-disciplinary dialogues and bring together research fields that contribute to understanding how we organize our lives in a finite world and the impacts of our actions. Nature Sustainability will not only publish fundamental research but also significant investigations into policies and solutions for ensuring human well-being now and in the future.Its ultimate goal is to address the greatest challenges of our time.
期刊最新文献
Pick the low-hanging fruit first Landscape of litigation in the United States Outcomes and policy focus of environmental litigation in the United States Balancing rights Impacts of climate litigation on firm value
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1