评估不同动力学模型在模拟铵化肥的土壤硝化过程中的有效性

IF 3.6 2区 农林科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Land Degradation & Development Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1002/ldr.5354
Jianyu Tao, Xiaoyuan Liu
{"title":"评估不同动力学模型在模拟铵化肥的土壤硝化过程中的有效性","authors":"Jianyu Tao, Xiaoyuan Liu","doi":"10.1002/ldr.5354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Precise estimation of the soil nitrification process of ammonium fertilizers is crucial to improving soil fertility and reducing environmental pollution since nitrification is closely related to ammonia volatilization and nitrate leaching. However, the applicability and effectiveness of different kinetic models in simulating the soil nitrification process have not been systematically evaluated in previous studies. Here, we compared the effectiveness of one self-established model (T-function) and three commonly-used kinetic models (L-function, zero-order kinetic model, and first-order kinetic model) using data extracted from peer-reviewed publications. Results showed that the average determination coefficients (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>) of the T-function and L-function were 3% higher than that of the first-order kinetic model, while the average root mean square errors (RMSE) of the T-function and L-function were 30% lower than that of the first-order kinetic model. In addition, first-order kinetic model could not function properly when it was applied to simulate linear data. Zero-order kinetic model was not suitable for predicting soil nitrification process because its mathematical nature was inconsistent with the actual soil nitrification process. Further investigations of the parameters of the T-function and L-function revealed that p1 (parameter 1) represented the soil net nitrate production of the applied N fertilizer, while p1 × p3 represented the soil nitrification rate. The response of the parameters of the T-function was more sensitive to soil pH, TN, and C/N ratio changes than those of the L-function. Therefore, the T-function is slightly more accurate than the L-function, but it requires more data points to achieve the best performance. In general, T-function and L-function are the most suitable models for simulating the soil nitrification process of N fertilizers and have the potential to be incorporated into soil N cycling models.","PeriodicalId":203,"journal":{"name":"Land Degradation & Development","volume":"235 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Effectiveness of Different Kinetic Models in Simulating the Soil Nitrification Process of Ammonium Fertilizers\",\"authors\":\"Jianyu Tao, Xiaoyuan Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ldr.5354\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Precise estimation of the soil nitrification process of ammonium fertilizers is crucial to improving soil fertility and reducing environmental pollution since nitrification is closely related to ammonia volatilization and nitrate leaching. However, the applicability and effectiveness of different kinetic models in simulating the soil nitrification process have not been systematically evaluated in previous studies. Here, we compared the effectiveness of one self-established model (T-function) and three commonly-used kinetic models (L-function, zero-order kinetic model, and first-order kinetic model) using data extracted from peer-reviewed publications. Results showed that the average determination coefficients (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>) of the T-function and L-function were 3% higher than that of the first-order kinetic model, while the average root mean square errors (RMSE) of the T-function and L-function were 30% lower than that of the first-order kinetic model. In addition, first-order kinetic model could not function properly when it was applied to simulate linear data. Zero-order kinetic model was not suitable for predicting soil nitrification process because its mathematical nature was inconsistent with the actual soil nitrification process. Further investigations of the parameters of the T-function and L-function revealed that p1 (parameter 1) represented the soil net nitrate production of the applied N fertilizer, while p1 × p3 represented the soil nitrification rate. The response of the parameters of the T-function was more sensitive to soil pH, TN, and C/N ratio changes than those of the L-function. Therefore, the T-function is slightly more accurate than the L-function, but it requires more data points to achieve the best performance. In general, T-function and L-function are the most suitable models for simulating the soil nitrification process of N fertilizers and have the potential to be incorporated into soil N cycling models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Land Degradation & Development\",\"volume\":\"235 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Land Degradation & Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.5354\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Degradation & Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.5354","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于硝化作用与氨的挥发和硝酸盐的淋溶密切相关,因此精确估算铵态氮肥的土壤硝化过程对于提高土壤肥力和减少环境污染至关重要。然而,以往的研究并未系统地评估不同动力学模型在模拟土壤硝化过程中的适用性和有效性。在此,我们利用从同行评议出版物中提取的数据,比较了一个自建模型(T-函数)和三个常用动力学模型(L-函数、零阶动力学模型和一阶动力学模型)的有效性。结果表明,T函数和L函数的平均判定系数(R2)比一阶动力学模型高3%,而T函数和L函数的平均均方根误差(RMSE)比一阶动力学模型低30%。此外,一阶动力学模型在模拟线性数据时无法正常运行。零阶动力学模型不适合预测土壤硝化过程,因为其数学性质与实际土壤硝化过程不一致。对 T 函数和 L 函数参数的进一步研究表明,p1(参数 1)代表施用氮肥的土壤硝酸盐净产量,而 p1 × p3 代表土壤硝化速率。与 L 函数相比,T 函数参数对土壤 pH 值、TN 值和 C/N 比值变化的响应更为敏感。因此,T 函数比 L 函数更准确,但需要更多的数据点才能达到最佳性能。总的来说,T 函数和 L 函数是最适合模拟氮肥在土壤中硝化过程的模型,有可能被纳入土壤氮循环模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing the Effectiveness of Different Kinetic Models in Simulating the Soil Nitrification Process of Ammonium Fertilizers
Precise estimation of the soil nitrification process of ammonium fertilizers is crucial to improving soil fertility and reducing environmental pollution since nitrification is closely related to ammonia volatilization and nitrate leaching. However, the applicability and effectiveness of different kinetic models in simulating the soil nitrification process have not been systematically evaluated in previous studies. Here, we compared the effectiveness of one self-established model (T-function) and three commonly-used kinetic models (L-function, zero-order kinetic model, and first-order kinetic model) using data extracted from peer-reviewed publications. Results showed that the average determination coefficients (R2) of the T-function and L-function were 3% higher than that of the first-order kinetic model, while the average root mean square errors (RMSE) of the T-function and L-function were 30% lower than that of the first-order kinetic model. In addition, first-order kinetic model could not function properly when it was applied to simulate linear data. Zero-order kinetic model was not suitable for predicting soil nitrification process because its mathematical nature was inconsistent with the actual soil nitrification process. Further investigations of the parameters of the T-function and L-function revealed that p1 (parameter 1) represented the soil net nitrate production of the applied N fertilizer, while p1 × p3 represented the soil nitrification rate. The response of the parameters of the T-function was more sensitive to soil pH, TN, and C/N ratio changes than those of the L-function. Therefore, the T-function is slightly more accurate than the L-function, but it requires more data points to achieve the best performance. In general, T-function and L-function are the most suitable models for simulating the soil nitrification process of N fertilizers and have the potential to be incorporated into soil N cycling models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Land Degradation & Development
Land Degradation & Development 农林科学-环境科学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
5.5 months
期刊介绍: Land Degradation & Development is an international journal which seeks to promote rational study of the recognition, monitoring, control and rehabilitation of degradation in terrestrial environments. The journal focuses on: - what land degradation is; - what causes land degradation; - the impacts of land degradation - the scale of land degradation; - the history, current status or future trends of land degradation; - avoidance, mitigation and control of land degradation; - remedial actions to rehabilitate or restore degraded land; - sustainable land management.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Climate Change on the Spatiotemporal Change in Vegetation Gross Primary Productivity of Marsh Wetlands Across China Yield More and Feed More: Unraveling the Multi‐Scale Determinants of the Spatial Variation in Plastic‐Mulched Farmland Across China Ecosystem Services Supply‐Demand Mismatch and Their Drivers in Highly Spatially Heterogeneous South China Karst Ecoregions The Effect of Different Aging Methods on the Heavy Metal Adsorption Capacity of Microplastics Agricultural Land Conversion and Challenges for Tenant Farmers: Empirical Evidence From Pakistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1