夏令时损害健康,加剧不平等

The BMJ Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1136/bmj.q2335
Karin G Johnson, Lauren Hale, Dayna A Johnson, Beth A Malow
{"title":"夏令时损害健康,加剧不平等","authors":"Karin G Johnson, Lauren Hale, Dayna A Johnson, Beth A Malow","doi":"10.1136/bmj.q2335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Eliminating this structural barrier would help reduce sleep health inequity, write Karin Johnson and colleagues Daylight saving time, a seasonal hour shift in clock time, is a legislative policy followed by about 70 countries. In the spring clocks are set an hour later for daylight saving time and in the autumn they return to standard time, which more closely aligns to the sun being overhead at noon. Daylight saving time is harmful to sleep and health and disproportionately affects vulnerable populations.1 This practice should therefore be scrapped to try to reduce sleep disturbances and other health inequities.2 In recent years, greater scientific clarity has emerged regarding the public health harms of the biannual switching of the clocks,13 but people are split on whether to end clock change with permanent daylight saving time or permanent standard time. Some business leaders argue that evening light promotes economic activity so therefore argue in favour of permanent daylight saving time. They have used the harms of switching twice yearly4 and the promise of increased evening exercise to promote permanent daylight saving time as the healthy choice.5 The medical and scientific community, including the British Sleep Society, who issued a position statement on daylight saving time,4 support permanent standard time and advocate against permanent daylight saving time.13 Later sunrises and sunsets during daylight saving time are associated with increased rates of cancer,678 obesity,7 heart attacks,7 diabetes,7 suicide,9 and motor vehicle incidents,10 disproportionately affecting minoritised populations. …","PeriodicalId":22388,"journal":{"name":"The BMJ","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Daylight saving time harms health and increases inequalities\",\"authors\":\"Karin G Johnson, Lauren Hale, Dayna A Johnson, Beth A Malow\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmj.q2335\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Eliminating this structural barrier would help reduce sleep health inequity, write Karin Johnson and colleagues Daylight saving time, a seasonal hour shift in clock time, is a legislative policy followed by about 70 countries. In the spring clocks are set an hour later for daylight saving time and in the autumn they return to standard time, which more closely aligns to the sun being overhead at noon. Daylight saving time is harmful to sleep and health and disproportionately affects vulnerable populations.1 This practice should therefore be scrapped to try to reduce sleep disturbances and other health inequities.2 In recent years, greater scientific clarity has emerged regarding the public health harms of the biannual switching of the clocks,13 but people are split on whether to end clock change with permanent daylight saving time or permanent standard time. Some business leaders argue that evening light promotes economic activity so therefore argue in favour of permanent daylight saving time. They have used the harms of switching twice yearly4 and the promise of increased evening exercise to promote permanent daylight saving time as the healthy choice.5 The medical and scientific community, including the British Sleep Society, who issued a position statement on daylight saving time,4 support permanent standard time and advocate against permanent daylight saving time.13 Later sunrises and sunsets during daylight saving time are associated with increased rates of cancer,678 obesity,7 heart attacks,7 diabetes,7 suicide,9 and motor vehicle incidents,10 disproportionately affecting minoritised populations. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":22388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The BMJ\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The BMJ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q2335\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The BMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q2335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

卡琳-约翰逊(Karin Johnson)及其同事写道,消除这一结构性障碍将有助于减少睡眠健康方面的不平等。在春季,时钟因夏令时而调晚一小时,到了秋季,时钟又恢复到标准时间,这与正午太阳在头顶的时间更接近。夏令时对睡眠和健康有害,对弱势群体的影响尤为严重。1 因此,应取消这种做法,以减少睡眠障碍和其他健康不公平现象。2 近年来,科学界对一年两次的时钟转换对公众健康的危害有了更清晰的认识,13 但人们对是以永久性夏令时还是永久性标准时间来结束时钟转换存在分歧。一些商界领袖认为,傍晚的光线可以促进经济活动,因此主张永久实行夏令时。13 夏令时期间较晚的日出日落与癌症、678 肥胖症、7 心脏病、7 糖尿病、7 自杀9 和机动车事故10 的发病率上升有关,对少数群体的影响尤为严重。...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Daylight saving time harms health and increases inequalities
Eliminating this structural barrier would help reduce sleep health inequity, write Karin Johnson and colleagues Daylight saving time, a seasonal hour shift in clock time, is a legislative policy followed by about 70 countries. In the spring clocks are set an hour later for daylight saving time and in the autumn they return to standard time, which more closely aligns to the sun being overhead at noon. Daylight saving time is harmful to sleep and health and disproportionately affects vulnerable populations.1 This practice should therefore be scrapped to try to reduce sleep disturbances and other health inequities.2 In recent years, greater scientific clarity has emerged regarding the public health harms of the biannual switching of the clocks,13 but people are split on whether to end clock change with permanent daylight saving time or permanent standard time. Some business leaders argue that evening light promotes economic activity so therefore argue in favour of permanent daylight saving time. They have used the harms of switching twice yearly4 and the promise of increased evening exercise to promote permanent daylight saving time as the healthy choice.5 The medical and scientific community, including the British Sleep Society, who issued a position statement on daylight saving time,4 support permanent standard time and advocate against permanent daylight saving time.13 Later sunrises and sunsets during daylight saving time are associated with increased rates of cancer,678 obesity,7 heart attacks,7 diabetes,7 suicide,9 and motor vehicle incidents,10 disproportionately affecting minoritised populations. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tranexamic acid for postpartum bleeding … and other research We need a gender just transition for health systems and climate action Isolated femoral head destruction One hundred years of electroencephalography . . . and other stories Should GPs be allowed to offer private services to their patients?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1