Sohrab N. Ali, Amanda McCormac, Andrei D. Cumpanas, Jaime Altamirano-Villarroel, Paul Piedras, Minh-Chau Vu, Andrew S. Afyouni, Zachary E. Tano, Kathryn Osann, Michael Klopfer, Pengbo Jiang, Roshan M. Patel, Jaime Landman, Ralph V. Clayman
{"title":"人体输尿管自然伸缩性的临床测定:初步研究","authors":"Sohrab N. Ali, Amanda McCormac, Andrei D. Cumpanas, Jaime Altamirano-Villarroel, Paul Piedras, Minh-Chau Vu, Andrew S. Afyouni, Zachary E. Tano, Kathryn Osann, Michael Klopfer, Pengbo Jiang, Roshan M. Patel, Jaime Landman, Ralph V. Clayman","doi":"10.1111/bju.16564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To define the natural distensibility of the human ureter and evaluate the impact of other possibly favourable factors on ureteric distensibility.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patients and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 101 patients undergoing ureteroscopic stone removal or percutaneous nephrolithotomy underwent ureteric sizing using sequential passage of 37-cm urethral dilators in 2-F increments while attached to a unique force sensor. Insertion forces were limited to 6 N. After 6 N was attained, an appropriately sized ureteric access sheath was passed. At the conclusion of each procedure, Post-Ureteroscopic Lesion Scale score was determined.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Urethral dilators were passed in 61% of patients at ≤14 F; 39% of patients accepted urethral dilators of ≥16 F. The mean dilator size was 14 F. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that preprocedural ureteric stenting and antibiotic use favoured passage of 16-F dilators (odds ratio [OR] 5.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.70–15.62 [<i>P</i> = 0.004] and OR 5.15, 95% CI 1.743–15.243 [<i>P</i> = 0.003], respectively). Neither tamsulosin nor prior urinary tract infection had an impact on ureteric size (OR 0.765, 95% CI 0.281–2.084 [<i>P</i> = 0.601], OR 1.049, 95% CI 0.269–4.089 [<i>P</i> = 0.945], respectively).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Using continuous insertion force monitoring and a 6-N threshold, the majority of unstented adult human ureters within our patient population safely accommodated a 14-F dilator. Safe passage of a 16-F dilator at the 6-N threshold was more likely among patients with a preexisting indwelling ureteric stent or patients who were treated with antibiotics within a week of the procedure.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":"135 3","pages":"456-464"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical determination of the natural distensibility of the human ureter: initial study\",\"authors\":\"Sohrab N. Ali, Amanda McCormac, Andrei D. Cumpanas, Jaime Altamirano-Villarroel, Paul Piedras, Minh-Chau Vu, Andrew S. Afyouni, Zachary E. Tano, Kathryn Osann, Michael Klopfer, Pengbo Jiang, Roshan M. Patel, Jaime Landman, Ralph V. Clayman\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bju.16564\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>To define the natural distensibility of the human ureter and evaluate the impact of other possibly favourable factors on ureteric distensibility.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Patients and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 101 patients undergoing ureteroscopic stone removal or percutaneous nephrolithotomy underwent ureteric sizing using sequential passage of 37-cm urethral dilators in 2-F increments while attached to a unique force sensor. Insertion forces were limited to 6 N. After 6 N was attained, an appropriately sized ureteric access sheath was passed. At the conclusion of each procedure, Post-Ureteroscopic Lesion Scale score was determined.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Urethral dilators were passed in 61% of patients at ≤14 F; 39% of patients accepted urethral dilators of ≥16 F. The mean dilator size was 14 F. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that preprocedural ureteric stenting and antibiotic use favoured passage of 16-F dilators (odds ratio [OR] 5.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.70–15.62 [<i>P</i> = 0.004] and OR 5.15, 95% CI 1.743–15.243 [<i>P</i> = 0.003], respectively). Neither tamsulosin nor prior urinary tract infection had an impact on ureteric size (OR 0.765, 95% CI 0.281–2.084 [<i>P</i> = 0.601], OR 1.049, 95% CI 0.269–4.089 [<i>P</i> = 0.945], respectively).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Using continuous insertion force monitoring and a 6-N threshold, the majority of unstented adult human ureters within our patient population safely accommodated a 14-F dilator. Safe passage of a 16-F dilator at the 6-N threshold was more likely among patients with a preexisting indwelling ureteric stent or patients who were treated with antibiotics within a week of the procedure.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJU International\",\"volume\":\"135 3\",\"pages\":\"456-464\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJU International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bju.16564\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJU International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bju.16564","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical determination of the natural distensibility of the human ureter: initial study
Objectives
To define the natural distensibility of the human ureter and evaluate the impact of other possibly favourable factors on ureteric distensibility.
Patients and Methods
A total of 101 patients undergoing ureteroscopic stone removal or percutaneous nephrolithotomy underwent ureteric sizing using sequential passage of 37-cm urethral dilators in 2-F increments while attached to a unique force sensor. Insertion forces were limited to 6 N. After 6 N was attained, an appropriately sized ureteric access sheath was passed. At the conclusion of each procedure, Post-Ureteroscopic Lesion Scale score was determined.
Results
Urethral dilators were passed in 61% of patients at ≤14 F; 39% of patients accepted urethral dilators of ≥16 F. The mean dilator size was 14 F. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that preprocedural ureteric stenting and antibiotic use favoured passage of 16-F dilators (odds ratio [OR] 5.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.70–15.62 [P = 0.004] and OR 5.15, 95% CI 1.743–15.243 [P = 0.003], respectively). Neither tamsulosin nor prior urinary tract infection had an impact on ureteric size (OR 0.765, 95% CI 0.281–2.084 [P = 0.601], OR 1.049, 95% CI 0.269–4.089 [P = 0.945], respectively).
Conclusion
Using continuous insertion force monitoring and a 6-N threshold, the majority of unstented adult human ureters within our patient population safely accommodated a 14-F dilator. Safe passage of a 16-F dilator at the 6-N threshold was more likely among patients with a preexisting indwelling ureteric stent or patients who were treated with antibiotics within a week of the procedure.
期刊介绍:
BJUI is one of the most highly respected medical journals in the world, with a truly international range of published papers and appeal. Every issue gives invaluable practical information in the form of original articles, reviews, comments, surgical education articles, and translational science articles in the field of urology. BJUI employs topical sections, and is in full colour, making it easier to browse or search for something specific.