人体输尿管自然伸缩性的临床测定:初步研究

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY BJU International Pub Date : 2025-02-20 Epub Date: 2024-10-26 DOI:10.1111/bju.16564
Sohrab N. Ali, Amanda McCormac, Andrei D. Cumpanas, Jaime Altamirano-Villarroel, Paul Piedras, Minh-Chau Vu, Andrew S. Afyouni, Zachary E. Tano, Kathryn Osann, Michael Klopfer, Pengbo Jiang, Roshan M. Patel, Jaime Landman, Ralph V. Clayman
{"title":"人体输尿管自然伸缩性的临床测定:初步研究","authors":"Sohrab N. Ali,&nbsp;Amanda McCormac,&nbsp;Andrei D. Cumpanas,&nbsp;Jaime Altamirano-Villarroel,&nbsp;Paul Piedras,&nbsp;Minh-Chau Vu,&nbsp;Andrew S. Afyouni,&nbsp;Zachary E. Tano,&nbsp;Kathryn Osann,&nbsp;Michael Klopfer,&nbsp;Pengbo Jiang,&nbsp;Roshan M. Patel,&nbsp;Jaime Landman,&nbsp;Ralph V. Clayman","doi":"10.1111/bju.16564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To define the natural distensibility of the human ureter and evaluate the impact of other possibly favourable factors on ureteric distensibility.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patients and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 101 patients undergoing ureteroscopic stone removal or percutaneous nephrolithotomy underwent ureteric sizing using sequential passage of 37-cm urethral dilators in 2-F increments while attached to a unique force sensor. Insertion forces were limited to 6 N. After 6 N was attained, an appropriately sized ureteric access sheath was passed. At the conclusion of each procedure, Post-Ureteroscopic Lesion Scale score was determined.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Urethral dilators were passed in 61% of patients at ≤14 F; 39% of patients accepted urethral dilators of ≥16 F. The mean dilator size was 14 F. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that preprocedural ureteric stenting and antibiotic use favoured passage of 16-F dilators (odds ratio [OR] 5.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.70–15.62 [<i>P</i> = 0.004] and OR 5.15, 95% CI 1.743–15.243 [<i>P</i> = 0.003], respectively). Neither tamsulosin nor prior urinary tract infection had an impact on ureteric size (OR 0.765, 95% CI 0.281–2.084 [<i>P</i> = 0.601], OR 1.049, 95% CI 0.269–4.089 [<i>P</i> = 0.945], respectively).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Using continuous insertion force monitoring and a 6-N threshold, the majority of unstented adult human ureters within our patient population safely accommodated a 14-F dilator. Safe passage of a 16-F dilator at the 6-N threshold was more likely among patients with a preexisting indwelling ureteric stent or patients who were treated with antibiotics within a week of the procedure.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":"135 3","pages":"456-464"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical determination of the natural distensibility of the human ureter: initial study\",\"authors\":\"Sohrab N. Ali,&nbsp;Amanda McCormac,&nbsp;Andrei D. Cumpanas,&nbsp;Jaime Altamirano-Villarroel,&nbsp;Paul Piedras,&nbsp;Minh-Chau Vu,&nbsp;Andrew S. Afyouni,&nbsp;Zachary E. Tano,&nbsp;Kathryn Osann,&nbsp;Michael Klopfer,&nbsp;Pengbo Jiang,&nbsp;Roshan M. Patel,&nbsp;Jaime Landman,&nbsp;Ralph V. Clayman\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bju.16564\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>To define the natural distensibility of the human ureter and evaluate the impact of other possibly favourable factors on ureteric distensibility.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Patients and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 101 patients undergoing ureteroscopic stone removal or percutaneous nephrolithotomy underwent ureteric sizing using sequential passage of 37-cm urethral dilators in 2-F increments while attached to a unique force sensor. Insertion forces were limited to 6 N. After 6 N was attained, an appropriately sized ureteric access sheath was passed. At the conclusion of each procedure, Post-Ureteroscopic Lesion Scale score was determined.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Urethral dilators were passed in 61% of patients at ≤14 F; 39% of patients accepted urethral dilators of ≥16 F. The mean dilator size was 14 F. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that preprocedural ureteric stenting and antibiotic use favoured passage of 16-F dilators (odds ratio [OR] 5.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.70–15.62 [<i>P</i> = 0.004] and OR 5.15, 95% CI 1.743–15.243 [<i>P</i> = 0.003], respectively). Neither tamsulosin nor prior urinary tract infection had an impact on ureteric size (OR 0.765, 95% CI 0.281–2.084 [<i>P</i> = 0.601], OR 1.049, 95% CI 0.269–4.089 [<i>P</i> = 0.945], respectively).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Using continuous insertion force monitoring and a 6-N threshold, the majority of unstented adult human ureters within our patient population safely accommodated a 14-F dilator. Safe passage of a 16-F dilator at the 6-N threshold was more likely among patients with a preexisting indwelling ureteric stent or patients who were treated with antibiotics within a week of the procedure.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJU International\",\"volume\":\"135 3\",\"pages\":\"456-464\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJU International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bju.16564\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJU International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bju.16564","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

确定人体输尿管的自然伸缩性,并评估其他可能的有利因素对输尿管伸缩性的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical determination of the natural distensibility of the human ureter: initial study

Objectives

To define the natural distensibility of the human ureter and evaluate the impact of other possibly favourable factors on ureteric distensibility.

Patients and Methods

A total of 101 patients undergoing ureteroscopic stone removal or percutaneous nephrolithotomy underwent ureteric sizing using sequential passage of 37-cm urethral dilators in 2-F increments while attached to a unique force sensor. Insertion forces were limited to 6 N. After 6 N was attained, an appropriately sized ureteric access sheath was passed. At the conclusion of each procedure, Post-Ureteroscopic Lesion Scale score was determined.

Results

Urethral dilators were passed in 61% of patients at ≤14 F; 39% of patients accepted urethral dilators of ≥16 F. The mean dilator size was 14 F. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that preprocedural ureteric stenting and antibiotic use favoured passage of 16-F dilators (odds ratio [OR] 5.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.70–15.62 [P = 0.004] and OR 5.15, 95% CI 1.743–15.243 [P = 0.003], respectively). Neither tamsulosin nor prior urinary tract infection had an impact on ureteric size (OR 0.765, 95% CI 0.281–2.084 [P = 0.601], OR 1.049, 95% CI 0.269–4.089 [P = 0.945], respectively).

Conclusion

Using continuous insertion force monitoring and a 6-N threshold, the majority of unstented adult human ureters within our patient population safely accommodated a 14-F dilator. Safe passage of a 16-F dilator at the 6-N threshold was more likely among patients with a preexisting indwelling ureteric stent or patients who were treated with antibiotics within a week of the procedure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BJU International
BJU International 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.40%
发文量
262
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BJUI is one of the most highly respected medical journals in the world, with a truly international range of published papers and appeal. Every issue gives invaluable practical information in the form of original articles, reviews, comments, surgical education articles, and translational science articles in the field of urology. BJUI employs topical sections, and is in full colour, making it easier to browse or search for something specific.
期刊最新文献
Comment on 'Novel MRI-US fusion with advanced annotation in focal cryoablation for prostate cancer: medium-term outcomes and learning curve insights'. In vitro evaluation of the new holmium:yttrium‐aluminium‐garnet laser with Magneto technology on behalf of the Progress and Collaboration in Endourology ( PACE) group Bladder washing cytology in the initial evaluation of patients with neuro‐urological disorders: to do or not to do? The optimal stent‐strategy in paediatric pyeloplasty: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis Artificial intelligence for predicting BCG response in non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1