{"title":"依恋不安全感与病态自恋之间的关系:三级荟萃分析","authors":"Yihan Zhang, Juan Zhang, Yihui Wang","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The detrimental effects of pathological narcissism on individual development and intimate relationships have been widely studied. Although the exact origins of this phenomenon are still debated, the important role that family dynamics play in its emergence is increasingly being recognized. Previous researchers have pointed out that insecure attachment is associated with pathological narcissism; however, empirical findings are inconsistent. Hence, this study conducted a three‐level random‐effects meta‐analysis based on 183 effect sizes from 29 articles (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 8247 participants). Our findings have demonstrated the significant and positive link between insecure attachment and pathological narcissism (<jats:italic>r</jats:italic> = .18; 95% CI: 0.14, 0.22; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < .001). In addition, a moderator analysis was carried out to explore factors that may weaken or strengthen the primary association of interest. In total, there are five significant moderators, including insecure attachment style (<jats:italic>F</jats:italic><jats:sub>(3,176)</jats:sub> = 13.72; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < .001), measurement tool of attachment insecurity (<jats:italic>F</jats:italic><jats:sub>(8,171)</jats:sub> = 4.59; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < .001), measurement tool of pathological narcissism (<jats:italic>F</jats:italic><jats:sub>(6,173)</jats:sub> = 5.21; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < .001), percentage of participants identifying as male (<jats:italic>F</jats:italic><jats:sub>(1,174)</jats:sub> = 4.04; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = .046), and age (<jats:italic>F</jats:italic><jats:sub>(1,178)</jats:sub> = 19.94; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < .001). This research highlights the positive correlation between attachment insecurity and pathological narcissism, providing family theorists with insights into how early family experiences influence personality formation and guiding family therapists in interventions for narcissistic pathology.","PeriodicalId":47446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","volume":"194 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relationship between attachment insecurity and pathological narcissism: A three‐level meta‐analysis\",\"authors\":\"Yihan Zhang, Juan Zhang, Yihui Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jftr.12593\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The detrimental effects of pathological narcissism on individual development and intimate relationships have been widely studied. Although the exact origins of this phenomenon are still debated, the important role that family dynamics play in its emergence is increasingly being recognized. Previous researchers have pointed out that insecure attachment is associated with pathological narcissism; however, empirical findings are inconsistent. Hence, this study conducted a three‐level random‐effects meta‐analysis based on 183 effect sizes from 29 articles (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 8247 participants). Our findings have demonstrated the significant and positive link between insecure attachment and pathological narcissism (<jats:italic>r</jats:italic> = .18; 95% CI: 0.14, 0.22; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < .001). In addition, a moderator analysis was carried out to explore factors that may weaken or strengthen the primary association of interest. In total, there are five significant moderators, including insecure attachment style (<jats:italic>F</jats:italic><jats:sub>(3,176)</jats:sub> = 13.72; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < .001), measurement tool of attachment insecurity (<jats:italic>F</jats:italic><jats:sub>(8,171)</jats:sub> = 4.59; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < .001), measurement tool of pathological narcissism (<jats:italic>F</jats:italic><jats:sub>(6,173)</jats:sub> = 5.21; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < .001), percentage of participants identifying as male (<jats:italic>F</jats:italic><jats:sub>(1,174)</jats:sub> = 4.04; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = .046), and age (<jats:italic>F</jats:italic><jats:sub>(1,178)</jats:sub> = 19.94; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < .001). This research highlights the positive correlation between attachment insecurity and pathological narcissism, providing family theorists with insights into how early family experiences influence personality formation and guiding family therapists in interventions for narcissistic pathology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Family Theory & Review\",\"volume\":\"194 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Family Theory & Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12593\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12593","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
病态自恋对个人发展和亲密关系的有害影响已被广泛研究。尽管人们对这一现象的确切起源仍有争议,但家庭动态在其出现过程中所起的重要作用已被越来越多的人所认识。以前的研究人员曾指出,不安全依恋与病态自恋有关;然而,实证研究结果并不一致。因此,本研究根据 29 篇文章中的 183 个效应大小(N = 8247 名参与者)进行了三级随机效应荟萃分析。我们的研究结果表明,不安全依恋与病态自恋之间存在显著的正相关(r = .18; 95% CI: 0.14, 0.22; p <.001)。此外,还进行了调节因素分析,以探索可能削弱或加强主要关联的因素。共有五个显著的调节因子,包括不安全依恋风格(F(3,176) = 13.72; p < .001)、依恋不安全感测量工具(F(8,171) = 4.59; p < .001)、病态自恋测量工具(F(6,173) = 5.21; p <.001)、男性参与者比例(F(1,174) = 4.04; p = .046)和年龄(F(1,178) = 19.94; p <.001)。这项研究强调了依恋不安全感与病态自恋之间的正相关性,为家庭理论家提供了早期家庭经历如何影响人格形成的见解,并为家庭治疗师干预自恋病态提供了指导。
The relationship between attachment insecurity and pathological narcissism: A three‐level meta‐analysis
The detrimental effects of pathological narcissism on individual development and intimate relationships have been widely studied. Although the exact origins of this phenomenon are still debated, the important role that family dynamics play in its emergence is increasingly being recognized. Previous researchers have pointed out that insecure attachment is associated with pathological narcissism; however, empirical findings are inconsistent. Hence, this study conducted a three‐level random‐effects meta‐analysis based on 183 effect sizes from 29 articles (N = 8247 participants). Our findings have demonstrated the significant and positive link between insecure attachment and pathological narcissism (r = .18; 95% CI: 0.14, 0.22; p < .001). In addition, a moderator analysis was carried out to explore factors that may weaken or strengthen the primary association of interest. In total, there are five significant moderators, including insecure attachment style (F(3,176) = 13.72; p < .001), measurement tool of attachment insecurity (F(8,171) = 4.59; p < .001), measurement tool of pathological narcissism (F(6,173) = 5.21; p < .001), percentage of participants identifying as male (F(1,174) = 4.04; p = .046), and age (F(1,178) = 19.94; p < .001). This research highlights the positive correlation between attachment insecurity and pathological narcissism, providing family theorists with insights into how early family experiences influence personality formation and guiding family therapists in interventions for narcissistic pathology.