Guilherme L. Menezes , Dante T. Valente Junior , Rafael E.P. Ferreira , Dario A.B. Oliveira , Julcimara A. Araujo , Marcio Duarte , Joao R.R. Dorea
{"title":"赋予知情选择权:计算机视觉如何帮助消费者做出有关肉类质量的决定。","authors":"Guilherme L. Menezes , Dante T. Valente Junior , Rafael E.P. Ferreira , Dario A.B. Oliveira , Julcimara A. Araujo , Marcio Duarte , Joao R.R. Dorea","doi":"10.1016/j.meatsci.2024.109675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Consumers often find it challenging to assess meat sensory quality, influenced by tenderness and intramuscular fat (IMF). This study aims to develop a computer vision system (CVS) using smartphone images to classify beef and pork steak tenderness (1), predicting shear force (SF) and IMF content (2), and performing a comparative evaluation between consumer assessments and the method's output (3). The dataset consisted of 924 beef and 514 pork steaks (one image per steak). We trained a deep neural network for image classification and regression. The model achieved an <em>F</em>1-score of 68.1 % in classifying beef as tender. After re-categorizing the dataset into ‘tender’ and ‘tough’, the <em>F</em>1-score for identifying tender increased to 76.6 %. For pork loin tenderness, the model achieved an <em>F</em>1-score of 81.4 %. This score slightly improved to 81.5 % after re-categorization into two classes. The regression models for predicting SF and IMF in beef steak achieved an R<sup>2</sup> value of 0.64 and 0.62, respectively, with a root mean squared prediction error (RMSEP) of 16.9 N and 2.6 %. For pork loin, the neural network predicted SF with an R<sup>2</sup> value of 0.76 and an RMSEP of 9.15 N, and IMF with an R<sup>2</sup> value of 0.54 and an RMSEP of 1.22 %. In 1000 paired comparisons, the neural network correctly identified the more tender beef steak in 76.5 % of cases, compared to a 46.7 % accuracy rate for human assessments. These findings suggest that CVS can provide a more objective method for evaluating meat tenderness and IMF before purchase, potentially enhancing consumer satisfaction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":389,"journal":{"name":"Meat Science","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 109675"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empowering informed choices: How computer vision can assists consumers in making decisions about meat quality\",\"authors\":\"Guilherme L. Menezes , Dante T. Valente Junior , Rafael E.P. Ferreira , Dario A.B. Oliveira , Julcimara A. Araujo , Marcio Duarte , Joao R.R. Dorea\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.meatsci.2024.109675\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Consumers often find it challenging to assess meat sensory quality, influenced by tenderness and intramuscular fat (IMF). This study aims to develop a computer vision system (CVS) using smartphone images to classify beef and pork steak tenderness (1), predicting shear force (SF) and IMF content (2), and performing a comparative evaluation between consumer assessments and the method's output (3). The dataset consisted of 924 beef and 514 pork steaks (one image per steak). We trained a deep neural network for image classification and regression. The model achieved an <em>F</em>1-score of 68.1 % in classifying beef as tender. After re-categorizing the dataset into ‘tender’ and ‘tough’, the <em>F</em>1-score for identifying tender increased to 76.6 %. For pork loin tenderness, the model achieved an <em>F</em>1-score of 81.4 %. This score slightly improved to 81.5 % after re-categorization into two classes. The regression models for predicting SF and IMF in beef steak achieved an R<sup>2</sup> value of 0.64 and 0.62, respectively, with a root mean squared prediction error (RMSEP) of 16.9 N and 2.6 %. For pork loin, the neural network predicted SF with an R<sup>2</sup> value of 0.76 and an RMSEP of 9.15 N, and IMF with an R<sup>2</sup> value of 0.54 and an RMSEP of 1.22 %. In 1000 paired comparisons, the neural network correctly identified the more tender beef steak in 76.5 % of cases, compared to a 46.7 % accuracy rate for human assessments. These findings suggest that CVS can provide a more objective method for evaluating meat tenderness and IMF before purchase, potentially enhancing consumer satisfaction.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":389,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Meat Science\",\"volume\":\"219 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109675\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Meat Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0309174024002523\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meat Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0309174024002523","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
消费者在评估肉类感官质量时往往会发现,肉类的嫩度和肌内脂肪(IMF)会影响肉类的感官质量。本研究旨在开发一种计算机视觉系统(CVS),利用智能手机图像对牛肉和猪肉牛排的嫩度进行分类(1),预测剪切力(SF)和肌内脂肪含量(2),并对消费者的评价和该方法的输出结果进行比较评估(3)。数据集包括 924 块牛肉牛排和 514 块猪肉牛排(每块牛排一张图片)。我们训练了一个深度神经网络来进行图像分类和回归。该模型在将牛肉分类为嫩肉方面取得了 68.1 % 的 F1 分数。将数据集重新分类为 "嫩 "和 "韧 "后,识别嫩度的 F1 分数提高到 76.6%。对于猪里脊肉的嫩度,模型的 F1 分数为 81.4%。在重新分为两类后,这一分数略微提高到 81.5%。预测牛扒 SF 和 IMF 的回归模型的 R2 值分别为 0.64 和 0.62,均方根预测误差 (RMSEP) 分别为 16.9 N 和 2.6 %。对于猪里脊肉,神经网络预测 SF 的 R2 值为 0.76,RMSEP 为 9.15 N,预测 IMF 的 R2 值为 0.54,RMSEP 为 1.22 %。在 1000 次配对比较中,神经网络在 76.5% 的情况下正确识别出了更嫩的牛排,而人工评估的准确率为 46.7%。这些研究结果表明,CVS 可以为购买前评估肉质嫩度和 IMF 提供更客观的方法,从而提高消费者的满意度。
Empowering informed choices: How computer vision can assists consumers in making decisions about meat quality
Consumers often find it challenging to assess meat sensory quality, influenced by tenderness and intramuscular fat (IMF). This study aims to develop a computer vision system (CVS) using smartphone images to classify beef and pork steak tenderness (1), predicting shear force (SF) and IMF content (2), and performing a comparative evaluation between consumer assessments and the method's output (3). The dataset consisted of 924 beef and 514 pork steaks (one image per steak). We trained a deep neural network for image classification and regression. The model achieved an F1-score of 68.1 % in classifying beef as tender. After re-categorizing the dataset into ‘tender’ and ‘tough’, the F1-score for identifying tender increased to 76.6 %. For pork loin tenderness, the model achieved an F1-score of 81.4 %. This score slightly improved to 81.5 % after re-categorization into two classes. The regression models for predicting SF and IMF in beef steak achieved an R2 value of 0.64 and 0.62, respectively, with a root mean squared prediction error (RMSEP) of 16.9 N and 2.6 %. For pork loin, the neural network predicted SF with an R2 value of 0.76 and an RMSEP of 9.15 N, and IMF with an R2 value of 0.54 and an RMSEP of 1.22 %. In 1000 paired comparisons, the neural network correctly identified the more tender beef steak in 76.5 % of cases, compared to a 46.7 % accuracy rate for human assessments. These findings suggest that CVS can provide a more objective method for evaluating meat tenderness and IMF before purchase, potentially enhancing consumer satisfaction.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Meat Science is to serve as a suitable platform for the dissemination of interdisciplinary and international knowledge on all factors influencing the properties of meat. While the journal primarily focuses on the flesh of mammals, contributions related to poultry will be considered if they enhance the overall understanding of the relationship between muscle nature and meat quality post mortem. Additionally, papers on large birds (e.g., emus, ostriches) as well as wild-captured mammals and crocodiles will be welcomed.