秋水仙碱预防中风和不良心血管事件的疗效:16 项随机对照试验的 Meta 分析。

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs Pub Date : 2024-10-26 DOI:10.1007/s40256-024-00689-7
Vikash Jaiswal, Novonil Deb, Muhammad Hanif, Zarghoona Wajid, Yusra Minahil Nasir, Sidra Naz, Kriti Kalra, Saria Qaiser, Abhigan Babu Shrestha, Dhrubajyoti Bandyopadhyay, Jishanth Mattumpuram
{"title":"秋水仙碱预防中风和不良心血管事件的疗效:16 项随机对照试验的 Meta 分析。","authors":"Vikash Jaiswal, Novonil Deb, Muhammad Hanif, Zarghoona Wajid, Yusra Minahil Nasir, Sidra Naz, Kriti Kalra, Saria Qaiser, Abhigan Babu Shrestha, Dhrubajyoti Bandyopadhyay, Jishanth Mattumpuram","doi":"10.1007/s40256-024-00689-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colchicine has been shown to reduce adverse cardiovascular events (ACE) and stroke among patients with coronary artery disease. However, its efficacy with short- and long-term use and risk of stroke has not been well studied, with conflicting results to date.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We sought to evaluate the efficacy of colchicine for the prevention of stroke and other cardiovascular outcomes and to evaluate the effect of short- and long-term use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic literature search on PubMed, EMBASE, and Clinicaltrial.gov for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception until July 20th, 2024. Odds ratios (ORs) were pooled using a random-effect model, and a p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 16 RCTs with 24,967 patients were included (12,538 in colchicine group and 12,429 in the control group) in the analysis. Pooled analysis of primary outcomes showed that risk of incidence of stroke was comparable between colchicine and placebo groups (OR 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-1.02, p = 0.07). Pooled analysis of secondary outcomes showed that colchicine significantly reduced the risk of incidence of ACE by 33% (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.54-0.82, p < 0.001), and myocardial infarction by 21% (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.95, p = 0.01) compared with placebo. However, the risk of all-cause mortality (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.79-1.21, p = 0.83) and cardiovascular mortality (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.56-1.08, p = 0.14) were comparable between both groups of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Colchicine was associated with an overall reduction in the risk of incidence of ACE and MI; however, no such effect was observed with mortality and stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":7652,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Colchicine for Prevention of Stroke and Adverse Cardiovascular Events: A Meta-analysis of 16 Randomized Controlled Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Vikash Jaiswal, Novonil Deb, Muhammad Hanif, Zarghoona Wajid, Yusra Minahil Nasir, Sidra Naz, Kriti Kalra, Saria Qaiser, Abhigan Babu Shrestha, Dhrubajyoti Bandyopadhyay, Jishanth Mattumpuram\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40256-024-00689-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colchicine has been shown to reduce adverse cardiovascular events (ACE) and stroke among patients with coronary artery disease. However, its efficacy with short- and long-term use and risk of stroke has not been well studied, with conflicting results to date.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We sought to evaluate the efficacy of colchicine for the prevention of stroke and other cardiovascular outcomes and to evaluate the effect of short- and long-term use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic literature search on PubMed, EMBASE, and Clinicaltrial.gov for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception until July 20th, 2024. Odds ratios (ORs) were pooled using a random-effect model, and a p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 16 RCTs with 24,967 patients were included (12,538 in colchicine group and 12,429 in the control group) in the analysis. Pooled analysis of primary outcomes showed that risk of incidence of stroke was comparable between colchicine and placebo groups (OR 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-1.02, p = 0.07). Pooled analysis of secondary outcomes showed that colchicine significantly reduced the risk of incidence of ACE by 33% (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.54-0.82, p < 0.001), and myocardial infarction by 21% (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.95, p = 0.01) compared with placebo. However, the risk of all-cause mortality (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.79-1.21, p = 0.83) and cardiovascular mortality (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.56-1.08, p = 0.14) were comparable between both groups of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Colchicine was associated with an overall reduction in the risk of incidence of ACE and MI; however, no such effect was observed with mortality and stroke.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40256-024-00689-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40256-024-00689-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:研究表明,秋水仙碱可减少冠心病患者的不良心血管事件(ACE)和中风。然而,对其短期和长期使用的疗效以及中风风险的研究并不充分,迄今为止的结果相互矛盾:我们试图评估秋水仙碱预防中风和其他心血管疾病的疗效,并评估短期和长期用药的效果:我们在PubMed、EMBASE和Clinicaltrial.gov上进行了系统性文献检索,以查找从开始到2024年7月20日的相关随机对照试验(RCT)。采用随机效应模型对比值比(ORs)进行汇总,P 值为结果:共有 16 项 RCT、24,967 名患者(12,538 名患者属于秋水仙碱组,12,429 名患者属于对照组)被纳入分析。主要结果的汇总分析显示,秋水仙碱组和安慰剂组的中风发病风险相当(OR 0.78,95% 置信区间 [CI] 0.59-1.02,P = 0.07)。对次要结果的汇总分析表明,与安慰剂相比,秋水仙碱可显著降低ACE发病风险33%(OR 0.67,95% CI 0.54-0.82,p < 0.001)和心肌梗死发病风险21%(OR 0.79,95% CI 0.65-0.95,p = 0.01)。然而,两组患者的全因死亡风险(OR 0.98,95% CI 0.79-1.21,p = 0.83)和心血管死亡风险(OR 0.78,95% CI 0.56-1.08,p = 0.14)相当:结论:秋水仙碱可全面降低 ACE 和心肌梗死的发病风险,但对死亡率和中风没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of Colchicine for Prevention of Stroke and Adverse Cardiovascular Events: A Meta-analysis of 16 Randomized Controlled Trials.

Background: Colchicine has been shown to reduce adverse cardiovascular events (ACE) and stroke among patients with coronary artery disease. However, its efficacy with short- and long-term use and risk of stroke has not been well studied, with conflicting results to date.

Objective: We sought to evaluate the efficacy of colchicine for the prevention of stroke and other cardiovascular outcomes and to evaluate the effect of short- and long-term use.

Methods: We performed a systematic literature search on PubMed, EMBASE, and Clinicaltrial.gov for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception until July 20th, 2024. Odds ratios (ORs) were pooled using a random-effect model, and a p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: A total of 16 RCTs with 24,967 patients were included (12,538 in colchicine group and 12,429 in the control group) in the analysis. Pooled analysis of primary outcomes showed that risk of incidence of stroke was comparable between colchicine and placebo groups (OR 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-1.02, p = 0.07). Pooled analysis of secondary outcomes showed that colchicine significantly reduced the risk of incidence of ACE by 33% (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.54-0.82, p < 0.001), and myocardial infarction by 21% (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.95, p = 0.01) compared with placebo. However, the risk of all-cause mortality (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.79-1.21, p = 0.83) and cardiovascular mortality (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.56-1.08, p = 0.14) were comparable between both groups of patients.

Conclusion: Colchicine was associated with an overall reduction in the risk of incidence of ACE and MI; however, no such effect was observed with mortality and stroke.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Promoting rational therapy within the discipline of cardiology, the American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs covers all aspects of the treatment of cardiovascular disorders, particularly the place in therapy of newer and established agents. Via a program of reviews and original clinical research articles, the journal addresses major issues relating to treatment of these disorders, including the pharmacology, efficacy and adverse effects of the major classes of drugs; information on newly developed drugs and drug classes; the therapeutic implications of latest research into the aetiology of cardiovascular disorders; and the practical management of specific clinical situations. The American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs offers a range of additional enhanced features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by a Key Points summary, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist patients, caregivers and others in understanding important medical advances. The journal also provides the option to include various other types of enhanced features including slide sets, videos and animations. All enhanced features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. Peer review is conducted using Editorial Manager®, supported by a database of international experts. This database is shared with other Adis journals.
期刊最新文献
Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interaction between Cilostazol and Rosuvastatin in Healthy Participants. Use of Direct Anticoagulants in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Review of the Current Evidence and Emerging Perspectives. Impact of Antibacterials on the Quality of Anticoagulation Control in Patients Initiating Warfarin Therapy. Sacubitril-Valsartan Lowers Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence and Left Atrial Volume Post-catheter Ablation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Acknowledgement to Referees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1