ChatGPT 与美国烧伤协会急性烧伤指南的一致性。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Annals of Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000004128
Sumaarg Pandya, Mario Alessandri Bonetti, Hilary Y Liu, Tiffany Jeong, Jenny A Ziembicki, Francesco M Egro
{"title":"ChatGPT 与美国烧伤协会急性烧伤指南的一致性。","authors":"Sumaarg Pandya, Mario Alessandri Bonetti, Hilary Y Liu, Tiffany Jeong, Jenny A Ziembicki, Francesco M Egro","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Burn injuries often require immediate assistance and specialized care for optimal management and outcomes. The emergence of accessible artificial intelligence technology has just recently started being applied to healthcare decision making and patient education. However, its role in clinical recommendations is still under scrutiny. This study aims to evaluate ChatGPT's outputs and the appropriateness of its responses to commonly asked questions regarding acute burn care when compared to the American Burn Association Guidelines. Twelve commonly asked questions were formulated by a fellowship-trained burn surgeon to address the American Burn Association's recommendations on burn injuries, management, and patient referral. These questions were prompted into ChatGPT, and each response was compared with the aforementioned guidelines, the gold standard for accurate and evidence-based burn care recommendations. Three burn surgeons independently evaluated the appropriateness and comprehensiveness of each ChatGPT response based on the guidelines according to the modified Global Quality Score scale. The average score for ChatGPT-generated responses was 4.56 ± 0.65, indicating the responses were exceptional quality with the most important topics covered and in high concordance with the guidelines. This initial comparison of ChatGPT-generated responses and the American Burn Association guidelines demonstrates that ChatGPT can accurately and comprehensibly describe appropriate treatment and management plans for acute burn injuries. We foresee that ChatGPT may play a role as a complementary tool in medical decision making and patient education, having a profound impact on clinical practice, research, and education.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":"93 5","pages":"564-574"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concordance of ChatGPT With American Burn Association Guidelines on Acute Burns.\",\"authors\":\"Sumaarg Pandya, Mario Alessandri Bonetti, Hilary Y Liu, Tiffany Jeong, Jenny A Ziembicki, Francesco M Egro\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Burn injuries often require immediate assistance and specialized care for optimal management and outcomes. The emergence of accessible artificial intelligence technology has just recently started being applied to healthcare decision making and patient education. However, its role in clinical recommendations is still under scrutiny. This study aims to evaluate ChatGPT's outputs and the appropriateness of its responses to commonly asked questions regarding acute burn care when compared to the American Burn Association Guidelines. Twelve commonly asked questions were formulated by a fellowship-trained burn surgeon to address the American Burn Association's recommendations on burn injuries, management, and patient referral. These questions were prompted into ChatGPT, and each response was compared with the aforementioned guidelines, the gold standard for accurate and evidence-based burn care recommendations. Three burn surgeons independently evaluated the appropriateness and comprehensiveness of each ChatGPT response based on the guidelines according to the modified Global Quality Score scale. The average score for ChatGPT-generated responses was 4.56 ± 0.65, indicating the responses were exceptional quality with the most important topics covered and in high concordance with the guidelines. This initial comparison of ChatGPT-generated responses and the American Burn Association guidelines demonstrates that ChatGPT can accurately and comprehensibly describe appropriate treatment and management plans for acute burn injuries. We foresee that ChatGPT may play a role as a complementary tool in medical decision making and patient education, having a profound impact on clinical practice, research, and education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"93 5\",\"pages\":\"564-574\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004128\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004128","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:烧伤往往需要立即救助和专业护理,以获得最佳管理和治疗效果。最近,人工智能技术刚刚开始应用于医疗决策和患者教育。然而,人工智能技术在临床建议中的作用仍有待进一步研究。本研究旨在评估 ChatGPT 的输出结果,以及与美国烧伤协会指南相比,它对急性烧伤护理常见问题的回答是否恰当。十二个常见问题是由一名受过研究培训的烧伤外科医生针对美国烧伤协会关于烧伤、管理和患者转诊的建议而提出的。这些问题被输入到 ChatGPT 中,每个回答都与上述指南进行了比较,后者是准确和循证烧伤护理建议的黄金标准。三位烧伤外科医生根据修改后的全球质量评分标准,根据指南独立评估了每个 ChatGPT 回答的适当性和全面性。ChatGPT 生成的回复的平均得分为 4.56 ± 0.65,表明这些回复质量优异,涵盖了最重要的主题,并且与指南高度一致。对 ChatGPT 生成的回复和美国烧伤协会指南的初步比较表明,ChatGPT 可以准确、易懂地描述急性烧伤的适当治疗和管理计划。我们预计 ChatGPT 可作为医疗决策和患者教育的辅助工具发挥作用,对临床实践、研究和教育产生深远影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Concordance of ChatGPT With American Burn Association Guidelines on Acute Burns.

Abstract: Burn injuries often require immediate assistance and specialized care for optimal management and outcomes. The emergence of accessible artificial intelligence technology has just recently started being applied to healthcare decision making and patient education. However, its role in clinical recommendations is still under scrutiny. This study aims to evaluate ChatGPT's outputs and the appropriateness of its responses to commonly asked questions regarding acute burn care when compared to the American Burn Association Guidelines. Twelve commonly asked questions were formulated by a fellowship-trained burn surgeon to address the American Burn Association's recommendations on burn injuries, management, and patient referral. These questions were prompted into ChatGPT, and each response was compared with the aforementioned guidelines, the gold standard for accurate and evidence-based burn care recommendations. Three burn surgeons independently evaluated the appropriateness and comprehensiveness of each ChatGPT response based on the guidelines according to the modified Global Quality Score scale. The average score for ChatGPT-generated responses was 4.56 ± 0.65, indicating the responses were exceptional quality with the most important topics covered and in high concordance with the guidelines. This initial comparison of ChatGPT-generated responses and the American Burn Association guidelines demonstrates that ChatGPT can accurately and comprehensibly describe appropriate treatment and management plans for acute burn injuries. We foresee that ChatGPT may play a role as a complementary tool in medical decision making and patient education, having a profound impact on clinical practice, research, and education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Changing Perspectives in Mastectomy: The Case for Nipple Preservation. Clinical Outcomes of Gender-Affirming Surgery in Individuals With Connective Tissue Disorders. Hourglass Constriction of a Single Fascicle of the Anterior Interosseous Nerve: A Case Report. Interprogram Differences in Core General, Core Plastic, and Plastic Surgery-Adjacent Training. Simple Approach to Cosmetic Medial Epicanthoplasty: A Modification of the Skin Redraping Method.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1