针对分娩硬膜外镇痛不足实施标准化硬膜外加量算法:一项单中心回顾性研究。

Q3 Medicine Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings Pub Date : 2024-09-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1080/08998280.2024.2401739
Jack Zeitz, Anne Waddle, Sloan Long, Dylan Grote, Cole Sorrels, Michael P Hofkamp
{"title":"针对分娩硬膜外镇痛不足实施标准化硬膜外加量算法:一项单中心回顾性研究。","authors":"Jack Zeitz, Anne Waddle, Sloan Long, Dylan Grote, Cole Sorrels, Michael P Hofkamp","doi":"10.1080/08998280.2024.2401739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We hypothesized that implementation of a labor epidural management algorithm would increase the labor epidural catheter replacement rate at our hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our institutional review board approved this study and waived the requirement for informed consent. Patients who had labor epidural analgesia and delivered vaginally or had replacement of an epidural catheter prior to vaginal delivery from August 1, 2022 to December 31, 2022 and from August 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023 were included in the study. Study investigators entered data from the electronic medical record into REDCap.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 530 and 740 patients received labor epidural analgesia and met inclusion criteria before and after implementation of the algorithm, respectively. Patients who received labor epidural analgesia after implementation of the protocol had an absolute increase of 1.0% in the catheter replacement rate, which was not statistically significant (<i>P</i> = 0.34). A multivariate logistic regression found that the number or rescue analgesia boluses (odds ratio 2.68; 95% confidence interval 2.092, 3.434; <i>P</i> < 0.001) and operator level of training (odds ratio 0.41; 95% confidence interval 0.226, 0.743; <i>P</i> = 0.003) were associated with catheter replacement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After implementation of a labor epidural catheter management algorithm, patients had an increase in labor epidural catheter replacement that was not statistically significant.</p>","PeriodicalId":8828,"journal":{"name":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","volume":"37 6","pages":"908-913"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11492741/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of a standardized epidural top-up algorithm for inadequate labor epidural analgesia: a single-center retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Jack Zeitz, Anne Waddle, Sloan Long, Dylan Grote, Cole Sorrels, Michael P Hofkamp\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08998280.2024.2401739\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We hypothesized that implementation of a labor epidural management algorithm would increase the labor epidural catheter replacement rate at our hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our institutional review board approved this study and waived the requirement for informed consent. Patients who had labor epidural analgesia and delivered vaginally or had replacement of an epidural catheter prior to vaginal delivery from August 1, 2022 to December 31, 2022 and from August 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023 were included in the study. Study investigators entered data from the electronic medical record into REDCap.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 530 and 740 patients received labor epidural analgesia and met inclusion criteria before and after implementation of the algorithm, respectively. Patients who received labor epidural analgesia after implementation of the protocol had an absolute increase of 1.0% in the catheter replacement rate, which was not statistically significant (<i>P</i> = 0.34). A multivariate logistic regression found that the number or rescue analgesia boluses (odds ratio 2.68; 95% confidence interval 2.092, 3.434; <i>P</i> < 0.001) and operator level of training (odds ratio 0.41; 95% confidence interval 0.226, 0.743; <i>P</i> = 0.003) were associated with catheter replacement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After implementation of a labor epidural catheter management algorithm, patients had an increase in labor epidural catheter replacement that was not statistically significant.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"37 6\",\"pages\":\"908-913\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11492741/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2024.2401739\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2024.2401739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们假设在我们医院实施分娩硬膜外管理算法会提高分娩硬膜外导管更换率:我们假设,在本医院实施分娩硬膜外管理算法将提高分娩硬膜外导管更换率:我们的机构审查委员会批准了这项研究,并免除了知情同意的要求。研究对象包括 2022 年 8 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日和 2023 年 8 月 1 日至 2023 年 12 月 31 日使用分娩硬膜外镇痛并经阴道分娩或在阴道分娩前更换硬膜外导管的患者。研究人员将电子病历中的数据输入 REDCap:在实施该算法之前和之后,分别有530名和740名患者接受了分娩硬膜外镇痛并符合纳入标准。实施该方案后接受分娩硬膜外镇痛的患者导管更换率绝对增加了1.0%,但无统计学意义(P = 0.34)。多变量逻辑回归发现,抢救性镇痛栓的数量(几率比2.68;95%置信区间2.092, 3.434;P P = 0.003)与导管更换有关:结论:实施分娩硬膜外导管管理算法后,患者更换分娩硬膜外导管的次数有所增加,但无统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Implementation of a standardized epidural top-up algorithm for inadequate labor epidural analgesia: a single-center retrospective study.

Background: We hypothesized that implementation of a labor epidural management algorithm would increase the labor epidural catheter replacement rate at our hospital.

Methods: Our institutional review board approved this study and waived the requirement for informed consent. Patients who had labor epidural analgesia and delivered vaginally or had replacement of an epidural catheter prior to vaginal delivery from August 1, 2022 to December 31, 2022 and from August 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023 were included in the study. Study investigators entered data from the electronic medical record into REDCap.

Results: A total of 530 and 740 patients received labor epidural analgesia and met inclusion criteria before and after implementation of the algorithm, respectively. Patients who received labor epidural analgesia after implementation of the protocol had an absolute increase of 1.0% in the catheter replacement rate, which was not statistically significant (P = 0.34). A multivariate logistic regression found that the number or rescue analgesia boluses (odds ratio 2.68; 95% confidence interval 2.092, 3.434; P < 0.001) and operator level of training (odds ratio 0.41; 95% confidence interval 0.226, 0.743; P = 0.003) were associated with catheter replacement.

Conclusion: After implementation of a labor epidural catheter management algorithm, patients had an increase in labor epidural catheter replacement that was not statistically significant.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
245
期刊最新文献
The importance of screening and surveillance: Barrett's esophagus and esophageal cancer. A brief descriptive analysis of a pilot study of peer support training and supervision for Texas firefighters. Contrast-associated acute kidney injury: How can we do better? "In a word, partnership"-lessons from a student-led health fair. A review of professionalism in surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1