不同表面处理对两种氧化锆陶瓷和一种复合材料之间剪切粘接强度的影响

IF 3.8 3区医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Bioengineering Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI:10.3390/bioengineering11101003

Se-Hyoun Kim, Young-Jun Lim, Dae-Joon Kim, Myung-Joo Kim, Ho-Boem Kwon, Yeon-Wha Baek

{"title":"不同表面处理对两种氧化锆陶瓷和一种复合材料之间剪切粘接强度的影响","authors":"Se-Hyoun Kim, Young-Jun Lim, Dae-Joon Kim, Myung-Joo Kim, Ho-Boem Kwon, Yeon-Wha Baek","doi":"10.3390/bioengineering11101003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to compare the surface changes and shear bond strength between a resin composite and two zirconia ceramics subjected to sandblasting and forming gas (5% H2 in N2) plasma surface treatment. Two types of zirconia ceramic specimens (3Y-TZP and (Y,Nb)-TZP) were divided into groups based on the following surface treatment methods: polishing (Control), sandblasting (SB), sandblasting and plasma (SB-P), and plasma treatment (P). Subsequently, chemical surface modification was performed using Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray, Tokyo, Japan), and the Filtek Z-250 (3M, Maplewood, MN, USA) resin composite was applied. Shear bond strengths (SBS) and surface characteristics were determined. Plasma treatment was effective in increasing the wettability. For SBS, there were significant differences among the groups, and the (Y,Nb)-TZP and SB-P groups showed the highest bond strength. Similarly, for the 3Y-TZP specimens, the shear bond strength increased with both plasma and sandblasting treatments, although no statistically significant change was observed. In the P group, both (Y,Nb)-TZP and 3Y-TZP showed a significant decrease in shear bond strength with the resin composite compared to the control group.","PeriodicalId":8874,"journal":{"name":"Bioengineering","volume":"11 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11505044/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Different Surface Treatments on Shear Bond Strength between Two Zirconia Ceramics and a Composite Material.\",\"authors\":\"Se-Hyoun Kim, Young-Jun Lim, Dae-Joon Kim, Myung-Joo Kim, Ho-Boem Kwon, Yeon-Wha Baek\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/bioengineering11101003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study was to compare the surface changes and shear bond strength between a resin composite and two zirconia ceramics subjected to sandblasting and forming gas (5% H2 in N2) plasma surface treatment. Two types of zirconia ceramic specimens (3Y-TZP and (Y,Nb)-TZP) were divided into groups based on the following surface treatment methods: polishing (Control), sandblasting (SB), sandblasting and plasma (SB-P), and plasma treatment (P). Subsequently, chemical surface modification was performed using Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray, Tokyo, Japan), and the Filtek Z-250 (3M, Maplewood, MN, USA) resin composite was applied. Shear bond strengths (SBS) and surface characteristics were determined. Plasma treatment was effective in increasing the wettability. For SBS, there were significant differences among the groups, and the (Y,Nb)-TZP and SB-P groups showed the highest bond strength. Similarly, for the 3Y-TZP specimens, the shear bond strength increased with both plasma and sandblasting treatments, although no statistically significant change was observed. In the P group, both (Y,Nb)-TZP and 3Y-TZP showed a significant decrease in shear bond strength with the resin composite compared to the control group.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioengineering\",\"volume\":\"11 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11505044/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioengineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11101003\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11101003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是比较树脂复合材料和两种氧化锆陶瓷在经过喷砂和成型气体（5% H2 in N2）等离子表面处理后的表面变化和剪切结合强度。根据以下表面处理方法将两种氧化锆陶瓷试样（3Y-TZP 和 (Y,Nb)-TZP）分为几组：抛光（对照组）、喷砂（SB）、喷砂和等离子（SB-P）以及等离子处理（P）。随后，使用 Clearfil SE Bond（可乐丽，日本东京）进行化学表面改性，并涂上 Filtek Z-250 （3M，美国明尼苏达州枫林市）树脂复合材料。对剪切粘接强度（SBS）和表面特性进行了测定。等离子处理能有效提高润湿性。在 SBS 方面，各组之间存在显著差异，(Y,Nb)-TZP 组和 SB-P 组的粘接强度最高。同样，3Y-TZP 试样的剪切粘接强度在等离子和喷砂处理后都有所提高，但没有观察到统计学上的显著变化。在 P 组中，与对照组相比，(Y,Nb)-TZP 和 3Y-TZP 与树脂复合材料的剪切粘接强度都有显著下降。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Impact of Different Surface Treatments on Shear Bond Strength between Two Zirconia Ceramics and a Composite Material.

The purpose of this study was to compare the surface changes and shear bond strength between a resin composite and two zirconia ceramics subjected to sandblasting and forming gas (5% H₂ in N₂) plasma surface treatment. Two types of zirconia ceramic specimens (3Y-TZP and (Y,Nb)-TZP) were divided into groups based on the following surface treatment methods: polishing (Control), sandblasting (SB), sandblasting and plasma (SB-P), and plasma treatment (P). Subsequently, chemical surface modification was performed using Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray, Tokyo, Japan), and the Filtek Z-250 (3M, Maplewood, MN, USA) resin composite was applied. Shear bond strengths (SBS) and surface characteristics were determined. Plasma treatment was effective in increasing the wettability. For SBS, there were significant differences among the groups, and the (Y,Nb)-TZP and SB-P groups showed the highest bond strength. Similarly, for the 3Y-TZP specimens, the shear bond strength increased with both plasma and sandblasting treatments, although no statistically significant change was observed. In the P group, both (Y,Nb)-TZP and 3Y-TZP showed a significant decrease in shear bond strength with the resin composite compared to the control group.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Bioengineering Chemical Engineering-Bioengineering

CiteScore

4.00

自引率

8.70%

发文量

661

期刊介绍： Aims Bioengineering (ISSN 2306-5354) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of bioengineering. It publishes original research papers, comprehensive reviews, communications and case reports. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. All aspects of bioengineering are welcomed from theoretical concepts to education and applications. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, four key features of this Journal: ● We are introducing a new concept in scientific and technical publications “The Translational Case Report in Bioengineering”. It is a descriptive explanatory analysis of a transformative or translational event. Understanding that the goal of bioengineering scholarship is to advance towards a transformative or clinical solution to an identified transformative/clinical need, the translational case report is used to explore causation in order to find underlying principles that may guide other similar transformative/translational undertakings. ● Manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed. ● Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material. ● We also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds. Scope ● Bionics and biological cybernetics: implantology; bio–abio interfaces ● Bioelectronics: wearable electronics; implantable electronics; “more than Moore” electronics; bioelectronics devices ● Bioprocess and biosystems engineering and applications: bioprocess design; biocatalysis; bioseparation and bioreactors; bioinformatics; bioenergy; etc. ● Biomolecular, cellular and tissue engineering and applications: tissue engineering; chromosome engineering; embryo engineering; cellular, molecular and synthetic biology; metabolic engineering; bio-nanotechnology; micro/nano technologies; genetic engineering; transgenic technology ● Biomedical engineering and applications: biomechatronics; biomedical electronics; biomechanics; biomaterials; biomimetics; biomedical diagnostics; biomedical therapy; biomedical devices; sensors and circuits; biomedical imaging and medical information systems; implants and regenerative medicine; neurotechnology; clinical engineering; rehabilitation engineering ● Biochemical engineering and applications: metabolic pathway engineering; modeling and simulation ● Translational bioengineering