伏替西汀与去文拉法辛治疗重度抑郁症患者功能障碍的疗效:多国 VIVRE 研究结果。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY CNS Spectrums Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1017/S1092852924000610
Michael Cronquist Christensen, Iria Grande, Andreas Rieckmann, Pratap Chokka
{"title":"伏替西汀与去文拉法辛治疗重度抑郁症患者功能障碍的疗效:多国 VIVRE 研究结果。","authors":"Michael Cronquist Christensen, Iria Grande, Andreas Rieckmann, Pratap Chokka","doi":"10.1017/S1092852924000610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In VIVRE (NCT04448431), vortioxetine was associated with significantly higher rates of symptomatic and functional remission, better daily and social functioning, and greater treatment satisfaction than desvenlafaxine in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and partial response to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) therapy. This analysis further explored the relative improvement in patient functioning with vortioxetine versus desvenlafaxine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>VIVRE was a randomized, double-blind study of vortioxetine (10 or 20 mg/day) versus desvenlafaxine (50 mg/day) in adults with MDD and partial response to initial SSRI monotherapy. Mean percentage changes from baseline to week 8 in Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) total and domain scores were analyzed by treatment group in the overall population and in working patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the overall population, the mean reduction in FAST total score from baseline after 8 weeks of treatment was 37.2% in vortioxetine-treated patients versus 31.8% in desvenlafaxine-treated patients (<i>P</i> = 0.04). Significantly greater improvements versus desvenlafaxine were seen in vortioxetine-treated patients for FAST autonomy, cognitive functioning, and interpersonal-relationships scores (all <i>P</i> < 0.05). In working patients, the mean reduction in FAST total score from baseline at week 8 was 38.7% versus 32.1% in the vortioxetine and desvenlafaxine groups, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.04). Significant correlations were seen between absolute changes in patient functioning, and those in depression severity and health-related quality of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Vortioxetine was significantly better than desvenlafaxine in improving overall functioning as well as daily, social, and cognitive functioning in patients with MDD with inadequate response to prior SSRI therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10505,"journal":{"name":"CNS Spectrums","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of vortioxetine versus desvenlafaxine in the treatment of functional impairment in patients with major depressive disorder: Results from the multinational VIVRE study.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Cronquist Christensen, Iria Grande, Andreas Rieckmann, Pratap Chokka\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1092852924000610\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In VIVRE (NCT04448431), vortioxetine was associated with significantly higher rates of symptomatic and functional remission, better daily and social functioning, and greater treatment satisfaction than desvenlafaxine in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and partial response to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) therapy. This analysis further explored the relative improvement in patient functioning with vortioxetine versus desvenlafaxine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>VIVRE was a randomized, double-blind study of vortioxetine (10 or 20 mg/day) versus desvenlafaxine (50 mg/day) in adults with MDD and partial response to initial SSRI monotherapy. Mean percentage changes from baseline to week 8 in Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) total and domain scores were analyzed by treatment group in the overall population and in working patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the overall population, the mean reduction in FAST total score from baseline after 8 weeks of treatment was 37.2% in vortioxetine-treated patients versus 31.8% in desvenlafaxine-treated patients (<i>P</i> = 0.04). Significantly greater improvements versus desvenlafaxine were seen in vortioxetine-treated patients for FAST autonomy, cognitive functioning, and interpersonal-relationships scores (all <i>P</i> < 0.05). In working patients, the mean reduction in FAST total score from baseline at week 8 was 38.7% versus 32.1% in the vortioxetine and desvenlafaxine groups, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.04). Significant correlations were seen between absolute changes in patient functioning, and those in depression severity and health-related quality of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Vortioxetine was significantly better than desvenlafaxine in improving overall functioning as well as daily, social, and cognitive functioning in patients with MDD with inadequate response to prior SSRI therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CNS Spectrums\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CNS Spectrums\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1092852924000610\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CNS Spectrums","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1092852924000610","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景在VIVRE(NCT04448431)研究中,对于重度抑郁障碍(MDD)且对选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)治疗有部分反应的患者,伏替西汀与去文拉法辛相比,具有明显更高的症状和功能缓解率、更好的日常和社会功能以及更高的治疗满意度。本分析进一步探讨了伏替西汀与去文拉法辛相比对患者功能的相对改善情况:VIVRE是一项随机双盲研究,研究对象是对最初的SSRI单药治疗有部分反应的MDD成人患者,研究对象为伏替西汀(10或20毫克/天)与去文拉法辛(50毫克/天)。按治疗组分析了总体人群和工作患者的功能评估简测(FAST)总分和领域分从基线到第8周的平均百分比变化:在总体人群中,接受伏替西汀治疗的患者在治疗 8 周后 FAST 总分与基线相比的平均降幅为 37.2%,而接受去文拉法辛治疗的患者为 31.8%(P = 0.04)。与去文拉法辛相比,伏替西汀治疗的患者在FAST自主性、认知功能和人际关系评分方面的改善幅度明显更大(均为P = 0.04)。患者功能的绝对变化与抑郁严重程度和健康相关生活质量的绝对变化之间存在显著相关性:结论:对于既往接受过 SSRI 治疗但效果不佳的 MDD 患者,在改善整体功能以及日常、社交和认知功能方面,伏替西汀的效果明显优于去文拉法辛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of vortioxetine versus desvenlafaxine in the treatment of functional impairment in patients with major depressive disorder: Results from the multinational VIVRE study.

Background: In VIVRE (NCT04448431), vortioxetine was associated with significantly higher rates of symptomatic and functional remission, better daily and social functioning, and greater treatment satisfaction than desvenlafaxine in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and partial response to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) therapy. This analysis further explored the relative improvement in patient functioning with vortioxetine versus desvenlafaxine.

Methods: VIVRE was a randomized, double-blind study of vortioxetine (10 or 20 mg/day) versus desvenlafaxine (50 mg/day) in adults with MDD and partial response to initial SSRI monotherapy. Mean percentage changes from baseline to week 8 in Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) total and domain scores were analyzed by treatment group in the overall population and in working patients.

Results: In the overall population, the mean reduction in FAST total score from baseline after 8 weeks of treatment was 37.2% in vortioxetine-treated patients versus 31.8% in desvenlafaxine-treated patients (P = 0.04). Significantly greater improvements versus desvenlafaxine were seen in vortioxetine-treated patients for FAST autonomy, cognitive functioning, and interpersonal-relationships scores (all P < 0.05). In working patients, the mean reduction in FAST total score from baseline at week 8 was 38.7% versus 32.1% in the vortioxetine and desvenlafaxine groups, respectively (P = 0.04). Significant correlations were seen between absolute changes in patient functioning, and those in depression severity and health-related quality of life.

Conclusion: Vortioxetine was significantly better than desvenlafaxine in improving overall functioning as well as daily, social, and cognitive functioning in patients with MDD with inadequate response to prior SSRI therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CNS Spectrums
CNS Spectrums 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
239
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: CNS Spectrums covers all aspects of the clinical neurosciences, neurotherapeutics, and neuropsychopharmacology, particularly those pertinent to the clinician and clinical investigator. The journal features focused, in-depth reviews, perspectives, and original research articles. New therapeutics of all types in psychiatry, mental health, and neurology are emphasized, especially first in man studies, proof of concept studies, and translational basic neuroscience studies. Subject coverage spans the full spectrum of neuropsychiatry, focusing on those crossing traditional boundaries between neurology and psychiatry.
期刊最新文献
Criteria and diagnostic scale of the post-combat delayed response (tension) syndrome. A clinical algorithm for diagnosis and treatment of insomnia in adults: an updated review. Efficacy of esketamine for perinatal depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Liberty or life: mental health care in Australia. What is the neurobiology of schizophrenia?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1