用于牙槽窝保存技术的 3D 可打印生物聚合物:软组织反应:试验性随机临床研究。

IF 2.5 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Dentistry Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI:10.3390/dj12100321
Nicola De Angelis, Paolo Pesce, Wiwiek Poedjiastoeti, Trijani Suwandi, Rosalina Tjandrawinata, Francesco Bagnasco, Maria Menini
{"title":"用于牙槽窝保存技术的 3D 可打印生物聚合物:软组织反应:试验性随机临床研究。","authors":"Nicola De Angelis, Paolo Pesce, Wiwiek Poedjiastoeti, Trijani Suwandi, Rosalina Tjandrawinata, Francesco Bagnasco, Maria Menini","doi":"10.3390/dj12100321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of the present parallel clinical study is to evaluate the efficacy of 3D-printed biopolymers compounded with osteoconductive material (beta-tricalcium phosphate and hydroxyapatite) for soft tissue closure after tooth extraction.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>this study followed the CONSORT reporting guidelines; 39 patients were treated with socket preservation using 3D-printed biopolymers and randomly divided into 3 groups (Test 1, Test 2, and Control). All cases were treated without flap elevation, careful cleaning and debridement of the sites, and then randomly sealed as follows: In T1, with a 3D-printed disk of poli-D-lactic acid with 10% of hydroxyapatite; in T2, using a 3D-printed disk of poli-ε caprolactone with 20% of β-tricalcium phosphate; and in T3, the socket was left open to heal. At baseline (extraction time) and 6 weeks after extraction, the rate of exposure was evaluated and stratified according to the site (anterior, posterior).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No dropouts were observed during the 6 weeks follow-up. All sites underwent uneventful healing with no complications. For posterior teeth, Test 1 and Test 2 showed full healing of the soft tissues with a reduction of the exposed area from 46.5 ± 8.25 mm<sup>2</sup> to 0.6 ± 0.84 mm<sup>2</sup> and from 47.1 ± 8.67 mm<sup>2</sup> to 0.6 ± 0.7 mm<sup>2</sup>, respectively. The Control group exhibited a reduction from 45.6 ± 7.25 mm<sup>2</sup> to 1.2 ± 0.9 mm<sup>2</sup>. Both Tests 1 and 2, when compared to the Control group, showed statistically significant better healing (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Anterior teeth showed a complete closure of the socket 4 weeks after the extraction with no noticeable differences between Test and Control.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both materials used in this study showed evidence to achieve the purpose. Ethical Guidelines: written informed consent was obtained from the participants of the study, as requested by the Ethics Committee for Health Research Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Trisakti, with the following number: 641/S3/KEPK/FKG/5/2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":"12 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11506638/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"3D-Printable Biopolymers for Socket Preservation Technique: Soft Tissues Response: A Pilot Randomised Clinical Study.\",\"authors\":\"Nicola De Angelis, Paolo Pesce, Wiwiek Poedjiastoeti, Trijani Suwandi, Rosalina Tjandrawinata, Francesco Bagnasco, Maria Menini\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/dj12100321\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of the present parallel clinical study is to evaluate the efficacy of 3D-printed biopolymers compounded with osteoconductive material (beta-tricalcium phosphate and hydroxyapatite) for soft tissue closure after tooth extraction.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>this study followed the CONSORT reporting guidelines; 39 patients were treated with socket preservation using 3D-printed biopolymers and randomly divided into 3 groups (Test 1, Test 2, and Control). All cases were treated without flap elevation, careful cleaning and debridement of the sites, and then randomly sealed as follows: In T1, with a 3D-printed disk of poli-D-lactic acid with 10% of hydroxyapatite; in T2, using a 3D-printed disk of poli-ε caprolactone with 20% of β-tricalcium phosphate; and in T3, the socket was left open to heal. At baseline (extraction time) and 6 weeks after extraction, the rate of exposure was evaluated and stratified according to the site (anterior, posterior).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No dropouts were observed during the 6 weeks follow-up. All sites underwent uneventful healing with no complications. For posterior teeth, Test 1 and Test 2 showed full healing of the soft tissues with a reduction of the exposed area from 46.5 ± 8.25 mm<sup>2</sup> to 0.6 ± 0.84 mm<sup>2</sup> and from 47.1 ± 8.67 mm<sup>2</sup> to 0.6 ± 0.7 mm<sup>2</sup>, respectively. The Control group exhibited a reduction from 45.6 ± 7.25 mm<sup>2</sup> to 1.2 ± 0.9 mm<sup>2</sup>. Both Tests 1 and 2, when compared to the Control group, showed statistically significant better healing (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Anterior teeth showed a complete closure of the socket 4 weeks after the extraction with no noticeable differences between Test and Control.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both materials used in this study showed evidence to achieve the purpose. Ethical Guidelines: written informed consent was obtained from the participants of the study, as requested by the Ethics Committee for Health Research Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Trisakti, with the following number: 641/S3/KEPK/FKG/5/2023.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dentistry Journal\",\"volume\":\"12 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11506638/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dentistry Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12100321\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12100321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本平行临床研究的目的是评估3D打印生物聚合物与骨传导材料(β-磷酸三钙和羟基磷灰石)复合用于拔牙后软组织封闭的疗效。材料与方法:本研究遵循CONSORT报告指南;39例患者使用3D打印生物聚合物进行牙槽窝保存治疗,并随机分为3组(试验1组、试验2组和对照组)。所有病例在治疗过程中均不抬高皮瓣,仔细清洁和清创治疗部位,然后按以下方法随机密封:在 T1 组中,使用含有 10%羟基磷灰石的聚-D-乳酸 3D 打印盘;在 T2 组中,使用含有 20% β-磷酸三钙的聚-ε-己内酯 3D 打印盘;在 T3 组中,待窝洞愈合。在基线(拔牙时间)和拔牙后 6 周,对暴露率进行评估,并根据部位(前牙、后牙)进行分层:结果:在 6 周的随访中未发现脱落现象。所有部位均顺利愈合,无并发症。对于后牙,试验 1 和试验 2 显示软组织完全愈合,暴露面积分别从 46.5 ± 8.25 平方毫米减少到 0.6 ± 0.84 平方毫米和从 47.1 ± 8.67 平方毫米减少到 0.6 ± 0.7 平方毫米。对照组则从 45.6 ± 7.25 平方毫米减少到 1.2 ± 0.9 平方毫米。与对照组相比,试验 1 和试验 2 在统计学上都显示出更好的愈合效果(p < 0.05)。前牙在拔牙 4 周后牙槽窝完全闭合,试验组和对照组之间没有明显差异:本研究中使用的两种材料都证明达到了目的。伦理指南:根据 Trisakti 大学牙科学院健康研究伦理委员会的要求,本研究获得了参与者的书面知情同意,编号为:641/S3/KEPK/FKG/5/2023。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
3D-Printable Biopolymers for Socket Preservation Technique: Soft Tissues Response: A Pilot Randomised Clinical Study.

Background: The aim of the present parallel clinical study is to evaluate the efficacy of 3D-printed biopolymers compounded with osteoconductive material (beta-tricalcium phosphate and hydroxyapatite) for soft tissue closure after tooth extraction.

Materials and methods: this study followed the CONSORT reporting guidelines; 39 patients were treated with socket preservation using 3D-printed biopolymers and randomly divided into 3 groups (Test 1, Test 2, and Control). All cases were treated without flap elevation, careful cleaning and debridement of the sites, and then randomly sealed as follows: In T1, with a 3D-printed disk of poli-D-lactic acid with 10% of hydroxyapatite; in T2, using a 3D-printed disk of poli-ε caprolactone with 20% of β-tricalcium phosphate; and in T3, the socket was left open to heal. At baseline (extraction time) and 6 weeks after extraction, the rate of exposure was evaluated and stratified according to the site (anterior, posterior).

Results: No dropouts were observed during the 6 weeks follow-up. All sites underwent uneventful healing with no complications. For posterior teeth, Test 1 and Test 2 showed full healing of the soft tissues with a reduction of the exposed area from 46.5 ± 8.25 mm2 to 0.6 ± 0.84 mm2 and from 47.1 ± 8.67 mm2 to 0.6 ± 0.7 mm2, respectively. The Control group exhibited a reduction from 45.6 ± 7.25 mm2 to 1.2 ± 0.9 mm2. Both Tests 1 and 2, when compared to the Control group, showed statistically significant better healing (p < 0.05). Anterior teeth showed a complete closure of the socket 4 weeks after the extraction with no noticeable differences between Test and Control.

Conclusions: Both materials used in this study showed evidence to achieve the purpose. Ethical Guidelines: written informed consent was obtained from the participants of the study, as requested by the Ethics Committee for Health Research Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Trisakti, with the following number: 641/S3/KEPK/FKG/5/2023.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dentistry Journal
Dentistry Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
213
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Home Biofilm Management in Orthodontic Aligners: A Systematic Review. In Vitro Research Methods Used to Evaluate Shaping Ability of Rotary Endodontic Files-A Literature Review. Accuracy and Efficiency of the Surgical-Guide-Assisted Fiber Post Removal Technique for Anterior Teeth: An Ex Vivo Study. Correlation between Periodontitis and Onset of Alzheimer's Disease: A Literature Review. The Harmful Effects of Welding Fumes on Human Dental Enamel-A Microhardness Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1