在全国范围内禁止非急诊医疗期间的手术优先顺序:瑞士医院数据的准实验性回顾研究》。

IF 2.4 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Services Insights Pub Date : 2024-10-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/11786329241293534
Thomas Grischott, Tarun Mehra, Matthias R Meyer, Oliver Senn, Yael Rachamin
{"title":"在全国范围内禁止非急诊医疗期间的手术优先顺序:瑞士医院数据的准实验性回顾研究》。","authors":"Thomas Grischott, Tarun Mehra, Matthias R Meyer, Oliver Senn, Yael Rachamin","doi":"10.1177/11786329241293534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the COVID-19 lockdown in spring 2020, Switzerland restricted non-urgent healthcare services to safeguard capacity. While prioritization of care was supposed to be driven by medical urgency, demographic factors or economic incentives might have influenced the hospitals' resource allocation decisions.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study investigates potential determinants of procedure prioritization in hospitalized patients during the lockdown period.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Quasi-experimental retrospective study of hospital data in Switzerland.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 496 456 adult patients with known insurance status and a recorded procedure, admitted for cardiovascular, orthopedic/musculoskeletal or oncological reasons from January 2017 (3 years before the COVID-19 outbreak) to mid-April 2020 (in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic), to obtain admission rate ratios (ARRs, \"lockdown\" admission rates divided by \"normal\" rates) from negative binomial regression analysis of fortnightly admissions for frequent procedure-diagnosis combinations. Quade and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests compared ARRs between sex×age, insurance and comorbidity strata.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Admission rates showed significant reductions for 29 of 53 procedure-diagnosis combinations. Reductions varied strongly by emergency, with largest decreases in orthopedic procedures for arthrosis (osteoarthritis) and non-arthritic joint disorders, and the smallest in cerebral imaging for stroke patients and surgical procedures for malignant neoplasms. The only difference in ARRs between strata was a stronger decrease in admission rates for cardiovascular combinations for patients with private versus basic health insurance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While medical procedures were affected to varying degrees by the ban on non-urgent healthcare during the COVID-19 lockdown, we found no robust evidence that factors other than medical urgency influenced healthcare prioritization.</p>","PeriodicalId":12876,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Insights","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11503697/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Procedure Prioritization During a Nationwide Ban on Non-Urgent Healthcare: A Quasi-Experimental Retrospective Study of Hospital Data in Switzerland.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Grischott, Tarun Mehra, Matthias R Meyer, Oliver Senn, Yael Rachamin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11786329241293534\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the COVID-19 lockdown in spring 2020, Switzerland restricted non-urgent healthcare services to safeguard capacity. While prioritization of care was supposed to be driven by medical urgency, demographic factors or economic incentives might have influenced the hospitals' resource allocation decisions.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study investigates potential determinants of procedure prioritization in hospitalized patients during the lockdown period.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Quasi-experimental retrospective study of hospital data in Switzerland.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 496 456 adult patients with known insurance status and a recorded procedure, admitted for cardiovascular, orthopedic/musculoskeletal or oncological reasons from January 2017 (3 years before the COVID-19 outbreak) to mid-April 2020 (in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic), to obtain admission rate ratios (ARRs, \\\"lockdown\\\" admission rates divided by \\\"normal\\\" rates) from negative binomial regression analysis of fortnightly admissions for frequent procedure-diagnosis combinations. Quade and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests compared ARRs between sex×age, insurance and comorbidity strata.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Admission rates showed significant reductions for 29 of 53 procedure-diagnosis combinations. Reductions varied strongly by emergency, with largest decreases in orthopedic procedures for arthrosis (osteoarthritis) and non-arthritic joint disorders, and the smallest in cerebral imaging for stroke patients and surgical procedures for malignant neoplasms. The only difference in ARRs between strata was a stronger decrease in admission rates for cardiovascular combinations for patients with private versus basic health insurance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While medical procedures were affected to varying degrees by the ban on non-urgent healthcare during the COVID-19 lockdown, we found no robust evidence that factors other than medical urgency influenced healthcare prioritization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Services Insights\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11503697/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Services Insights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329241293534\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329241293534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在 2020 年春季 COVID-19 封锁期间,瑞士限制了非紧急医疗服务,以保障医疗能力。虽然医疗服务的优先顺序应由医疗紧迫性决定,但人口因素或经济激励可能会影响医院的资源分配决策:本研究调查了封锁期间住院病人手术优先顺序的潜在决定因素:设计:瑞士医院数据的准实验性回顾研究:我们分析了2017年1月(COVID-19疫情爆发前3年)至2020年4月中旬(COVID-19大流行的第一年)期间因心血管、骨科/肌肉骨骼或肿瘤原因入院的496 456名已知保险状况且有手术记录的成年患者,通过对频繁手术-诊断组合的每两周入院情况进行负二项回归分析,得出入院率比(ARRs,"封锁 "入院率除以 "正常 "入院率)。Quade和Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较了性别×年龄、保险和合并症分层之间的ARR:在 53 种手术-诊断组合中,29 种的入院率明显下降。不同急诊病人的入院率差异很大,其中关节病(骨关节炎)和非关节炎性关节紊乱的骨科手术入院率降幅最大,中风病人的脑成像和恶性肿瘤的外科手术入院率降幅最小。各阶层之间平均住院日率的唯一差异是,私人医疗保险患者与基本医疗保险患者的心血管组合入院率降幅更大:虽然在 COVID-19 封锁期间,医疗程序在不同程度上受到了非紧急医疗禁令的影响,但我们没有发现有力的证据表明医疗紧急性以外的因素影响了医疗优先级的确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Procedure Prioritization During a Nationwide Ban on Non-Urgent Healthcare: A Quasi-Experimental Retrospective Study of Hospital Data in Switzerland.

Background: During the COVID-19 lockdown in spring 2020, Switzerland restricted non-urgent healthcare services to safeguard capacity. While prioritization of care was supposed to be driven by medical urgency, demographic factors or economic incentives might have influenced the hospitals' resource allocation decisions.

Objectives: This study investigates potential determinants of procedure prioritization in hospitalized patients during the lockdown period.

Design: Quasi-experimental retrospective study of hospital data in Switzerland.

Methods: We analyzed 496 456 adult patients with known insurance status and a recorded procedure, admitted for cardiovascular, orthopedic/musculoskeletal or oncological reasons from January 2017 (3 years before the COVID-19 outbreak) to mid-April 2020 (in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic), to obtain admission rate ratios (ARRs, "lockdown" admission rates divided by "normal" rates) from negative binomial regression analysis of fortnightly admissions for frequent procedure-diagnosis combinations. Quade and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests compared ARRs between sex×age, insurance and comorbidity strata.

Results: Admission rates showed significant reductions for 29 of 53 procedure-diagnosis combinations. Reductions varied strongly by emergency, with largest decreases in orthopedic procedures for arthrosis (osteoarthritis) and non-arthritic joint disorders, and the smallest in cerebral imaging for stroke patients and surgical procedures for malignant neoplasms. The only difference in ARRs between strata was a stronger decrease in admission rates for cardiovascular combinations for patients with private versus basic health insurance.

Conclusion: While medical procedures were affected to varying degrees by the ban on non-urgent healthcare during the COVID-19 lockdown, we found no robust evidence that factors other than medical urgency influenced healthcare prioritization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Services Insights
Health Services Insights HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Healthcare Professionals' Resilience during the COVID-19 and Organizational Factors That Improve Individual Resilience: A Mixed-Method Study". A Fuzzy Bi-objective Mathematical Model for Perishable Medical Goods Supply Chain Network Considering Crisis Situations: An Empirical Study. Procedure Prioritization During a Nationwide Ban on Non-Urgent Healthcare: A Quasi-Experimental Retrospective Study of Hospital Data in Switzerland. Navigating Rehabilitation Transitions at Street Level: A Qualitative Analysis of Municipal Service Allocation to Individuals With Complex Needs. Patterns of Antidepressant and Anxiolytic Use and Spending in 14 European Countries (2012-2021): A Comprehensive Time Series Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1