Breaststroke and butterfly intercycle kinematic variation according to different competitive levels with Statistical Parametric Mapping analysis

Breaststroke and butterfly are complex swimming techniques requiring refined motor skills to perform successfully, with coordinated and consistent interaction between propulsive and resistive forces being decisive when considering swimmers expertise. The current study analysed those techniques intercycle kinematic variation in two swimmers cohorts. Twenty elite and 15 national level swimmers performed one 25 m breaststroke and one 25 m butterfly sprints, with an underwater camera recording images at 120 Hz in the sagittal plane. Mean velocity, maximum and minimum velocities, stroke rate and length, intracycle velocity variation and phases relative duration were calculated for consecutive cycles (elite: five breaststroke/butterfly, national level: eight breaststroke/seven butterfly). The two highest peaks and the lower peak in between in breaststroke were also addressed. Intercycle and inter-groups analysis were performed using ANOVA, ANCOVA and Statistical Parametric Mapping. Elite and national level differed regarding breaststroke mean and maximum velocities, 1st and 2nd peaks and minimum between peaks (1.30 ± 0.02 vs 1.15 ± 0.02 m/s, 2.13 ± 0.05 vs 1.88 ± 0.06 m/s, 1.63 ± 0.05 vs 1.48 ± 0.05 m/s, 2.13 ± 0.05 vs 1.86 ± 0.05 m/s, 1.33 ± 0.04 vs 1.23 ± 0.04 m/s), and butterfly mean, maximum and minimum velocities, stroke rate and intracycle velocity variation, respectively (1.65 ± 0.01 vs 1.50 ± 0.01 m/s, 2.20 ± 0.04 vs 2.09 ± 0.04 m/s, 1.12 ± 0.04 vs 0.79 ± 0.04 m/s, (57.9 ± 0.9 vs 54.9 ± 1.0cycles/min, 18.4 ± 1.3 vs 23.7 ± 1.3 %). Elite and national level swimmers showed consistent breaststroke intercycle kinematic variation, but a butterfly mean velocity decay, with the upper limbs release and recovery, and the outsweep phases originating variability between butterfly cycles. Skill levels contrasted in technical and strategic features at sprint breaststroke and butterfly but showed similar velocity variability between consecutive swimming cycles.