足底筋膜和足底长韧带对足底纵弓稳定性的贡献。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS Journal of biomechanics Pub Date : 2024-10-19 DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112373
Luigi Piarulli, Rena Mathew, Sorin Siegler
{"title":"足底筋膜和足底长韧带对足底纵弓稳定性的贡献。","authors":"Luigi Piarulli,&nbsp;Rena Mathew,&nbsp;Sorin Siegler","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The contribution of the Plantar Fascia (PF) and Long Plantar Ligament (LPL), two ligaments extending from the hindfoot to the forefoot, to arch stability has been studied in the past using <em>in vivo</em>, <em>in vitro</em>, and in silico methodologies. In silico studies were based on one single model obtained from one single subject and did not account for the known inter-subject morphological and biomechanical variations. In the present study, we developed computational dynamic models of nine different legs obtained from nine different individuals to evaluate the role of the LPL and PF in arch support, accounting for biological differences between subjects. These models were validated by comparing the simulation results against experimental results from the corresponding cadaver legs. After validation, we simulated body weight conditions for each model by applying a vertical load to the tibia, starting from zero and increasing linearly to 720 N. Kinematic and dynamic parameters, including the variation of the medial arch angle and of the navicular height, as well as the passive forces developed by the LPL and PF, were used to evaluate the contribution of these ligaments to arch support under body weight. The results indicate that a total collapse of the medial longitudinal arch occurred only when both the LPL and PF were absent, but a stable arch was maintained when either one of these two ligament structures were present. The results varied significantly among the specific models, highlighting the importance of using multiple models to account for inter-subject morphological differences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 112373"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contribution of the plantar fascia and long plantar ligaments to the stability of the longitudinal arch of the foot\",\"authors\":\"Luigi Piarulli,&nbsp;Rena Mathew,&nbsp;Sorin Siegler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112373\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The contribution of the Plantar Fascia (PF) and Long Plantar Ligament (LPL), two ligaments extending from the hindfoot to the forefoot, to arch stability has been studied in the past using <em>in vivo</em>, <em>in vitro</em>, and in silico methodologies. In silico studies were based on one single model obtained from one single subject and did not account for the known inter-subject morphological and biomechanical variations. In the present study, we developed computational dynamic models of nine different legs obtained from nine different individuals to evaluate the role of the LPL and PF in arch support, accounting for biological differences between subjects. These models were validated by comparing the simulation results against experimental results from the corresponding cadaver legs. After validation, we simulated body weight conditions for each model by applying a vertical load to the tibia, starting from zero and increasing linearly to 720 N. Kinematic and dynamic parameters, including the variation of the medial arch angle and of the navicular height, as well as the passive forces developed by the LPL and PF, were used to evaluate the contribution of these ligaments to arch support under body weight. The results indicate that a total collapse of the medial longitudinal arch occurred only when both the LPL and PF were absent, but a stable arch was maintained when either one of these two ligament structures were present. The results varied significantly among the specific models, highlighting the importance of using multiple models to account for inter-subject morphological differences.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"176 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112373\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929024004512\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929024004512","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

足底筋膜(PF)和长足底韧带(LPL)是两条从后足延伸到前足的韧带,过去曾使用体内、体外和硅学方法对这两条韧带对足弓稳定性的贡献进行过研究。硅学研究基于从单个受试者身上获得的单一模型,并没有考虑到已知的受试者之间的形态和生物力学差异。在本研究中,我们开发了从九个不同个体获得的九条不同腿的计算动态模型,以评估 LPL 和 PF 在足弓支撑中的作用,同时考虑到受试者之间的生物差异。通过将模拟结果与相应尸体腿部的实验结果进行比较,对这些模型进行了验证。验证后,我们对每个模型模拟了体重条件,在胫骨上施加垂直负载,从零开始线性增加到 720 牛顿。运动学和动力学参数,包括内侧足弓角度和舟骨高度的变化,以及 LPL 和 PF 产生的被动力,用于评估这些韧带在体重作用下对足弓支撑的贡献。结果表明,只有当 LPL 和 PF 都缺失时,内侧纵弓才会完全塌陷,但当这两个韧带结构中的任何一个存在时,内侧纵弓都能保持稳定。具体模型之间的结果差异很大,这凸显了使用多种模型来考虑受试者之间形态差异的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Contribution of the plantar fascia and long plantar ligaments to the stability of the longitudinal arch of the foot
The contribution of the Plantar Fascia (PF) and Long Plantar Ligament (LPL), two ligaments extending from the hindfoot to the forefoot, to arch stability has been studied in the past using in vivo, in vitro, and in silico methodologies. In silico studies were based on one single model obtained from one single subject and did not account for the known inter-subject morphological and biomechanical variations. In the present study, we developed computational dynamic models of nine different legs obtained from nine different individuals to evaluate the role of the LPL and PF in arch support, accounting for biological differences between subjects. These models were validated by comparing the simulation results against experimental results from the corresponding cadaver legs. After validation, we simulated body weight conditions for each model by applying a vertical load to the tibia, starting from zero and increasing linearly to 720 N. Kinematic and dynamic parameters, including the variation of the medial arch angle and of the navicular height, as well as the passive forces developed by the LPL and PF, were used to evaluate the contribution of these ligaments to arch support under body weight. The results indicate that a total collapse of the medial longitudinal arch occurred only when both the LPL and PF were absent, but a stable arch was maintained when either one of these two ligament structures were present. The results varied significantly among the specific models, highlighting the importance of using multiple models to account for inter-subject morphological differences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of biomechanics
Journal of biomechanics 生物-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership. Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to: -Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells. -Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions. -Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response. -Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing. -Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine. -Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction. -Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules. -Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints. -Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics. -Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.
期刊最新文献
Effects of knee joint position on the triceps Suræ torque-size relationship during plantarflexion in healthy young adults. Differential T2* changes in tibialis anterior and soleus: Influence of exercise type and perceived exertion. Shear viscoelastic properties of human orbital fat. Société de Biomécanique young investigator award 2023: Estimation of intersegmental load at L5-S1 during lifting/lowering tasks using force plate free markerless motion capture. Changes in lower extremity muscle coordination over a 30-minute walk do not differ by muscle fatigability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1