心脏多频磁共振弹性成像在评估左心室硬度和粘度方面的再现性

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1002/jmri.29640
Johannes Castelein, Amanda S Duus, Pernille S Bække, Ingolf Sack, Matthias S Anders, Karen Kettless, Adam E Hansen, Rudi A J O Dierckx, Ole De Backer, Niels G Vejlstrup, Morten A V Lund, Ronald J H Borra
{"title":"心脏多频磁共振弹性成像在评估左心室硬度和粘度方面的再现性","authors":"Johannes Castelein, Amanda S Duus, Pernille S Bække, Ingolf Sack, Matthias S Anders, Karen Kettless, Adam E Hansen, Rudi A J O Dierckx, Ole De Backer, Niels G Vejlstrup, Morten A V Lund, Ronald J H Borra","doi":"10.1002/jmri.29640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) shows promise in assessing the mechanofunctional properties of the heart but faces clinical challenges, mainly synchronization with cardiac cycle, breathing, and external harmonic stimulation.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the reproducibility of in vivo cardiac multifrequency MRE (MMRE) for assessing diastolic left ventricular (LV) stiffness and viscosity.</p><p><strong>Study type: </strong>Prospective.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>This single-center study included a total of 28 participants (mean age, 56.6 ± 23.0 years; 16 male) consisting of randomly selected healthy participants (mean age, 44.6 ± 20.1 years; 9 male) and patients with aortic stenosis (mean age, 78.3 ± 3.8 years; 7 male).</p><p><strong>Field strength/sequence: </strong>3 T, 3D multifrequency MRE with a single-shot spin-echo planar imaging sequence.</p><p><strong>Assessment: </strong>Each participant underwent two cardiac MMRE examinations on the same day. Full 3D wave fields were acquired in diastole at frequencies of 80, 90, and 100 Hz during a total of three breath-holds. Shear wave speed (SWS) and penetration rate (PR) were reconstructed as a surrogate for tissue stiffness and inverse viscous loss. Epicardial and endocardial ROIs were manually drawn by two independent readers to segment the LV myocardium.</p><p><strong>Statistical tests: </strong>Shapiro-Wilk test, Bland-Altman analysis and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). P-value <0.05 were considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bland-Altman analyses and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC = 0.96 for myocardial stiffness and ICC = 0.93 for viscosity) indicated near-perfect test-retest repeatability among examinations on the same day. The mean SWS for scan and re-scan diastolic LV myocardium were 2.42 ± 0.24 m/s and 2.39 ± 0.23 m/s; the mean PR were 1.24 ± 0.17 m/s and 1.22 ± 0.14 m/s. Inter-reader variability showed good to excellent agreement for myocardial stiffness (ICC = 0.92) and viscosity (ICC = 0.85).</p><p><strong>Data conclusion: </strong>Cardiac MMRE is a promising and reproducible method for noninvasive assessment of diastolic LV stiffness and viscosity.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: 1.</p>","PeriodicalId":16140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reproducibility of Cardiac Multifrequency MR Elastography in Assessing Left Ventricular Stiffness and Viscosity.\",\"authors\":\"Johannes Castelein, Amanda S Duus, Pernille S Bække, Ingolf Sack, Matthias S Anders, Karen Kettless, Adam E Hansen, Rudi A J O Dierckx, Ole De Backer, Niels G Vejlstrup, Morten A V Lund, Ronald J H Borra\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jmri.29640\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) shows promise in assessing the mechanofunctional properties of the heart but faces clinical challenges, mainly synchronization with cardiac cycle, breathing, and external harmonic stimulation.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the reproducibility of in vivo cardiac multifrequency MRE (MMRE) for assessing diastolic left ventricular (LV) stiffness and viscosity.</p><p><strong>Study type: </strong>Prospective.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>This single-center study included a total of 28 participants (mean age, 56.6 ± 23.0 years; 16 male) consisting of randomly selected healthy participants (mean age, 44.6 ± 20.1 years; 9 male) and patients with aortic stenosis (mean age, 78.3 ± 3.8 years; 7 male).</p><p><strong>Field strength/sequence: </strong>3 T, 3D multifrequency MRE with a single-shot spin-echo planar imaging sequence.</p><p><strong>Assessment: </strong>Each participant underwent two cardiac MMRE examinations on the same day. Full 3D wave fields were acquired in diastole at frequencies of 80, 90, and 100 Hz during a total of three breath-holds. Shear wave speed (SWS) and penetration rate (PR) were reconstructed as a surrogate for tissue stiffness and inverse viscous loss. Epicardial and endocardial ROIs were manually drawn by two independent readers to segment the LV myocardium.</p><p><strong>Statistical tests: </strong>Shapiro-Wilk test, Bland-Altman analysis and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). P-value <0.05 were considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bland-Altman analyses and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC = 0.96 for myocardial stiffness and ICC = 0.93 for viscosity) indicated near-perfect test-retest repeatability among examinations on the same day. The mean SWS for scan and re-scan diastolic LV myocardium were 2.42 ± 0.24 m/s and 2.39 ± 0.23 m/s; the mean PR were 1.24 ± 0.17 m/s and 1.22 ± 0.14 m/s. Inter-reader variability showed good to excellent agreement for myocardial stiffness (ICC = 0.92) and viscosity (ICC = 0.85).</p><p><strong>Data conclusion: </strong>Cardiac MMRE is a promising and reproducible method for noninvasive assessment of diastolic LV stiffness and viscosity.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: 1.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.29640\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.29640","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目的:确定体内心脏多频弹性成像(MMRE)评估舒张期左心室(LV)硬度和粘度的可重复性:研究类型:前瞻性:这项单中心研究共纳入 28 名参与者(平均年龄为 56.6 ± 23.0 岁;16 名男性),包括随机挑选的健康参与者(平均年龄为 44.6 ± 20.1 岁;9 名男性)和主动脉瓣狭窄患者(平均年龄为 78.3 ± 3.8 岁;7 名男性):场强/序列:3 T,三维多频 MRE,单次自旋回波平面成像序列:每位受试者在同一天接受两次心脏 MMRE 检查。在总共三次屏气过程中,分别以 80、90 和 100 Hz 的频率采集舒张期的全三维波场。重建剪切波速度(SWS)和穿透率(PR),作为组织僵硬度和反向粘性损失的替代指标。心外膜和心内膜 ROI 由两名独立读者手动绘制,以分割左心室心肌:Shapiro-Wilk 检验、Bland-Altman 分析和类内相关系数 (ICC)。P 值结果:Bland-Altman分析和类内相关系数(心肌僵硬度的ICC = 0.96,粘度的ICC = 0.93)表明,同一天进行的检查几乎具有完美的重复性。扫描和再扫描舒张左心室心肌的平均 SWS 为 2.42 ± 0.24 m/s 和 2.39 ± 0.23 m/s;平均 PR 为 1.24 ± 0.17 m/s 和 1.22 ± 0.14 m/s。在心肌僵硬度(ICC = 0.92)和粘度(ICC = 0.85)方面,读数器之间的差异显示出良好到极佳的一致性:数据结论:心脏 MMRE 是一种很有前途且可重复的无创评估舒张左心室僵硬度和粘度的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reproducibility of Cardiac Multifrequency MR Elastography in Assessing Left Ventricular Stiffness and Viscosity.

Background: Cardiac magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) shows promise in assessing the mechanofunctional properties of the heart but faces clinical challenges, mainly synchronization with cardiac cycle, breathing, and external harmonic stimulation.

Purpose: To determine the reproducibility of in vivo cardiac multifrequency MRE (MMRE) for assessing diastolic left ventricular (LV) stiffness and viscosity.

Study type: Prospective.

Subjects: This single-center study included a total of 28 participants (mean age, 56.6 ± 23.0 years; 16 male) consisting of randomly selected healthy participants (mean age, 44.6 ± 20.1 years; 9 male) and patients with aortic stenosis (mean age, 78.3 ± 3.8 years; 7 male).

Field strength/sequence: 3 T, 3D multifrequency MRE with a single-shot spin-echo planar imaging sequence.

Assessment: Each participant underwent two cardiac MMRE examinations on the same day. Full 3D wave fields were acquired in diastole at frequencies of 80, 90, and 100 Hz during a total of three breath-holds. Shear wave speed (SWS) and penetration rate (PR) were reconstructed as a surrogate for tissue stiffness and inverse viscous loss. Epicardial and endocardial ROIs were manually drawn by two independent readers to segment the LV myocardium.

Statistical tests: Shapiro-Wilk test, Bland-Altman analysis and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). P-value <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results: Bland-Altman analyses and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC = 0.96 for myocardial stiffness and ICC = 0.93 for viscosity) indicated near-perfect test-retest repeatability among examinations on the same day. The mean SWS for scan and re-scan diastolic LV myocardium were 2.42 ± 0.24 m/s and 2.39 ± 0.23 m/s; the mean PR were 1.24 ± 0.17 m/s and 1.22 ± 0.14 m/s. Inter-reader variability showed good to excellent agreement for myocardial stiffness (ICC = 0.92) and viscosity (ICC = 0.85).

Data conclusion: Cardiac MMRE is a promising and reproducible method for noninvasive assessment of diastolic LV stiffness and viscosity.

Level of evidence: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: 1.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.80%
发文量
494
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (JMRI) is an international journal devoted to the timely publication of basic and clinical research, educational and review articles, and other information related to the diagnostic applications of magnetic resonance.
期刊最新文献
Associations of Postencephalitic Epilepsy Using Multi-Contrast Whole Brain MRI: A Large Self-Supervised Vision Foundation Model Strategy. Influence of Multiband Technique on Temporal Diffusion Spectroscopy and Its Diagnostic Value in Breast Tumors. Application of Anti-Motion Ultra-Fast Quantitative MRI in Neurological Disorder Imaging: Insights From Huntington's Disease. Editorial for "Identifying Primary Sites of Spinal Metastases: Expert-Derived Features vs. ResNet50 Model Using Non-Enhanced MRI". Effects of Static and Low-Frequency Magnetic Fields on Gene Expression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1