外科医生对全腹膜外 (TEP) 疝修补术术中并发症的处理方法。

Mehmet Esref Ulutas, Abdullah Hilmi Yılmaz
{"title":"外科医生对全腹膜外 (TEP) 疝修补术术中并发症的处理方法。","authors":"Mehmet Esref Ulutas, Abdullah Hilmi Yılmaz","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>This study aimed to determine the frequency of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) and how surgeons managed complications such as intraoperative bleeding, organ damage, and peritoneal injury that may develop during this procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data for the study were collected through an electronic survey created using Google Forms and sent using WhatsApp in May 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 220 of 250 surgeons (88%) working in 25 healthcare centers located in different regions where the survey was distributed. Fourteen respondents with missing data were excluded from the study. The mean age of the remaining 206 participants was 39.6 (27-69) years. The rate of surgeons using laparoscopic techniques in inguinal hernia surgery was 89.3%. The method most preferred by the surgeons performing LIHR was total extraperitoneal (TEP) repair (60.9%), followed by transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair (39.1%). The surgeons preferred open procedures in patients with a history of lower abdominal surgery, those with scrotal hernia, and elderly patients. Additionally, in cases of intraoperative complications that developed at different stages of TEP, it was observed that participants mostly convert to the TAPP technique (43.5-46%), and in some cases, almost all participants continued the procedure with the same technique, i.e., TEP repair (94.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study revealed that surgeons preferred open procedures in some specific patient groups, but they mostly preferred LIHR in the remaining cases. Young surgeons, in particular, seem more inclined to employ laparoscopic methods. In cases of intraoperative complications, most surgeons chose to continue with laparoscopic techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11495859/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgeons' Approach to Intraoperative Complications in Total Extraperitoneal (TEP) Hernia Repair.\",\"authors\":\"Mehmet Esref Ulutas, Abdullah Hilmi Yılmaz\",\"doi\":\"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>This study aimed to determine the frequency of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) and how surgeons managed complications such as intraoperative bleeding, organ damage, and peritoneal injury that may develop during this procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data for the study were collected through an electronic survey created using Google Forms and sent using WhatsApp in May 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 220 of 250 surgeons (88%) working in 25 healthcare centers located in different regions where the survey was distributed. Fourteen respondents with missing data were excluded from the study. The mean age of the remaining 206 participants was 39.6 (27-69) years. The rate of surgeons using laparoscopic techniques in inguinal hernia surgery was 89.3%. The method most preferred by the surgeons performing LIHR was total extraperitoneal (TEP) repair (60.9%), followed by transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair (39.1%). The surgeons preferred open procedures in patients with a history of lower abdominal surgery, those with scrotal hernia, and elderly patients. Additionally, in cases of intraoperative complications that developed at different stages of TEP, it was observed that participants mostly convert to the TAPP technique (43.5-46%), and in some cases, almost all participants continued the procedure with the same technique, i.e., TEP repair (94.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study revealed that surgeons preferred open procedures in some specific patient groups, but they mostly preferred LIHR in the remaining cases. Young surgeons, in particular, seem more inclined to employ laparoscopic methods. In cases of intraoperative complications, most surgeons chose to continue with laparoscopic techniques.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11495859/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2024.00020\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2024.00020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:本研究旨在确定腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术(LIHR)的频率,以及外科医生如何处理术中出血、器官损伤和腹膜损伤等可能发生的并发症:研究数据通过使用谷歌表格制作的电子调查表收集,并于 2024 年 5 月使用 WhatsApp 发送:研究对象包括 250 名外科医生中的 220 人(88%),他们在调查问卷发放地不同地区的 25 家医疗中心工作。研究排除了 14 名数据缺失的受访者。其余 206 名参与者的平均年龄为 39.6(27-69)岁。在腹股沟疝气手术中使用腹腔镜技术的外科医生比例为 89.3%。进行腹股沟疝手术的外科医生最喜欢的方法是全腹膜外(TEP)修补术(60.9%),其次是经腹膜前(TAPP)修补术(39.1%)。对于有下腹部手术史的患者、阴囊疝患者和老年患者,外科医生更倾向于采用开放式手术。此外,在 TEP 不同阶段出现术中并发症的情况下,据观察,参与者大多转用 TAPP 技术(43.5%-46%),在某些情况下,几乎所有参与者都继续使用相同的技术进行手术,即 TEP 修复术(94.6%):本研究显示,外科医生在某些特定患者群体中更倾向于开放手术,但在其余病例中,他们大多更倾向于 LIHR。尤其是年轻外科医生,似乎更倾向于使用腹腔镜方法。在出现术中并发症的情况下,大多数外科医生选择继续使用腹腔镜技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Surgeons' Approach to Intraoperative Complications in Total Extraperitoneal (TEP) Hernia Repair.

Background and objectives: This study aimed to determine the frequency of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) and how surgeons managed complications such as intraoperative bleeding, organ damage, and peritoneal injury that may develop during this procedure.

Methods: The data for the study were collected through an electronic survey created using Google Forms and sent using WhatsApp in May 2024.

Results: The study included 220 of 250 surgeons (88%) working in 25 healthcare centers located in different regions where the survey was distributed. Fourteen respondents with missing data were excluded from the study. The mean age of the remaining 206 participants was 39.6 (27-69) years. The rate of surgeons using laparoscopic techniques in inguinal hernia surgery was 89.3%. The method most preferred by the surgeons performing LIHR was total extraperitoneal (TEP) repair (60.9%), followed by transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair (39.1%). The surgeons preferred open procedures in patients with a history of lower abdominal surgery, those with scrotal hernia, and elderly patients. Additionally, in cases of intraoperative complications that developed at different stages of TEP, it was observed that participants mostly convert to the TAPP technique (43.5-46%), and in some cases, almost all participants continued the procedure with the same technique, i.e., TEP repair (94.6%).

Conclusion: This study revealed that surgeons preferred open procedures in some specific patient groups, but they mostly preferred LIHR in the remaining cases. Young surgeons, in particular, seem more inclined to employ laparoscopic methods. In cases of intraoperative complications, most surgeons chose to continue with laparoscopic techniques.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons publishes original scientific articles on basic science and technical topics in all the fields involved with laparoscopic, robotic, and minimally invasive surgery. CRSLS, MIS Case Reports from SLS is dedicated to the publication of Case Reports in the field of minimally invasive surgery. The journals seek to advance our understandings and practice of minimally invasive, image-guided surgery by providing a forum for all relevant disciplines and by promoting the exchange of information and ideas across specialties.
期刊最新文献
Hysterectomy for Large Uterus by Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS). Surgeons' Approach to Intraoperative Complications in Total Extraperitoneal (TEP) Hernia Repair. Inferior-Medial Approach to Laparoscopic Splenic Vessel-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy. Comparative Analysis of Hemostasis and Staple-Line Integrity between Medtronic Tri-StapleTM with Preloaded Buttress Material and the AEONTM Stapler in Bariatric Surgery. Current Status and Role of Artificial Intelligence in Anorectal Diseases and Pelvic Floor Disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1