藻类补充剂对成人人体测量指标的影响:经过 GRADE 评估的随机对照试验的系统回顾和元分析》(A GRADE-Assessed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials)。

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Nutrition reviews Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1093/nutrit/nuae151
Shervin Kazeminejad, Pishva Arzhang, Mohammadreza Moradi Baniasadi, Alireza Hatami, Leila Azadbakht
{"title":"藻类补充剂对成人人体测量指标的影响:经过 GRADE 评估的随机对照试验的系统回顾和元分析》(A GRADE-Assessed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials)。","authors":"Shervin Kazeminejad, Pishva Arzhang, Mohammadreza Moradi Baniasadi, Alireza Hatami, Leila Azadbakht","doi":"10.1093/nutrit/nuae151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Inconsistent results have been reported regarding the effects of different types of algae, such as Spirulina and Chlorella, on anthropometric indices.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To conduct a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of algae supplementation on anthropometric indices.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A comprehensive systematic search was conducted to find relevant articles published from January 1990 to January 2024.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing algae supplementation with a placebo or control group were included. The risk of bias and certainty of the evidence were evaluated using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology, respectively. The random-effects model was used to find the Weighted mean differences (WMDs) for each outcome.</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>Of 9079 distinct articles in the initial screening, 61 clinical trials were included in this meta-analysis. Algae supplementation resulted in lower body mass index (WMD, -0.27 kg/m2 (95% CI, -0.42 to -0.13); GRADE rating, low), body weight (WMD: -0.78 kg [-1.18 to -0.38]; GRADE rating, low), waist circumference (WMD, -0.68 cm [-1.27 to -0.10]; GRADE rating, very low), kilograms of body fat (WMD, -0.65 kg [-1.13 to -0.17]; GRADE rating, low), and body fat percentage (WMD, -0.9% [-1.62 to -0.17]; GRADE rating, very low) compared with placebo or controls. Nevertheless, the statistically significant effects of algae supplementation on hip circumference (WMD, -0.20 cm [-0.73 to 0.32]; GRADE rating, moderate), waist to hip ratio (WMD, -0.01 [-0.01 to 0.00]; GRADE rating, moderate), and lean body mass (WMD, -0.30 kg [-0.62 to 0.02]; GRADE rating, moderate) were not observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the findings of this meta-analysis indicate supplementation with algae may exert beneficial effects on anthropometric indices. However, due to between-studies heterogeneity and very low to low levels of GRADE for significant outcomes, the results should be interpreted with caution.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO registration no. CRD42024522923.</p>","PeriodicalId":19469,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Algae Supplementation on Anthropometric Indices in Adults: A GRADE-Assessed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Shervin Kazeminejad, Pishva Arzhang, Mohammadreza Moradi Baniasadi, Alireza Hatami, Leila Azadbakht\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/nutrit/nuae151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Inconsistent results have been reported regarding the effects of different types of algae, such as Spirulina and Chlorella, on anthropometric indices.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To conduct a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of algae supplementation on anthropometric indices.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A comprehensive systematic search was conducted to find relevant articles published from January 1990 to January 2024.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing algae supplementation with a placebo or control group were included. The risk of bias and certainty of the evidence were evaluated using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology, respectively. The random-effects model was used to find the Weighted mean differences (WMDs) for each outcome.</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>Of 9079 distinct articles in the initial screening, 61 clinical trials were included in this meta-analysis. Algae supplementation resulted in lower body mass index (WMD, -0.27 kg/m2 (95% CI, -0.42 to -0.13); GRADE rating, low), body weight (WMD: -0.78 kg [-1.18 to -0.38]; GRADE rating, low), waist circumference (WMD, -0.68 cm [-1.27 to -0.10]; GRADE rating, very low), kilograms of body fat (WMD, -0.65 kg [-1.13 to -0.17]; GRADE rating, low), and body fat percentage (WMD, -0.9% [-1.62 to -0.17]; GRADE rating, very low) compared with placebo or controls. Nevertheless, the statistically significant effects of algae supplementation on hip circumference (WMD, -0.20 cm [-0.73 to 0.32]; GRADE rating, moderate), waist to hip ratio (WMD, -0.01 [-0.01 to 0.00]; GRADE rating, moderate), and lean body mass (WMD, -0.30 kg [-0.62 to 0.02]; GRADE rating, moderate) were not observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the findings of this meta-analysis indicate supplementation with algae may exert beneficial effects on anthropometric indices. However, due to between-studies heterogeneity and very low to low levels of GRADE for significant outcomes, the results should be interpreted with caution.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO registration no. CRD42024522923.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19469,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuae151\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuae151","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于螺旋藻和小球藻等不同类型的藻类对人体测量指数的影响,有报道称结果不一致:进行荟萃分析,评估补充藻类对人体测量指数的功效:数据提取:对1990年1月至2024年1月期间发表的相关文章进行了全面系统的检索:数据提取:纳入了将海藻补充剂与安慰剂或对照组进行比较的随机对照试验(RCT)。分别使用科克伦偏倚风险工具和建议评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)方法对证据的偏倚风险和确定性进行评估。数据分析采用随机效应模型计算每项结果的加权平均差(WMDs):在初步筛选的 9079 篇文章中,有 61 项临床试验被纳入本次荟萃分析。补充海藻可降低体重指数(WMD,-0.27 kg/m2 (95% CI, -0.42 to -0.13);GRADE评分,低)、体重(WMD:-0.78 kg [-1.18 to -0.38];GRADE评分,低)、腰围(WMD,-0.68 cm [-1.27至-0.10];GRADE评分,极低)、体脂公斤数(WMD,-0.65公斤[-1.13至-0.17];GRADE评分,低)和体脂百分比(WMD,-0.9%[-1.62至-0.17];GRADE评分,极低)与安慰剂或对照组相比。然而,藻类补充剂对臀围(WMD,-0.20厘米[-0.73至0.32];GRADE评分,中等)、腰臀比(WMD,-0.01[-0.01至0.00];GRADE评分,中等)和瘦体重(WMD,-0.30千克[-0.62至0.02];GRADE评分,中等)的影响没有统计学意义:总体而言,这项荟萃分析的结果表明,补充藻类可对人体测量指数产生有益影响。然而,由于研究之间存在异质性,且重要结果的 GRADE 评级很低至很低,因此在解释结果时应谨慎:系统综述注册:PROSPERO 注册号CRD42024522923。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Effect of Algae Supplementation on Anthropometric Indices in Adults: A GRADE-Assessed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Context: Inconsistent results have been reported regarding the effects of different types of algae, such as Spirulina and Chlorella, on anthropometric indices.

Objective: To conduct a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of algae supplementation on anthropometric indices.

Data sources: A comprehensive systematic search was conducted to find relevant articles published from January 1990 to January 2024.

Data extraction: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing algae supplementation with a placebo or control group were included. The risk of bias and certainty of the evidence were evaluated using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology, respectively. The random-effects model was used to find the Weighted mean differences (WMDs) for each outcome.

Data analysis: Of 9079 distinct articles in the initial screening, 61 clinical trials were included in this meta-analysis. Algae supplementation resulted in lower body mass index (WMD, -0.27 kg/m2 (95% CI, -0.42 to -0.13); GRADE rating, low), body weight (WMD: -0.78 kg [-1.18 to -0.38]; GRADE rating, low), waist circumference (WMD, -0.68 cm [-1.27 to -0.10]; GRADE rating, very low), kilograms of body fat (WMD, -0.65 kg [-1.13 to -0.17]; GRADE rating, low), and body fat percentage (WMD, -0.9% [-1.62 to -0.17]; GRADE rating, very low) compared with placebo or controls. Nevertheless, the statistically significant effects of algae supplementation on hip circumference (WMD, -0.20 cm [-0.73 to 0.32]; GRADE rating, moderate), waist to hip ratio (WMD, -0.01 [-0.01 to 0.00]; GRADE rating, moderate), and lean body mass (WMD, -0.30 kg [-0.62 to 0.02]; GRADE rating, moderate) were not observed.

Conclusions: Overall, the findings of this meta-analysis indicate supplementation with algae may exert beneficial effects on anthropometric indices. However, due to between-studies heterogeneity and very low to low levels of GRADE for significant outcomes, the results should be interpreted with caution.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO registration no. CRD42024522923.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition reviews
Nutrition reviews 医学-营养学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition Reviews is a highly cited, monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that specializes in the publication of authoritative and critical literature reviews on current and emerging topics in nutrition science, food science, clinical nutrition, and nutrition policy. Readers of Nutrition Reviews include nutrition scientists, biomedical researchers, clinical and dietetic practitioners, and advanced students of nutrition.
期刊最新文献
Fiber intake and fiber intervention in depression and anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized controlled trials. Effects of carnosine and histidine-containing dipeptides on biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Effects of intermittent fasting combined with physical exercise on cardiometabolic outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies. Energy and nutrient intake by people with and without sarcopenia diagnosed by the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Impact of ketogenic diet on cardiovascular disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1