{"title":"划分 2 型躁狂症和重度抑郁症的大脑功能网络和结构。","authors":"Yen-Ling Chen, Jia-En Jhou, Ya-Mei Bai, Mu-Hong Chen, Pei-Chi Tu, Yu-Te Wu","doi":"10.1016/bs.pbr.2024.05.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Distinguishing between type 2 bipolar disorder (BD II) and major depressive disorder (MDD) poses a significant clinical challenge due to their overlapping symptomatology. This study aimed to investigate neurobiological markers that differentiate BD II from MDD using multimodal neuroimaging techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-nine individuals with BD II, 114 with MDD, and 117 healthy controls participated in the study, undergoing structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging. Functional connectivity (FC) analysis used regions from Shen's whole-brain FC-based atlas. Feature selection was carried out using independent t-tests and ReliefF algorithms, followed by classification using Support Vector Machine and wide neural network.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences in brain structure and function were observed among patients with BD II, MDD, and healthy controls. Both structural and functional alterations were more pronounced in BD II compared to MDD, particularly in regions associated with sensory processing, motor function, and the cerebellum. Classification based on neurobiological markers achieved a mean testing accuracy of 88.24%, with the t-test selected features outperforming those selected by ReliefF. Dysconnectivity patterns correlated with symptom severity and functioning in BD II but not MDD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that neurobiological markers derived from multimodal imaging techniques can effectively differentiate patients with BD II from those with MDD. The identified alterations in brain structure and function, particularly in sensory-motor processing networks, may serve as potential biomarkers for distinguishing between these mood disorders. However, the influence of psychotropic medications and daily functioning severity on these neurobiological markers warrants further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":20598,"journal":{"name":"Progress in brain research","volume":"290 ","pages":"63-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brain functional networks and structures that categorize type 2 bipolar disorder and major depression.\",\"authors\":\"Yen-Ling Chen, Jia-En Jhou, Ya-Mei Bai, Mu-Hong Chen, Pei-Chi Tu, Yu-Te Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/bs.pbr.2024.05.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Distinguishing between type 2 bipolar disorder (BD II) and major depressive disorder (MDD) poses a significant clinical challenge due to their overlapping symptomatology. This study aimed to investigate neurobiological markers that differentiate BD II from MDD using multimodal neuroimaging techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-nine individuals with BD II, 114 with MDD, and 117 healthy controls participated in the study, undergoing structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging. Functional connectivity (FC) analysis used regions from Shen's whole-brain FC-based atlas. Feature selection was carried out using independent t-tests and ReliefF algorithms, followed by classification using Support Vector Machine and wide neural network.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences in brain structure and function were observed among patients with BD II, MDD, and healthy controls. Both structural and functional alterations were more pronounced in BD II compared to MDD, particularly in regions associated with sensory processing, motor function, and the cerebellum. Classification based on neurobiological markers achieved a mean testing accuracy of 88.24%, with the t-test selected features outperforming those selected by ReliefF. Dysconnectivity patterns correlated with symptom severity and functioning in BD II but not MDD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that neurobiological markers derived from multimodal imaging techniques can effectively differentiate patients with BD II from those with MDD. The identified alterations in brain structure and function, particularly in sensory-motor processing networks, may serve as potential biomarkers for distinguishing between these mood disorders. However, the influence of psychotropic medications and daily functioning severity on these neurobiological markers warrants further investigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20598,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in brain research\",\"volume\":\"290 \",\"pages\":\"63-81\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in brain research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2024.05.008\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Neuroscience\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in brain research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2024.05.008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:由于双相情感障碍(BD II)和重度抑郁障碍(MDD)的症状表现相互重叠,因此如何区分这两种疾病是一项重大的临床挑战。本研究旨在利用多模态神经影像学技术研究区分 BD II 和 MDD 的神经生物学标志物:59名BD II患者、114名MDD患者和117名健康对照者参加了研究,并接受了结构和功能磁共振成像检查。功能连通性(FC)分析使用了Shen基于全脑FC图谱的区域。使用独立 t 检验和 ReliefF 算法进行特征选择,然后使用支持向量机和宽神经网络进行分类:结果:在 BD II、MDD 患者和健康对照组之间观察到了大脑结构和功能的显著差异。与 MDD 相比,BD II 患者的结构和功能改变更为明显,尤其是在与感觉处理、运动功能和小脑相关的区域。基于神经生物学标记的分类平均测试准确率为 88.24%,t 检验所选特征优于 ReliefF 所选特征。异常连接模式与 BD II 的症状严重程度和功能相关,但与 MDD 无关:我们的研究结果表明,从多模态成像技术中提取的神经生物学标记可有效区分 BD II 和 MDD 患者。已发现的大脑结构和功能改变,尤其是感觉运动处理网络的改变,可作为区分这些情绪障碍的潜在生物标志物。然而,精神药物和日常功能严重程度对这些神经生物学标志物的影响还需要进一步研究。
Brain functional networks and structures that categorize type 2 bipolar disorder and major depression.
Background: Distinguishing between type 2 bipolar disorder (BD II) and major depressive disorder (MDD) poses a significant clinical challenge due to their overlapping symptomatology. This study aimed to investigate neurobiological markers that differentiate BD II from MDD using multimodal neuroimaging techniques.
Methods: Fifty-nine individuals with BD II, 114 with MDD, and 117 healthy controls participated in the study, undergoing structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging. Functional connectivity (FC) analysis used regions from Shen's whole-brain FC-based atlas. Feature selection was carried out using independent t-tests and ReliefF algorithms, followed by classification using Support Vector Machine and wide neural network.
Results: Significant differences in brain structure and function were observed among patients with BD II, MDD, and healthy controls. Both structural and functional alterations were more pronounced in BD II compared to MDD, particularly in regions associated with sensory processing, motor function, and the cerebellum. Classification based on neurobiological markers achieved a mean testing accuracy of 88.24%, with the t-test selected features outperforming those selected by ReliefF. Dysconnectivity patterns correlated with symptom severity and functioning in BD II but not MDD.
Conclusion: Our findings suggest that neurobiological markers derived from multimodal imaging techniques can effectively differentiate patients with BD II from those with MDD. The identified alterations in brain structure and function, particularly in sensory-motor processing networks, may serve as potential biomarkers for distinguishing between these mood disorders. However, the influence of psychotropic medications and daily functioning severity on these neurobiological markers warrants further investigation.
期刊介绍:
Progress in Brain Research is the most acclaimed and accomplished series in neuroscience. The serial is well-established as an extensive documentation of contemporary advances in the field. The volumes contain authoritative reviews and original articles by invited specialists. The rigorous editing of the volumes assures that they will appeal to all laboratory and clinical brain research workers in the various disciplines: neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, neuroendocrinology, neuropathology, basic neurology, biological psychiatry and the behavioral sciences.