利用技术支持基于测量的护理:测量辅助护理计划的设计与实施。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Psychiatric services Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1176/appi.ps.20240135
Dana Steidtmann, Katie E Raffel, Joel Green, Edward MacPhee, Sarah Nagle-Yang, Sarah Schwenk, Danielle Cooke, Alejandra C Santisteban, Allison G Dempsey
{"title":"利用技术支持基于测量的护理:测量辅助护理计划的设计与实施。","authors":"Dana Steidtmann, Katie E Raffel, Joel Green, Edward MacPhee, Sarah Nagle-Yang, Sarah Schwenk, Danielle Cooke, Alejandra C Santisteban, Allison G Dempsey","doi":"10.1176/appi.ps.20240135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The authors aimed to increase measurement-based care in an outpatient academic psychiatry service.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Measurement-Assisted Care program (MAC) was implemented as a clinical quality-improvement effort that included 4,665 unique patients and 176 clinicians over 12 months. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7), PTSD Checklist for DSM-5, and Brief Inventory of Thriving were automatically included in the patient electronic check-in process for new visits; the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 were included for return visits. Patient responses were automatically routed to clinicians' electronic health record inboxes and documentation templates. MAC was rolled out in two phases, and clinicians were surveyed about their use of MAC data 3-6 months after the start of the program.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After implementation of MAC, PHQ-9 completion rates increased from 5% to 66% of visits for phase 1 and from 5% to 60% for phase 2. Post-MAC completion rates were higher for telehealth (70%) than for in-person (40%) visits. More than 90% of clinicians reported that MAC was useful with at least one of their three most recent patients, and 51% reported that it was useful with all three of their three most recent patients. Clinician adoption was high, with 78% reporting that they use MAC data to guide care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MAC increased the completion rate of patient-reported outcome measures, especially for telehealth visits. Clinicians reported that they frequently use and discuss MAC data with patients, implying that technology-supported workflows can help systems with high telehealth utilization capture and use patient-reported outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20878,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric services","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Technology to Support Measurement-Based Care: Design and Implementation of the Measurement-Assisted Care Program.\",\"authors\":\"Dana Steidtmann, Katie E Raffel, Joel Green, Edward MacPhee, Sarah Nagle-Yang, Sarah Schwenk, Danielle Cooke, Alejandra C Santisteban, Allison G Dempsey\",\"doi\":\"10.1176/appi.ps.20240135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The authors aimed to increase measurement-based care in an outpatient academic psychiatry service.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Measurement-Assisted Care program (MAC) was implemented as a clinical quality-improvement effort that included 4,665 unique patients and 176 clinicians over 12 months. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7), PTSD Checklist for DSM-5, and Brief Inventory of Thriving were automatically included in the patient electronic check-in process for new visits; the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 were included for return visits. Patient responses were automatically routed to clinicians' electronic health record inboxes and documentation templates. MAC was rolled out in two phases, and clinicians were surveyed about their use of MAC data 3-6 months after the start of the program.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After implementation of MAC, PHQ-9 completion rates increased from 5% to 66% of visits for phase 1 and from 5% to 60% for phase 2. Post-MAC completion rates were higher for telehealth (70%) than for in-person (40%) visits. More than 90% of clinicians reported that MAC was useful with at least one of their three most recent patients, and 51% reported that it was useful with all three of their three most recent patients. Clinician adoption was high, with 78% reporting that they use MAC data to guide care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MAC increased the completion rate of patient-reported outcome measures, especially for telehealth visits. Clinicians reported that they frequently use and discuss MAC data with patients, implying that technology-supported workflows can help systems with high telehealth utilization capture and use patient-reported outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20878,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatric services\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatric services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.20240135\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric services","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.20240135","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的作者旨在提高精神科门诊学术服务中基于测量的护理水平:测量辅助护理计划(MAC)作为一项提高临床质量的工作得以实施,在 12 个月的时间里共纳入了 4665 名患者和 176 名临床医生。患者健康问卷-9 (PHQ-9)、广泛性焦虑症量表 (GAD-7)、DSM-5创伤后应激障碍核对表和茁壮成长简表被自动纳入新就诊患者的电子签到流程;PHQ-9 和 GAD-7 被纳入复诊患者的电子签到流程。患者的回复会自动发送到临床医生的电子健康记录收件箱和文档模板中。MAC 分两个阶段推出,并在计划开始 3-6 个月后对临床医生使用 MAC 数据的情况进行了调查:结果:实施 MAC 后,PHQ-9 的完成率在第一阶段从 5%上升到 66%,在第二阶段从 5%上升到 60%。实施 MAC 后,远程医疗的完成率(70%)高于面对面就诊的完成率(40%)。超过 90% 的临床医生表示,MAC 对他们最近接诊的三名患者中的至少一名患者有用,51% 的临床医生表示,MAC 对他们最近接诊的三名患者中的所有三名患者都有用。临床医生对 MAC 的采用率很高,78% 的临床医生表示他们使用 MAC 数据来指导治疗:结论:MAC 提高了患者报告结果测量的完成率,尤其是远程医疗就诊的完成率。临床医生表示,他们经常使用 MAC 数据并与患者进行讨论,这意味着技术支持的工作流程可以帮助远程医疗利用率高的系统获取并使用患者报告的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using Technology to Support Measurement-Based Care: Design and Implementation of the Measurement-Assisted Care Program.

Objective: The authors aimed to increase measurement-based care in an outpatient academic psychiatry service.

Methods: The Measurement-Assisted Care program (MAC) was implemented as a clinical quality-improvement effort that included 4,665 unique patients and 176 clinicians over 12 months. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7), PTSD Checklist for DSM-5, and Brief Inventory of Thriving were automatically included in the patient electronic check-in process for new visits; the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 were included for return visits. Patient responses were automatically routed to clinicians' electronic health record inboxes and documentation templates. MAC was rolled out in two phases, and clinicians were surveyed about their use of MAC data 3-6 months after the start of the program.

Results: After implementation of MAC, PHQ-9 completion rates increased from 5% to 66% of visits for phase 1 and from 5% to 60% for phase 2. Post-MAC completion rates were higher for telehealth (70%) than for in-person (40%) visits. More than 90% of clinicians reported that MAC was useful with at least one of their three most recent patients, and 51% reported that it was useful with all three of their three most recent patients. Clinician adoption was high, with 78% reporting that they use MAC data to guide care.

Conclusions: MAC increased the completion rate of patient-reported outcome measures, especially for telehealth visits. Clinicians reported that they frequently use and discuss MAC data with patients, implying that technology-supported workflows can help systems with high telehealth utilization capture and use patient-reported outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatric services
Psychiatric services 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.90%
发文量
295
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychiatric Services, established in 1950, is published monthly by the American Psychiatric Association. The peer-reviewed journal features research reports on issues related to the delivery of mental health services, especially for people with serious mental illness in community-based treatment programs. Long known as an interdisciplinary journal, Psychiatric Services recognizes that provision of high-quality care involves collaboration among a variety of professionals, frequently working as a team. Authors of research reports published in the journal include psychiatrists, psychologists, pharmacists, nurses, social workers, drug and alcohol treatment counselors, economists, policy analysts, and professionals in related systems such as criminal justice and welfare systems. In the mental health field, the current focus on patient-centered, recovery-oriented care and on dissemination of evidence-based practices is transforming service delivery systems at all levels. Research published in Psychiatric Services contributes to this transformation.
期刊最新文献
Clinic-Level Predictors of Psychotherapy Dosage in the Military Health System. Factor Structure, Reliability, and Construct Validity of the Wellness Inventory. Understanding Involuntary Hospitalization Applications Submitted to an Urban Police Department. Changes in Mental Health Services Use Under the ACA in One State: Role of Mental Health Provider Shortages. Association of Inpatient Occupational Therapy Utilization With Reduced Risk for Psychiatric Readmission Among Veterans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1