COVID-19 大流行期间和之后院外心脏骤停复苏质量的变化。

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Resuscitation Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110419
Charlotte Kennedy, Emily Nehme, David Anderson, Ashanti Dantanarayana, Belinda Delardes, Ziad Nehme
{"title":"COVID-19 大流行期间和之后院外心脏骤停复苏质量的变化。","authors":"Charlotte Kennedy, Emily Nehme, David Anderson, Ashanti Dantanarayana, Belinda Delardes, Ziad Nehme","doi":"10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The impact of personal protective equipment (PPE) on resuscitation quality is largely unknown. We sought to examine the effect of PPE requirements on CPR quality and resuscitation interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic in Victoria, Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult OHCA patients of medical aetiology who received attempted resuscitation. The study consisted of three periods; a pre-COVID-19 period (1st March 2019 to 15th March 2020), the COVID-19 period (16th March 2020 to 12th October 2022) and a post-COVID-19 period (13th October 2022 to 30th June 2023). Multivariable quantile and logistic regression were used to examine changes in CPR metrics and time to resuscitation interventions across the three periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 8,956 patients (2,389 pre-COVID-19, 4,935 during COVID-19 and 1,632 post-COVID-19). A number of CPR quality metrics deteriorated during the COVID-19 period compared to the pre-COVID-19 period, including: chest compression fraction (median difference [MD] -0.81 percentage points; 95% CI -1.07,-0.56), release velocity (MD -5.26 mm per second; 95% CI -9.79, -0.72) and resuscitation duration (MD -2.2 min; 95% CI -3.39, -1.05). The COVID-19 period was also associated with longer post-shock pauses (MD 0.22 s; 95% CI 0.05, 0.38), and a reduction in the risk-adjusted odds of receiving adrenaline administration within 5 mins (AOR 0.72, 95% CI 0.63 - 0.82) and laryngeal mask insertion within 10 mins of arrival (AOR 0.83, 95% CI 0.74 - 0.94). These factors, with the exception of resuscitation duration and time to larygeal mask insertion, remained significantly different from baseline for the post-COVID-19 period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Several CPR quality metrics declined during the COVID-19 period and some remain below pre-pandemic levels. Further research is needed to understand these impacts on OHCA outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":21052,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation","volume":" ","pages":"110419"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation quality during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Charlotte Kennedy, Emily Nehme, David Anderson, Ashanti Dantanarayana, Belinda Delardes, Ziad Nehme\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110419\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The impact of personal protective equipment (PPE) on resuscitation quality is largely unknown. We sought to examine the effect of PPE requirements on CPR quality and resuscitation interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic in Victoria, Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult OHCA patients of medical aetiology who received attempted resuscitation. The study consisted of three periods; a pre-COVID-19 period (1st March 2019 to 15th March 2020), the COVID-19 period (16th March 2020 to 12th October 2022) and a post-COVID-19 period (13th October 2022 to 30th June 2023). Multivariable quantile and logistic regression were used to examine changes in CPR metrics and time to resuscitation interventions across the three periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 8,956 patients (2,389 pre-COVID-19, 4,935 during COVID-19 and 1,632 post-COVID-19). A number of CPR quality metrics deteriorated during the COVID-19 period compared to the pre-COVID-19 period, including: chest compression fraction (median difference [MD] -0.81 percentage points; 95% CI -1.07,-0.56), release velocity (MD -5.26 mm per second; 95% CI -9.79, -0.72) and resuscitation duration (MD -2.2 min; 95% CI -3.39, -1.05). The COVID-19 period was also associated with longer post-shock pauses (MD 0.22 s; 95% CI 0.05, 0.38), and a reduction in the risk-adjusted odds of receiving adrenaline administration within 5 mins (AOR 0.72, 95% CI 0.63 - 0.82) and laryngeal mask insertion within 10 mins of arrival (AOR 0.83, 95% CI 0.74 - 0.94). These factors, with the exception of resuscitation duration and time to larygeal mask insertion, remained significantly different from baseline for the post-COVID-19 period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Several CPR quality metrics declined during the COVID-19 period and some remain below pre-pandemic levels. Further research is needed to understand these impacts on OHCA outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resuscitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"110419\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resuscitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110419\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110419","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:个人防护设备 (PPE) 对复苏质量的影响在很大程度上还不为人所知。我们试图研究澳大利亚维多利亚州 COVID-19 大流行期间个人防护设备要求对心肺复苏质量和复苏干预的影响:我们对接受尝试性复苏的医源性成人 OHCA 患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。研究包括三个阶段:COVID-19 前阶段(2019 年 3 月 1 日至 2020 年 3 月 15 日)、COVID-19 阶段(2020 年 3 月 16 日至 2022 年 10 月 12 日)和 COVID-19 后阶段(2022 年 10 月 13 日至 2023 年 6 月 30 日)。采用多变量量化回归和逻辑回归研究心肺复苏指标和复苏干预时间在三个时期的变化 结果:我们纳入了 8956 例患者(COVID-19 前 2389 例,COVID-19 期间 4935 例,COVID-19 后 1632 例)。与 COVID-19 前相比,COVID-19 期间的一些心肺复苏质量指标有所下降,包括:胸外按压分数(中位数差异 [MD] -0.81 个百分点;95% CI -1.07,-0.56 )、释放速度(MD -5.26 毫米/秒;95% CI -9.79, -0.72)和复苏持续时间(MD -2.2 分钟;95% CI -3.39, -1.05)。COVID-19 期间还与电击后暂停时间较长(MD 0.22 秒;95% CI 0.05,0.38)以及在到达后 5 分钟内注射肾上腺素(AOR 0.72,95% CI 0.63 - 0.82)和在到达后 10 分钟内插入喉罩(AOR 0.83,95% CI 0.74 - 0.94)的风险调整几率降低有关。除复苏持续时间和喉罩插入时间外,这些因素在COVID-19后仍与基线有显著差异:结论:在 COVID-19 期间,一些心肺复苏质量指标有所下降,有些指标仍低于大流行前的水平。需要进一步研究以了解这些指标对 OHCA 结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Changes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation quality during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Aim: The impact of personal protective equipment (PPE) on resuscitation quality is largely unknown. We sought to examine the effect of PPE requirements on CPR quality and resuscitation interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic in Victoria, Australia.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult OHCA patients of medical aetiology who received attempted resuscitation. The study consisted of three periods; a pre-COVID-19 period (1st March 2019 to 15th March 2020), the COVID-19 period (16th March 2020 to 12th October 2022) and a post-COVID-19 period (13th October 2022 to 30th June 2023). Multivariable quantile and logistic regression were used to examine changes in CPR metrics and time to resuscitation interventions across the three periods.

Results: We included 8,956 patients (2,389 pre-COVID-19, 4,935 during COVID-19 and 1,632 post-COVID-19). A number of CPR quality metrics deteriorated during the COVID-19 period compared to the pre-COVID-19 period, including: chest compression fraction (median difference [MD] -0.81 percentage points; 95% CI -1.07,-0.56), release velocity (MD -5.26 mm per second; 95% CI -9.79, -0.72) and resuscitation duration (MD -2.2 min; 95% CI -3.39, -1.05). The COVID-19 period was also associated with longer post-shock pauses (MD 0.22 s; 95% CI 0.05, 0.38), and a reduction in the risk-adjusted odds of receiving adrenaline administration within 5 mins (AOR 0.72, 95% CI 0.63 - 0.82) and laryngeal mask insertion within 10 mins of arrival (AOR 0.83, 95% CI 0.74 - 0.94). These factors, with the exception of resuscitation duration and time to larygeal mask insertion, remained significantly different from baseline for the post-COVID-19 period.

Conclusion: Several CPR quality metrics declined during the COVID-19 period and some remain below pre-pandemic levels. Further research is needed to understand these impacts on OHCA outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resuscitation
Resuscitation 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
18.50%
发文量
556
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Resuscitation is a monthly international and interdisciplinary medical journal. The papers published deal with the aetiology, pathophysiology and prevention of cardiac arrest, resuscitation training, clinical resuscitation, and experimental resuscitation research, although papers relating to animal studies will be published only if they are of exceptional interest and related directly to clinical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Papers relating to trauma are published occasionally but the majority of these concern traumatic cardiac arrest.
期刊最新文献
Implications of an Individualized Resuscitation Strategy Using Continuous Rhythm and Physiologic Status Assessment During Ongoing CPR. Unraveling some of the myth about drowning, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and outcomes: Many critical factors and processes, most of them disappointingly difficult to manage. Who put the "E" in CPR: Equity before Extracorporeal? Using cardiac arrest registries for clinical trials by adding wagons to a rolling train. A retrospective 'target trial emulation' comparing amiodarone and lidocaine for adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1