Eugene Nshimiyimana, Pascal Ubuzima, Christelle Mukeshimana, Dimitrios Michelogiannakis, Dieudonne Mbyayingabo, Eric Mugabo, Dan Gakunzi, Evariste Ndanga, Patrick Mazimpaka, Janvier Habumugisha
{"title":"在恒牙期使用透明矫治器和微型螺钉固定矫治器进行骨骼和牙齿开牙合治疗:系统综述。","authors":"Eugene Nshimiyimana, Pascal Ubuzima, Christelle Mukeshimana, Dimitrios Michelogiannakis, Dieudonne Mbyayingabo, Eric Mugabo, Dan Gakunzi, Evariste Ndanga, Patrick Mazimpaka, Janvier Habumugisha","doi":"10.1016/j.ejwf.2024.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The objective was to systematically review studies assessing the efficacy of clear aligner therapy (CAT) and miniscrew-anchored fixed appliances (MAFAs) in the correction of skeletal and dental open bite in the permanent dentition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted across different databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, Web of Science, Medline, Scopus and Google Scholar, up to April 2024. Studies were chosen based on prespecified inclusion criteria. The dentoskeletal changes based on lateral cephalometry were evaluated from the included papers. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias (RoB) assessment were performed in duplicate. Risk of bias assessment was done using ROBINS-I (Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions) and Cochrane RoB 2 tools. GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) assessed certainty of evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 22 studies that were selected, 13 papers covered MAFAs, while 9 articles focused on CATs. Since the included papers consist of prospective and retrospective observational studies, as well as two randomized controlled trials, the scientific evidence is at a low level. CATs primarily induced posterior teeth intrusion and anterior teeth extrusion, contributing to the reduction of the posterior vertical dimension and improved occlusal contacts. Conversely, MAFAs facilitated significant molars intrusion, and controlled anterior teeth extrusion, effectively addressing both dental and skeletal discrepancies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review supports the use of MAFAs and CATs for treating skeletal and dental open bite, highlighting their effectiveness and implications for orthodontic practice. The limitations of this study should be considered when interpreting the results.</p>","PeriodicalId":43456,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Skeletal and dental open bite treatment using clear aligners and orthodontic miniscrew-anchored fixed appliances in permanent dentition: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Eugene Nshimiyimana, Pascal Ubuzima, Christelle Mukeshimana, Dimitrios Michelogiannakis, Dieudonne Mbyayingabo, Eric Mugabo, Dan Gakunzi, Evariste Ndanga, Patrick Mazimpaka, Janvier Habumugisha\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejwf.2024.09.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The objective was to systematically review studies assessing the efficacy of clear aligner therapy (CAT) and miniscrew-anchored fixed appliances (MAFAs) in the correction of skeletal and dental open bite in the permanent dentition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted across different databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, Web of Science, Medline, Scopus and Google Scholar, up to April 2024. Studies were chosen based on prespecified inclusion criteria. The dentoskeletal changes based on lateral cephalometry were evaluated from the included papers. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias (RoB) assessment were performed in duplicate. Risk of bias assessment was done using ROBINS-I (Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions) and Cochrane RoB 2 tools. GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) assessed certainty of evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 22 studies that were selected, 13 papers covered MAFAs, while 9 articles focused on CATs. Since the included papers consist of prospective and retrospective observational studies, as well as two randomized controlled trials, the scientific evidence is at a low level. CATs primarily induced posterior teeth intrusion and anterior teeth extrusion, contributing to the reduction of the posterior vertical dimension and improved occlusal contacts. Conversely, MAFAs facilitated significant molars intrusion, and controlled anterior teeth extrusion, effectively addressing both dental and skeletal discrepancies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review supports the use of MAFAs and CATs for treating skeletal and dental open bite, highlighting their effectiveness and implications for orthodontic practice. The limitations of this study should be considered when interpreting the results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43456,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejwf.2024.09.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejwf.2024.09.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:目的:系统回顾评估透明矫治器疗法(CAT)和微型螺钉固定矫治器(MAFAs)在矫正恒牙列骨骼和牙齿开合咬合方面疗效的研究:在不同的数据库中进行文献检索,包括 PubMed、Cochrane Library、Science Direct、Web of Science、Medline、Scopus 和 Google Scholar(截至 2024 年 4 月)。研究根据预先设定的纳入标准进行选择。从纳入的论文中评估了基于侧向头颅测量的牙骨骼变化。研究选择、数据提取和偏倚风险(RoB)评估一式两份。偏倚风险评估采用 ROBINS-I(非随机干预研究中的偏倚风险)和 Cochrane RoB 2 工具进行。GRADE(建议评估、制定和评价分级)对证据的确定性进行了评估:在所选的 22 项研究中,13 篇论文涉及 MAFAs,9 篇侧重于 CATs。由于纳入的论文包括前瞻性和回顾性观察研究,以及两项随机对照试验,因此科学证据的水平较低。CATs主要诱导后牙内陷和前牙挤出,有助于减少后牙垂直度和改善咬合接触。相反,MAFAs 能促进臼齿明显内收,并控制前牙挤出,有效解决牙齿和骨骼的差异:本综述支持使用 MAFAs 和 CATs 治疗骨骼和牙齿开合咬合,强调了它们的有效性和对正畸实践的影响。在解释结果时应考虑到本研究的局限性。
Skeletal and dental open bite treatment using clear aligners and orthodontic miniscrew-anchored fixed appliances in permanent dentition: A systematic review.
Background: The objective was to systematically review studies assessing the efficacy of clear aligner therapy (CAT) and miniscrew-anchored fixed appliances (MAFAs) in the correction of skeletal and dental open bite in the permanent dentition.
Methods: A literature search was conducted across different databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, Web of Science, Medline, Scopus and Google Scholar, up to April 2024. Studies were chosen based on prespecified inclusion criteria. The dentoskeletal changes based on lateral cephalometry were evaluated from the included papers. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias (RoB) assessment were performed in duplicate. Risk of bias assessment was done using ROBINS-I (Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions) and Cochrane RoB 2 tools. GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) assessed certainty of evidence.
Results: Out of the 22 studies that were selected, 13 papers covered MAFAs, while 9 articles focused on CATs. Since the included papers consist of prospective and retrospective observational studies, as well as two randomized controlled trials, the scientific evidence is at a low level. CATs primarily induced posterior teeth intrusion and anterior teeth extrusion, contributing to the reduction of the posterior vertical dimension and improved occlusal contacts. Conversely, MAFAs facilitated significant molars intrusion, and controlled anterior teeth extrusion, effectively addressing both dental and skeletal discrepancies.
Conclusions: This review supports the use of MAFAs and CATs for treating skeletal and dental open bite, highlighting their effectiveness and implications for orthodontic practice. The limitations of this study should be considered when interpreting the results.