自杀意念问卷(QSI):在成人和青少年临床人群中测量自杀意念的简易工具的心理计量特性》(Psychometric Properties of a Brief Tool Measuring Suicidal Ideation in Adult and Adolescent Clinical Populations)。

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psicothema Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.7334/psicothema2023.252
Mary Joyce, Conal Wrigley, Mary Kells, Catalina Suarez, Daniel Flynn, Ailbhe Spillane, Abigale Owens
{"title":"自杀意念问卷(QSI):在成人和青少年临床人群中测量自杀意念的简易工具的心理计量特性》(Psychometric Properties of a Brief Tool Measuring Suicidal Ideation in Adult and Adolescent Clinical Populations)。","authors":"Mary Joyce, Conal Wrigley, Mary Kells, Catalina Suarez, Daniel Flynn, Ailbhe Spillane, Abigale Owens","doi":"10.7334/psicothema2023.252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Identifying accurate methods of assessing suicidal ideation has important implications. The lack of a universal definition of suicidal ideation has complicated measurement efforts. This study details the development of a brief self-report measure of suicidal ideation which specifically focuses on thoughts of suicide.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The Questionnaire for Suicidal Ideation (QSI) was developed by collating items from three existing measures of suicidal ideation. Items explicitly describing acts or behaviours were removed and Posner et al.'s (2007) definition of suicidal ideation was applied to the remaining items. The final questionnaire consisted of 6 items. Participants were adults (n = 192) and adolescents (n = 152) attending community mental health services in the Irish public health service.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The QSI demonstrated excellent reliability in adult (α = .91) and adolescent ( = .90) samples. Exploratory factor analysis produced a one-factor solution explaining 70% and 66% of the variance in adult and adolescent samples respectively. Evidence of relation with other variables was demonstrated with strong correlations between the QSI and measures of depression, hopelessness and borderline symptoms (r = .48 - .68).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results suggest that the QSI may be a reliable and valid method of assessing suicidal ideation in clinical populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":48179,"journal":{"name":"Psicothema","volume":"36 4","pages":"361-368"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Questionnaire for Suicidal Ideation (QSI): Psychometric Properties of a Brief Tool Measuring Suicidal Ideation in Adult and Adolescent Clinical Populations.\",\"authors\":\"Mary Joyce, Conal Wrigley, Mary Kells, Catalina Suarez, Daniel Flynn, Ailbhe Spillane, Abigale Owens\",\"doi\":\"10.7334/psicothema2023.252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Identifying accurate methods of assessing suicidal ideation has important implications. The lack of a universal definition of suicidal ideation has complicated measurement efforts. This study details the development of a brief self-report measure of suicidal ideation which specifically focuses on thoughts of suicide.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The Questionnaire for Suicidal Ideation (QSI) was developed by collating items from three existing measures of suicidal ideation. Items explicitly describing acts or behaviours were removed and Posner et al.'s (2007) definition of suicidal ideation was applied to the remaining items. The final questionnaire consisted of 6 items. Participants were adults (n = 192) and adolescents (n = 152) attending community mental health services in the Irish public health service.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The QSI demonstrated excellent reliability in adult (α = .91) and adolescent ( = .90) samples. Exploratory factor analysis produced a one-factor solution explaining 70% and 66% of the variance in adult and adolescent samples respectively. Evidence of relation with other variables was demonstrated with strong correlations between the QSI and measures of depression, hopelessness and borderline symptoms (r = .48 - .68).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results suggest that the QSI may be a reliable and valid method of assessing suicidal ideation in clinical populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psicothema\",\"volume\":\"36 4\",\"pages\":\"361-368\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psicothema\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2023.252\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psicothema","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2023.252","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:确定评估自杀意念的准确方法具有重要意义。由于缺乏对自杀意念的通用定义,使得测量工作变得复杂。本研究详细介绍了一种简短的自杀意念自我报告测量方法的开发过程,该方法特别关注自杀意念:自杀意念问卷(QSI)是通过整理现有的三种自杀意念测量方法中的项目而编制的。其中明确描述行为或举止的项目被删除,Posner 等人(2007 年)对自杀意念的定义适用于其余项目。最终问卷由 6 个项目组成。调查对象为在爱尔兰公共卫生服务机构接受社区心理健康服务的成年人(192 人)和青少年(152 人):结果:QSI 在成人(= 0.91)和青少年(= 0.90)样本中显示出极佳的可靠性。探索性因子分析得出的单因子解分别解释了成人和青少年样本中 70% 和 66% 的变异。QSI与抑郁、绝望和边缘症状的测量结果(= .48 - .68)之间存在很强的相关性,证明了QSI与其他变量之间的关系:结果表明,QSI 可能是评估临床人群自杀意念的一种可靠而有效的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Questionnaire for Suicidal Ideation (QSI): Psychometric Properties of a Brief Tool Measuring Suicidal Ideation in Adult and Adolescent Clinical Populations.

Background: Identifying accurate methods of assessing suicidal ideation has important implications. The lack of a universal definition of suicidal ideation has complicated measurement efforts. This study details the development of a brief self-report measure of suicidal ideation which specifically focuses on thoughts of suicide.

Method: The Questionnaire for Suicidal Ideation (QSI) was developed by collating items from three existing measures of suicidal ideation. Items explicitly describing acts or behaviours were removed and Posner et al.'s (2007) definition of suicidal ideation was applied to the remaining items. The final questionnaire consisted of 6 items. Participants were adults (n = 192) and adolescents (n = 152) attending community mental health services in the Irish public health service.

Results: The QSI demonstrated excellent reliability in adult (α = .91) and adolescent ( = .90) samples. Exploratory factor analysis produced a one-factor solution explaining 70% and 66% of the variance in adult and adolescent samples respectively. Evidence of relation with other variables was demonstrated with strong correlations between the QSI and measures of depression, hopelessness and borderline symptoms (r = .48 - .68).

Conclusions: The results suggest that the QSI may be a reliable and valid method of assessing suicidal ideation in clinical populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psicothema
Psicothema PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
69
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: La revista Psicothema fue fundada en Asturias en 1989 y está editada conjuntamente por la Facultad y el Departamento de Psicología de la Universidad de Oviedo y el Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos del Principado de Asturias. Publica cuatro números al año. Se admiten trabajos tanto de investigación básica como aplicada, pertenecientes a cualquier ámbito de la Psicología, que previamente a su publicación son evaluados anónimamente por revisores externos. Psicothema está incluida en las bases de datos nacionales e internacionales más relevantes, entre las que cabe destacar Psychological Abstracts, Current Contents y MEDLINE/Index Medicus, entre otras. Además, figura en las listas de Factor de Impacto del Journal Citation Reports. Psicothema es una revista abierta a cualquier enfoque u orientación psicológica que venga avalada por la fuerza de los datos y los argumentos, y en la que encuentran acomodo todos los autores que sean capaces de convencer a los revisores de que sus manuscritos tienen la calidad para ser publicados. Psicothema es una revista de acceso abierto lo que significa que todo el contenido está a disposición de cualquier usuario o institución sin cargo alguno. Los usuarios pueden leer, descargar, copiar, distribuir, imprimir, buscar, o realizar enlaces a los textos completos de esta revista sin pedir permiso previo al editor o al autor, siempre y cuando la fuente original sea referenciada. Para acervos y repositorios, se prefiere que la cobertura se realice mediante enlaces a la propia web de Psicothema. Nos parece que una apuesta decidida por la calidad es el mejor modo de servir a nuestros lectores, cuyas sugerencias siempre serán bienvenidas.
期刊最新文献
Facing Fear and Embracing Safety: Validation of the COVID-19 Psychosocial Scales in Essential Frontline Workers During the Pandemic. Giftedness and Family Well-being: The Role of Emotional Intelligence, Perceived Social Support and Stress. Nighttime Fears and Coping Responses in School-Aged Children: A Latent Profile Analysis. Online Gendered Violence Victimization Among Adults: Prevalence, Predictors and Psychological Outcomes. Psychometric Properties of the Online Version of the General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7): A Longitudinal Study in Pregnant and Postpartum Spanish Women.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1