集体虚拟运动对帕金森病患者的影响:随机对照试验。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Physiotherapy Theory and Practice Pub Date : 2024-10-27 DOI:10.1080/09593985.2024.2420015
Sarah C Fishel, Megan E Hotchkiss, Christine A McNamara, Kaitlyn M Sevilla, Samantha A Brown
{"title":"集体虚拟运动对帕金森病患者的影响:随机对照试验。","authors":"Sarah C Fishel, Megan E Hotchkiss, Christine A McNamara, Kaitlyn M Sevilla, Samantha A Brown","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2024.2420015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For people with Parkinson's disease (PwPD), high-intensity exercise in individual or group format can improve function and quality of life (QoL). Individualized virtual exercise programs have been effective for people with PD, but the feasibility and impact of group exercise in the virtual format has not been investigated.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the effect of individual and group virtual exercise on functional mobility and QoL for PwPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty PwPD were randomized to individualized (<i>n</i> = 10) or group (<i>n</i> = 10) virtual exercise 2 times per week for 8 weeks. Exercises were multi-dimensional, and intensity was monitored with a wrist-worn heart rate (HR) monitor. Outcomes were assessed before and after the program, including standing balance, gait speed, gait endurance, motor function, QoL, and self-efficacy. Within-and between-group changes were analyzed using a mixed model analysis of variance (ANOVA) and nonparametric tests were used for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants attended over 75% of scheduled sessions. Within-group analysis showed statistically significant improvements in Five Times Sit-to-Stand (<i>p</i> < .01), mini-BESTest (<i>p</i> = .03), comfortable (<i>p</i> < .01) and fast gait speeds (<i>p</i> = .02), and gait endurance (<i>p</i> < .01) with large effect sizes (partial eta squared > 0.25). There were no statistically significant differences between groups on any outcomes (<i>p</i> > .09). In more than 70% of sessions, participants reached an exercise intensity ≥ 65% HR maximum.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This high-intensity, virtual exercise program was safe and effective at improving balance and functional mobility for community-dwelling PwPD in individual and group format. Virtual exercise programs, either in an individual or group format, can increase access to high-quality programs for PwPD.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of group virtual exercise on people with Parkinson's disease: A randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah C Fishel, Megan E Hotchkiss, Christine A McNamara, Kaitlyn M Sevilla, Samantha A Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09593985.2024.2420015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For people with Parkinson's disease (PwPD), high-intensity exercise in individual or group format can improve function and quality of life (QoL). Individualized virtual exercise programs have been effective for people with PD, but the feasibility and impact of group exercise in the virtual format has not been investigated.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the effect of individual and group virtual exercise on functional mobility and QoL for PwPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty PwPD were randomized to individualized (<i>n</i> = 10) or group (<i>n</i> = 10) virtual exercise 2 times per week for 8 weeks. Exercises were multi-dimensional, and intensity was monitored with a wrist-worn heart rate (HR) monitor. Outcomes were assessed before and after the program, including standing balance, gait speed, gait endurance, motor function, QoL, and self-efficacy. Within-and between-group changes were analyzed using a mixed model analysis of variance (ANOVA) and nonparametric tests were used for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants attended over 75% of scheduled sessions. Within-group analysis showed statistically significant improvements in Five Times Sit-to-Stand (<i>p</i> < .01), mini-BESTest (<i>p</i> = .03), comfortable (<i>p</i> < .01) and fast gait speeds (<i>p</i> = .02), and gait endurance (<i>p</i> < .01) with large effect sizes (partial eta squared > 0.25). There were no statistically significant differences between groups on any outcomes (<i>p</i> > .09). In more than 70% of sessions, participants reached an exercise intensity ≥ 65% HR maximum.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This high-intensity, virtual exercise program was safe and effective at improving balance and functional mobility for community-dwelling PwPD in individual and group format. Virtual exercise programs, either in an individual or group format, can increase access to high-quality programs for PwPD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2024.2420015\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2024.2420015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对于帕金森病患者(PwPD)而言,个人或集体形式的高强度锻炼可改善其功能和生活质量(QoL)。目的:比较个人和集体虚拟运动对帕金森病患者功能活动能力和生活质量的影响:20 名残疾人被随机分配到个性化(10 人)或集体(10 人)虚拟运动中,每周 2 次,持续 8 周。运动是多维度的,强度通过腕戴式心率(HR)监测器进行监测。对项目前后的结果进行评估,包括站立平衡、步态速度、步态耐力、运动功能、生活质量和自我效能。采用混合模型方差分析(ANOVA)和非参数检验对组内和组间的变化进行分析:结果:参与者参加了 75% 以上的预定课程。组内分析表明,在五次坐立(P P = .03)、舒适(P P = .02)和步态耐力(P 0.25)方面有显著的统计学进步。在任何结果上,组间差异均无统计学意义(P > .09)。在超过 70% 的课程中,参与者的运动强度达到了心率最大值的 65%:这种高强度的虚拟运动项目对于改善社区居住的残疾人的平衡能力和功能活动能力既安全又有效,既可以个人参与,也可以小组参与。无论是个人还是团体形式的虚拟运动项目,都能增加残疾人获得高质量项目的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of group virtual exercise on people with Parkinson's disease: A randomized controlled trial.

Background: For people with Parkinson's disease (PwPD), high-intensity exercise in individual or group format can improve function and quality of life (QoL). Individualized virtual exercise programs have been effective for people with PD, but the feasibility and impact of group exercise in the virtual format has not been investigated.

Purpose: To compare the effect of individual and group virtual exercise on functional mobility and QoL for PwPD.

Methods: Twenty PwPD were randomized to individualized (n = 10) or group (n = 10) virtual exercise 2 times per week for 8 weeks. Exercises were multi-dimensional, and intensity was monitored with a wrist-worn heart rate (HR) monitor. Outcomes were assessed before and after the program, including standing balance, gait speed, gait endurance, motor function, QoL, and self-efficacy. Within-and between-group changes were analyzed using a mixed model analysis of variance (ANOVA) and nonparametric tests were used for analysis.

Results: Participants attended over 75% of scheduled sessions. Within-group analysis showed statistically significant improvements in Five Times Sit-to-Stand (p < .01), mini-BESTest (p = .03), comfortable (p < .01) and fast gait speeds (p = .02), and gait endurance (p < .01) with large effect sizes (partial eta squared > 0.25). There were no statistically significant differences between groups on any outcomes (p > .09). In more than 70% of sessions, participants reached an exercise intensity ≥ 65% HR maximum.

Conclusion: This high-intensity, virtual exercise program was safe and effective at improving balance and functional mobility for community-dwelling PwPD in individual and group format. Virtual exercise programs, either in an individual or group format, can increase access to high-quality programs for PwPD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.
期刊最新文献
Investigation of pain activity patterns, disability, body awareness, proprioception and function in individuals with and without lumbar spinal decompression surgery. Variation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis presentation and outcomes based on phenotype and physical therapy movement system diagnosis: a case series. The prevalence, characteristics, and associated factors of pain in individuals with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Association between varus thrust and foot alignment and flexibility in knee osteoarthritis. Fear of movement interacts with trunk mobility, and pain intensity to predict disability in patients with chronic low back pain: a classification and regression tree (CART) analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1