腰椎融合内固定术对年轻患者腰椎间盘突出症的影响:回顾性研究

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q1 Medicine Medical Science Monitor Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.12659/MSM.944570
JiChao Guo, GuoHui Xu, Sheng Li, ZhiYong Li, JianNing Liu, Wei Wang, XiangBei Qi, WenYuan Ding, Xu Li
{"title":"腰椎融合内固定术对年轻患者腰椎间盘突出症的影响:回顾性研究","authors":"JiChao Guo, GuoHui Xu, Sheng Li, ZhiYong Li, JianNing Liu, Wei Wang, XiangBei Qi, WenYuan Ding, Xu Li","doi":"10.12659/MSM.944570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND Lumbar fusion and internal fixation techniques have shown promise in treating lumbar disc herniation (LDH), yet the impact on lumbar function in young patients remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the impact of lumbar fusion on lumbar function in young patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted on 330 patients diagnosed with LDH admitted to our hospital. Patients were divided into 2 groups: a control group (n=264) that underwent a minimally invasive procedure with a keyhole lens, and a research group (n=66) that underwent lumbar fusion internal fixation. Clinical features and therapeutic outcomes were assessed using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) Lumbar Scores before surgery and 12 months postoperatively. Additionally, intervertebral space height, degree of vertebral spondylolisthesis (grades I, II, and III), incidence of adverse effects, and treatment efficacy were measured pre-and post-surgically. RESULTS No significant difference in ODI and JOA scores was found between the groups before surgery (P>0.05). Postoperatively, the research group had lower ODI scores, higher JOA scores, and lower intervertebral space heights compared to the control group (P=0.001). While grade 1 and 2 spondylolisthesis showed slight improvement (P>0.05), a significant difference was observed in grade III spondylolisthesis between the 2 groups (P=0.001). Additionally, the research group had a lower incidence of adverse effects (P=0.049) and higher treatment efficacy, although the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS Lumbar fusion with internal fixation produced better postoperative outcomes and fewer adverse effects than minimally invasive procedures in young patients with lumbar disc herniation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48888,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Monitor","volume":"30 ","pages":"e944570"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11529090/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Lumbar Fusion Internal Fixation on Lumbar Disc Herniation in Young Patients: A Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"JiChao Guo, GuoHui Xu, Sheng Li, ZhiYong Li, JianNing Liu, Wei Wang, XiangBei Qi, WenYuan Ding, Xu Li\",\"doi\":\"10.12659/MSM.944570\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BACKGROUND Lumbar fusion and internal fixation techniques have shown promise in treating lumbar disc herniation (LDH), yet the impact on lumbar function in young patients remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the impact of lumbar fusion on lumbar function in young patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted on 330 patients diagnosed with LDH admitted to our hospital. Patients were divided into 2 groups: a control group (n=264) that underwent a minimally invasive procedure with a keyhole lens, and a research group (n=66) that underwent lumbar fusion internal fixation. Clinical features and therapeutic outcomes were assessed using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) Lumbar Scores before surgery and 12 months postoperatively. Additionally, intervertebral space height, degree of vertebral spondylolisthesis (grades I, II, and III), incidence of adverse effects, and treatment efficacy were measured pre-and post-surgically. RESULTS No significant difference in ODI and JOA scores was found between the groups before surgery (P>0.05). Postoperatively, the research group had lower ODI scores, higher JOA scores, and lower intervertebral space heights compared to the control group (P=0.001). While grade 1 and 2 spondylolisthesis showed slight improvement (P>0.05), a significant difference was observed in grade III spondylolisthesis between the 2 groups (P=0.001). Additionally, the research group had a lower incidence of adverse effects (P=0.049) and higher treatment efficacy, although the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS Lumbar fusion with internal fixation produced better postoperative outcomes and fewer adverse effects than minimally invasive procedures in young patients with lumbar disc herniation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Science Monitor\",\"volume\":\"30 \",\"pages\":\"e944570\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11529090/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Science Monitor\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.944570\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Monitor","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.944570","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景腰椎融合术和内固定技术在治疗腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)方面已显示出良好的前景,但对年轻患者腰椎功能的影响仍不清楚。本研究旨在探讨腰椎融合术对年轻患者腰椎功能的影响。材料与方法 对本院收治的 330 名 LDH 患者进行回顾性分析。患者分为两组:对照组(264 人)接受锁孔镜头微创手术,研究组(66 人)接受腰椎融合内固定术。在术前和术后12个月,使用Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)和日本骨科协会(JOA)腰椎评分对临床特征和治疗效果进行评估。此外,还测量了手术前后的椎间隙高度、椎体滑脱程度(I、II 和 III 级)、不良反应发生率和治疗效果。结果 两组患者术前的 ODI 和 JOA 评分无明显差异(P>0.05)。术后,与对照组相比,研究组的 ODI 评分更低,JOA 评分更高,椎间隙高度更低(P=0.001)。虽然 1 级和 2 级椎体滑脱略有改善(P>0.05),但两组在 III 级椎体滑脱方面存在显著差异(P=0.001)。此外,研究组的不良反应发生率较低(P=0.049),疗效较高,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 与微创手术相比,腰椎间盘突出症年轻患者接受腰椎内固定融合术的术后效果更好,不良反应更少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of Lumbar Fusion Internal Fixation on Lumbar Disc Herniation in Young Patients: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND Lumbar fusion and internal fixation techniques have shown promise in treating lumbar disc herniation (LDH), yet the impact on lumbar function in young patients remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the impact of lumbar fusion on lumbar function in young patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted on 330 patients diagnosed with LDH admitted to our hospital. Patients were divided into 2 groups: a control group (n=264) that underwent a minimally invasive procedure with a keyhole lens, and a research group (n=66) that underwent lumbar fusion internal fixation. Clinical features and therapeutic outcomes were assessed using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) Lumbar Scores before surgery and 12 months postoperatively. Additionally, intervertebral space height, degree of vertebral spondylolisthesis (grades I, II, and III), incidence of adverse effects, and treatment efficacy were measured pre-and post-surgically. RESULTS No significant difference in ODI and JOA scores was found between the groups before surgery (P>0.05). Postoperatively, the research group had lower ODI scores, higher JOA scores, and lower intervertebral space heights compared to the control group (P=0.001). While grade 1 and 2 spondylolisthesis showed slight improvement (P>0.05), a significant difference was observed in grade III spondylolisthesis between the 2 groups (P=0.001). Additionally, the research group had a lower incidence of adverse effects (P=0.049) and higher treatment efficacy, although the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS Lumbar fusion with internal fixation produced better postoperative outcomes and fewer adverse effects than minimally invasive procedures in young patients with lumbar disc herniation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Science Monitor
Medical Science Monitor MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
514
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Medical Science Monitor (MSM) established in 1995 is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal which publishes original articles in Clinical Medicine and related disciplines such as Epidemiology and Population Studies, Product Investigations, Development of Laboratory Techniques :: Diagnostics and Medical Technology which enable presentation of research or review works in overlapping areas of medicine and technology such us (but not limited to): medical diagnostics, medical imaging systems, computer simulation of health and disease processes, new medical devices, etc. Reviews and Special Reports - papers may be accepted on the basis that they provide a systematic, critical and up-to-date overview of literature pertaining to research or clinical topics. Meta-analyses are considered as reviews. A special attention will be paid to a teaching value of a review paper. Medical Science Monitor is internationally indexed in Thomson-Reuters Web of Science, Journals Citation Report (JCR), Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI), Index Medicus MEDLINE, PubMed, PMC, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, Chemical Abstracts CAS and Index Copernicus.
期刊最新文献
A Review of Emerging Viral Pathogens and Current Concerns for Vertical Transmission of Infection. Echocardiographic and Impedance Cardiography Analysis of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function in Acromegaly Patients. Decreased RSPO3 and β-Catenin in Preeclampsia: Correlation with Blood Pressure and Pregnancy Outcomes. Computed Tomography Parameters for Prognosis Prediction in Non-Occlusive Mesenteric Ischemia. Optimizing Anesthetic Management for Laparoscopic Surgery: A Comprehensive Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1