2 型糖尿病亚型及其在代谢性肝病和纤维化进展中的作用。

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q1 Medicine Medical Science Monitor Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.12659/MSM.946016
Froylan David Martínez-Sánchez, David Medina-Julio, Jacqueline Córdova-Gallardo, Maria Juliana Corredor Nassar, Nahum Méndez-Sánchez
{"title":"2 型糖尿病亚型及其在代谢性肝病和纤维化进展中的作用。","authors":"Froylan David Martínez-Sánchez, David Medina-Julio, Jacqueline Córdova-Gallardo, Maria Juliana Corredor Nassar, Nahum Méndez-Sánchez","doi":"10.12659/MSM.946016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND The relationship between different subgroups of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and the progression of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and liver fibrosis has not been thoroughly studied. This study aims to determine the association between T2D subgroups and the risk of developing advanced liver fibrosis using the Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index, a non-invasive marker for assessing liver fibrosis risk. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 1205 patients with T2D were categorized into 4 distinct subgroups: severe insulin-deficient diabetes (SIDD), severe insulin-resistant diabetes (SIRD), mild obesity-related diabetes (MOD), and mild age-related diabetes (MARD). The FIB-4 index was calculated for each patient to estimate the degree of liver fibrosis, with the following cutoff points: <1.3 indicating no or mild fibrosis, 1.3-2.67 suggesting moderate fibrosis, and >2.67 indicating advanced fibrosis (F3-F4). Logistic regression was used to compare the odds of advanced fibrosis across these subgroups. RESULTS The SIRD subgroup exhibited significantly higher odds of advanced liver fibrosis (F3-F4), compared with the other subgroups, as indicated by elevated FIB-4 scores (P<0.05). In contrast, the SIDD and MOD subgroups had lower odds of advanced fibrosis, while the MARD subgroup showed an intermediate association. CONCLUSIONS The findings suggest that the FIB-4 index, as a noninvasive assessment tool, effectively stratifies liver fibrosis risk among different T2D subgroups. This stratification can inform more personalized management strategies for patients with MASLD, underscoring the importance of accounting for the heterogeneity within T2D in clinical assessments of liver fibrosis risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":48888,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Monitor","volume":"30 ","pages":"e946016"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11520462/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Type 2 Diabetes Subtypes and Their Role in Metabolic Liver Disease and Fibrosis Progression.\",\"authors\":\"Froylan David Martínez-Sánchez, David Medina-Julio, Jacqueline Córdova-Gallardo, Maria Juliana Corredor Nassar, Nahum Méndez-Sánchez\",\"doi\":\"10.12659/MSM.946016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BACKGROUND The relationship between different subgroups of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and the progression of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and liver fibrosis has not been thoroughly studied. This study aims to determine the association between T2D subgroups and the risk of developing advanced liver fibrosis using the Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index, a non-invasive marker for assessing liver fibrosis risk. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 1205 patients with T2D were categorized into 4 distinct subgroups: severe insulin-deficient diabetes (SIDD), severe insulin-resistant diabetes (SIRD), mild obesity-related diabetes (MOD), and mild age-related diabetes (MARD). The FIB-4 index was calculated for each patient to estimate the degree of liver fibrosis, with the following cutoff points: <1.3 indicating no or mild fibrosis, 1.3-2.67 suggesting moderate fibrosis, and >2.67 indicating advanced fibrosis (F3-F4). Logistic regression was used to compare the odds of advanced fibrosis across these subgroups. RESULTS The SIRD subgroup exhibited significantly higher odds of advanced liver fibrosis (F3-F4), compared with the other subgroups, as indicated by elevated FIB-4 scores (P<0.05). In contrast, the SIDD and MOD subgroups had lower odds of advanced fibrosis, while the MARD subgroup showed an intermediate association. CONCLUSIONS The findings suggest that the FIB-4 index, as a noninvasive assessment tool, effectively stratifies liver fibrosis risk among different T2D subgroups. This stratification can inform more personalized management strategies for patients with MASLD, underscoring the importance of accounting for the heterogeneity within T2D in clinical assessments of liver fibrosis risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Science Monitor\",\"volume\":\"30 \",\"pages\":\"e946016\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11520462/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Science Monitor\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.946016\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Monitor","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.946016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 2型糖尿病(T2D)不同亚组与代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪性肝病(MASLD)和肝纤维化进展之间的关系尚未得到深入研究。本研究旨在使用纤维化-4(FIB-4)指数(一种评估肝纤维化风险的无创标记物)确定 T2D 亚组与发展为晚期肝纤维化风险之间的关联。材料与方法 共有1205名T2D患者被分为4个不同的亚组:重度胰岛素缺乏性糖尿病(SIDD)、重度胰岛素抵抗性糖尿病(SIRD)、轻度肥胖相关性糖尿病(MOD)和轻度年龄相关性糖尿病(MARD)。计算每位患者的 FIB-4 指数以估算肝纤维化程度,分界点如下:2.67表示肝纤维化晚期(F3-F4)。采用逻辑回归法比较这些亚组中出现晚期肝纤维化的几率。结果 与其他亚组相比,SIRD 亚组出现晚期肝纤维化(F3-F4)的几率明显更高,表现为 FIB-4 评分升高(P<0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Type 2 Diabetes Subtypes and Their Role in Metabolic Liver Disease and Fibrosis Progression.

BACKGROUND The relationship between different subgroups of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and the progression of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and liver fibrosis has not been thoroughly studied. This study aims to determine the association between T2D subgroups and the risk of developing advanced liver fibrosis using the Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index, a non-invasive marker for assessing liver fibrosis risk. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 1205 patients with T2D were categorized into 4 distinct subgroups: severe insulin-deficient diabetes (SIDD), severe insulin-resistant diabetes (SIRD), mild obesity-related diabetes (MOD), and mild age-related diabetes (MARD). The FIB-4 index was calculated for each patient to estimate the degree of liver fibrosis, with the following cutoff points: <1.3 indicating no or mild fibrosis, 1.3-2.67 suggesting moderate fibrosis, and >2.67 indicating advanced fibrosis (F3-F4). Logistic regression was used to compare the odds of advanced fibrosis across these subgroups. RESULTS The SIRD subgroup exhibited significantly higher odds of advanced liver fibrosis (F3-F4), compared with the other subgroups, as indicated by elevated FIB-4 scores (P<0.05). In contrast, the SIDD and MOD subgroups had lower odds of advanced fibrosis, while the MARD subgroup showed an intermediate association. CONCLUSIONS The findings suggest that the FIB-4 index, as a noninvasive assessment tool, effectively stratifies liver fibrosis risk among different T2D subgroups. This stratification can inform more personalized management strategies for patients with MASLD, underscoring the importance of accounting for the heterogeneity within T2D in clinical assessments of liver fibrosis risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Science Monitor
Medical Science Monitor MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
514
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Medical Science Monitor (MSM) established in 1995 is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal which publishes original articles in Clinical Medicine and related disciplines such as Epidemiology and Population Studies, Product Investigations, Development of Laboratory Techniques :: Diagnostics and Medical Technology which enable presentation of research or review works in overlapping areas of medicine and technology such us (but not limited to): medical diagnostics, medical imaging systems, computer simulation of health and disease processes, new medical devices, etc. Reviews and Special Reports - papers may be accepted on the basis that they provide a systematic, critical and up-to-date overview of literature pertaining to research or clinical topics. Meta-analyses are considered as reviews. A special attention will be paid to a teaching value of a review paper. Medical Science Monitor is internationally indexed in Thomson-Reuters Web of Science, Journals Citation Report (JCR), Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI), Index Medicus MEDLINE, PubMed, PMC, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, Chemical Abstracts CAS and Index Copernicus.
期刊最新文献
A Review of Emerging Viral Pathogens and Current Concerns for Vertical Transmission of Infection. Echocardiographic and Impedance Cardiography Analysis of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function in Acromegaly Patients. Decreased RSPO3 and β-Catenin in Preeclampsia: Correlation with Blood Pressure and Pregnancy Outcomes. Computed Tomography Parameters for Prognosis Prediction in Non-Occlusive Mesenteric Ischemia. Optimizing Anesthetic Management for Laparoscopic Surgery: A Comprehensive Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1