以意义为中心的干预措施对癌症幸存者及其家庭照顾者的生存困境和心理健康结果的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1111/wvn.12752
Ziqi Wang, Dongsheng Xu, Shuanghan Yu, Yantong Liu, Yujie Han, Wei Zhao, Wei Zhang
{"title":"以意义为中心的干预措施对癌症幸存者及其家庭照顾者的生存困境和心理健康结果的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Ziqi Wang, Dongsheng Xu, Shuanghan Yu, Yantong Liu, Yujie Han, Wei Zhao, Wei Zhang","doi":"10.1111/wvn.12752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancer is a global public health concern that causes psychosocial and spiritual challenges in those who suffer from it and their family caregivers. Meaning-centered interventions have a positive impact on improving anxiety and depression in patients with advanced cancer. However, the impact of meaning-centered interventions on existential distress of patients with cancer and family caregivers' mental health is still unclear.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To examine the efficacy of meaning-centered interventions in alleviating existential distress, enhancing quality of life, and fostering a sense of meaning among cancer survivors and their family caregivers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis 2020 statement. A comprehensive search was conducted from inception until September 2023 across nine databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, The Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, WANFANG, and CNKI. Heterogeneity testing and meta-analyses were conducted using Review Manger 5.3. We calculated standard mean deviations and 95% confidence intervals and presented forest plots for assessing intervention effects. Two reviewers independently evaluated the risk of bias of all included articles. STATA 17.0 was used for publication bias analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review included 25 studies with 2399 participants, and 22 were included in the meta-analysis. Meaning-centered interventions enhanced quality of life, alleviated existential distress, and reduced depressive symptoms and cancer-related fatigue. They did not affect spiritual well-being. The subgroup analysis showed that the individual form and long-term intervention (≥3 months) enhanced the quality of life in cancer survivors. Meaning-centered interventions reduce depression in advanced cancer survivors more than in mixed-stage cancer survivors. Meaning-centered interventions significantly enhanced benefit finding for family caregivers.</p><p><strong>Linking evidence to action: </strong>Meaning-centered interventions may improve mental health for patients with cancer and their family caregivers. Future research must include diverse cultural perspectives to understand the impact of meaning-centered interventions on various groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":49355,"journal":{"name":"Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of meaning-centered interventions on existential distress and mental health outcomes in cancer survivors and their family caregivers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Ziqi Wang, Dongsheng Xu, Shuanghan Yu, Yantong Liu, Yujie Han, Wei Zhao, Wei Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/wvn.12752\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancer is a global public health concern that causes psychosocial and spiritual challenges in those who suffer from it and their family caregivers. Meaning-centered interventions have a positive impact on improving anxiety and depression in patients with advanced cancer. However, the impact of meaning-centered interventions on existential distress of patients with cancer and family caregivers' mental health is still unclear.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To examine the efficacy of meaning-centered interventions in alleviating existential distress, enhancing quality of life, and fostering a sense of meaning among cancer survivors and their family caregivers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis 2020 statement. A comprehensive search was conducted from inception until September 2023 across nine databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, The Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, WANFANG, and CNKI. Heterogeneity testing and meta-analyses were conducted using Review Manger 5.3. We calculated standard mean deviations and 95% confidence intervals and presented forest plots for assessing intervention effects. Two reviewers independently evaluated the risk of bias of all included articles. STATA 17.0 was used for publication bias analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review included 25 studies with 2399 participants, and 22 were included in the meta-analysis. Meaning-centered interventions enhanced quality of life, alleviated existential distress, and reduced depressive symptoms and cancer-related fatigue. They did not affect spiritual well-being. The subgroup analysis showed that the individual form and long-term intervention (≥3 months) enhanced the quality of life in cancer survivors. Meaning-centered interventions reduce depression in advanced cancer survivors more than in mixed-stage cancer survivors. Meaning-centered interventions significantly enhanced benefit finding for family caregivers.</p><p><strong>Linking evidence to action: </strong>Meaning-centered interventions may improve mental health for patients with cancer and their family caregivers. Future research must include diverse cultural perspectives to understand the impact of meaning-centered interventions on various groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12752\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12752","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:癌症是一个全球性的公共健康问题,它给患者及其家庭护理人员带来了心理和精神上的挑战。以意义为中心的干预对改善晚期癌症患者的焦虑和抑郁有积极影响。目的:研究以意义为中心的干预措施在减轻癌症幸存者及其家庭照顾者的生存困境、提高生活质量和培养意义感方面的功效:本系统综述和荟萃分析是根据《2020 年系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目声明》进行的。从开始到 2023 年 9 月,在九个数据库中进行了全面检索:PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、PsycINFO、The Cochrane Library、CINAHL、Scopus、WANFANG 和 CNKI。使用Review Manger 5.3进行了异质性检验和荟萃分析。我们计算了标准平均差和 95% 置信区间,并绘制了森林图来评估干预效果。两名审稿人独立评估了所有纳入文章的偏倚风险。采用 STATA 17.0 进行发表偏倚分析:综述包括 25 项研究,共有 2399 名参与者,其中 22 项被纳入荟萃分析。以意义为中心的干预提高了患者的生活质量,减轻了生存压力,减少了抑郁症状和与癌症相关的疲劳。这些干预措施并不影响精神健康。亚组分析显示,个人形式和长期干预(≥3个月)提高了癌症幸存者的生活质量。与混合阶段癌症幸存者相比,以意义为中心的干预更能减轻晚期癌症幸存者的抑郁。以意义为中心的干预措施大大提高了家庭照顾者的获益:以意义为中心的干预措施可以改善癌症患者及其家庭照顾者的心理健康。未来的研究必须包括不同的文化视角,以了解以意义为中心的干预措施对不同群体的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness of meaning-centered interventions on existential distress and mental health outcomes in cancer survivors and their family caregivers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Background: Cancer is a global public health concern that causes psychosocial and spiritual challenges in those who suffer from it and their family caregivers. Meaning-centered interventions have a positive impact on improving anxiety and depression in patients with advanced cancer. However, the impact of meaning-centered interventions on existential distress of patients with cancer and family caregivers' mental health is still unclear.

Aims: To examine the efficacy of meaning-centered interventions in alleviating existential distress, enhancing quality of life, and fostering a sense of meaning among cancer survivors and their family caregivers.

Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis 2020 statement. A comprehensive search was conducted from inception until September 2023 across nine databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, The Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, WANFANG, and CNKI. Heterogeneity testing and meta-analyses were conducted using Review Manger 5.3. We calculated standard mean deviations and 95% confidence intervals and presented forest plots for assessing intervention effects. Two reviewers independently evaluated the risk of bias of all included articles. STATA 17.0 was used for publication bias analysis.

Results: The review included 25 studies with 2399 participants, and 22 were included in the meta-analysis. Meaning-centered interventions enhanced quality of life, alleviated existential distress, and reduced depressive symptoms and cancer-related fatigue. They did not affect spiritual well-being. The subgroup analysis showed that the individual form and long-term intervention (≥3 months) enhanced the quality of life in cancer survivors. Meaning-centered interventions reduce depression in advanced cancer survivors more than in mixed-stage cancer survivors. Meaning-centered interventions significantly enhanced benefit finding for family caregivers.

Linking evidence to action: Meaning-centered interventions may improve mental health for patients with cancer and their family caregivers. Future research must include diverse cultural perspectives to understand the impact of meaning-centered interventions on various groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.60%
发文量
72
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The leading nursing society that has brought you the Journal of Nursing Scholarship is pleased to bring you Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. Now publishing 6 issues per year, this peer-reviewed journal and top information resource from The Honor Society of Nursing, Sigma Theta Tau International, uniquely bridges knowledge and application, taking a global approach in its presentation of research, policy and practice, education and management, and its link to action in real world settings. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing is written especially for: Clinicians Researchers Nurse leaders Managers Administrators Educators Policymakers Worldviews on Evidence­-Based Nursing is a primary source of information for using evidence-based nursing practice to improve patient care by featuring: Knowledge synthesis articles with best practice applications and recommendations for linking evidence to action in real world practice, administra-tive, education and policy settings Original articles and features that present large-scale studies, which challenge and develop the knowledge base about evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare Special features and columns with information geared to readers’ diverse roles: clinical practice, education, research, policy and administration/leadership Commentaries about current evidence-based practice issues and developments A forum that encourages readers to engage in an ongoing dialogue on critical issues and questions in evidence-based nursing Reviews of the latest publications and resources on evidence-based nursing and healthcare News about professional organizations, conferences and other activities around the world related to evidence-based nursing Links to other global evidence-based nursing resources and organizations.
期刊最新文献
Long-term effects of non-pharmacological interventions in adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Comparing the effectiveness of peer-led healthy aging interventions on depression and quality of life in community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Effectiveness of meaning-centered interventions on existential distress and mental health outcomes in cancer survivors and their family caregivers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Evaluating a peer-support mind-body medicine intervention for healthcare leaders. Experiences of clinical nurses with medication interruption: A systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1