Francesco Conversano , Maria Giovanna Di Trani , Rocco Morello , Alberto Bottino , Paola Pisani , Antonella Vimercati , Marco Di Paola , Sergio Casciaro
{"title":"利用经会阴超声增强分娩时胎儿头部位置评估的自动化方法","authors":"Francesco Conversano , Maria Giovanna Di Trani , Rocco Morello , Alberto Bottino , Paola Pisani , Antonella Vimercati , Marco Di Paola , Sergio Casciaro","doi":"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.09.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale and Objectives</h3><div>Accurate assessment of fetal head station (FHS) is crucial during labor management to reduce the risk of complications and plan the mode of delivery. Although digital vaginal examination (DVE) has been associated with inaccuracies in FHS assessment, ultrasound (US) evaluation remains dependent on sonographer expertise. This study aimed at investigating the reliability and accuracy of an automatic approach to assess the FHS during labor with transperineal US (TPU).</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>In this prospective observational study, 27 pregnant women in the second stage of labor, with fetuses in cephalic presentation, underwent conventional labor management with additional TPU examination. A total of 45 2D B-mode TPU acquisitions were performed at different FHS, before performing DVE. The FHS was assessed by the algorithm (FHS<sub>aut</sub>) on TPU images and by DVE (FHS<sub>dig</sub>). The sonographic assessment of FHS by expert sonographer (FHS<sub>exp</sub>) on the same TPU acquisition used for the automatic measurement served as gold standard. The performance and accuracy were assessed through Spearman's <em>ρ</em>, the coefficient of determination (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup>), root mean square error (RMSE), and Bland–Altman analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A strong correlation between FHS<sub>aut</sub> and FHS<sub>exp</sub> (<em>ρ</em> = 0.97, <em>p</em> < 0.001) and a high coefficient of determination (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.95) were found. A lower correlation with FHS<sub>exp</sub> (<em>ρ</em> = 0.66, <em>p</em> < 0.001) and coefficient of determination (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.52) was found for DVE. Moreover, the RMSE reported higher accuracy of FHS<sub>aut</sub> (RMSE = 0.32 cm) compared to FHS<sub>dig</sub> (RMSE = 0.97 cm). Bland–Altman analysis showed that the algorithm performed with smaller bias and narrower limits of agreement compared to DVE.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The proposed algorithm can evaluate FHS with high accuracy and low RMSE. This approach could facilitate the use of US in labor, supporting the clinical staff in labor management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49399,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automated Approach for Enhancing Fetal Head Station Assessment in Labor with Transperineal Ultrasound\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Conversano , Maria Giovanna Di Trani , Rocco Morello , Alberto Bottino , Paola Pisani , Antonella Vimercati , Marco Di Paola , Sergio Casciaro\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.09.022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Rationale and Objectives</h3><div>Accurate assessment of fetal head station (FHS) is crucial during labor management to reduce the risk of complications and plan the mode of delivery. Although digital vaginal examination (DVE) has been associated with inaccuracies in FHS assessment, ultrasound (US) evaluation remains dependent on sonographer expertise. This study aimed at investigating the reliability and accuracy of an automatic approach to assess the FHS during labor with transperineal US (TPU).</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>In this prospective observational study, 27 pregnant women in the second stage of labor, with fetuses in cephalic presentation, underwent conventional labor management with additional TPU examination. A total of 45 2D B-mode TPU acquisitions were performed at different FHS, before performing DVE. The FHS was assessed by the algorithm (FHS<sub>aut</sub>) on TPU images and by DVE (FHS<sub>dig</sub>). The sonographic assessment of FHS by expert sonographer (FHS<sub>exp</sub>) on the same TPU acquisition used for the automatic measurement served as gold standard. The performance and accuracy were assessed through Spearman's <em>ρ</em>, the coefficient of determination (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup>), root mean square error (RMSE), and Bland–Altman analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A strong correlation between FHS<sub>aut</sub> and FHS<sub>exp</sub> (<em>ρ</em> = 0.97, <em>p</em> < 0.001) and a high coefficient of determination (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.95) were found. A lower correlation with FHS<sub>exp</sub> (<em>ρ</em> = 0.66, <em>p</em> < 0.001) and coefficient of determination (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.52) was found for DVE. Moreover, the RMSE reported higher accuracy of FHS<sub>aut</sub> (RMSE = 0.32 cm) compared to FHS<sub>dig</sub> (RMSE = 0.97 cm). Bland–Altman analysis showed that the algorithm performed with smaller bias and narrower limits of agreement compared to DVE.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The proposed algorithm can evaluate FHS with high accuracy and low RMSE. This approach could facilitate the use of US in labor, supporting the clinical staff in labor management.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301562924003673\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301562924003673","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Automated Approach for Enhancing Fetal Head Station Assessment in Labor with Transperineal Ultrasound
Rationale and Objectives
Accurate assessment of fetal head station (FHS) is crucial during labor management to reduce the risk of complications and plan the mode of delivery. Although digital vaginal examination (DVE) has been associated with inaccuracies in FHS assessment, ultrasound (US) evaluation remains dependent on sonographer expertise. This study aimed at investigating the reliability and accuracy of an automatic approach to assess the FHS during labor with transperineal US (TPU).
Materials and Methods
In this prospective observational study, 27 pregnant women in the second stage of labor, with fetuses in cephalic presentation, underwent conventional labor management with additional TPU examination. A total of 45 2D B-mode TPU acquisitions were performed at different FHS, before performing DVE. The FHS was assessed by the algorithm (FHSaut) on TPU images and by DVE (FHSdig). The sonographic assessment of FHS by expert sonographer (FHSexp) on the same TPU acquisition used for the automatic measurement served as gold standard. The performance and accuracy were assessed through Spearman's ρ, the coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), and Bland–Altman analysis.
Results
A strong correlation between FHSaut and FHSexp (ρ = 0.97, p < 0.001) and a high coefficient of determination (R2 = 0.95) were found. A lower correlation with FHSexp (ρ = 0.66, p < 0.001) and coefficient of determination (R2 = 0.52) was found for DVE. Moreover, the RMSE reported higher accuracy of FHSaut (RMSE = 0.32 cm) compared to FHSdig (RMSE = 0.97 cm). Bland–Altman analysis showed that the algorithm performed with smaller bias and narrower limits of agreement compared to DVE.
Conclusion
The proposed algorithm can evaluate FHS with high accuracy and low RMSE. This approach could facilitate the use of US in labor, supporting the clinical staff in labor management.
期刊介绍:
Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology is the official journal of the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. The journal publishes original contributions that demonstrate a novel application of an existing ultrasound technology in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, new and improved clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and the interactions between ultrasound and biological systems, including bioeffects. Papers that simply utilize standard diagnostic ultrasound as a measuring tool will be considered out of scope. Extended critical reviews of subjects of contemporary interest in the field are also published, in addition to occasional editorial articles, clinical and technical notes, book reviews, letters to the editor and a calendar of forthcoming meetings. It is the aim of the journal fully to meet the information and publication requirements of the clinicians, scientists, engineers and other professionals who constitute the biomedical ultrasonic community.