B. Schmitt, L. Moore, K. Heath, E. Concannon, M. Wagstaff
{"title":"多学科大规模烧伤模拟演习。","authors":"B. Schmitt, L. Moore, K. Heath, E. Concannon, M. Wagstaff","doi":"10.1016/j.burns.2024.08.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Disaster simulation exercises are important to test service processes, capabilities, and deficiencies; disaster response planning should encompass the entire multidisciplinary team over an extended period. Our service simulated a modest eight burn casualty scenario to test our service capabilities over a 10-week period across medical, nursing, and allied health professions. Requirements due to the mass burns casualty cohort were predicted in terms of theatre requirements, allied health treatment hours required, and nursing hours requirements. Prospective business-as-usual service provision data were also collected over the 10-week study period with respect to theatre utilisation, allied health workload, nursing hours, and burns ward bed census. These data were then superimposed on predicted mass burn casualty requirements to gauge total workload demands over the study period. Results showed an expected significant initial spike in theatre requirements in the first week post mass casualty, with ongoing deficiencies in theatre allocation occurring throughout the 10-week study period. Allied health staff were working at or near capacity in a business-as-usual setting with major spikes in workload demand occurring due to the mass burn casualty cohort. Total workload demands clearly exceeded current staff capacity for most of the allied health professions over the 10-week period. Bed census exceeded funded nursing bed capacity for all but seven days of the study period. Predicted combined nursing hours exceeded funded capacity for all but two days. This simulation clearly demonstrated the high and immediate increase in workload demands across all professions over a prolonged 10-week period and that high business-as-usual demand can greatly affect staff capacity to cope with a mass casualty surge in admissions. It was able to provide evidence, and awareness, for leadership and management on the need for resources and resource re-allocation in a mass burn casualty scenario. It also informed a review of our current triggers for activating our SA Health Multiple Burns Plan.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50717,"journal":{"name":"Burns","volume":"50 9","pages":"Article 107251"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-disciplinary mass burn casualty simulation exercise\",\"authors\":\"B. Schmitt, L. Moore, K. Heath, E. Concannon, M. Wagstaff\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.burns.2024.08.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Disaster simulation exercises are important to test service processes, capabilities, and deficiencies; disaster response planning should encompass the entire multidisciplinary team over an extended period. Our service simulated a modest eight burn casualty scenario to test our service capabilities over a 10-week period across medical, nursing, and allied health professions. Requirements due to the mass burns casualty cohort were predicted in terms of theatre requirements, allied health treatment hours required, and nursing hours requirements. Prospective business-as-usual service provision data were also collected over the 10-week study period with respect to theatre utilisation, allied health workload, nursing hours, and burns ward bed census. These data were then superimposed on predicted mass burn casualty requirements to gauge total workload demands over the study period. Results showed an expected significant initial spike in theatre requirements in the first week post mass casualty, with ongoing deficiencies in theatre allocation occurring throughout the 10-week study period. Allied health staff were working at or near capacity in a business-as-usual setting with major spikes in workload demand occurring due to the mass burn casualty cohort. Total workload demands clearly exceeded current staff capacity for most of the allied health professions over the 10-week period. Bed census exceeded funded nursing bed capacity for all but seven days of the study period. Predicted combined nursing hours exceeded funded capacity for all but two days. This simulation clearly demonstrated the high and immediate increase in workload demands across all professions over a prolonged 10-week period and that high business-as-usual demand can greatly affect staff capacity to cope with a mass casualty surge in admissions. It was able to provide evidence, and awareness, for leadership and management on the need for resources and resource re-allocation in a mass burn casualty scenario. It also informed a review of our current triggers for activating our SA Health Multiple Burns Plan.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Burns\",\"volume\":\"50 9\",\"pages\":\"Article 107251\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Burns\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305417924002705\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Burns","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305417924002705","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Multi-disciplinary mass burn casualty simulation exercise
Disaster simulation exercises are important to test service processes, capabilities, and deficiencies; disaster response planning should encompass the entire multidisciplinary team over an extended period. Our service simulated a modest eight burn casualty scenario to test our service capabilities over a 10-week period across medical, nursing, and allied health professions. Requirements due to the mass burns casualty cohort were predicted in terms of theatre requirements, allied health treatment hours required, and nursing hours requirements. Prospective business-as-usual service provision data were also collected over the 10-week study period with respect to theatre utilisation, allied health workload, nursing hours, and burns ward bed census. These data were then superimposed on predicted mass burn casualty requirements to gauge total workload demands over the study period. Results showed an expected significant initial spike in theatre requirements in the first week post mass casualty, with ongoing deficiencies in theatre allocation occurring throughout the 10-week study period. Allied health staff were working at or near capacity in a business-as-usual setting with major spikes in workload demand occurring due to the mass burn casualty cohort. Total workload demands clearly exceeded current staff capacity for most of the allied health professions over the 10-week period. Bed census exceeded funded nursing bed capacity for all but seven days of the study period. Predicted combined nursing hours exceeded funded capacity for all but two days. This simulation clearly demonstrated the high and immediate increase in workload demands across all professions over a prolonged 10-week period and that high business-as-usual demand can greatly affect staff capacity to cope with a mass casualty surge in admissions. It was able to provide evidence, and awareness, for leadership and management on the need for resources and resource re-allocation in a mass burn casualty scenario. It also informed a review of our current triggers for activating our SA Health Multiple Burns Plan.
期刊介绍:
Burns aims to foster the exchange of information among all engaged in preventing and treating the effects of burns. The journal focuses on clinical, scientific and social aspects of these injuries and covers the prevention of the injury, the epidemiology of such injuries and all aspects of treatment including development of new techniques and technologies and verification of existing ones. Regular features include clinical and scientific papers, state of the art reviews and descriptions of burn-care in practice.
Topics covered by Burns include: the effects of smoke on man and animals, their tissues and cells; the responses to and treatment of patients and animals with chemical injuries to the skin; the biological and clinical effects of cold injuries; surgical techniques which are, or may be relevant to the treatment of burned patients during the acute or reconstructive phase following injury; well controlled laboratory studies of the effectiveness of anti-microbial agents on infection and new materials on scarring and healing; inflammatory responses to injury, effectiveness of related agents and other compounds used to modify the physiological and cellular responses to the injury; experimental studies of burns and the outcome of burn wound healing; regenerative medicine concerning the skin.