Lucette Toussaint, Maxime Billot, Rémi Cabirol, Philippe Rigoard, Romain David, Paul Teillet, Romain Tisserand
{"title":"通过新的侧向判断任务评估慢性腰背痛对内隐性运动想象的影响。","authors":"Lucette Toussaint, Maxime Billot, Rémi Cabirol, Philippe Rigoard, Romain David, Paul Teillet, Romain Tisserand","doi":"10.1016/j.jpain.2024.104719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is clear that implicit motor imagery (IMI) is impaired by chronic pain in peripheral regions (hand, feet), but unclear in axial regions (neck, shoulder, back). Previous IMI tasks displayed small-amplitude movements of axial regions, which limits person-centered IMI processes mobilization. This study aimed to assess the impact of chronic low back pain (CLBP) on IMI processes with a new task displaying large-amplitude whole-body movements mobilizing the lumbar spine. Twenty patients with CLBP and twenty age-matched controls performed a laterality judgment task on four distinct whole-body movements (trunk flexion, trunk rotation, capoeira, kickboxing). Participants viewed images from four different body viewpoints (back, left, right and front), randomly presented. Mixed ANOVAs were used to compare judgment accuracy and response times between groups and conditions. In participants with CLBP, response times were longer than in controls. The response times of participants with CLBP were also associated with DN4 scores, a self-reported questionnaire assessing neuropathic pain. We validated the use of a person-centered IMI because, for all participants, the accuracy decreased and the response times increased for images presented in the front viewpoint, i.e. when a 180° turn in IMI was required, compared to other viewpoints. The laterality judgment task proposed here confirmed that CLBP impacts IMI processes, and that the nature of pain (neuropathic or mechanical) needs to be considered because it seems to modulate IMI processes. PERSPECTIVES: A laterality judgment task with large-amplitude lumbar movements is key to show that CLBP alters processing speed of sensorimotor information originating from the painful region. This task could become an objective tool, transferable in clinical settings, for assessing the impact and the progression of CLBP on motor control processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of chronic low back pain on implicit motor imagery assessed by a new laterality judgment task.\",\"authors\":\"Lucette Toussaint, Maxime Billot, Rémi Cabirol, Philippe Rigoard, Romain David, Paul Teillet, Romain Tisserand\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpain.2024.104719\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>It is clear that implicit motor imagery (IMI) is impaired by chronic pain in peripheral regions (hand, feet), but unclear in axial regions (neck, shoulder, back). Previous IMI tasks displayed small-amplitude movements of axial regions, which limits person-centered IMI processes mobilization. This study aimed to assess the impact of chronic low back pain (CLBP) on IMI processes with a new task displaying large-amplitude whole-body movements mobilizing the lumbar spine. Twenty patients with CLBP and twenty age-matched controls performed a laterality judgment task on four distinct whole-body movements (trunk flexion, trunk rotation, capoeira, kickboxing). Participants viewed images from four different body viewpoints (back, left, right and front), randomly presented. Mixed ANOVAs were used to compare judgment accuracy and response times between groups and conditions. In participants with CLBP, response times were longer than in controls. The response times of participants with CLBP were also associated with DN4 scores, a self-reported questionnaire assessing neuropathic pain. We validated the use of a person-centered IMI because, for all participants, the accuracy decreased and the response times increased for images presented in the front viewpoint, i.e. when a 180° turn in IMI was required, compared to other viewpoints. The laterality judgment task proposed here confirmed that CLBP impacts IMI processes, and that the nature of pain (neuropathic or mechanical) needs to be considered because it seems to modulate IMI processes. PERSPECTIVES: A laterality judgment task with large-amplitude lumbar movements is key to show that CLBP alters processing speed of sensorimotor information originating from the painful region. This task could become an objective tool, transferable in clinical settings, for assessing the impact and the progression of CLBP on motor control processes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2024.104719\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2024.104719","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of chronic low back pain on implicit motor imagery assessed by a new laterality judgment task.
It is clear that implicit motor imagery (IMI) is impaired by chronic pain in peripheral regions (hand, feet), but unclear in axial regions (neck, shoulder, back). Previous IMI tasks displayed small-amplitude movements of axial regions, which limits person-centered IMI processes mobilization. This study aimed to assess the impact of chronic low back pain (CLBP) on IMI processes with a new task displaying large-amplitude whole-body movements mobilizing the lumbar spine. Twenty patients with CLBP and twenty age-matched controls performed a laterality judgment task on four distinct whole-body movements (trunk flexion, trunk rotation, capoeira, kickboxing). Participants viewed images from four different body viewpoints (back, left, right and front), randomly presented. Mixed ANOVAs were used to compare judgment accuracy and response times between groups and conditions. In participants with CLBP, response times were longer than in controls. The response times of participants with CLBP were also associated with DN4 scores, a self-reported questionnaire assessing neuropathic pain. We validated the use of a person-centered IMI because, for all participants, the accuracy decreased and the response times increased for images presented in the front viewpoint, i.e. when a 180° turn in IMI was required, compared to other viewpoints. The laterality judgment task proposed here confirmed that CLBP impacts IMI processes, and that the nature of pain (neuropathic or mechanical) needs to be considered because it seems to modulate IMI processes. PERSPECTIVES: A laterality judgment task with large-amplitude lumbar movements is key to show that CLBP alters processing speed of sensorimotor information originating from the painful region. This task could become an objective tool, transferable in clinical settings, for assessing the impact and the progression of CLBP on motor control processes.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pain publishes original articles related to all aspects of pain, including clinical and basic research, patient care, education, and health policy. Articles selected for publication in the Journal are most commonly reports of original clinical research or reports of original basic research. In addition, invited critical reviews, including meta analyses of drugs for pain management, invited commentaries on reviews, and exceptional case studies are published in the Journal. The mission of the Journal is to improve the care of patients in pain by providing a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and other health professionals to publish original research.