用机器学习方法确定流感和 SARS-CoV-2 感染重症患者呼吸道细菌/真菌合并感染的风险因素:西班牙视角。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Antibiotics-Basel Pub Date : 2024-10-14 DOI:10.3390/antibiotics13100968
Alejandro Rodríguez, Josep Gómez, Ignacio Martín-Loeches, Laura Claverias, Emili Díaz, Rafael Zaragoza, Marcio Borges-Sa, Frederic Gómez-Bertomeu, Álvaro Franquet, Sandra Trefler, Carlos González Garzón, Lissett Cortés, Florencia Alés, Susana Sancho, Jordi Solé-Violán, Ángel Estella, Julen Berrueta, Alejandro García-Martínez, Borja Suberviola, Juan J Guardiola, María Bodí
{"title":"用机器学习方法确定流感和 SARS-CoV-2 感染重症患者呼吸道细菌/真菌合并感染的风险因素:西班牙视角。","authors":"Alejandro Rodríguez, Josep Gómez, Ignacio Martín-Loeches, Laura Claverias, Emili Díaz, Rafael Zaragoza, Marcio Borges-Sa, Frederic Gómez-Bertomeu, Álvaro Franquet, Sandra Trefler, Carlos González Garzón, Lissett Cortés, Florencia Alés, Susana Sancho, Jordi Solé-Violán, Ángel Estella, Julen Berrueta, Alejandro García-Martínez, Borja Suberviola, Juan J Guardiola, María Bodí","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics13100968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Bacterial/fungal coinfections (COIs) are associated with antibiotic overuse, poor outcomes such as prolonged ICU stay, and increased mortality. Our aim was to develop machine learning-based predictive models to identify respiratory bacterial or fungal coinfections upon ICU admission. <b>Methods</b>: We conducted a secondary analysis of two prospective multicenter cohort studies with confirmed influenza A (H1N1)pdm09 and COVID-19. Multiple logistic regression (MLR) and random forest (RF) were used to identify factors associated with BFC in the overall population and in each subgroup (influenza and COVID-19). The performance of these models was assessed by the area under the ROC curve (AUC) and out-of-bag (OOB) methods for MLR and RF, respectively. <b>Results</b>: Of the 8902 patients, 41.6% had influenza and 58.4% had SARS-CoV-2 infection. The median age was 60 years, 66% were male, and the crude ICU mortality was 25%. BFC was observed in 14.2% of patients. Overall, the predictive models showed modest performances, with an AUC of 0.68 (MLR) and OOB 36.9% (RF). Specific models did not show improved performance. However, age, procalcitonin, CRP, APACHE II, SOFA, and shock were factors associated with BFC in most models. <b>Conclusions</b>: Machine learning models do not adequately predict the presence of co-infection in critically ill patients with pandemic virus infection. However, the presence of factors such as advanced age, elevated procalcitonin or CPR, and high severity of illness should alert clinicians to the need to rule out this complication on admission to the ICU.</p>","PeriodicalId":54246,"journal":{"name":"Antibiotics-Basel","volume":"13 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11504409/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Machine Learning Approach to Determine Risk Factors for Respiratory Bacterial/Fungal Coinfection in Critically Ill Patients with Influenza and SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Spanish Perspective.\",\"authors\":\"Alejandro Rodríguez, Josep Gómez, Ignacio Martín-Loeches, Laura Claverias, Emili Díaz, Rafael Zaragoza, Marcio Borges-Sa, Frederic Gómez-Bertomeu, Álvaro Franquet, Sandra Trefler, Carlos González Garzón, Lissett Cortés, Florencia Alés, Susana Sancho, Jordi Solé-Violán, Ángel Estella, Julen Berrueta, Alejandro García-Martínez, Borja Suberviola, Juan J Guardiola, María Bodí\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/antibiotics13100968\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Bacterial/fungal coinfections (COIs) are associated with antibiotic overuse, poor outcomes such as prolonged ICU stay, and increased mortality. Our aim was to develop machine learning-based predictive models to identify respiratory bacterial or fungal coinfections upon ICU admission. <b>Methods</b>: We conducted a secondary analysis of two prospective multicenter cohort studies with confirmed influenza A (H1N1)pdm09 and COVID-19. Multiple logistic regression (MLR) and random forest (RF) were used to identify factors associated with BFC in the overall population and in each subgroup (influenza and COVID-19). The performance of these models was assessed by the area under the ROC curve (AUC) and out-of-bag (OOB) methods for MLR and RF, respectively. <b>Results</b>: Of the 8902 patients, 41.6% had influenza and 58.4% had SARS-CoV-2 infection. The median age was 60 years, 66% were male, and the crude ICU mortality was 25%. BFC was observed in 14.2% of patients. Overall, the predictive models showed modest performances, with an AUC of 0.68 (MLR) and OOB 36.9% (RF). Specific models did not show improved performance. However, age, procalcitonin, CRP, APACHE II, SOFA, and shock were factors associated with BFC in most models. <b>Conclusions</b>: Machine learning models do not adequately predict the presence of co-infection in critically ill patients with pandemic virus infection. However, the presence of factors such as advanced age, elevated procalcitonin or CPR, and high severity of illness should alert clinicians to the need to rule out this complication on admission to the ICU.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antibiotics-Basel\",\"volume\":\"13 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11504409/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antibiotics-Basel\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13100968\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antibiotics-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13100968","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:细菌/真菌并发感染(COIs)与抗生素过度使用、不良预后(如延长重症监护室住院时间)和死亡率增加有关。我们的目的是开发基于机器学习的预测模型,以识别入住 ICU 时的呼吸道细菌或真菌合并感染。方法:我们对两项前瞻性多中心队列研究进行了二次分析,这两项研究分别确诊了甲型 H1N1 流行性感冒 (H1N1)pdm09 和 COVID-19。采用多元逻辑回归(MLR)和随机森林(RF)来确定总体人群和各亚组(流感和 COVID-19)中与 BFC 相关的因素。这些模型的性能分别通过 MLR 和 RF 的 ROC 曲线下面积 (AUC) 和袋外面积 (OOB) 方法进行评估。结果:在 8902 名患者中,41.6% 感染了流感,58.4% 感染了 SARS-CoV-2。中位年龄为 60 岁,66% 为男性,重症监护病房的粗死亡率为 25%。14.2%的患者出现 BFC。总体而言,预测模型表现一般,AUC 为 0.68(MLR),OOB 为 36.9%(RF)。特定模型的性能没有提高。不过,在大多数模型中,年龄、降钙素原、CRP、APACHE II、SOFA 和休克都是与 BFC 相关的因素。结论机器学习模型不能充分预测感染大流行病毒的重症患者是否合并感染。但是,高龄、降钙素原或心肺复苏率升高、病情严重等因素的存在应提醒临床医生在入住重症监护室时需要排除这种并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Machine Learning Approach to Determine Risk Factors for Respiratory Bacterial/Fungal Coinfection in Critically Ill Patients with Influenza and SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Spanish Perspective.

Background: Bacterial/fungal coinfections (COIs) are associated with antibiotic overuse, poor outcomes such as prolonged ICU stay, and increased mortality. Our aim was to develop machine learning-based predictive models to identify respiratory bacterial or fungal coinfections upon ICU admission. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of two prospective multicenter cohort studies with confirmed influenza A (H1N1)pdm09 and COVID-19. Multiple logistic regression (MLR) and random forest (RF) were used to identify factors associated with BFC in the overall population and in each subgroup (influenza and COVID-19). The performance of these models was assessed by the area under the ROC curve (AUC) and out-of-bag (OOB) methods for MLR and RF, respectively. Results: Of the 8902 patients, 41.6% had influenza and 58.4% had SARS-CoV-2 infection. The median age was 60 years, 66% were male, and the crude ICU mortality was 25%. BFC was observed in 14.2% of patients. Overall, the predictive models showed modest performances, with an AUC of 0.68 (MLR) and OOB 36.9% (RF). Specific models did not show improved performance. However, age, procalcitonin, CRP, APACHE II, SOFA, and shock were factors associated with BFC in most models. Conclusions: Machine learning models do not adequately predict the presence of co-infection in critically ill patients with pandemic virus infection. However, the presence of factors such as advanced age, elevated procalcitonin or CPR, and high severity of illness should alert clinicians to the need to rule out this complication on admission to the ICU.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Antibiotics-Basel
Antibiotics-Basel Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
14.60%
发文量
1547
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Antibiotics (ISSN 2079-6382) is an open access, peer reviewed journal on all aspects of antibiotics. Antibiotics is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing the general fields of biochemistry, chemistry, genetics, microbiology and pharmacology. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of papers.
期刊最新文献
The Synergy of Machine Learning and Epidemiology in Addressing Carbapenem Resistance: A Comprehensive Review. Resilience of Loin Meat Microbiota and of Resistance Genes to a Chlortetracycline Treatment in Weaned Piglets. Gut Microbiota and New Microbiome-Targeted Drugs for Clostridioides difficile Infections. Combinations of Terminalia bellirica (Gaertn.) Roxb. and Terminalia chebula Retz. Extracts with Selected Antibiotics Against Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria: Bioactivity and Phytochemistry. Isatin Bis-Imidathiazole Hybrids Identified as FtsZ Inhibitors with On-Target Activity Against Staphylococcus aureus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1