膳食类黄酮与肺癌:经 GRADE 评估的观察性研究系统综述和元分析》(A GRADE-Assessed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies)。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Nutrition and Cancer-An International Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1080/01635581.2024.2417457
Kimia Rostampour, Kimia Alipour, Fatemeh Mirjalili, Bita Forootani, Hooman Yekrang Safakar, Sara Beigrezaei, Scott C Forbes, Amin Salehi-Abargouei
{"title":"膳食类黄酮与肺癌:经 GRADE 评估的观察性研究系统综述和元分析》(A GRADE-Assessed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies)。","authors":"Kimia Rostampour, Kimia Alipour, Fatemeh Mirjalili, Bita Forootani, Hooman Yekrang Safakar, Sara Beigrezaei, Scott C Forbes, Amin Salehi-Abargouei","doi":"10.1080/01635581.2024.2417457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Individual observational studies examining the association between polyphenols and the risk of lung cancer have reported mixed findings. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the pooled effects between polyphenol intake and lung cancer risk. A systematic search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases in April 2023. Random-effect models were used to estimate odd ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). In total, 20 studies were included in the systematic review. The pooled analyses indicated that a higher intake of flavonoids (OR = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.67,0.98; <i>p</i> = 0.03) and isoflavone (OR = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.74,0.92; <i>p</i> < 0.001) were associated with lower odds of lung cancer. In addition, the ingestion of anthocyanidin (OR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.65,0.98; <i>p</i> = 0.04), kaempferol (OR = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.64,0.96; <i>p</i> = 0.02), quercetin (OR = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.48,0.91; <i>p</i> = 0.01) and flavanones (OR = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.59,0.85; <i>p</i> < 0.001) reduced the likelihood of developing lung cancer. Overall, our findings suggest that flavonoids, isoflavones, anthocyanidin, kaempferol, quercetin, and flavanones may protect against lung cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":54701,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition and Cancer-An International Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dietary Flavonoids and Lung Cancer: A GRADE-Assessed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.\",\"authors\":\"Kimia Rostampour, Kimia Alipour, Fatemeh Mirjalili, Bita Forootani, Hooman Yekrang Safakar, Sara Beigrezaei, Scott C Forbes, Amin Salehi-Abargouei\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01635581.2024.2417457\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Individual observational studies examining the association between polyphenols and the risk of lung cancer have reported mixed findings. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the pooled effects between polyphenol intake and lung cancer risk. A systematic search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases in April 2023. Random-effect models were used to estimate odd ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). In total, 20 studies were included in the systematic review. The pooled analyses indicated that a higher intake of flavonoids (OR = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.67,0.98; <i>p</i> = 0.03) and isoflavone (OR = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.74,0.92; <i>p</i> < 0.001) were associated with lower odds of lung cancer. In addition, the ingestion of anthocyanidin (OR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.65,0.98; <i>p</i> = 0.04), kaempferol (OR = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.64,0.96; <i>p</i> = 0.02), quercetin (OR = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.48,0.91; <i>p</i> = 0.01) and flavanones (OR = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.59,0.85; <i>p</i> < 0.001) reduced the likelihood of developing lung cancer. Overall, our findings suggest that flavonoids, isoflavones, anthocyanidin, kaempferol, quercetin, and flavanones may protect against lung cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54701,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition and Cancer-An International Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition and Cancer-An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2024.2417457\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition and Cancer-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2024.2417457","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于多酚与肺癌风险之间关系的单项观察性研究报告结果不一。因此,我们进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析,以确定多酚摄入量与肺癌风险之间的综合效应。我们于 2023 年 4 月在 PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science 数据库中进行了系统性检索。随机效应模型用于估计奇数比(OR)和 95% 置信区间(95% CI)。共有 20 项研究被纳入系统综述。汇总分析表明,摄入较多的类黄酮(OR = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.67,0.98; p = 0.03)和异黄酮(OR = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.74,0.92; p p = 0.04)、山柰酚(OR = 0.78;95% CI:0.64,0.96;P = 0.02)、槲皮素(OR = 0.66;95% CI:0.48,0.91;P = 0.01)和黄烷酮(OR = 0.71;95% CI:0.59,0.85;P = 0.01)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dietary Flavonoids and Lung Cancer: A GRADE-Assessed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.

Individual observational studies examining the association between polyphenols and the risk of lung cancer have reported mixed findings. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the pooled effects between polyphenol intake and lung cancer risk. A systematic search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases in April 2023. Random-effect models were used to estimate odd ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). In total, 20 studies were included in the systematic review. The pooled analyses indicated that a higher intake of flavonoids (OR = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.67,0.98; p = 0.03) and isoflavone (OR = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.74,0.92; p < 0.001) were associated with lower odds of lung cancer. In addition, the ingestion of anthocyanidin (OR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.65,0.98; p = 0.04), kaempferol (OR = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.64,0.96; p = 0.02), quercetin (OR = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.48,0.91; p = 0.01) and flavanones (OR = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.59,0.85; p < 0.001) reduced the likelihood of developing lung cancer. Overall, our findings suggest that flavonoids, isoflavones, anthocyanidin, kaempferol, quercetin, and flavanones may protect against lung cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: This timely publication reports and reviews current findings on the effects of nutrition on the etiology, therapy, and prevention of cancer. Etiological issues include clinical and experimental research in nutrition, carcinogenesis, epidemiology, biochemistry, and molecular biology. Coverage of therapy focuses on research in clinical nutrition and oncology, dietetics, and bioengineering. Prevention approaches include public health recommendations, preventative medicine, behavior modification, education, functional foods, and agricultural and food production policies.
期刊最新文献
Puerarin Ameliorates Ferroptosis in Neuronal Injury Through the PI3K/AKT Signaling Pathway. Body Composition Decrease and Impact on Clinical Outcome in Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Gastrectomy After Neoadjuvant Treatment. Associations Between Obesity and Risk of Thyroid Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies. Dietary Flavonoids and Lung Cancer: A GRADE-Assessed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Activation of the WNT7B/β-Catenin Pathway Initiates GLUT1 Expression and Promotes Aerobic Glycolysis in Colorectal Cancer Cells.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1