使用铰接式和非铰接式假肢的经胫截肢者在脚趾最小间隙处的角度运动学。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1115/1.4066958
Mauricio Riveras, Matthew Oldfield, Paola Catalfamo-Formento
{"title":"使用铰接式和非铰接式假肢的经胫截肢者在脚趾最小间隙处的角度运动学。","authors":"Mauricio Riveras, Matthew Oldfield, Paola Catalfamo-Formento","doi":"10.1115/1.4066958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Subjects with unilateral transtibial amputation exhibit altered minimum toe clearance (MTC) depending on the ankle prosthesis used, possibly due to a limited prosthetic ankle angle. The aim of this study was to investigate the alterations in joints kinematics responsible for the changes in MTC when using an Articulating Hydraulic Ankle (AHA) compared to a Non Articulating Ankle (NAA) prosthesis. Twelve participants with unilateral transtibial amputation walked at self-selected speed on a 10 meter pathway. They used the same AHA and NAA prosthetic models and the prosthetic characteristics were unchanged except for the ankle mechanisms and, consequently, its mass. Data from MTC and hip, knee and ankle angles in the sagittal, frontal and transversal plane at the time of MTC were statistically analyzed with a paired sample t-test. The AHA prosthesis showed significantly higher MTC mean (AHA = 24.7 ± 9.6 mm vs. NAA = 17.4 ± 5.2 mm, P < 0.01) and variability (13.4 ± 9.6 mm vs. 6.7 ± 4.2 mm, P = 0.03) on the prosthetic limb than the NAA. A higher mean MTC could be explained by an increase in ankle angle dorsiflexion (AHA = -1.2 ± 2.6° vs. NAA = -2.9 ± 1.5°, P = 0.01) while the variability of the prosthetic MTC appears to be influenced by changes in prosthetic mass. The results of this study suggests that ankle dorsiflexion during swing and the mass of the prosthesis have a direct influence in mean MTC and its variability, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":54871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Angular kinematics at minimum toe clearance in people with transtibial amputation using articulated and non-articulated prosthesis.\",\"authors\":\"Mauricio Riveras, Matthew Oldfield, Paola Catalfamo-Formento\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4066958\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Subjects with unilateral transtibial amputation exhibit altered minimum toe clearance (MTC) depending on the ankle prosthesis used, possibly due to a limited prosthetic ankle angle. The aim of this study was to investigate the alterations in joints kinematics responsible for the changes in MTC when using an Articulating Hydraulic Ankle (AHA) compared to a Non Articulating Ankle (NAA) prosthesis. Twelve participants with unilateral transtibial amputation walked at self-selected speed on a 10 meter pathway. They used the same AHA and NAA prosthetic models and the prosthetic characteristics were unchanged except for the ankle mechanisms and, consequently, its mass. Data from MTC and hip, knee and ankle angles in the sagittal, frontal and transversal plane at the time of MTC were statistically analyzed with a paired sample t-test. The AHA prosthesis showed significantly higher MTC mean (AHA = 24.7 ± 9.6 mm vs. NAA = 17.4 ± 5.2 mm, P < 0.01) and variability (13.4 ± 9.6 mm vs. 6.7 ± 4.2 mm, P = 0.03) on the prosthetic limb than the NAA. A higher mean MTC could be explained by an increase in ankle angle dorsiflexion (AHA = -1.2 ± 2.6° vs. NAA = -2.9 ± 1.5°, P = 0.01) while the variability of the prosthetic MTC appears to be influenced by changes in prosthetic mass. The results of this study suggests that ankle dorsiflexion during swing and the mass of the prosthesis have a direct influence in mean MTC and its variability, respectively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4066958\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4066958","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

单侧经胫骨截肢受试者的最小脚趾间隙(MTC)会因所使用的踝关节假体而发生变化,这可能是由于假体踝关节角度有限所致。本研究的目的是调查关节运动学的变化,这些变化是使用铰接式液压踝关节(AHA)与非铰接式踝关节(NAA)假肢时造成最小脚趾间隙(MTC)变化的原因。12 名单侧经胫截肢的参与者在 10 米长的路径上以自选速度行走。他们使用了相同的 AHA 和 NAA 假肢模型,除了踝关节装置以及其质量外,假肢特征均保持不变。通过配对样本t检验对MTC数据以及MTC时髋关节、膝关节和踝关节在矢状面、正面和横向的角度进行了统计分析。AHA假肢的MTC平均值(AHA = 24.7 ± 9.6 mm vs. NAA = 17.4 ± 5.2 mm,P < 0.01)和变异性(13.4 ± 9.6 mm vs. 6.7 ± 4.2 mm,P = 0.03)均明显高于NAA假肢。踝关节背屈角度的增加(AHA = -1.2 ± 2.6° vs. NAA = -2.9 ± 1.5°,P = 0.01)可以解释更高的平均 MTC,而假肢 MTC 的变异性似乎受到假肢质量变化的影响。本研究结果表明,摆动时的踝关节外翻和假肢质量分别对平均 MTC 及其变异性有直接影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Angular kinematics at minimum toe clearance in people with transtibial amputation using articulated and non-articulated prosthesis.

Subjects with unilateral transtibial amputation exhibit altered minimum toe clearance (MTC) depending on the ankle prosthesis used, possibly due to a limited prosthetic ankle angle. The aim of this study was to investigate the alterations in joints kinematics responsible for the changes in MTC when using an Articulating Hydraulic Ankle (AHA) compared to a Non Articulating Ankle (NAA) prosthesis. Twelve participants with unilateral transtibial amputation walked at self-selected speed on a 10 meter pathway. They used the same AHA and NAA prosthetic models and the prosthetic characteristics were unchanged except for the ankle mechanisms and, consequently, its mass. Data from MTC and hip, knee and ankle angles in the sagittal, frontal and transversal plane at the time of MTC were statistically analyzed with a paired sample t-test. The AHA prosthesis showed significantly higher MTC mean (AHA = 24.7 ± 9.6 mm vs. NAA = 17.4 ± 5.2 mm, P < 0.01) and variability (13.4 ± 9.6 mm vs. 6.7 ± 4.2 mm, P = 0.03) on the prosthetic limb than the NAA. A higher mean MTC could be explained by an increase in ankle angle dorsiflexion (AHA = -1.2 ± 2.6° vs. NAA = -2.9 ± 1.5°, P = 0.01) while the variability of the prosthetic MTC appears to be influenced by changes in prosthetic mass. The results of this study suggests that ankle dorsiflexion during swing and the mass of the prosthesis have a direct influence in mean MTC and its variability, respectively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
169
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Artificial Organs and Prostheses; Bioinstrumentation and Measurements; Bioheat Transfer; Biomaterials; Biomechanics; Bioprocess Engineering; Cellular Mechanics; Design and Control of Biological Systems; Physiological Systems.
期刊最新文献
Image-Based Estimation of Left Ventricular Myocardial Stiffness. Phenomenological Muscle Constitutive Model With Actin-Titin Binding for Simulating Active Stretching. Regulatory Role of Collagen XI in the Establishment of Mechanical Properties of Tendons and Ligaments in Mice Is Tissue Dependent. Study of the Mechanism of Perceived Rotational Acceleration of a Bionic Semicircular Canal on the Basis of the "Circular Geometry Hypothesis". Walking Slope and Heavy Backpacks Affect Peak and Impulsive Lumbar Joint Contact Forces.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1