助产士在妊娠、分娩和产后期间的持续护理:匹配队列研究。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1111/birt.12875
L Lundborg, K Åberg, X Liu, M Norman, O Stephansson, K Pettersson, M Ekborn, S Cnattingius, M Ahlberg
{"title":"助产士在妊娠、分娩和产后期间的持续护理:匹配队列研究。","authors":"L Lundborg, K Åberg, X Liu, M Norman, O Stephansson, K Pettersson, M Ekborn, S Cnattingius, M Ahlberg","doi":"10.1111/birt.12875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare pregnancy outcomes in a midwifery continuity of care (MCoC) model to standard midwifery care in Sweden.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Matched cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Public healthcare during pregnancy and childbirth, Stockholm, Sweden.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>Women giving birth at Karolinska University Hospital site Huddinge in Stockholm between January 1, 2019, and August 31, 2021.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on all births including MCoC and standard care, during the time period, were retrieved from the national Swedish Pregnancy Register. Propensity score matching was applied to obtain a matched set from the standard care group for every woman in the MCoC model. Based on the matched cohort, we estimated risk ratios (RR) for binary outcomes with 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Interventions during labor, mode of birth, and preterm birth (< 37 gestational weeks).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with standard care, women in the MCoC model were more likely to give birth spontaneously (RR 1.06 95% CI 1.02-1.10) and less likely to have an elective cesarean on maternal request (RR 0.24 95% CI 0.11-0.51). The risk of preterm birth was also reduced in the MCoC group (RR 0.51 95% CI 0.32-0.82).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MCoC model was associated with fewer medical interventions and improved pregnancy outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Midwifery Continuity of Care During Pregnancy, Birth, and the Postpartum Period: A Matched Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"L Lundborg, K Åberg, X Liu, M Norman, O Stephansson, K Pettersson, M Ekborn, S Cnattingius, M Ahlberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/birt.12875\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare pregnancy outcomes in a midwifery continuity of care (MCoC) model to standard midwifery care in Sweden.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Matched cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Public healthcare during pregnancy and childbirth, Stockholm, Sweden.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>Women giving birth at Karolinska University Hospital site Huddinge in Stockholm between January 1, 2019, and August 31, 2021.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on all births including MCoC and standard care, during the time period, were retrieved from the national Swedish Pregnancy Register. Propensity score matching was applied to obtain a matched set from the standard care group for every woman in the MCoC model. Based on the matched cohort, we estimated risk ratios (RR) for binary outcomes with 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Interventions during labor, mode of birth, and preterm birth (< 37 gestational weeks).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with standard care, women in the MCoC model were more likely to give birth spontaneously (RR 1.06 95% CI 1.02-1.10) and less likely to have an elective cesarean on maternal request (RR 0.24 95% CI 0.11-0.51). The risk of preterm birth was also reduced in the MCoC group (RR 0.51 95% CI 0.32-0.82).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MCoC model was associated with fewer medical interventions and improved pregnancy outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12875\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12875","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较瑞典助产士持续护理(MCoC)模式与标准助产士护理的妊娠结局:比较瑞典助产士持续护理(MCoC)模式与标准助产护理的妊娠结局:设计:匹配队列研究:研究地点:瑞典斯德哥尔摩妊娠和分娩期间的公共医疗保健:人群:2019 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 8 月 31 日期间在斯德哥尔摩卡罗林斯卡大学医院 Huddinge 院区分娩的妇女:方法:从瑞典全国妊娠登记册中检索这一时期内包括 MCoC 和标准护理在内的所有分娩数据。采用倾向得分匹配法为 MCoC 模型中的每位妇女从标准护理组中获得匹配组。根据匹配队列,我们估算了二元结果的风险比(RR)及 95% 的置信区间(CI):主要结果测量指标:产程干预、分娩方式和早产(结果:与标准护理相比,MCoC 模型中的产妇分娩方式更安全、更有效率:与标准护理相比,MCoC 模型中的产妇更有可能自然分娩(RR 1.06 95% CI 1.02-1.10),更不可能应产妇要求进行选择性剖宫产(RR 0.24 95% CI 0.11-0.51)。MCoC 组的早产风险也有所降低(RR 0.51 95% CI 0.32-0.82):MCoC模式减少了医疗干预,改善了妊娠结局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Midwifery Continuity of Care During Pregnancy, Birth, and the Postpartum Period: A Matched Cohort Study.

Objective: To compare pregnancy outcomes in a midwifery continuity of care (MCoC) model to standard midwifery care in Sweden.

Design: Matched cohort study.

Setting: Public healthcare during pregnancy and childbirth, Stockholm, Sweden.

Population: Women giving birth at Karolinska University Hospital site Huddinge in Stockholm between January 1, 2019, and August 31, 2021.

Methods: Data on all births including MCoC and standard care, during the time period, were retrieved from the national Swedish Pregnancy Register. Propensity score matching was applied to obtain a matched set from the standard care group for every woman in the MCoC model. Based on the matched cohort, we estimated risk ratios (RR) for binary outcomes with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Main outcome measures: Interventions during labor, mode of birth, and preterm birth (< 37 gestational weeks).

Results: Compared with standard care, women in the MCoC model were more likely to give birth spontaneously (RR 1.06 95% CI 1.02-1.10) and less likely to have an elective cesarean on maternal request (RR 0.24 95% CI 0.11-0.51). The risk of preterm birth was also reduced in the MCoC group (RR 0.51 95% CI 0.32-0.82).

Conclusion: The MCoC model was associated with fewer medical interventions and improved pregnancy outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care
Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care is a multidisciplinary, refereed journal devoted to issues and practices in the care of childbearing women, infants, and families. It is written by and for professionals in maternal and neonatal health, nurses, midwives, physicians, public health workers, doulas, social scientists, childbirth educators, lactation counselors, epidemiologists, and other health caregivers and policymakers in perinatal care.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information A History of Cesarean Birth as a Risk Factor for Postpartum Hemorrhage Even After Successful Planned Vaginal Birth. Pregnant Women's Care Needs During Early Labor-A Scoping Review. Sociodemographic and Health-Related Risk Factors Associated With Planned and Emergency Cesarean Births in Mexico. Validating the Quality Maternal and Newborn Care Framework Index: A Global Tool for Quality-of-Care Evaluations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1