从美国国家心肺血液研究所 Covid-19 临床试验中汲取的经验教训。

NEJM evidence Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1056/EVIDctcs2300291
Sonia M Thomas, Robert A Harrington, Clyde W Yancy, Diane Nugent, Serpil Erzurum, Gordon R Bernard, Mary Cushman, Judith S Hochman, Paul M Ridker, Thomas L Ortel, Sean P Collins, Clifton W Callaway, Tracy L Nolen, Kelsey N Womack, Samuel M Brown, Annetine Gelijns, Mark Geraci, Adit A Ginde, Nigel S Key, Jerry A Krishnan, Lisa LaVange, Stephen R Wisniewski, Lisa Berdan, Antonello Punturieri, David C Goff, Amy P Patterson
{"title":"从美国国家心肺血液研究所 Covid-19 临床试验中汲取的经验教训。","authors":"Sonia M Thomas, Robert A Harrington, Clyde W Yancy, Diane Nugent, Serpil Erzurum, Gordon R Bernard, Mary Cushman, Judith S Hochman, Paul M Ridker, Thomas L Ortel, Sean P Collins, Clifton W Callaway, Tracy L Nolen, Kelsey N Womack, Samuel M Brown, Annetine Gelijns, Mark Geraci, Adit A Ginde, Nigel S Key, Jerry A Krishnan, Lisa LaVange, Stephen R Wisniewski, Lisa Berdan, Antonello Punturieri, David C Goff, Amy P Patterson","doi":"10.1056/EVIDctcs2300291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AbstractIn response to the Covid-19 pandemic, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute launched five multisite clinical trials testing candidate host tissue-directed medical interventions to hasten recovery, improve function, and reduce morbidity and mortality. Speed, flexibility, and collaboration were essential. This article from the Steering and Executive committees describes the Collaborating Network of Networks for Evaluating Covid-19 and Therapeutic Strategies (CONNECTS) research program that enrolled 6690 participants and evaluated 18 intervention strategies using 10 molecular agents across the care continuum (outpatient, inpatient, and post discharge), and reports lessons learned from this initiative. Successes include rapid trial execution through collaboration and adaptive platform designs. Challenges that impeded efficiency included time required to execute subcontracts, constraints on clinical research workforce, and limited research infrastructure in nonacademic settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":74256,"journal":{"name":"NEJM evidence","volume":"3 11","pages":"EVIDctcs2300291"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lessons Learned from National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Covid-19 Clinical Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Sonia M Thomas, Robert A Harrington, Clyde W Yancy, Diane Nugent, Serpil Erzurum, Gordon R Bernard, Mary Cushman, Judith S Hochman, Paul M Ridker, Thomas L Ortel, Sean P Collins, Clifton W Callaway, Tracy L Nolen, Kelsey N Womack, Samuel M Brown, Annetine Gelijns, Mark Geraci, Adit A Ginde, Nigel S Key, Jerry A Krishnan, Lisa LaVange, Stephen R Wisniewski, Lisa Berdan, Antonello Punturieri, David C Goff, Amy P Patterson\",\"doi\":\"10.1056/EVIDctcs2300291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>AbstractIn response to the Covid-19 pandemic, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute launched five multisite clinical trials testing candidate host tissue-directed medical interventions to hasten recovery, improve function, and reduce morbidity and mortality. Speed, flexibility, and collaboration were essential. This article from the Steering and Executive committees describes the Collaborating Network of Networks for Evaluating Covid-19 and Therapeutic Strategies (CONNECTS) research program that enrolled 6690 participants and evaluated 18 intervention strategies using 10 molecular agents across the care continuum (outpatient, inpatient, and post discharge), and reports lessons learned from this initiative. Successes include rapid trial execution through collaboration and adaptive platform designs. Challenges that impeded efficiency included time required to execute subcontracts, constraints on clinical research workforce, and limited research infrastructure in nonacademic settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NEJM evidence\",\"volume\":\"3 11\",\"pages\":\"EVIDctcs2300291\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NEJM evidence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDctcs2300291\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEJM evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDctcs2300291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 为应对 Covid-19 大流行,美国国家心肺血液研究所启动了五项多站点临床试验,测试候选宿主组织导向医疗干预措施,以加速康复、改善功能并降低发病率和死亡率。速度、灵活性和协作至关重要。指导委员会和执行委员会的这篇文章介绍了 "评估Covid-19和治疗策略的网络协作网络(CONNECTS)"研究计划,该计划共招募了6690名参与者,在整个护理过程(门诊、住院和出院后)中使用10种分子制剂评估了18种干预策略,并报告了从该计划中吸取的经验教训。成功之处包括通过合作和适应性平台设计快速执行试验。阻碍效率的挑战包括执行分包合同所需的时间、临床研究人员的限制以及非学术环境中有限的研究基础设施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lessons Learned from National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Covid-19 Clinical Trials.

AbstractIn response to the Covid-19 pandemic, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute launched five multisite clinical trials testing candidate host tissue-directed medical interventions to hasten recovery, improve function, and reduce morbidity and mortality. Speed, flexibility, and collaboration were essential. This article from the Steering and Executive committees describes the Collaborating Network of Networks for Evaluating Covid-19 and Therapeutic Strategies (CONNECTS) research program that enrolled 6690 participants and evaluated 18 intervention strategies using 10 molecular agents across the care continuum (outpatient, inpatient, and post discharge), and reports lessons learned from this initiative. Successes include rapid trial execution through collaboration and adaptive platform designs. Challenges that impeded efficiency included time required to execute subcontracts, constraints on clinical research workforce, and limited research infrastructure in nonacademic settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Blood Pressure Targets for Adults with Vasodilatory Shock - An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis. BNC210, an α7 Nicotinic Receptor Modulator, in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. A Meta-Analysis of Levofloxacin for Contacts of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis. Treating Patients, Not P Values. A 50-Year-Old Man with Left-Sided Weakness and Difficulty Speaking Clearly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1