Hilary Arsenault, Agnieszka Kuffel, Patricia Dugard, Niamh Nic Daeid, Alexander Gray
{"title":"痕量 DNA 及其在各种表面上的持久性:一项长期研究,调查表面类型和环境条件的影响--第二部分,非金属。","authors":"Hilary Arsenault, Agnieszka Kuffel, Patricia Dugard, Niamh Nic Daeid, Alexander Gray","doi":"10.1016/j.fsigen.2024.103151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The work presented herein is the second part of a large-scale persistence project aimed at identifying trends in trace DNA persistence. This study aims to show how different environmental storage conditions and target surface characteristics influence the persistence of cellular and cell free DNA (cfDNA) over time. To eliminate variation within the experiment, we used a proxy DNA deposit consisting of a synthetic fingerprint solution, cellular DNA, and/or cfDNA. Samples were collected and analysed from eight non-metal surfaces over the course of 1 year (27 time points) under three different environmental storage conditions. The results of this experiment show that surface characteristics in conjunction with DNA type greatly influence DNA persistence. Variation in the amount of DNA recovered over time was greatly influenced by surface porosity. CfDNA persisted at significantly higher levels on non-porous surfaces, and cellular DNA persisted at higher levels on porous items. Furthermore, statistically significant differences in DNA persistence were found among the items classified as non-porous surfaces and among the items classified as porous surfaces. Additionally, this study showed that the sample storage environment had a larger impact on DNA persistence than previously observed for metal surfaces [1]. When considering DNA type, cellular DNA was shown to persist for longer than cfDNA and persistence as a whole appears to be better when DNA is deposited alone rather than in mixtures. Unsurprisingly, it was found that the amount of DNA recovered from trace deposits decreased over time. However, DNA decay is highly dependent on the surface type and exhibits higher variability at short time points and on porous surfaces. For each of the surfaces tested, DNA persisted 1 year past deposition (in some combination of DNA type and environmental condition), except for wood, on which DNA did not persist in any capacity past four months. This data is intended to add to our understanding of DNA persistence and the factors which affect it.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50435,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Science International-Genetics","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 103151"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trace DNA and its persistence on various surfaces: A long term study investigating the influence of surface type and environmental conditions – Part two, non-metals\",\"authors\":\"Hilary Arsenault, Agnieszka Kuffel, Patricia Dugard, Niamh Nic Daeid, Alexander Gray\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fsigen.2024.103151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The work presented herein is the second part of a large-scale persistence project aimed at identifying trends in trace DNA persistence. This study aims to show how different environmental storage conditions and target surface characteristics influence the persistence of cellular and cell free DNA (cfDNA) over time. To eliminate variation within the experiment, we used a proxy DNA deposit consisting of a synthetic fingerprint solution, cellular DNA, and/or cfDNA. Samples were collected and analysed from eight non-metal surfaces over the course of 1 year (27 time points) under three different environmental storage conditions. The results of this experiment show that surface characteristics in conjunction with DNA type greatly influence DNA persistence. Variation in the amount of DNA recovered over time was greatly influenced by surface porosity. CfDNA persisted at significantly higher levels on non-porous surfaces, and cellular DNA persisted at higher levels on porous items. Furthermore, statistically significant differences in DNA persistence were found among the items classified as non-porous surfaces and among the items classified as porous surfaces. Additionally, this study showed that the sample storage environment had a larger impact on DNA persistence than previously observed for metal surfaces [1]. When considering DNA type, cellular DNA was shown to persist for longer than cfDNA and persistence as a whole appears to be better when DNA is deposited alone rather than in mixtures. Unsurprisingly, it was found that the amount of DNA recovered from trace deposits decreased over time. However, DNA decay is highly dependent on the surface type and exhibits higher variability at short time points and on porous surfaces. For each of the surfaces tested, DNA persisted 1 year past deposition (in some combination of DNA type and environmental condition), except for wood, on which DNA did not persist in any capacity past four months. This data is intended to add to our understanding of DNA persistence and the factors which affect it.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forensic Science International-Genetics\",\"volume\":\"74 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103151\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forensic Science International-Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1872497324001479\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Science International-Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1872497324001479","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文介绍的工作是大规模持久性项目的第二部分,该项目旨在确定痕量 DNA 的持久性趋势。本研究旨在展示不同的环境储存条件和目标表面特征如何影响细胞和游离细胞 DNA(cfDNA)的持久性。为了消除实验中的差异,我们使用了由合成指纹溶液、细胞 DNA 和/或 cfDNA 组成的替代 DNA 沉积物。在三种不同的环境储存条件下,我们对八个非金属表面进行了为期一年(27 个时间点)的样本采集和分析。实验结果表明,表面特征和 DNA 类型对 DNA 的持久性有很大影响。随着时间的推移,DNA 回收量的变化在很大程度上受到表面孔隙率的影响。无孔表面的 CfDNA 持久性明显更高,而多孔表面的细胞 DNA 持久性更高。此外,被归类为无孔表面的物品和被归类为多孔表面的物品之间在 DNA 持久性方面存在明显的统计学差异。此外,这项研究还表明,与之前观察到的金属表面相比,样品储存环境对 DNA 持久性的影响更大[1]。在考虑 DNA 类型时,细胞 DNA 的持久性比 cfDNA 更长,而且 DNA 单独沉积而非混合物沉积时,整体持久性似乎更好。不难发现,从痕量沉积物中回收的 DNA 数量会随着时间的推移而减少。不过,DNA 的衰减在很大程度上取决于表面类型,在短时间点和多孔表面上表现出更高的可变性。在测试的每种表面上,DNA 都能在沉积物沉积 1 年后(在 DNA 类型和环境条件的某种组合下)继续存在,但木材除外,因为木材上的 DNA 在 4 个月后就不再以任何形式存在了。这些数据旨在加深我们对 DNA 持久性及其影响因素的了解。
Trace DNA and its persistence on various surfaces: A long term study investigating the influence of surface type and environmental conditions – Part two, non-metals
The work presented herein is the second part of a large-scale persistence project aimed at identifying trends in trace DNA persistence. This study aims to show how different environmental storage conditions and target surface characteristics influence the persistence of cellular and cell free DNA (cfDNA) over time. To eliminate variation within the experiment, we used a proxy DNA deposit consisting of a synthetic fingerprint solution, cellular DNA, and/or cfDNA. Samples were collected and analysed from eight non-metal surfaces over the course of 1 year (27 time points) under three different environmental storage conditions. The results of this experiment show that surface characteristics in conjunction with DNA type greatly influence DNA persistence. Variation in the amount of DNA recovered over time was greatly influenced by surface porosity. CfDNA persisted at significantly higher levels on non-porous surfaces, and cellular DNA persisted at higher levels on porous items. Furthermore, statistically significant differences in DNA persistence were found among the items classified as non-porous surfaces and among the items classified as porous surfaces. Additionally, this study showed that the sample storage environment had a larger impact on DNA persistence than previously observed for metal surfaces [1]. When considering DNA type, cellular DNA was shown to persist for longer than cfDNA and persistence as a whole appears to be better when DNA is deposited alone rather than in mixtures. Unsurprisingly, it was found that the amount of DNA recovered from trace deposits decreased over time. However, DNA decay is highly dependent on the surface type and exhibits higher variability at short time points and on porous surfaces. For each of the surfaces tested, DNA persisted 1 year past deposition (in some combination of DNA type and environmental condition), except for wood, on which DNA did not persist in any capacity past four months. This data is intended to add to our understanding of DNA persistence and the factors which affect it.
期刊介绍:
Forensic Science International: Genetics is the premier journal in the field of Forensic Genetics. This branch of Forensic Science can be defined as the application of genetics to human and non-human material (in the sense of a science with the purpose of studying inherited characteristics for the analysis of inter- and intra-specific variations in populations) for the resolution of legal conflicts.
The scope of the journal includes:
Forensic applications of human polymorphism.
Testing of paternity and other family relationships, immigration cases, typing of biological stains and tissues from criminal casework, identification of human remains by DNA testing methodologies.
Description of human polymorphisms of forensic interest, with special interest in DNA polymorphisms.
Autosomal DNA polymorphisms, mini- and microsatellites (or short tandem repeats, STRs), single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), X and Y chromosome polymorphisms, mtDNA polymorphisms, and any other type of DNA variation with potential forensic applications.
Non-human DNA polymorphisms for crime scene investigation.
Population genetics of human polymorphisms of forensic interest.
Population data, especially from DNA polymorphisms of interest for the solution of forensic problems.
DNA typing methodologies and strategies.
Biostatistical methods in forensic genetics.
Evaluation of DNA evidence in forensic problems (such as paternity or immigration cases, criminal casework, identification), classical and new statistical approaches.
Standards in forensic genetics.
Recommendations of regulatory bodies concerning methods, markers, interpretation or strategies or proposals for procedural or technical standards.
Quality control.
Quality control and quality assurance strategies, proficiency testing for DNA typing methodologies.
Criminal DNA databases.
Technical, legal and statistical issues.
General ethical and legal issues related to forensic genetics.