{"title":"亚感觉电噪声刺激对支撑面扰动时平衡反应控制的影响","authors":"Zahra Bassiri , Oluwasegun Akinniyi , Nathan Humphrey , Dario Martelli","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2024.10.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The ability to respond effectively to balance perturbations is crucial for fall prevention. Subsensory electrical stimulation (SES) applied to the skin leads to improved proactive balance control but there is limited evidence on the SES effect on reactive balance control.</div></div><div><h3>Research Questions</h3><div>To test the efficiency of SES in improving reactive balance control against unpredictable support surface perturbations and to compare the effects of SES applied to the trunk and the lower legs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Twenty-three young adults stood on a treadmill while recovering from 15 forward and 15 backward surface translations of increasing magnitude to determine the backward and forward stepping thresholds (<em>BSTh</em> and <em>FSTh</em>). Then, they recovered from three repetitions of forward and backward perturbations of fixed magnitude to determine the characteristic of the compensatory step (i.e., step time, step length, step delay and Margin of Stability - <em>MOS</em>). Each test was conducted with no stimulation (NS), leg stimulation (LS), or trunk stimulation (TS) equal to 90 % of the sensory threshold. Repeated-measures ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc tests were used to analyze the main and interaction effects of stimulation and repetition.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>TS and LS increased the <em>BSTh</em> by 31.5 % (p=0.002) and 16.4 % (p=0.028), respectively, with greater effects of TS; (ii) during backward perturbations, TS reduced compensatory step time by 9.0 %, step length by 17.1 %, and MOS at compensatory heel strike by 17.7 % (p<0.016); and (iii) during forward perturbations, LS and TS reduced the step time by 4.5 % and 3.5 % (p<0.017), and increased the minimum MOS by 7.8 % and 4.5 %, respectively (p<0.048).</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>This is the first study that showed how the application of SES affects reactive balance control during support surface perturbations. TS was more effective than LS during backward perturbations. TS may be an effective strategy to enhance balance control during reactive postural tasks, thus potentially reducing fall risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12496,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":"114 ","pages":"Pages 297-304"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of subsensory electrical noise stimulation on the reactive control of balance during support surface perturbations\",\"authors\":\"Zahra Bassiri , Oluwasegun Akinniyi , Nathan Humphrey , Dario Martelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2024.10.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The ability to respond effectively to balance perturbations is crucial for fall prevention. Subsensory electrical stimulation (SES) applied to the skin leads to improved proactive balance control but there is limited evidence on the SES effect on reactive balance control.</div></div><div><h3>Research Questions</h3><div>To test the efficiency of SES in improving reactive balance control against unpredictable support surface perturbations and to compare the effects of SES applied to the trunk and the lower legs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Twenty-three young adults stood on a treadmill while recovering from 15 forward and 15 backward surface translations of increasing magnitude to determine the backward and forward stepping thresholds (<em>BSTh</em> and <em>FSTh</em>). Then, they recovered from three repetitions of forward and backward perturbations of fixed magnitude to determine the characteristic of the compensatory step (i.e., step time, step length, step delay and Margin of Stability - <em>MOS</em>). Each test was conducted with no stimulation (NS), leg stimulation (LS), or trunk stimulation (TS) equal to 90 % of the sensory threshold. Repeated-measures ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc tests were used to analyze the main and interaction effects of stimulation and repetition.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>TS and LS increased the <em>BSTh</em> by 31.5 % (p=0.002) and 16.4 % (p=0.028), respectively, with greater effects of TS; (ii) during backward perturbations, TS reduced compensatory step time by 9.0 %, step length by 17.1 %, and MOS at compensatory heel strike by 17.7 % (p<0.016); and (iii) during forward perturbations, LS and TS reduced the step time by 4.5 % and 3.5 % (p<0.017), and increased the minimum MOS by 7.8 % and 4.5 %, respectively (p<0.048).</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>This is the first study that showed how the application of SES affects reactive balance control during support surface perturbations. TS was more effective than LS during backward perturbations. TS may be an effective strategy to enhance balance control during reactive postural tasks, thus potentially reducing fall risk.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gait & posture\",\"volume\":\"114 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 297-304\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gait & posture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636224006337\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636224006337","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:有效应对平衡干扰的能力对于预防跌倒至关重要。施加在皮肤上的亚感觉电刺激(SES)可提高主动平衡控制能力,但有关 SES 对被动平衡控制能力影响的证据却很有限:研究问题:测试 SES 对不可预测的支撑面扰动改善反应平衡控制的效率,并比较施加在躯干和小腿上的 SES 的效果:方法:23 名年轻成年人站在跑步机上,同时从 15 次向前和 15 次向后的表面平移中恢复,平移幅度依次增大,以确定前后跨步阈值(BSTh 和 FSTh)。然后,他们从三次重复的固定幅度的向前和向后扰动中恢复,以确定补偿步的特征(即步长、步长、步长延迟和稳定幅度 - MOS)。每次测试都在无刺激(NS)、腿部刺激(LS)或躯干刺激(TS)相当于感觉阈值 90% 的情况下进行。采用重复测量方差分析和 Tukey 事后检验分析刺激和重复的主效应和交互效应:结果:TS和LS分别增加了31.5%(p=0.002)和16.4%(p=0.028)的BSTh,其中TS的影响更大;(ii) 在向后扰动时,TS减少了9.0%的代偿步时间、17.1%的步长和17.7%的代偿击踵时的MOS(p显著性:这是第一项显示在支撑面扰动时应用 SES 如何影响反应平衡控制的研究。在后向扰动过程中,TS 比 LS 更有效。在执行反应性姿势任务时,TS 可能是一种增强平衡控制的有效策略,从而有可能降低跌倒风险。
The effects of subsensory electrical noise stimulation on the reactive control of balance during support surface perturbations
Background
The ability to respond effectively to balance perturbations is crucial for fall prevention. Subsensory electrical stimulation (SES) applied to the skin leads to improved proactive balance control but there is limited evidence on the SES effect on reactive balance control.
Research Questions
To test the efficiency of SES in improving reactive balance control against unpredictable support surface perturbations and to compare the effects of SES applied to the trunk and the lower legs.
Methods
Twenty-three young adults stood on a treadmill while recovering from 15 forward and 15 backward surface translations of increasing magnitude to determine the backward and forward stepping thresholds (BSTh and FSTh). Then, they recovered from three repetitions of forward and backward perturbations of fixed magnitude to determine the characteristic of the compensatory step (i.e., step time, step length, step delay and Margin of Stability - MOS). Each test was conducted with no stimulation (NS), leg stimulation (LS), or trunk stimulation (TS) equal to 90 % of the sensory threshold. Repeated-measures ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc tests were used to analyze the main and interaction effects of stimulation and repetition.
Results
TS and LS increased the BSTh by 31.5 % (p=0.002) and 16.4 % (p=0.028), respectively, with greater effects of TS; (ii) during backward perturbations, TS reduced compensatory step time by 9.0 %, step length by 17.1 %, and MOS at compensatory heel strike by 17.7 % (p<0.016); and (iii) during forward perturbations, LS and TS reduced the step time by 4.5 % and 3.5 % (p<0.017), and increased the minimum MOS by 7.8 % and 4.5 %, respectively (p<0.048).
Significance
This is the first study that showed how the application of SES affects reactive balance control during support surface perturbations. TS was more effective than LS during backward perturbations. TS may be an effective strategy to enhance balance control during reactive postural tasks, thus potentially reducing fall risk.
期刊介绍:
Gait & Posture is a vehicle for the publication of up-to-date basic and clinical research on all aspects of locomotion and balance.
The topics covered include: Techniques for the measurement of gait and posture, and the standardization of results presentation; Studies of normal and pathological gait; Treatment of gait and postural abnormalities; Biomechanical and theoretical approaches to gait and posture; Mathematical models of joint and muscle mechanics; Neurological and musculoskeletal function in gait and posture; The evolution of upright posture and bipedal locomotion; Adaptations of carrying loads, walking on uneven surfaces, climbing stairs etc; spinal biomechanics only if they are directly related to gait and/or posture and are of general interest to our readers; The effect of aging and development on gait and posture; Psychological and cultural aspects of gait; Patient education.