牢记大局

IF 2 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Groundwater Pub Date : 2024-10-27 DOI:10.1111/gwat.13451
Kenneth R. Bradbury
{"title":"牢记大局","authors":"Kenneth R. Bradbury","doi":"10.1111/gwat.13451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As a practicing hydrogeologist, I have assisted many people and communities who have problem wells or water shortages. But when I recently experienced my own water shortage, I realized how much we in developed countries depend on and take for granted that the water will just be there, and will be fit to drink, when we turn on the tap. In late May of this year, thunderstorms and a few tornados rumbled across the midwestern United States, including our home in southern Wisconsin. My wife and I live in a rural area and are accustomed to thunderstorms in the spring. We are also used to occasional electric power outages, which happen three or four times a year and usually last from 15 min to an hour. So, we weren't especially surprised or worried when our lights went out during the storm. Suddenly, our home was silent except for the rain on the windows—no TV, no radio, no internet, no refrigerator, no lights—and no water, because we depend on our domestic well and pump. Our system usually holds enough water and pressure for a couple of toilet flushes and face washes, but that's it. When the blackout lasts 1 to 2 h, no problem. But when it lasts for 24, then 48, then 60 h, as it did this time, we realize how much we take our well, and our water, for granted. We had no water stockpiled. Fortunately, I was able to drive to a convenience store and purchase a few gallons of “pure spring water” to get us through the requisite drinking, face washing, and tooth brushing, but flushing the toilets was a more complicated matter. Our older home has standard toilets, which require about 7 gal per flush (unlike the newer low-flow toilets). I found myself lugging buckets of water up a hill from a nearby stream (and 7 gal weighs around 58 pounds) for flushing toilets and watering our neighbors' horses.</p><p>Obviously, my power outage was just a minor inconvenience compared to the problems of billions of people faced with real disasters and perpetual water shortages. Based on research by Mekonnen and Hoekstra (<span>2016</span>), UNICEF reports that “…four billion people—almost two thirds of the world's population—experience severe water scarcity for at least one month each year, and over two billion people live in countries where water supply is inadequate (https://www.unicef.org/wash/water-scarcity).” This experience made me contemplate the scope of groundwater science and wonder if we are emphasizing the right things in our work and ignoring the big picture while we focus on the small stuff.</p><p><i>Groundwater's</i> publisher, Wiley, lists the top four issue categories addressed by papers in the journal during the past year as, (1) groundwater flow models; (2) groundwater/aquifer recharge; (3) flow/solute transport simulation; and (4) groundwater solute composition and concentrations. These are all important and interesting topics but may not directly address one of the fundamental issues of our time—global water supply and sustainability, the topic of a recent excellent review paper by Scanlon et al. (<span>2023</span>).</p><p>Several years ago, I was fortunate to spend time in Zimbabwe and observed the effort that local villagers (usually women or children) put forth in fetching water by hand or head (Figure 1) to meet daily needs. I visited a village that had a well recently installed by some international goodwill organization. Unfortunately, that well stood unused because the pump had failed, and no repair parts were available. Instead, I saw women and children walking nearly a mile to the local river to obtain water. I doubt that these people were worried about PFAS, nitrates, or other trace chemicals; their goal was just to obtain enough water to get through the day—that's the big picture for them. The pages of <i>Groundwater</i> contain numerous excellent articles covering the landscape of groundwater science, but we need to remember that many people in the world are desperate to just have enough water to go about their lives. The small quantities needed by rural families in impoverished areas will not impact global sustainability. These people don't really need new scientific advances or solutions to global problems; they do need implementation of reliable and robust groundwater practices in their local areas. <i>Groundwater</i> welcomes articles and/or commentaries on how to accomplish this.</p>","PeriodicalId":12866,"journal":{"name":"Groundwater","volume":"62 6","pages":"820-821"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gwat.13451","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Remembering the Big Picture\",\"authors\":\"Kenneth R. Bradbury\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gwat.13451\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>As a practicing hydrogeologist, I have assisted many people and communities who have problem wells or water shortages. But when I recently experienced my own water shortage, I realized how much we in developed countries depend on and take for granted that the water will just be there, and will be fit to drink, when we turn on the tap. In late May of this year, thunderstorms and a few tornados rumbled across the midwestern United States, including our home in southern Wisconsin. My wife and I live in a rural area and are accustomed to thunderstorms in the spring. We are also used to occasional electric power outages, which happen three or four times a year and usually last from 15 min to an hour. So, we weren't especially surprised or worried when our lights went out during the storm. Suddenly, our home was silent except for the rain on the windows—no TV, no radio, no internet, no refrigerator, no lights—and no water, because we depend on our domestic well and pump. Our system usually holds enough water and pressure for a couple of toilet flushes and face washes, but that's it. When the blackout lasts 1 to 2 h, no problem. But when it lasts for 24, then 48, then 60 h, as it did this time, we realize how much we take our well, and our water, for granted. We had no water stockpiled. Fortunately, I was able to drive to a convenience store and purchase a few gallons of “pure spring water” to get us through the requisite drinking, face washing, and tooth brushing, but flushing the toilets was a more complicated matter. Our older home has standard toilets, which require about 7 gal per flush (unlike the newer low-flow toilets). I found myself lugging buckets of water up a hill from a nearby stream (and 7 gal weighs around 58 pounds) for flushing toilets and watering our neighbors' horses.</p><p>Obviously, my power outage was just a minor inconvenience compared to the problems of billions of people faced with real disasters and perpetual water shortages. Based on research by Mekonnen and Hoekstra (<span>2016</span>), UNICEF reports that “…four billion people—almost two thirds of the world's population—experience severe water scarcity for at least one month each year, and over two billion people live in countries where water supply is inadequate (https://www.unicef.org/wash/water-scarcity).” This experience made me contemplate the scope of groundwater science and wonder if we are emphasizing the right things in our work and ignoring the big picture while we focus on the small stuff.</p><p><i>Groundwater's</i> publisher, Wiley, lists the top four issue categories addressed by papers in the journal during the past year as, (1) groundwater flow models; (2) groundwater/aquifer recharge; (3) flow/solute transport simulation; and (4) groundwater solute composition and concentrations. These are all important and interesting topics but may not directly address one of the fundamental issues of our time—global water supply and sustainability, the topic of a recent excellent review paper by Scanlon et al. (<span>2023</span>).</p><p>Several years ago, I was fortunate to spend time in Zimbabwe and observed the effort that local villagers (usually women or children) put forth in fetching water by hand or head (Figure 1) to meet daily needs. I visited a village that had a well recently installed by some international goodwill organization. Unfortunately, that well stood unused because the pump had failed, and no repair parts were available. Instead, I saw women and children walking nearly a mile to the local river to obtain water. I doubt that these people were worried about PFAS, nitrates, or other trace chemicals; their goal was just to obtain enough water to get through the day—that's the big picture for them. The pages of <i>Groundwater</i> contain numerous excellent articles covering the landscape of groundwater science, but we need to remember that many people in the world are desperate to just have enough water to go about their lives. The small quantities needed by rural families in impoverished areas will not impact global sustainability. These people don't really need new scientific advances or solutions to global problems; they do need implementation of reliable and robust groundwater practices in their local areas. <i>Groundwater</i> welcomes articles and/or commentaries on how to accomplish this.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Groundwater\",\"volume\":\"62 6\",\"pages\":\"820-821\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gwat.13451\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Groundwater\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gwat.13451\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Groundwater","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gwat.13451","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为一名执业水文地质学家,我曾帮助过许多水井有问题或缺水的人和社区。但是,当我最近亲身经历缺水问题时,我才意识到,我们发达国家的人们是多么依赖并理所当然地认为,当我们打开水龙头时,水就在那里,就可以饮用。今年 5 月下旬,雷暴和几场龙卷风在美国中西部地区隆隆作响,包括我们在威斯康星州南部的家。我和妻子住在农村地区,对春季的雷暴习以为常。我们也习惯了偶尔的停电,这种情况每年会发生三四次,通常持续 15 分钟到一个小时不等。因此,当我们的电灯在暴风雨中熄灭时,我们并没有感到特别惊讶或担心。突然间,除了雨水打在窗户上,家里一片寂静--没有电视、收音机、互联网、冰箱、电灯,也没有水,因为我们依靠的是家用水井和水泵。我们的系统通常有足够的水量和水压来冲洗几次厕所和洗脸,但仅此而已。当停电持续 1 到 2 小时时,没有问题。但当停电持续 24 小时、48 小时、60 小时,就像这次停电一样,我们才意识到我们是多么想当然地使用我们的水井和水。我们没有储备水。幸运的是,我开车到便利店买了几加仑的 "纯净泉水",可以满足我们喝水、洗脸和刷牙的需要。我们的老房子使用的是标准马桶,每次冲水大约需要 7 加仑(与新型低流量马桶不同)。我发现自己要从附近的小溪里拖着水桶上山(7 加仑重约 58 磅),用于冲厕所和给邻居的马匹浇水。显然,与面临真正灾难和长期缺水的数十亿人相比,我的停电只是一个小小的不便。根据 Mekonnen 和 Hoekstra(2016 年)的研究,联合国儿童基金会报告称:"......40 亿人--几乎占世界人口的三分之二--每年至少有一个月经历严重缺水,超过 20 亿人生活在供水不足的国家(https://www.unicef.org/wash/water-scarcity)"。这次经历让我思考地下水科学的范围,并怀疑我们是否在工作中强调了正确的事情,而忽略了大局,只关注小事。《地下水》的出版商 Wiley 列出了去年该期刊论文涉及的四大问题类别:(1) 地下水流模型;(2) 地下水/含水层补给;(3) 流量/溶质输运模拟;以及 (4) 地下水溶质成分和浓度。几年前,我有幸在津巴布韦度过了一段时间,观察到当地村民(通常是妇女或儿童)为满足日常需要而用手或头取水所付出的努力(图 1)。我访问过一个村庄,那里最近由某个国际友好组织安装了一口水井。遗憾的是,由于水泵出了故障,又没有维修零件,这口井一直闲置着。相反,我看到妇女和儿童步行近一英里到当地的河流取水。我怀疑这些人是否担心全氟辛烷磺酸、硝酸盐或其他微量化学物质;他们的目标只是获得足够的水以度过一天--这就是他们的大局观。地下水》杂志刊登了大量关于地下水科学的优秀文章,但我们需要记住,世界上有很多人都在为获得足够的水而绝望。贫困地区农村家庭所需的少量水不会影响全球的可持续发展。这些人并不真正需要新的科学进步或全球性问题的解决方案;他们需要的是在当地实施可靠、稳健的地下水利用方法。地下水》欢迎有关如何实现这一目标的文章和/或评论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Remembering the Big Picture

As a practicing hydrogeologist, I have assisted many people and communities who have problem wells or water shortages. But when I recently experienced my own water shortage, I realized how much we in developed countries depend on and take for granted that the water will just be there, and will be fit to drink, when we turn on the tap. In late May of this year, thunderstorms and a few tornados rumbled across the midwestern United States, including our home in southern Wisconsin. My wife and I live in a rural area and are accustomed to thunderstorms in the spring. We are also used to occasional electric power outages, which happen three or four times a year and usually last from 15 min to an hour. So, we weren't especially surprised or worried when our lights went out during the storm. Suddenly, our home was silent except for the rain on the windows—no TV, no radio, no internet, no refrigerator, no lights—and no water, because we depend on our domestic well and pump. Our system usually holds enough water and pressure for a couple of toilet flushes and face washes, but that's it. When the blackout lasts 1 to 2 h, no problem. But when it lasts for 24, then 48, then 60 h, as it did this time, we realize how much we take our well, and our water, for granted. We had no water stockpiled. Fortunately, I was able to drive to a convenience store and purchase a few gallons of “pure spring water” to get us through the requisite drinking, face washing, and tooth brushing, but flushing the toilets was a more complicated matter. Our older home has standard toilets, which require about 7 gal per flush (unlike the newer low-flow toilets). I found myself lugging buckets of water up a hill from a nearby stream (and 7 gal weighs around 58 pounds) for flushing toilets and watering our neighbors' horses.

Obviously, my power outage was just a minor inconvenience compared to the problems of billions of people faced with real disasters and perpetual water shortages. Based on research by Mekonnen and Hoekstra (2016), UNICEF reports that “…four billion people—almost two thirds of the world's population—experience severe water scarcity for at least one month each year, and over two billion people live in countries where water supply is inadequate (https://www.unicef.org/wash/water-scarcity).” This experience made me contemplate the scope of groundwater science and wonder if we are emphasizing the right things in our work and ignoring the big picture while we focus on the small stuff.

Groundwater's publisher, Wiley, lists the top four issue categories addressed by papers in the journal during the past year as, (1) groundwater flow models; (2) groundwater/aquifer recharge; (3) flow/solute transport simulation; and (4) groundwater solute composition and concentrations. These are all important and interesting topics but may not directly address one of the fundamental issues of our time—global water supply and sustainability, the topic of a recent excellent review paper by Scanlon et al. (2023).

Several years ago, I was fortunate to spend time in Zimbabwe and observed the effort that local villagers (usually women or children) put forth in fetching water by hand or head (Figure 1) to meet daily needs. I visited a village that had a well recently installed by some international goodwill organization. Unfortunately, that well stood unused because the pump had failed, and no repair parts were available. Instead, I saw women and children walking nearly a mile to the local river to obtain water. I doubt that these people were worried about PFAS, nitrates, or other trace chemicals; their goal was just to obtain enough water to get through the day—that's the big picture for them. The pages of Groundwater contain numerous excellent articles covering the landscape of groundwater science, but we need to remember that many people in the world are desperate to just have enough water to go about their lives. The small quantities needed by rural families in impoverished areas will not impact global sustainability. These people don't really need new scientific advances or solutions to global problems; they do need implementation of reliable and robust groundwater practices in their local areas. Groundwater welcomes articles and/or commentaries on how to accomplish this.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Groundwater
Groundwater 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Ground Water is the leading international journal focused exclusively on ground water. Since 1963, Ground Water has published a dynamic mix of papers on topics related to ground water including ground water flow and well hydraulics, hydrogeochemistry and contaminant hydrogeology, application of geophysics, groundwater management and policy, and history of ground water hydrology. This is the journal you can count on to bring you the practical applications in ground water hydrology.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Jupyter Notebooks for Parameter Estimation, Uncertainty Analysis, and Optimization with PEST++ Remembering the Big Picture Exploring Freshwater Beneath the Ocean Floor Society News
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1