810 纳米高功率激光对正畸托槽表面生物膜的去除和杀菌作用:体外研究

Huan Yang, Kai Yang
{"title":"810 纳米高功率激光对正畸托槽表面生物膜的去除和杀菌作用:体外研究","authors":"Huan Yang, Kai Yang","doi":"10.1089/photob.2024.0088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> The present study aimed to analyze the biofilm removal and bactericidal effect of laser treatment alone and laser combined with ultrasonic scaling on orthodontic brackets. It also assessed whether the use of a laser can improve the efficiency of biofilm removal and bactericidal effect compared with traditional ultrasonic instrumentation. <b><i>Background Data:</i></b> <i>Streptococcus mutans</i> (<i>S. mutans</i>) can lead to white spots and dental caries. Orthodontic brackets make teeth cleaning more difficult, and biofilms or bacteria on the surface of brackets worsen the oral environment, which may cause some oral diseases. Laser can be used for biofilm removal and killing bacteria on the surface of an object through thermal, photochemical, and pressure effects, which is widely used in the treatment of oral diseases. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A total of 600 mandibular incisor brackets were collected for this study. Among these, 320 unused brackets were used for the <i>S. mutans</i> crystal violet assay (<i>n</i> = 160) and for <i>S. mutans</i> live/dead bacterial staining (<i>n</i> = 160). Another 280 brackets, obtained from patients who had undergone therapy for over two years, were used for the mature multispecies biofilms removal assay (<i>n</i> = 120) and multispecies bacterial live/dead bacterial staining (<i>n</i> = 160). Ultrasonic scaling, laser, and laser combined with ultrasonic scaling were applied to the labial surface of brackets covered by <i>S. mutans</i> biofilm or mature multispecies biofilms. Specifically, we used the following three methods: ultrasonic scaling for 10 sec without laser; 810-nm laser (Doctor Smile, Italy, LA5D0 001.1) with 0.3-mm spot size at total 21.2 kJ/cm<sup>2</sup> for 10 sec; and 810-nm laser at total 10.6 kJ/cm<sup>2</sup> for 5 sec, followed by ultrasonic scaling for 5 sec. The 810-nm diode laser removed biofilms with a power of 1.5 W and a power density of 2.12 kW/cm<sup>2</sup>. The <i>S. mutans</i> biofilm was examined using crystal violet assay, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used for mature multispecies biofilms to evaluate the effect of the three methods on biofilm removal. Live/dead bacterial staining was used to examine the bactericidal effect on remaining biofilms by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). <b><i>Results:</i></b> For <i>S. mutans</i> biofilm, the optical density (OD) value and live/dead bacterial ratio in the laser and the laser combined with ultrasonic scaling groups were significantly lower than those in the ultrasonic scaling group (<i>p</i> < 0.05); moreover, the OD value and the live/dead bacterial ratio in laser treatment combined with ultrasonic scaling and laser treatment alone showed no significant difference (<i>p</i> > 0.05). For mature multispecies biofilms, the percentage of biofilm coverage after treatment was higher in the laser group than in the ultrasonic scaling group (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and lower in the laser combined with ultrasonic scaling group than in the ultrasonic scaling group (<i>p</i> < 0.05), and live/dead bacterial staining showed that laser treatment alone killed the most bacteria, followed by laser treatment combined with ultrasonic scaling, while ultrasonic scaling alone seldom killed bacteria. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Laser treatment alone has a better bactericidal effect and can also remove more <i>S. mutans</i> biofilm than ultrasonic scaling alone, but it fails to remove more mature multispecies biofilms. Laser treatment combined with ultrasonic scaling can remove more <i>S. mutans</i> biofilm and mature multispecies biofilms than ultrasonic scaling alone and also has a better bactericidal effect than ultrasonic scaling alone on a bracket surface.</p>","PeriodicalId":94169,"journal":{"name":"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Biofilm Removal and Bactericidal Effect of an 810-nm High-Power Laser on an Orthodontic Bracket Surface: An In Vitro Study.\",\"authors\":\"Huan Yang, Kai Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/photob.2024.0088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> The present study aimed to analyze the biofilm removal and bactericidal effect of laser treatment alone and laser combined with ultrasonic scaling on orthodontic brackets. It also assessed whether the use of a laser can improve the efficiency of biofilm removal and bactericidal effect compared with traditional ultrasonic instrumentation. <b><i>Background Data:</i></b> <i>Streptococcus mutans</i> (<i>S. mutans</i>) can lead to white spots and dental caries. Orthodontic brackets make teeth cleaning more difficult, and biofilms or bacteria on the surface of brackets worsen the oral environment, which may cause some oral diseases. Laser can be used for biofilm removal and killing bacteria on the surface of an object through thermal, photochemical, and pressure effects, which is widely used in the treatment of oral diseases. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A total of 600 mandibular incisor brackets were collected for this study. Among these, 320 unused brackets were used for the <i>S. mutans</i> crystal violet assay (<i>n</i> = 160) and for <i>S. mutans</i> live/dead bacterial staining (<i>n</i> = 160). Another 280 brackets, obtained from patients who had undergone therapy for over two years, were used for the mature multispecies biofilms removal assay (<i>n</i> = 120) and multispecies bacterial live/dead bacterial staining (<i>n</i> = 160). Ultrasonic scaling, laser, and laser combined with ultrasonic scaling were applied to the labial surface of brackets covered by <i>S. mutans</i> biofilm or mature multispecies biofilms. Specifically, we used the following three methods: ultrasonic scaling for 10 sec without laser; 810-nm laser (Doctor Smile, Italy, LA5D0 001.1) with 0.3-mm spot size at total 21.2 kJ/cm<sup>2</sup> for 10 sec; and 810-nm laser at total 10.6 kJ/cm<sup>2</sup> for 5 sec, followed by ultrasonic scaling for 5 sec. The 810-nm diode laser removed biofilms with a power of 1.5 W and a power density of 2.12 kW/cm<sup>2</sup>. The <i>S. mutans</i> biofilm was examined using crystal violet assay, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used for mature multispecies biofilms to evaluate the effect of the three methods on biofilm removal. Live/dead bacterial staining was used to examine the bactericidal effect on remaining biofilms by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). <b><i>Results:</i></b> For <i>S. mutans</i> biofilm, the optical density (OD) value and live/dead bacterial ratio in the laser and the laser combined with ultrasonic scaling groups were significantly lower than those in the ultrasonic scaling group (<i>p</i> < 0.05); moreover, the OD value and the live/dead bacterial ratio in laser treatment combined with ultrasonic scaling and laser treatment alone showed no significant difference (<i>p</i> > 0.05). For mature multispecies biofilms, the percentage of biofilm coverage after treatment was higher in the laser group than in the ultrasonic scaling group (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and lower in the laser combined with ultrasonic scaling group than in the ultrasonic scaling group (<i>p</i> < 0.05), and live/dead bacterial staining showed that laser treatment alone killed the most bacteria, followed by laser treatment combined with ultrasonic scaling, while ultrasonic scaling alone seldom killed bacteria. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Laser treatment alone has a better bactericidal effect and can also remove more <i>S. mutans</i> biofilm than ultrasonic scaling alone, but it fails to remove more mature multispecies biofilms. Laser treatment combined with ultrasonic scaling can remove more <i>S. mutans</i> biofilm and mature multispecies biofilms than ultrasonic scaling alone and also has a better bactericidal effect than ultrasonic scaling alone on a bracket surface.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/photob.2024.0088\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/photob.2024.0088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在分析单独使用激光治疗和激光与超声波洗牙相结合对正畸托槽的生物膜去除和杀菌效果。与传统的超声波器械相比,本研究还评估了使用激光是否能提高生物膜去除效率和杀菌效果。背景数据:变异链球菌(S. mutans)可导致白斑和龋齿。正畸托槽会增加牙齿清洁的难度,托槽表面的生物膜或细菌会使口腔环境恶化,从而引发一些口腔疾病。激光可用于清除生物膜,通过热效应、光化学效应和压力效应杀死物体表面的细菌,在口腔疾病治疗中得到广泛应用。方法:本研究共收集了 600 个下颌门牙托槽。其中,320 个未使用的托槽被用于变异杆菌水晶紫检测(160 个)和变异杆菌活/死细菌染色(160 个)。另外 280 个托架来自接受过两年以上治疗的患者,用于成熟多菌种生物膜去除试验(n = 120)和多菌种细菌活/死细菌染色(n = 160)。超声波洗牙、激光洗牙以及激光与超声波洗牙相结合的方法被应用于被变异棒状杆菌生物膜或成熟的多菌种生物膜覆盖的托槽唇面。具体来说,我们使用了以下三种方法:超声波洗牙 10 秒,不使用激光;810 纳米激光(意大利 Doctor Smile 公司,LA5D0 001.1),光斑大小为 0.3 毫米,总能量为 21.2 千焦/平方厘米,持续 10 秒;810 纳米激光,总能量为 10.6 千焦/平方厘米,持续 5 秒,然后超声波洗牙 5 秒。810 纳米二极管激光去除生物膜的功率为 1.5 W,功率密度为 2.12 kW/cm2。使用结晶紫检测法检查变异单胞菌生物膜,并使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)观察成熟的多菌种生物膜,以评估三种方法对生物膜去除的影响。利用共焦激光扫描显微镜(CLSM)对活/死细菌染色,检查对残留生物膜的杀菌效果。结果对于变异单胞菌生物膜,激光组和激光联合超声波洗牙组的光密度(OD)值和活/死菌比均显著低于超声波洗牙组(P < 0.05);此外,激光治疗联合超声波洗牙组和单独激光治疗组的光密度(OD)值和活/死菌比无显著差异(P > 0.05)。对于成熟的多菌种生物膜,激光组治疗后生物膜覆盖率高于超声波洁治组(P < 0.05),激光联合超声波洁治组低于超声波洁治组(P < 0.05),活/死细菌染色显示,单独激光治疗杀死的细菌最多,其次是激光治疗联合超声波洁治,而单独超声波洁治很少杀死细菌。结论是单独使用激光治疗比单独使用超声波洁牙有更好的杀菌效果,也能去除更多的变异牙齿螺杆菌生物膜,但无法去除更成熟的多菌种生物膜。激光治疗结合超声波洁牙比单独使用超声波洁牙能去除更多的变异杆菌生物膜和成熟的多菌种生物膜,而且比单独使用超声波洁牙对托槽表面的杀菌效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Biofilm Removal and Bactericidal Effect of an 810-nm High-Power Laser on an Orthodontic Bracket Surface: An In Vitro Study.

Objective: The present study aimed to analyze the biofilm removal and bactericidal effect of laser treatment alone and laser combined with ultrasonic scaling on orthodontic brackets. It also assessed whether the use of a laser can improve the efficiency of biofilm removal and bactericidal effect compared with traditional ultrasonic instrumentation. Background Data: Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) can lead to white spots and dental caries. Orthodontic brackets make teeth cleaning more difficult, and biofilms or bacteria on the surface of brackets worsen the oral environment, which may cause some oral diseases. Laser can be used for biofilm removal and killing bacteria on the surface of an object through thermal, photochemical, and pressure effects, which is widely used in the treatment of oral diseases. Methods: A total of 600 mandibular incisor brackets were collected for this study. Among these, 320 unused brackets were used for the S. mutans crystal violet assay (n = 160) and for S. mutans live/dead bacterial staining (n = 160). Another 280 brackets, obtained from patients who had undergone therapy for over two years, were used for the mature multispecies biofilms removal assay (n = 120) and multispecies bacterial live/dead bacterial staining (n = 160). Ultrasonic scaling, laser, and laser combined with ultrasonic scaling were applied to the labial surface of brackets covered by S. mutans biofilm or mature multispecies biofilms. Specifically, we used the following three methods: ultrasonic scaling for 10 sec without laser; 810-nm laser (Doctor Smile, Italy, LA5D0 001.1) with 0.3-mm spot size at total 21.2 kJ/cm2 for 10 sec; and 810-nm laser at total 10.6 kJ/cm2 for 5 sec, followed by ultrasonic scaling for 5 sec. The 810-nm diode laser removed biofilms with a power of 1.5 W and a power density of 2.12 kW/cm2. The S. mutans biofilm was examined using crystal violet assay, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used for mature multispecies biofilms to evaluate the effect of the three methods on biofilm removal. Live/dead bacterial staining was used to examine the bactericidal effect on remaining biofilms by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Results: For S. mutans biofilm, the optical density (OD) value and live/dead bacterial ratio in the laser and the laser combined with ultrasonic scaling groups were significantly lower than those in the ultrasonic scaling group (p < 0.05); moreover, the OD value and the live/dead bacterial ratio in laser treatment combined with ultrasonic scaling and laser treatment alone showed no significant difference (p > 0.05). For mature multispecies biofilms, the percentage of biofilm coverage after treatment was higher in the laser group than in the ultrasonic scaling group (p < 0.05) and lower in the laser combined with ultrasonic scaling group than in the ultrasonic scaling group (p < 0.05), and live/dead bacterial staining showed that laser treatment alone killed the most bacteria, followed by laser treatment combined with ultrasonic scaling, while ultrasonic scaling alone seldom killed bacteria. Conclusions: Laser treatment alone has a better bactericidal effect and can also remove more S. mutans biofilm than ultrasonic scaling alone, but it fails to remove more mature multispecies biofilms. Laser treatment combined with ultrasonic scaling can remove more S. mutans biofilm and mature multispecies biofilms than ultrasonic scaling alone and also has a better bactericidal effect than ultrasonic scaling alone on a bracket surface.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Photobiomodulation, Photomedicine, and Laser Surgery Editor-in-Chief: Michael R Hamblin, PhD Co-Editor-in-Chief: Heidi Abrahamse, PhD
期刊最新文献
"Five-Step" Vaporization of the Prostate Using 180-W XPS Greenlight Laser in Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia of Large Volume: Improved Efficacy and Safety. Effects of Laser Acupuncture on Metabolic Functions of Sedentary People: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial. Photobiomodulation as a Potential Adjuvant Therapy to Improve Cochlear Implant Efficiency. The Effect of Photobiomodulation on Bone Mineral Density, Serum Vitamin D, and Bone Formation Markers in Individuals with Complete Spinal Cord Injuries with Osteoporosis. The Effects of Photobiomodulation Therapy in Cubital Tunnel Syndrome, Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1