José Caamaño, David Díaz, Cecilia Beltrán, Claudina Aguayo, Bárbara Castillo, Luis Bustos, Nicolás Saavedra
{"title":"重症 COVID-19 的康复血浆疗法:智利南部大流行爆发初期的试点研究。","authors":"José Caamaño, David Díaz, Cecilia Beltrán, Claudina Aguayo, Bárbara Castillo, Luis Bustos, Nicolás Saavedra","doi":"10.4067/s0034-98872024000300351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Convalescent Plasma (CP) from patients who recovered from COVID-19 may present neutralizing antibodies against viral protein S of SARS-CoV-2 and emerged as a potential therapeutic alternative for patients with severe infection at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic breakout. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the effect and safety of CP treatment in patients with severe COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed a quasi-experimental study that included 156 patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by RT-qPCR and severe symptoms who received CP. As a control group, we selected a historical cohort of 113 individuals admitted with COVID-19 and severe symptomatology before the starting date of the study. Clinical status and mortality during the study period were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no adverse reactions to CP administration. In the CP group, days on mechanical ventilation were significantly lower than the control group (2.8±5.08 days vs. 4.7±6.19 days; p= 0.0081). Moreover, a significant difference was observed in the number of days stayed in the critical patient unit (CPU) in CP vs. controls (4.2±5.47 vs. 5.8±6.39 days, p= 0.0281).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We observed no association between CP administration and survival at 14 days. Treatment with CP was safe and not associated with adverse events. In addition, using CP was associated with a reduction in both stay at the CPU and connection to mechanical ventilation.</p>","PeriodicalId":101370,"journal":{"name":"Revista medica de Chile","volume":"152 3","pages":"351-359"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Convalescent Plasma Therapy in Severe COVID-19: A Pilot Study at the Beginning of the Pandemic Outbreak in Southern Chile.\",\"authors\":\"José Caamaño, David Díaz, Cecilia Beltrán, Claudina Aguayo, Bárbara Castillo, Luis Bustos, Nicolás Saavedra\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/s0034-98872024000300351\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Convalescent Plasma (CP) from patients who recovered from COVID-19 may present neutralizing antibodies against viral protein S of SARS-CoV-2 and emerged as a potential therapeutic alternative for patients with severe infection at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic breakout. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the effect and safety of CP treatment in patients with severe COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed a quasi-experimental study that included 156 patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by RT-qPCR and severe symptoms who received CP. As a control group, we selected a historical cohort of 113 individuals admitted with COVID-19 and severe symptomatology before the starting date of the study. Clinical status and mortality during the study period were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no adverse reactions to CP administration. In the CP group, days on mechanical ventilation were significantly lower than the control group (2.8±5.08 days vs. 4.7±6.19 days; p= 0.0081). Moreover, a significant difference was observed in the number of days stayed in the critical patient unit (CPU) in CP vs. controls (4.2±5.47 vs. 5.8±6.39 days, p= 0.0281).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We observed no association between CP administration and survival at 14 days. Treatment with CP was safe and not associated with adverse events. In addition, using CP was associated with a reduction in both stay at the CPU and connection to mechanical ventilation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista medica de Chile\",\"volume\":\"152 3\",\"pages\":\"351-359\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista medica de Chile\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0034-98872024000300351\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista medica de Chile","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0034-98872024000300351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Convalescent Plasma Therapy in Severe COVID-19: A Pilot Study at the Beginning of the Pandemic Outbreak in Southern Chile.
Convalescent Plasma (CP) from patients who recovered from COVID-19 may present neutralizing antibodies against viral protein S of SARS-CoV-2 and emerged as a potential therapeutic alternative for patients with severe infection at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic breakout. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the effect and safety of CP treatment in patients with severe COVID-19.
Methods: We designed a quasi-experimental study that included 156 patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by RT-qPCR and severe symptoms who received CP. As a control group, we selected a historical cohort of 113 individuals admitted with COVID-19 and severe symptomatology before the starting date of the study. Clinical status and mortality during the study period were recorded.
Results: There were no adverse reactions to CP administration. In the CP group, days on mechanical ventilation were significantly lower than the control group (2.8±5.08 days vs. 4.7±6.19 days; p= 0.0081). Moreover, a significant difference was observed in the number of days stayed in the critical patient unit (CPU) in CP vs. controls (4.2±5.47 vs. 5.8±6.39 days, p= 0.0281).
Conclusions: We observed no association between CP administration and survival at 14 days. Treatment with CP was safe and not associated with adverse events. In addition, using CP was associated with a reduction in both stay at the CPU and connection to mechanical ventilation.