重症 COVID-19 的康复血浆疗法:智利南部大流行爆发初期的试点研究。

José Caamaño, David Díaz, Cecilia Beltrán, Claudina Aguayo, Bárbara Castillo, Luis Bustos, Nicolás Saavedra
{"title":"重症 COVID-19 的康复血浆疗法:智利南部大流行爆发初期的试点研究。","authors":"José Caamaño, David Díaz, Cecilia Beltrán, Claudina Aguayo, Bárbara Castillo, Luis Bustos, Nicolás Saavedra","doi":"10.4067/s0034-98872024000300351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Convalescent Plasma (CP) from patients who recovered from COVID-19 may present neutralizing antibodies against viral protein S of SARS-CoV-2 and emerged as a potential therapeutic alternative for patients with severe infection at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic breakout. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the effect and safety of CP treatment in patients with severe COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed a quasi-experimental study that included 156 patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by RT-qPCR and severe symptoms who received CP. As a control group, we selected a historical cohort of 113 individuals admitted with COVID-19 and severe symptomatology before the starting date of the study. Clinical status and mortality during the study period were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no adverse reactions to CP administration. In the CP group, days on mechanical ventilation were significantly lower than the control group (2.8±5.08 days vs. 4.7±6.19 days; p= 0.0081). Moreover, a significant difference was observed in the number of days stayed in the critical patient unit (CPU) in CP vs. controls (4.2±5.47 vs. 5.8±6.39 days, p= 0.0281).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We observed no association between CP administration and survival at 14 days. Treatment with CP was safe and not associated with adverse events. In addition, using CP was associated with a reduction in both stay at the CPU and connection to mechanical ventilation.</p>","PeriodicalId":101370,"journal":{"name":"Revista medica de Chile","volume":"152 3","pages":"351-359"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Convalescent Plasma Therapy in Severe COVID-19: A Pilot Study at the Beginning of the Pandemic Outbreak in Southern Chile.\",\"authors\":\"José Caamaño, David Díaz, Cecilia Beltrán, Claudina Aguayo, Bárbara Castillo, Luis Bustos, Nicolás Saavedra\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/s0034-98872024000300351\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Convalescent Plasma (CP) from patients who recovered from COVID-19 may present neutralizing antibodies against viral protein S of SARS-CoV-2 and emerged as a potential therapeutic alternative for patients with severe infection at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic breakout. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the effect and safety of CP treatment in patients with severe COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed a quasi-experimental study that included 156 patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by RT-qPCR and severe symptoms who received CP. As a control group, we selected a historical cohort of 113 individuals admitted with COVID-19 and severe symptomatology before the starting date of the study. Clinical status and mortality during the study period were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no adverse reactions to CP administration. In the CP group, days on mechanical ventilation were significantly lower than the control group (2.8±5.08 days vs. 4.7±6.19 days; p= 0.0081). Moreover, a significant difference was observed in the number of days stayed in the critical patient unit (CPU) in CP vs. controls (4.2±5.47 vs. 5.8±6.39 days, p= 0.0281).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We observed no association between CP administration and survival at 14 days. Treatment with CP was safe and not associated with adverse events. In addition, using CP was associated with a reduction in both stay at the CPU and connection to mechanical ventilation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista medica de Chile\",\"volume\":\"152 3\",\"pages\":\"351-359\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista medica de Chile\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0034-98872024000300351\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista medica de Chile","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0034-98872024000300351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

COVID-19大流行爆发初期,来自COVID-19康复患者的康复血浆(CP)可能会产生针对SARS-CoV-2病毒蛋白S的中和抗体,并成为重症感染患者的一种潜在替代治疗方法。因此,本研究旨在评估 CP 治疗重症 COVID-19 患者的效果和安全性:我们设计了一项准实验研究,纳入了 156 名经 RT-qPCR 确认感染 SARS-CoV-2 并出现严重症状的患者,他们都接受了 CP 治疗。作为对照组,我们选择了在研究开始日期之前因 COVID-19 和严重症状入院的 113 名患者作为历史队列。我们记录了研究期间的临床状态和死亡率:结果:服用 CP 无不良反应。CP组的机械通气天数明显少于对照组(2.8±5.08天 vs. 4.7±6.19天;p= 0.0081)。此外,CP 组与对照组在危重病人病房(CPU)的住院天数也有明显差异(4.2±5.47 天 vs. 5.8±6.39 天,p= 0.0281):我们观察到使用氯化石蜡与 14 天存活率之间没有关联。使用氯化石蜡治疗是安全的,且与不良事件无关。此外,使用氯化石蜡与减少中央处理器的停留时间和机械通气的连接有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Convalescent Plasma Therapy in Severe COVID-19: A Pilot Study at the Beginning of the Pandemic Outbreak in Southern Chile.

Convalescent Plasma (CP) from patients who recovered from COVID-19 may present neutralizing antibodies against viral protein S of SARS-CoV-2 and emerged as a potential therapeutic alternative for patients with severe infection at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic breakout. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the effect and safety of CP treatment in patients with severe COVID-19.

Methods: We designed a quasi-experimental study that included 156 patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by RT-qPCR and severe symptoms who received CP. As a control group, we selected a historical cohort of 113 individuals admitted with COVID-19 and severe symptomatology before the starting date of the study. Clinical status and mortality during the study period were recorded.

Results: There were no adverse reactions to CP administration. In the CP group, days on mechanical ventilation were significantly lower than the control group (2.8±5.08 days vs. 4.7±6.19 days; p= 0.0081). Moreover, a significant difference was observed in the number of days stayed in the critical patient unit (CPU) in CP vs. controls (4.2±5.47 vs. 5.8±6.39 days, p= 0.0281).

Conclusions: We observed no association between CP administration and survival at 14 days. Treatment with CP was safe and not associated with adverse events. In addition, using CP was associated with a reduction in both stay at the CPU and connection to mechanical ventilation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Another Lesson from the Pandemic: Supervisor Social Support for Mental Health Protection in Healthcare Workers, Chile]. [Chronic Insomnia: A Public Health Problem]. [Coronary Angiography in Clinical Practice: Update on Indications, Complications, and Contraindications]. [Diversity and Institution: Scopes for Health Sciences Education]. [Duties of the Physician in Relation to the Use of Alternative and Complementary Medicines by Their Patients].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1