太阳周期 23 至 25 的地表下流动的长期趋势

IF 2.7 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS Solar Physics Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1007/s11207-024-02397-6
Rudolf Komm
{"title":"太阳周期 23 至 25 的地表下流动的长期趋势","authors":"Rudolf Komm","doi":"10.1007/s11207-024-02397-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We study the long-term variation of the zonal and meridional flows from Solar Cycle 23 to 25 derived with ring-diagram analysis applied to <i>Global Oscillation Network Group</i> (GONG) and <i>Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager</i> (HMI) Dopplergrams. We focus mainly on the subsurface flows averaged over depths from 2.0 Mm to 11.6 Mm since their long-term variations are sufficiently similar. First, we examine their temporal variations for systematic artifacts. We find that the GONG-derived zonal flows increase almost linearly with time until about 2020, which we correct with a linear regression. Then we determine the average differences between the GONG- and HMI-derived flows. The average offset is <span>\\(0.15 \\pm 0.53\\)</span> m s<sup>−1</sup> for the zonal flow and <span>\\(0.65 \\pm 0.08\\)</span> m s<sup>−1</sup> for the meridional flow within <span>\\(\\pm 30.0^{\\circ }\\)</span> latitude. The average difference of the meridional flow is nearly constant with latitude in this range, whereas that of the zonal flow varies similarly to that of the magnetic activity. At latitudes of 45.0<sup>∘</sup> and higher, the differences increase and are larger than those at lower latitudes, which is most likely due to the combined effect of different spatial resolution between GONG and HMI and geometric projection effects. Finally, we combine the GONG- and HMI-derived flows and find, as expected, that the solar-cycle variation is the dominant long-term variation. At each latitude within <span>\\(\\pm 30.0^{\\circ }\\)</span>, the meridional-flow pattern appears ahead of the zonal-flow pattern by an average lag of <span>\\(0.926 \\pm 0.126\\)</span> years. The equatorward and poleward branches of the solar-cycle variation occur at 52.5<sup>∘</sup> with the poleward branches present near 60.0<sup>∘</sup> and the equatorward ones at lower latitudes. The zonal flows at 52.5<sup>∘</sup> and 60.0<sup>∘</sup> show an additional trend and decrease by <span>\\(2.9 \\pm 0. 3\\)</span> m s<sup>−1</sup> over 11 years. This decrease might nevertheless be related to the solar cycle and imply that the flow amplitudes are anticorrelated with the strength of the associated solar cycle.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":777,"journal":{"name":"Solar Physics","volume":"299 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-Term Trends in Subsurface Flows of Solar Cycle 23 to 25\",\"authors\":\"Rudolf Komm\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11207-024-02397-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We study the long-term variation of the zonal and meridional flows from Solar Cycle 23 to 25 derived with ring-diagram analysis applied to <i>Global Oscillation Network Group</i> (GONG) and <i>Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager</i> (HMI) Dopplergrams. We focus mainly on the subsurface flows averaged over depths from 2.0 Mm to 11.6 Mm since their long-term variations are sufficiently similar. First, we examine their temporal variations for systematic artifacts. We find that the GONG-derived zonal flows increase almost linearly with time until about 2020, which we correct with a linear regression. Then we determine the average differences between the GONG- and HMI-derived flows. The average offset is <span>\\\\(0.15 \\\\pm 0.53\\\\)</span> m s<sup>−1</sup> for the zonal flow and <span>\\\\(0.65 \\\\pm 0.08\\\\)</span> m s<sup>−1</sup> for the meridional flow within <span>\\\\(\\\\pm 30.0^{\\\\circ }\\\\)</span> latitude. The average difference of the meridional flow is nearly constant with latitude in this range, whereas that of the zonal flow varies similarly to that of the magnetic activity. At latitudes of 45.0<sup>∘</sup> and higher, the differences increase and are larger than those at lower latitudes, which is most likely due to the combined effect of different spatial resolution between GONG and HMI and geometric projection effects. Finally, we combine the GONG- and HMI-derived flows and find, as expected, that the solar-cycle variation is the dominant long-term variation. At each latitude within <span>\\\\(\\\\pm 30.0^{\\\\circ }\\\\)</span>, the meridional-flow pattern appears ahead of the zonal-flow pattern by an average lag of <span>\\\\(0.926 \\\\pm 0.126\\\\)</span> years. The equatorward and poleward branches of the solar-cycle variation occur at 52.5<sup>∘</sup> with the poleward branches present near 60.0<sup>∘</sup> and the equatorward ones at lower latitudes. The zonal flows at 52.5<sup>∘</sup> and 60.0<sup>∘</sup> show an additional trend and decrease by <span>\\\\(2.9 \\\\pm 0. 3\\\\)</span> m s<sup>−1</sup> over 11 years. This decrease might nevertheless be related to the solar cycle and imply that the flow amplitudes are anticorrelated with the strength of the associated solar cycle.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":777,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Solar Physics\",\"volume\":\"299 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Solar Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11207-024-02397-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Solar Physics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11207-024-02397-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了太阳周期 23 至 25 的纵向和经向流的长期变化,这些变化是通过对全球涛动网络组(GONG)和日震与磁成像仪(HMI)多普勒图进行环图分析得出的。我们主要关注的是平均深度为 2.0 毫米到 11.6 毫米的次表层流,因为它们的长期变化非常相似。首先,我们研究了它们的时间变化,以寻找系统性伪影。我们发现,在 2020 年之前,由 GONG 得出的带状流几乎随时间呈线性增长,我们对此进行了线性回归校正。然后,我们确定 GONG 和 HMI 导出流量之间的平均差异。在 30.0^{/circ }纬度范围内,经向流的平均偏移量为 0.65 m s-1。在这一范围内,经向流的平均差值随纬度的变化几乎是恒定的,而带流的平均差值与磁活动的平均差值变化相似。在纬度 45.0∘及更高的纬度上,差异增大,而且比低纬度上的差异更大,这很可能是由于 GONG 和 HMI 的空间分辨率不同以及几何投影效应的综合影响。最后,我们综合了 GONG 和 HMI 得出的流量,发现正如预期的那样,太阳周期变化是主要的长期变化。在每个纬度(30.0^/pm)范围内,经向流模式比纬向流模式平均滞后(0.926/pm 0.126)年。太阳周期变化的赤道分支和极地分支出现在52.5∘,极地分支出现在60.0∘附近,赤道分支出现在较低纬度。52.5∘和60.0∘处的带状流显示出一种额外的趋势,在11年中减少了(2.9\pm 0. 3\) m s-1。然而,这种下降可能与太阳周期有关,并意味着流动振幅与相关太阳周期的强度是反相关的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Long-Term Trends in Subsurface Flows of Solar Cycle 23 to 25

We study the long-term variation of the zonal and meridional flows from Solar Cycle 23 to 25 derived with ring-diagram analysis applied to Global Oscillation Network Group (GONG) and Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) Dopplergrams. We focus mainly on the subsurface flows averaged over depths from 2.0 Mm to 11.6 Mm since their long-term variations are sufficiently similar. First, we examine their temporal variations for systematic artifacts. We find that the GONG-derived zonal flows increase almost linearly with time until about 2020, which we correct with a linear regression. Then we determine the average differences between the GONG- and HMI-derived flows. The average offset is \(0.15 \pm 0.53\) m s−1 for the zonal flow and \(0.65 \pm 0.08\) m s−1 for the meridional flow within \(\pm 30.0^{\circ }\) latitude. The average difference of the meridional flow is nearly constant with latitude in this range, whereas that of the zonal flow varies similarly to that of the magnetic activity. At latitudes of 45.0 and higher, the differences increase and are larger than those at lower latitudes, which is most likely due to the combined effect of different spatial resolution between GONG and HMI and geometric projection effects. Finally, we combine the GONG- and HMI-derived flows and find, as expected, that the solar-cycle variation is the dominant long-term variation. At each latitude within \(\pm 30.0^{\circ }\), the meridional-flow pattern appears ahead of the zonal-flow pattern by an average lag of \(0.926 \pm 0.126\) years. The equatorward and poleward branches of the solar-cycle variation occur at 52.5 with the poleward branches present near 60.0 and the equatorward ones at lower latitudes. The zonal flows at 52.5 and 60.0 show an additional trend and decrease by \(2.9 \pm 0. 3\) m s−1 over 11 years. This decrease might nevertheless be related to the solar cycle and imply that the flow amplitudes are anticorrelated with the strength of the associated solar cycle.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Solar Physics
Solar Physics 地学天文-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
17.90%
发文量
146
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Solar Physics was founded in 1967 and is the principal journal for the publication of the results of fundamental research on the Sun. The journal treats all aspects of solar physics, ranging from the internal structure of the Sun and its evolution to the outer corona and solar wind in interplanetary space. Papers on solar-terrestrial physics and on stellar research are also published when their results have a direct bearing on our understanding of the Sun.
期刊最新文献
Prediction of Geoeffective CMEs Using SOHO Images and Deep Learning A New Solar Hard X-ray Image Reconstruction Algorithm for ASO-S/HXI Based on Deep Learning Calibration and Performance of the Full-Disk Vector MagnetoGraph (FMG) on Board the Advanced Space-Based Solar Observatory (ASO-S) Evaluation of Sunspot Areas Derived by Automated Sunspot-Detection Methods Helioseismic Constraints: Past, Current, and Future Observations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1