首页 > 最新文献

Solar Physics最新文献

英文 中文
Solar Polar Field Reversals as the Result of the Global Magnetic Field Meridional Flows 太阳极场反转是全球磁场经向流动的结果
IF 2.4 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS Pub Date : 2026-03-12 DOI: 10.1007/s11207-026-02627-z
Irina A. Bilenko

Based on data obtained from Wilcox Solar Observatory, the solar polar magnetic field reversals in Cycles 21 – 25 are considered. The results indicate that the polarity reversal occurs at the maximum of sunspot activity of each cycle, but the beginning, end, and duration of the reversals did not demonstrate any association with the Wolf numbers, which are characteristics of local magnetic fields. Moreover, during the periods of polarity reversal, the correlation between global magnetic field (GMF) parameters and Wolf numbers decreased and even moved into an anti-correlation mode.

The polarity reversal occurred during periods of sharp structural changes in the GMF, accompanied by a redistribution of the positive- and negative-polarity magnetic field domination in the North and South hemispheres. All parameters of the GMF demonstrate characteristic changes associated with polarity reversal.

The polar field reversals are determined by the GMF flows of positive- and negative-polarity magnetic fields, which cyclically migrate from one pole to the opposite pole. The magnetic fields of the new polarity are delivered to the poles by a certain flow, and then carried away by the same flow to the opposite pole. In each cycle, the increase in the polar magnetic field strength to its maximal values at the solar activity minimum and following decrees to the cycle maximum coincides with the latitudinal changes in corresponding magnetic field flow. The differences in start, duration, and end times of the polarity reversal at each pole are a consequence of the different width and speed of the corresponding flow.

Interaction with magnetic fields of active regions during the passage of the GMF pole-to-pole meridional flows through low latitudes leads to the formation of longitudinal magnetic structures and a sectorial structure of the GMF.

Equations for calculating the meridional circulation of positive- and negative-polarity magnetic field flows are proposed. They allow to predict the time of polarity reversals, and since polarity reversals occur at the maxima of cycles, then also predict the time of maxima of both the future and past cycles.

根据Wilcox太阳观测站的资料,考虑了太阳第21 ~ 25周期的极磁场倒转。结果表明,磁极反转发生在太阳黑子活动高峰期,但反转的开始、结束和持续时间与局地磁场特征沃尔夫数无关。此外,在极性反转期间,全球磁场(GMF)参数与狼数的相关性降低,甚至进入反相关模式。极性反转发生在全球变暖的剧烈结构变化期间,伴随着南北半球正极性和负极性磁场主导地位的重新分配。GMF的所有参数都表现出与极性反转相关的特征变化。磁极倒转是由正极性和负极性磁场的GMF流决定的,它们周期性地从一极迁移到另一极。新极性的磁场由一定的气流输送到两极,然后被同样的气流带到相反的两极。在每一个周期中,极磁场强度在太阳活动最小时增大到最大值并依次增大到周期最大值的规律与相应磁场流的纬向变化一致。两极两极的极性反转的开始、持续时间和结束时间的差异是相应流的不同宽度和速度的结果。GMF极对极经向气流通过低纬度地区时,与活动区域磁场的相互作用导致GMF纵向磁结构和扇形结构的形成。提出了正、负极性磁场流经向环流的计算公式。它们允许预测极性反转的时间,并且由于极性反转发生在周期的最大值,那么也可以预测未来和过去周期的最大值时间。
{"title":"Solar Polar Field Reversals as the Result of the Global Magnetic Field Meridional Flows","authors":"Irina A. Bilenko","doi":"10.1007/s11207-026-02627-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11207-026-02627-z","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Based on data obtained from Wilcox Solar Observatory, the solar polar magnetic field reversals in Cycles 21 – 25 are considered. The results indicate that the polarity reversal occurs at the maximum of sunspot activity of each cycle, but the beginning, end, and duration of the reversals did not demonstrate any association with the Wolf numbers, which are characteristics of local magnetic fields. Moreover, during the periods of polarity reversal, the correlation between global magnetic field (GMF) parameters and Wolf numbers decreased and even moved into an anti-correlation mode.</p><p>The polarity reversal occurred during periods of sharp structural changes in the GMF, accompanied by a redistribution of the positive- and negative-polarity magnetic field domination in the North and South hemispheres. All parameters of the GMF demonstrate characteristic changes associated with polarity reversal.</p><p>The polar field reversals are determined by the GMF flows of positive- and negative-polarity magnetic fields, which cyclically migrate from one pole to the opposite pole. The magnetic fields of the new polarity are delivered to the poles by a certain flow, and then carried away by the same flow to the opposite pole. In each cycle, the increase in the polar magnetic field strength to its maximal values at the solar activity minimum and following decrees to the cycle maximum coincides with the latitudinal changes in corresponding magnetic field flow. The differences in start, duration, and end times of the polarity reversal at each pole are a consequence of the different width and speed of the corresponding flow.</p><p>Interaction with magnetic fields of active regions during the passage of the GMF pole-to-pole meridional flows through low latitudes leads to the formation of longitudinal magnetic structures and a sectorial structure of the GMF.</p><p>Equations for calculating the meridional circulation of positive- and negative-polarity magnetic field flows are proposed. They allow to predict the time of polarity reversals, and since polarity reversals occur at the maxima of cycles, then also predict the time of maxima of both the future and past cycles.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":777,"journal":{"name":"Solar Physics","volume":"301 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147441811","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction: Citizen CATE 2024: Extending Totality During the 8 April 2024 Total Solar Eclipse with a Distributed Network of Community Participants 更正:Citizen CATE 2024:在社区参与者的分布式网络中延长2024年4月8日日全食期间的日全食
IF 2.4 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS Pub Date : 2026-03-12 DOI: 10.1007/s11207-026-02637-x
Sarah A. Kovac, Amir Caspi, Daniel B. Seaton, Daniel W. Zietlow, Paul Bryans, Joan R. Burkepile, Sarah J. Davis, Craig E. DeForest, David Elmore, Sanjay Gosain, Rebecca Haacker, Marcus Hughes, Jason Jackiewicz, Viliam Klein, Derek Lamb, Valentin Martinez Pillet, Evy McUmber, Ritesh Patel, Kevin Reardon, Willow Reed, Anna Tosolini, Andrei E. Ursache, John K. Williams, Padma A. Yanamandra-Fisher, John Carini, Charles H. Gardner, Shawn Laatsch, Patricia H. Reiff, Nikita Saini, Rachael L. Weir, Kira F. Baasch, Jacquelyn Bellefontaine, Timothy D. Collins, Ryan J. Ferko, Leticia Ferrer, Margaret Hill, Jonathan M. Kessler, Jeremy A. Lusk, Jennifer Miller-Ray, Catarino Morales III, Brian W. Murphy, Kayla L. Olson, Mark J. Percy, Gwen Perry, Andrea A. Rivera, Aarran W. Shaw, Erik Stinnett, Eden L. Thompson, Hazel S. Wilkins, Yue Zhang, Angel Allison, John J. Alves, Angelica A. Alvis, Lucinda J. Alvis, Alvin J. G. Angeles, Aa’lasia Batchelor, Robert Benedict, Amelia Bettati, Abbie Bevill, Katherine Bibee Wolfson, Christina Raye Bingham, Bradley A. Bolton, Iris P. Borunda, Mario F. Borunda, Adam Bowen, Daniel L. Brookshier, MerRick Brown, Fred Bruenjes, Lisa Bunselmeier, Brian E. Burke, Bo Chen, Chi-Jui Chen, Zhean Chen, Marcia Chenevey Long, Nathaniel D. Cook, Tommy Copeland, Adrian J. Corter, Lawson L. Corter, Michael J. Corter, Theresa N. Costilow, Lori E. Cypert, Derrion Crouch-Bond, Beata Csatho, Clayton C. Cundiff, Stella S. Cundiff, Darrell DeMotta, Judy Dickey, Hannah L. Dirlam, Nathan Dodson, Donovan Driver, Jennifer Dudley-Winter, Justin Dulyanunt, Jordan R. Duncan, Scarlett C. Dyer, Lizabeth D. Eason, Timothy E. Eason, Jerry L. Edwards, Jaylynn N. Eisenhour, Ogheneovo N. Erho, Elijah J. Fleming, Andrew J. Fritsch III, Stephanie D. Frosch, Sahir Gagan, Joshua Gamble, Caitlyn L. Geisheimer, Ashleyahna George, Treva D. Gough, Jo Lin Gowing, Robert Greeson, Julie D. Griffin, Justin L. Grover, Simon L. Grover, Annie Hadley, Austin S. Hailey, Katrina B. Halasa, Jacob Harrison, Rachael Heltz Herman, Melissa Hentnik, Robert Hentnik, Mark Herman, Brenda G. Henderson, David T. Henderson, J. Michael Henthorn II, Thomas Hogue, Billy J. House, Toni Ray Howe, Brianna N. Isola, Mark A. Iwen, Jordyn Johnson, Richard O. Johnson III, Sophia P. Jones, Hanieh Karimi, Katy R. Kiser, Michael K. Koomson Jr., Morgan M. Koss, Ryan P. Kovacs, Carol A. Kovalak Martin, Kassidy Lange, Kyle Lawrence Leathers, Michael H. Lee, Kevin W. Lehman, Garret R. Leopold, Hsiao-Chun Lin, Heather Liptak, Logan Liptak, Michael A. Liptak, Alonso Lopez, Evan L. Lopez, Don Loving, April Luehmann, Kristen M. Lusk, Tia L. MacDonald, Ian A. Mannings, Priscilla Marin, Christopher J. Martin, Jamie Martin, Alejandra Olivia Martinez, Terah L. Martinez, Elizabeth S. Mays, Seth McGowan, Edward M. McHenry III, Kaz Meszaros, Tyler J. Metivier, Quinn W. Miller, Adam V. Miranda, Carlos Miranda, Pranvera Miranda, David M. W. Mitchell, Lydia N. Montgomery, Lillie B. Moore, Christopher P. Morse, Ira S. Morse, Raman Mukundan, Patrick T. Murphy, Nicarao J. Narvaez, Ahmed Nasreldin, Thomas Neel, Travis A. Nelson, Ellianna Nestlerode, Adam Z. Neuville, Brian A. Neuville, Allison Newberg, Jeremy L. Nicholson, Makenna F. Nickens, Sining Niu, Jedidiah O’Brien, Luis A. Otero, Jacob A. Ott, Joel A. Ott, Justin M. Ott, Michael E. Ott, Shekhar Pant, Ivan Parmuzin, Eric J. Parr, Sagar P. Paudel, Courtney M. Payne, Hayden B. Phillips, Elizabeth R. Prinkey, Kwesi A. Quagraine, Wesley J. Reddish, Azariah Rhodes, Stephen Kyle Rimler, Carlyn S. Rocazella, Tiska E. Rodgers, Devalyn Rogers, Oren R. Ross, Benjamin D. Roth, Melissa Rummel, John F. Rusho, Michael W. Sampson, Sophia Saucerman, James Scoville, Martin Wayne Seifert, Michael H. Seile Sr., Asad Shahab, Thomas G. Skirko, David C. Smith, Emily R. Snode-Brenneman, Cassandra Spaulding, Neha Srivastava, Amy L. Strecker, Aidan Sweets, Morghan Taylor, Deborah S. Teuscher, Owen Totten, Stephen Totten, Stephanie Totten, Andrew Totten, Corina R. Ursache, Susan V. Benedict, Yolanda Vasquez, R. Anthony Vincent, Alan Webb, Walter Webb, Roderick M. Weinschenk, Sedrick Weinschenk, Cash A. Wendel, Elisabeth Wheeler, Bethany A. Whitehouse, Gabriel J. Whitehouse, David A. Wiesner, Philip J. Williams, John A. Zakelj
{"title":"Correction: Citizen CATE 2024: Extending Totality During the 8 April 2024 Total Solar Eclipse with a Distributed Network of Community Participants","authors":"Sarah A. Kovac,&nbsp;Amir Caspi,&nbsp;Daniel B. Seaton,&nbsp;Daniel W. Zietlow,&nbsp;Paul Bryans,&nbsp;Joan R. Burkepile,&nbsp;Sarah J. Davis,&nbsp;Craig E. DeForest,&nbsp;David Elmore,&nbsp;Sanjay Gosain,&nbsp;Rebecca Haacker,&nbsp;Marcus Hughes,&nbsp;Jason Jackiewicz,&nbsp;Viliam Klein,&nbsp;Derek Lamb,&nbsp;Valentin Martinez Pillet,&nbsp;Evy McUmber,&nbsp;Ritesh Patel,&nbsp;Kevin Reardon,&nbsp;Willow Reed,&nbsp;Anna Tosolini,&nbsp;Andrei E. Ursache,&nbsp;John K. Williams,&nbsp;Padma A. Yanamandra-Fisher,&nbsp;John Carini,&nbsp;Charles H. Gardner,&nbsp;Shawn Laatsch,&nbsp;Patricia H. Reiff,&nbsp;Nikita Saini,&nbsp;Rachael L. Weir,&nbsp;Kira F. Baasch,&nbsp;Jacquelyn Bellefontaine,&nbsp;Timothy D. Collins,&nbsp;Ryan J. Ferko,&nbsp;Leticia Ferrer,&nbsp;Margaret Hill,&nbsp;Jonathan M. Kessler,&nbsp;Jeremy A. Lusk,&nbsp;Jennifer Miller-Ray,&nbsp;Catarino Morales III,&nbsp;Brian W. Murphy,&nbsp;Kayla L. Olson,&nbsp;Mark J. Percy,&nbsp;Gwen Perry,&nbsp;Andrea A. Rivera,&nbsp;Aarran W. Shaw,&nbsp;Erik Stinnett,&nbsp;Eden L. Thompson,&nbsp;Hazel S. Wilkins,&nbsp;Yue Zhang,&nbsp;Angel Allison,&nbsp;John J. Alves,&nbsp;Angelica A. Alvis,&nbsp;Lucinda J. Alvis,&nbsp;Alvin J. G. Angeles,&nbsp;Aa’lasia Batchelor,&nbsp;Robert Benedict,&nbsp;Amelia Bettati,&nbsp;Abbie Bevill,&nbsp;Katherine Bibee Wolfson,&nbsp;Christina Raye Bingham,&nbsp;Bradley A. Bolton,&nbsp;Iris P. Borunda,&nbsp;Mario F. Borunda,&nbsp;Adam Bowen,&nbsp;Daniel L. Brookshier,&nbsp;MerRick Brown,&nbsp;Fred Bruenjes,&nbsp;Lisa Bunselmeier,&nbsp;Brian E. Burke,&nbsp;Bo Chen,&nbsp;Chi-Jui Chen,&nbsp;Zhean Chen,&nbsp;Marcia Chenevey Long,&nbsp;Nathaniel D. Cook,&nbsp;Tommy Copeland,&nbsp;Adrian J. Corter,&nbsp;Lawson L. Corter,&nbsp;Michael J. Corter,&nbsp;Theresa N. Costilow,&nbsp;Lori E. Cypert,&nbsp;Derrion Crouch-Bond,&nbsp;Beata Csatho,&nbsp;Clayton C. Cundiff,&nbsp;Stella S. Cundiff,&nbsp;Darrell DeMotta,&nbsp;Judy Dickey,&nbsp;Hannah L. Dirlam,&nbsp;Nathan Dodson,&nbsp;Donovan Driver,&nbsp;Jennifer Dudley-Winter,&nbsp;Justin Dulyanunt,&nbsp;Jordan R. Duncan,&nbsp;Scarlett C. Dyer,&nbsp;Lizabeth D. Eason,&nbsp;Timothy E. Eason,&nbsp;Jerry L. Edwards,&nbsp;Jaylynn N. Eisenhour,&nbsp;Ogheneovo N. Erho,&nbsp;Elijah J. Fleming,&nbsp;Andrew J. Fritsch III,&nbsp;Stephanie D. Frosch,&nbsp;Sahir Gagan,&nbsp;Joshua Gamble,&nbsp;Caitlyn L. Geisheimer,&nbsp;Ashleyahna George,&nbsp;Treva D. Gough,&nbsp;Jo Lin Gowing,&nbsp;Robert Greeson,&nbsp;Julie D. Griffin,&nbsp;Justin L. Grover,&nbsp;Simon L. Grover,&nbsp;Annie Hadley,&nbsp;Austin S. Hailey,&nbsp;Katrina B. Halasa,&nbsp;Jacob Harrison,&nbsp;Rachael Heltz Herman,&nbsp;Melissa Hentnik,&nbsp;Robert Hentnik,&nbsp;Mark Herman,&nbsp;Brenda G. Henderson,&nbsp;David T. Henderson,&nbsp;J. Michael Henthorn II,&nbsp;Thomas Hogue,&nbsp;Billy J. House,&nbsp;Toni Ray Howe,&nbsp;Brianna N. Isola,&nbsp;Mark A. Iwen,&nbsp;Jordyn Johnson,&nbsp;Richard O. Johnson III,&nbsp;Sophia P. Jones,&nbsp;Hanieh Karimi,&nbsp;Katy R. Kiser,&nbsp;Michael K. Koomson Jr.,&nbsp;Morgan M. Koss,&nbsp;Ryan P. Kovacs,&nbsp;Carol A. Kovalak Martin,&nbsp;Kassidy Lange,&nbsp;Kyle Lawrence Leathers,&nbsp;Michael H. Lee,&nbsp;Kevin W. Lehman,&nbsp;Garret R. Leopold,&nbsp;Hsiao-Chun Lin,&nbsp;Heather Liptak,&nbsp;Logan Liptak,&nbsp;Michael A. Liptak,&nbsp;Alonso Lopez,&nbsp;Evan L. Lopez,&nbsp;Don Loving,&nbsp;April Luehmann,&nbsp;Kristen M. Lusk,&nbsp;Tia L. MacDonald,&nbsp;Ian A. Mannings,&nbsp;Priscilla Marin,&nbsp;Christopher J. Martin,&nbsp;Jamie Martin,&nbsp;Alejandra Olivia Martinez,&nbsp;Terah L. Martinez,&nbsp;Elizabeth S. Mays,&nbsp;Seth McGowan,&nbsp;Edward M. McHenry III,&nbsp;Kaz Meszaros,&nbsp;Tyler J. Metivier,&nbsp;Quinn W. Miller,&nbsp;Adam V. Miranda,&nbsp;Carlos Miranda,&nbsp;Pranvera Miranda,&nbsp;David M. W. Mitchell,&nbsp;Lydia N. Montgomery,&nbsp;Lillie B. Moore,&nbsp;Christopher P. Morse,&nbsp;Ira S. Morse,&nbsp;Raman Mukundan,&nbsp;Patrick T. Murphy,&nbsp;Nicarao J. Narvaez,&nbsp;Ahmed Nasreldin,&nbsp;Thomas Neel,&nbsp;Travis A. Nelson,&nbsp;Ellianna Nestlerode,&nbsp;Adam Z. Neuville,&nbsp;Brian A. Neuville,&nbsp;Allison Newberg,&nbsp;Jeremy L. Nicholson,&nbsp;Makenna F. Nickens,&nbsp;Sining Niu,&nbsp;Jedidiah O’Brien,&nbsp;Luis A. Otero,&nbsp;Jacob A. Ott,&nbsp;Joel A. Ott,&nbsp;Justin M. Ott,&nbsp;Michael E. Ott,&nbsp;Shekhar Pant,&nbsp;Ivan Parmuzin,&nbsp;Eric J. Parr,&nbsp;Sagar P. Paudel,&nbsp;Courtney M. Payne,&nbsp;Hayden B. Phillips,&nbsp;Elizabeth R. Prinkey,&nbsp;Kwesi A. Quagraine,&nbsp;Wesley J. Reddish,&nbsp;Azariah Rhodes,&nbsp;Stephen Kyle Rimler,&nbsp;Carlyn S. Rocazella,&nbsp;Tiska E. Rodgers,&nbsp;Devalyn Rogers,&nbsp;Oren R. Ross,&nbsp;Benjamin D. Roth,&nbsp;Melissa Rummel,&nbsp;John F. Rusho,&nbsp;Michael W. Sampson,&nbsp;Sophia Saucerman,&nbsp;James Scoville,&nbsp;Martin Wayne Seifert,&nbsp;Michael H. Seile Sr.,&nbsp;Asad Shahab,&nbsp;Thomas G. Skirko,&nbsp;David C. Smith,&nbsp;Emily R. Snode-Brenneman,&nbsp;Cassandra Spaulding,&nbsp;Neha Srivastava,&nbsp;Amy L. Strecker,&nbsp;Aidan Sweets,&nbsp;Morghan Taylor,&nbsp;Deborah S. Teuscher,&nbsp;Owen Totten,&nbsp;Stephen Totten,&nbsp;Stephanie Totten,&nbsp;Andrew Totten,&nbsp;Corina R. Ursache,&nbsp;Susan V. Benedict,&nbsp;Yolanda Vasquez,&nbsp;R. Anthony Vincent,&nbsp;Alan Webb,&nbsp;Walter Webb,&nbsp;Roderick M. Weinschenk,&nbsp;Sedrick Weinschenk,&nbsp;Cash A. Wendel,&nbsp;Elisabeth Wheeler,&nbsp;Bethany A. Whitehouse,&nbsp;Gabriel J. Whitehouse,&nbsp;David A. Wiesner,&nbsp;Philip J. Williams,&nbsp;John A. Zakelj","doi":"10.1007/s11207-026-02637-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11207-026-02637-x","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":777,"journal":{"name":"Solar Physics","volume":"301 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11207-026-02637-x.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147441349","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Probabilistic Calibration Procedure for the CORSAIR Polarimeter CORSAIR偏振仪的概率校准程序
IF 2.4 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS Pub Date : 2026-03-09 DOI: 10.1007/s11207-026-02630-4
Alan Hsu, Jenna Samra, Steven Tomczyk, Maxim Kramar

We present a novel Bayesian model and a corresponding robust, probabilistic calibration procedure for the CORSAIR polarimeter that can be applied to other polarimeters. Our calibration procedure combines existing Mueller matrix representations of polarimeters with Bayesian methods, and computes the posterior distribution of the parameters by collecting data from the polarimeter at different states. We show that the algorithm is able to converge and recover a well-constrained posterior of the free parameters with a credible interval that is consistent with the ground truth values. Posterior predictive checks indicate that our generative model with inferred parameters can reproduce the calibration data within the predictive uncertainty, and captures the dominant systematic effects of the calibration procedure. We further show that we can propagate calibration uncertainties in the distributions to downstream reconstructions of Stokes measurements and magnetic-field estimates. We find that the contribution of calibration uncertainty towards the reconstructed results is minimal relative to that of the photon noise uncertainty, indicating that estimates using our Bayesian calibration algorithm can achieve photon noise-limited measurements in the magnetic-field parameters. Finally, we test the Bayesian calibration algorithm on a lab prototype of the CORSAIR polarimeter, and show that it converges and closely recovers theoretical estimates of the free parameters from real-world measurements.

我们提出了一种新的贝叶斯模型和相应的鲁棒概率校准程序,可以应用于其他偏振光计。我们的校准程序将现有的Mueller矩阵表示与贝叶斯方法相结合,并通过收集不同状态下的偏振仪数据来计算参数的后验分布。我们证明该算法能够收敛并恢复自由参数的良好约束后验,其可信区间与基本真值一致。后验预测检验表明,基于推断参数的生成模型可以在预测不确定度内再现校准数据,并捕获校准过程的主要系统效应。我们进一步表明,我们可以将分布中的校准不确定性传播到Stokes测量和磁场估计的下游重建中。我们发现,相对于光子噪声的不确定性,校准不确定性对重建结果的贡献是最小的,这表明使用贝叶斯校准算法估计可以在磁场参数中实现光子噪声限制的测量。最后,我们在CORSAIR偏振仪的实验室样机上对贝叶斯校准算法进行了测试,结果表明该算法收敛并接近地恢复了实际测量中自由参数的理论估计。
{"title":"A Probabilistic Calibration Procedure for the CORSAIR Polarimeter","authors":"Alan Hsu,&nbsp;Jenna Samra,&nbsp;Steven Tomczyk,&nbsp;Maxim Kramar","doi":"10.1007/s11207-026-02630-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11207-026-02630-4","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We present a novel Bayesian model and a corresponding robust, probabilistic calibration procedure for the CORSAIR polarimeter that can be applied to other polarimeters. Our calibration procedure combines existing Mueller matrix representations of polarimeters with Bayesian methods, and computes the posterior distribution of the parameters by collecting data from the polarimeter at different states. We show that the algorithm is able to converge and recover a well-constrained posterior of the free parameters with a credible interval that is consistent with the ground truth values. Posterior predictive checks indicate that our generative model with inferred parameters can reproduce the calibration data within the predictive uncertainty, and captures the dominant systematic effects of the calibration procedure. We further show that we can propagate calibration uncertainties in the distributions to downstream reconstructions of Stokes measurements and magnetic-field estimates. We find that the contribution of calibration uncertainty towards the reconstructed results is minimal relative to that of the photon noise uncertainty, indicating that estimates using our Bayesian calibration algorithm can achieve photon noise-limited measurements in the magnetic-field parameters. Finally, we test the Bayesian calibration algorithm on a lab prototype of the CORSAIR polarimeter, and show that it converges and closely recovers theoretical estimates of the free parameters from real-world measurements.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":777,"journal":{"name":"Solar Physics","volume":"301 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11207-026-02630-4.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147440899","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An Analysis of Eruptive Events Observed with the Hvar Observatory’s Double Solar Telescope 赫瓦尔天文台双太阳望远镜观测到的喷发事件分析
IF 2.4 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS Pub Date : 2026-03-05 DOI: 10.1007/s11207-026-02628-y
Luči Karbonini, Mateja Dumbović, Karmen Martinić, Filip Matković, Akshay Kumar Remeshan

We performed a Sun-to-Earth analysis of Earth-directed eruptive events observed with the H(alpha ) solar telescope at the Hvar Observatory, examining the consistency between their remote and in situ signatures. Filaments/prominences (283 events) and flares (91 events) reported in the Hvar catalog (2010 – 2019) were associated with coronal mass ejections (CMEs) listed in the SOHO/LASCO CME catalog, resulting in 42 H(alpha ) eruptive events with CME counterparts. These CMEs were subsequently linked to their interplanetary counterparts (ICMEs) near Earth using the Drag-Based Model (DBM) and its probabilistic implementation, DBEMv4, and cross-checked against three independent ICME catalogs. To refine and confirm these associations, we performed three-dimensional Graduated Cylindrical Shell (GCS) reconstructions, re-ran DBEMv4 using 3D parameters, and analysed in situ ICME signatures. We identified eight reliable H(alpha ) eruptive event–CME–ICME associations, for which we derived the axial field orientation, inclination, and chirality. Only one event (12.5%) exhibited full consistency between the remotely inferred and in situ flux rope properties, increasing to 75% when intermediate inclinations (approximately 45) were considered a match. Our results, consistent with previous studies, reveal substantial variability between flux rope properties derived from remote and in situ observations. This variability likely arises from both measurement uncertainties and intrinsic evolutionary effects, which cannot yet be clearly disentangled. These findings underscore the importance of multi-spacecraft and multi-instrument observations for understanding CME evolution and emphasise the continued value of H(alpha ) imaging in constraining the early physical properties of solar flare signatures exhibit characteristic ribbon structures.

我们对赫瓦尔天文台的H (alpha )太阳望远镜观测到的指向地球的喷发事件进行了太阳到地球的分析,检查了它们的远程和原位特征之间的一致性。Hvar目录(2010 - 2019)中报告的细丝/日珥(283次)和耀斑(91次)与SOHO/LASCO CME目录中列出的日冕物质抛射(CME)有关,导致42次H (alpha )爆发事件与CME对应。随后,利用基于拖拽模型(DBM)及其概率实现DBEMv4将这些日冕物质抛射与地球附近的行星际抛射(ICMEs)联系起来,并与三个独立的ICME目录交叉核对。为了完善和确认这些关联,我们进行了三维梯度圆柱壳(GCS)重建,使用3D参数重新运行了DBEMv4,并分析了原位ICME特征。我们确定了8个可靠的H (alpha )爆发事件- cme - icme关联,为此我们导出了轴向场取向、倾角和手性。只有一个事件(12.5)%) exhibited full consistency between the remotely inferred and in situ flux rope properties, increasing to 75% when intermediate inclinations (approximately 45∘) were considered a match. Our results, consistent with previous studies, reveal substantial variability between flux rope properties derived from remote and in situ observations. This variability likely arises from both measurement uncertainties and intrinsic evolutionary effects, which cannot yet be clearly disentangled. These findings underscore the importance of multi-spacecraft and multi-instrument observations for understanding CME evolution and emphasise the continued value of H(alpha ) imaging in constraining the early physical properties of solar flare signatures exhibit characteristic ribbon structures.
{"title":"An Analysis of Eruptive Events Observed with the Hvar Observatory’s Double Solar Telescope","authors":"Luči Karbonini,&nbsp;Mateja Dumbović,&nbsp;Karmen Martinić,&nbsp;Filip Matković,&nbsp;Akshay Kumar Remeshan","doi":"10.1007/s11207-026-02628-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11207-026-02628-y","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We performed a Sun-to-Earth analysis of Earth-directed eruptive events observed with the H<span>(alpha )</span> solar telescope at the Hvar Observatory, examining the consistency between their remote and <i>in situ</i> signatures. Filaments/prominences (283 events) and flares (91 events) reported in the Hvar catalog (2010 – 2019) were associated with coronal mass ejections (CMEs) listed in the SOHO/LASCO CME catalog, resulting in 42 H<span>(alpha )</span> eruptive events with CME counterparts. These CMEs were subsequently linked to their interplanetary counterparts (ICMEs) near Earth using the Drag-Based Model (DBM) and its probabilistic implementation, DBEMv4, and cross-checked against three independent ICME catalogs. To refine and confirm these associations, we performed three-dimensional Graduated Cylindrical Shell (GCS) reconstructions, re-ran DBEMv4 using 3D parameters, and analysed <i>in situ</i> ICME signatures. We identified eight reliable H<span>(alpha )</span> eruptive event–CME–ICME associations, for which we derived the axial field orientation, inclination, and chirality. Only one event (12.5%) exhibited full consistency between the remotely inferred and <i>in situ</i> flux rope properties, increasing to 75% when intermediate inclinations (approximately 45<sup>∘</sup>) were considered a match. Our results, consistent with previous studies, reveal substantial variability between flux rope properties derived from remote and <i>in situ</i> observations. This variability likely arises from both measurement uncertainties and intrinsic evolutionary effects, which cannot yet be clearly disentangled. These findings underscore the importance of multi-spacecraft and multi-instrument observations for understanding CME evolution and emphasise the continued value of H<span>(alpha )</span> imaging in constraining the early physical properties of solar flare signatures exhibit characteristic ribbon structures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":777,"journal":{"name":"Solar Physics","volume":"301 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147362699","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An Unusual Long-Lived Radio Burst Oscillating in Frequency 频率振荡的不寻常的长寿命无线电暴
IF 2.4 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS Pub Date : 2026-03-04 DOI: 10.1007/s11207-026-02635-z
Marian Karlický, Robert Sych, Alena Zemanová

In this paper, we present a unique decimetric radio burst that oscillates not only in time but also in frequency. Its duration, exceeding 80 minutes, is significantly longer than any radio oscillations previously reported in the literature. The oscillation period of the burst was about 3 minutes, suggesting a connection with sunspot oscillations observed in EUV and radio wavelengths. We detected the same periodicity in a 3000 MHz radio source located in a loop anchored to sunspots and spanning the entire active region, where flares occurred during the burst. Based on these observations, we propose that the frequency-oscillating burst is generated in the loop, serving as a reservoir of accelerated electrons, by the electron-cyclotron mechanism. Waves originating in the sunspot penetrate into the loop containing the source of the frequency-oscillating burst, and the resonant period of this loop appears to be close to that of the incoming waves. As a result, the radio emission of the burst oscillated for about 80 minutes with a 3-minute period. The magnetic-field strength in the burst source was estimated to be about 250 G.

在本文中,我们提出了一个独特的分米射电暴,它不仅在时间上振荡,而且在频率上振荡。它的持续时间超过80分钟,比以往文献报道的任何无线电振荡都要长得多。爆发的振荡周期约为3分钟,表明与在极紫外和无线电波长观测到的太阳黑子振荡有关。我们在3000兆赫射电源中发现了同样的周期性,该射电源位于固定在太阳黑子上的环路上,横跨整个活动区域,在爆发期间耀斑发生的地方。基于这些观察,我们提出频率振荡爆发是在环路中产生的,通过电子回旋机制作为加速电子的储存库。源自太阳黑子的波穿透到包含频率振荡爆发源的环路中,并且该环路的共振周期似乎与入射波的共振周期接近。结果,爆发的无线电发射以3分钟的周期振荡约80分钟。据估计,爆发源的磁场强度约为250 G。
{"title":"An Unusual Long-Lived Radio Burst Oscillating in Frequency","authors":"Marian Karlický,&nbsp;Robert Sych,&nbsp;Alena Zemanová","doi":"10.1007/s11207-026-02635-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11207-026-02635-z","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper, we present a unique decimetric radio burst that oscillates not only in time but also in frequency. Its duration, exceeding 80 minutes, is significantly longer than any radio oscillations previously reported in the literature. The oscillation period of the burst was about 3 minutes, suggesting a connection with sunspot oscillations observed in EUV and radio wavelengths. We detected the same periodicity in a 3000 MHz radio source located in a loop anchored to sunspots and spanning the entire active region, where flares occurred during the burst. Based on these observations, we propose that the frequency-oscillating burst is generated in the loop, serving as a reservoir of accelerated electrons, by the electron-cyclotron mechanism. Waves originating in the sunspot penetrate into the loop containing the source of the frequency-oscillating burst, and the resonant period of this loop appears to be close to that of the incoming waves. As a result, the radio emission of the burst oscillated for about 80 minutes with a 3-minute period. The magnetic-field strength in the burst source was estimated to be about 250 G.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":777,"journal":{"name":"Solar Physics","volume":"301 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11207-026-02635-z.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147362904","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Spectroscopic Analysis and RHD Modeling of the First Ca II H and H(epsilon ) Flare Spectra from DKIST/ViSP 来自DKIST/ViSP的第一Ca II H和H (epsilon )耀斑光谱的光谱分析和RHD建模
IF 2.4 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS Pub Date : 2026-03-03 DOI: 10.1007/s11207-026-02633-1
Cole Tamburri, Adam Kowalski, Gianna Cauzzi, Maria Kazachenko, Alexandra Tritschler, Rahul Yadav, Ryan French, Yuta Notsu, Kevin Reardon, Isaiah Tristan

We analyze decay phase observations of the GOES class C6.7 flare SOL2022-08-19T20:31 by the Visible Spectropolarimeter (ViSP) on the National Science Foundation’s Daniel K. Inouye Solar Telescope (DKIST). The data include the first flare-time DKIST observations of the chromospheric Ca II H 396.8 nm and H(epsilon ) 397.0 nm spectral lines. These diagnostics have rarely been studied together during the modern era of high-resolution solar flare observations, and never at the spectral and spatial resolution of the DKIST. We directly compare DKIST spectra to state-of-the-art RADYN+RH simulations, including one heated by a nonthermal electron beam and one by in-situ thermal conduction. While certain salient properties of the spectra such as the width of H(epsilon ) are reproduced, the models severely underestimate the width of Ca II H in the red wing and fail to reproduce the exact relative intensity of Ca II H to H(epsilon ). The models exhibit a range of chromospheric electron densities spanning over an order of magnitude. Unlike the modeled lower-order Balmer-series lines, we find that the width of H(epsilon ) is not solely related to the high-density upper chromosphere; the widths and intensities are also sensitive to the deeper flare layers. We outline possible avenues towards improvement of flare models, such as a comprehensive evaluation of flare heating mechanisms in the context of both impulsive and decay phase high-resolution data.

利用美国国家科学基金会Daniel K. Inouye太阳望远镜(DKIST)上的可见分光偏振仪(ViSP)对GOES C6.7级耀斑SOL2022-08-19T20:31的衰减相位进行了分析。这些数据包括首次在耀斑时间DKIST观测到的色球Ca II H 396.8 nm和H (epsilon ) 397.0 nm谱线。在高分辨率太阳耀斑观测的现代时代,这些诊断很少被一起研究,而且从来没有在DKIST的光谱和空间分辨率上进行过研究。我们直接比较了DKIST光谱与最先进的RADYN+RH模拟,包括一个由非热电子束加热和一个由原位热传导加热。虽然再现了光谱的某些显著特性,如H的宽度(epsilon ),但模型严重低估了红翼中Ca II H的宽度,并且无法准确再现Ca II H与H (epsilon )的相对强度。这些模型展示了一个跨越一个数量级的色球电子密度范围。与模拟的低阶balmer系列线不同,我们发现H (epsilon )的宽度并不仅仅与高密度的上色球有关;宽度和强度对较深的耀斑层也很敏感。我们概述了改进耀斑模型的可能途径,例如在脉冲和衰变阶段高分辨率数据的背景下对耀斑加热机制的综合评估。
{"title":"Spectroscopic Analysis and RHD Modeling of the First Ca II H and H(epsilon ) Flare Spectra from DKIST/ViSP","authors":"Cole Tamburri,&nbsp;Adam Kowalski,&nbsp;Gianna Cauzzi,&nbsp;Maria Kazachenko,&nbsp;Alexandra Tritschler,&nbsp;Rahul Yadav,&nbsp;Ryan French,&nbsp;Yuta Notsu,&nbsp;Kevin Reardon,&nbsp;Isaiah Tristan","doi":"10.1007/s11207-026-02633-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11207-026-02633-1","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We analyze decay phase observations of the GOES class C6.7 flare SOL2022-08-19T20:31 by the Visible Spectropolarimeter (ViSP) on the National Science Foundation’s Daniel K. Inouye Solar Telescope (DKIST). The data include the first flare-time DKIST observations of the chromospheric Ca <span>II</span> H 396.8 nm and H<span>(epsilon )</span> 397.0 nm spectral lines. These diagnostics have rarely been studied together during the modern era of high-resolution solar flare observations, and never at the spectral and spatial resolution of the DKIST. We directly compare DKIST spectra to state-of-the-art RADYN+RH simulations, including one heated by a nonthermal electron beam and one by in-situ thermal conduction. While certain salient properties of the spectra such as the width of H<span>(epsilon )</span> are reproduced, the models severely underestimate the width of Ca II H in the red wing and fail to reproduce the exact relative intensity of Ca II H to H<span>(epsilon )</span>. The models exhibit a range of chromospheric electron densities spanning over an order of magnitude. Unlike the modeled lower-order Balmer-series lines, we find that the width of H<span>(epsilon )</span> is not solely related to the high-density upper chromosphere; the widths and intensities are also sensitive to the deeper flare layers. We outline possible avenues towards improvement of flare models, such as a comprehensive evaluation of flare heating mechanisms in the context of both impulsive and decay phase high-resolution data.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":777,"journal":{"name":"Solar Physics","volume":"301 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11207-026-02633-1.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147336454","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Solar Energetic Proton Events Observed by the High Energy Telescopes on the STEREO Spacecraft or at the Earth During the First Solar Orbit of STEREO A (2006 – 2023) STEREO航天器上高能望远镜或STEREO A第一太阳轨道期间地球上观测到的太阳高能质子事件(2006 - 2023)
IF 2.4 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS Pub Date : 2026-03-03 DOI: 10.1007/s11207-026-02614-4
Ian G. Richardson, Tycho T. von Rosenvinge, O. Chris St. Cyr, David Lario, J. Grant Mitchell, Eric R. Christian

The twin Solar TErrestrial Relations Observatory (STEREO) A and B spacecraft were launched in October 2006 into heliocentric orbits at (sim 1) AU, advancing ahead of or lagging behind Earth, respectively, at (sim 22^{circ })/year. The spacecraft provide in situ observations of the solar wind and energetic particle populations, as well as remote sensing observations of solar activity and the corona. In particular, the High Energy Telescopes (HETs) on the STEREO spacecraft observe 0.7 – 4 MeV electrons and 13 – 100 MeV protons. This article summarizes observations of solar energetic particle (SEP) events made by the STEREO HETs from the beginning of the mission through Solar Cycle 24 to December 2023, approaching the maximum of Solar Cycle 25 and encompassing STEREO A first full orbit of the Sun relative to Earth, completed in August 2023; contact with STEREO B was lost in October 2014. Specifically, the catalog of SEP events including (sim,25text{ MeV}) protons observed by the STEREO HETs and/or instruments on spacecraft near Earth in Richardson et al. (Solar Phys. 289, 3059, 2014) is updated to include (sim 450) SEP events and a total of (sim 1000) separate observations of these events from the various spacecraft locations. These extensive observations can provide unique insight into the propagation of energetic protons in the inner heliosphere and how the properties of the particle events are related to those of the associated solar eruptions. In particular, we examine the association of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and SEP events with all 397 M and X-class solar X-ray flares in the period June 2010 – January 2014 and demonstrate that, for these events, the occurrence of a CME accompanying a flare is required for the detection of a (sim 25text{ MeV}) proton event. On the other hand, many flares accompanied by CMEs are not followed by detected SEP events. The longitudinal width and intensity of the associated SEP events generally increase with the CME speed and the flare intensity. We also note evidence for a (sim 150) day “Rieger-like” periodicity in the SEP occurrence rate in 2020 – 2023 during the rising phase of Solar Cycle 25.

双日地关系天文台(STEREO) A和B航天器于2006年10月发射到(sim 1)天文单位的日心轨道上,分别以(sim 22^{circ }) /年的速度领先或落后于地球。该航天器提供了对太阳风和高能粒子群的现场观测,以及对太阳活动和日冕的遥感观测。特别是STEREO航天器上的高能望远镜(HETs)观测到0.7 - 4 MeV的电子和13 - 100 MeV的质子。本文总结了从任务开始到第24太阳周期到2023年12月,接近第25太阳周期的最大值,包括2023年8月完成的STEREO A第一次太阳相对地球完整轨道的太阳高能粒子(SEP)事件观测。2014年10月与STEREO B失去联系。具体来说,包括理查德森等人(Solar Phys. 289, 3059, 2014)的STEREO HETs和/或近地航天器上的仪器观测到的(sim,25text{ MeV})质子在内的SEP事件目录被更新为包括(sim 450) SEP事件和来自不同航天器位置的这些事件的单独观测总数(sim 1000)。这些广泛的观察可以为高能质子在内日球层的传播提供独特的见解,以及粒子事件的性质如何与相关的太阳爆发有关。特别是,我们研究了日冕物质抛射(CME)和SEP事件与2010年6月至2014年1月期间所有397 M和x级太阳x射线耀斑的关系,并证明,对于这些事件,日冕物质抛射伴随耀斑的发生是检测(sim 25text{ MeV})质子事件的必要条件。另一方面,许多伴随着日冕物质抛射的耀斑并没有被探测到SEP事件。随着日冕物质抛射速度和耀斑强度的增加,日冕物质抛射事件的纵向宽度和强度也随之增加。我们还注意到,在2020 - 2023年太阳周期第25上升阶段,SEP发生率存在(sim 150)日“类似里格尔”的周期性。
{"title":"Solar Energetic Proton Events Observed by the High Energy Telescopes on the STEREO Spacecraft or at the Earth During the First Solar Orbit of STEREO A (2006 – 2023)","authors":"Ian G. Richardson,&nbsp;Tycho T. von Rosenvinge,&nbsp;O. Chris St. Cyr,&nbsp;David Lario,&nbsp;J. Grant Mitchell,&nbsp;Eric R. Christian","doi":"10.1007/s11207-026-02614-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11207-026-02614-4","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The twin Solar TErrestrial Relations Observatory (STEREO) A and B spacecraft were launched in October 2006 into heliocentric orbits at <span>(sim 1)</span> AU, advancing ahead of or lagging behind Earth, respectively, at <span>(sim 22^{circ })</span>/year. The spacecraft provide in situ observations of the solar wind and energetic particle populations, as well as remote sensing observations of solar activity and the corona. In particular, the High Energy Telescopes (HETs) on the STEREO spacecraft observe 0.7 – 4 MeV electrons and 13 – 100 MeV protons. This article summarizes observations of solar energetic particle (SEP) events made by the STEREO HETs from the beginning of the mission through Solar Cycle 24 to December 2023, approaching the maximum of Solar Cycle 25 and encompassing STEREO A first full orbit of the Sun relative to Earth, completed in August 2023; contact with STEREO B was lost in October 2014. Specifically, the catalog of SEP events including <span>(sim,25text{ MeV})</span> protons observed by the STEREO HETs and/or instruments on spacecraft near Earth in Richardson et al. (Solar Phys. 289, 3059, 2014) is updated to include <span>(sim 450)</span> SEP events and a total of <span>(sim 1000)</span> separate observations of these events from the various spacecraft locations. These extensive observations can provide unique insight into the propagation of energetic protons in the inner heliosphere and how the properties of the particle events are related to those of the associated solar eruptions. In particular, we examine the association of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and SEP events with all 397 M and X-class solar X-ray flares in the period June 2010 – January 2014 and demonstrate that, for these events, the occurrence of a CME accompanying a flare is required for the detection of a <span>(sim 25text{ MeV})</span> proton event. On the other hand, many flares accompanied by CMEs are not followed by detected SEP events. The longitudinal width and intensity of the associated SEP events generally increase with the CME speed and the flare intensity. We also note evidence for a <span>(sim 150)</span> day “Rieger-like” periodicity in the SEP occurrence rate in 2020 – 2023 during the rising phase of Solar Cycle 25.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":777,"journal":{"name":"Solar Physics","volume":"301 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11207-026-02614-4.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147336455","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reevaluating the Predictive Power of Sunspot Area, Hale, and McIntosh Classifications for CME Speed in Solar Cycles 23 – 25 太阳黑子面积、Hale和McIntosh分类对太阳周期23 - 25日冕物质抛射速度预测能力的再评估
IF 2.4 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS Pub Date : 2026-03-03 DOI: 10.1007/s11207-026-02626-0
Alphin Joshy

We investigate the long-assumed relationship between sunspot group properties and coronal mass ejection (CME) speed using a manually verified dataset of 1488 M- and X-class flare-CME associations spanning Solar Cycles 23, 24, and 25. For each event, the associated sunspot area, Hale magnetic classification, and McIntosh class were compiled based on the active region identified at the flare time, animated GOES X-ray flux plots, and movies from the Large Angle and Spectrometric Coronagraph. Contrary to operational forecasting expectations, we find that these traditional photospheric parameters are consistently poor predictors of CME speed. Across all three solar cycles and CME speed categories; Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients and multivariable regression models show that these metrics only account for less than 4% variance in CME speed. These results demonstrate that even large and magnetically complex active regions do not reliably produce fast CMEs, while some of the fastest events originate from small or simple regions. These results highlight the limitations of traditional sunspot indicators, which exclude key magnetic structures such as plages, in capturing the full eruptive potential of active regions and fail to capture coronal conditions that govern CME acceleration. Improved CME forecasting may require greater emphasis on coronal magnetic topology and non-spot magnetic environments.

我们研究了太阳黑子群特性和日冕物质抛射(CME)速度之间的长期假设关系,使用人工验证的1488个M和x级耀斑-CME关联数据集,跨越太阳周期23、24和25。对于每个事件,相关的太阳黑子区域、Hale磁分类和McIntosh分类是根据耀斑时确定的活动区域、动画GOES x射线通量图以及大角度和光谱日冕仪的电影编制的。与业务预测预期相反,我们发现这些传统的光球参数一直不能很好地预测CME的速度。在所有三个太阳周期和日冕物质抛射速度类别中;Pearson和Spearman相关系数和多变量回归模型表明,这些指标仅占CME速度的不到4%的方差。这些结果表明,即使是大而磁复杂的活动区域也不能可靠地产生快速的日冕物质抛射,而一些最快的事件起源于小或简单的区域。这些结果突出了传统的太阳黑子指示器的局限性,它排除了关键的磁结构,如斑块,在捕捉活动区域的全部爆发潜力方面,并且无法捕捉控制CME加速的日冕条件。改进日冕抛射预报可能需要更加重视日冕磁拓扑和非斑磁环境。
{"title":"Reevaluating the Predictive Power of Sunspot Area, Hale, and McIntosh Classifications for CME Speed in Solar Cycles 23 – 25","authors":"Alphin Joshy","doi":"10.1007/s11207-026-02626-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11207-026-02626-0","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We investigate the long-assumed relationship between sunspot group properties and coronal mass ejection (CME) speed using a manually verified dataset of 1488 M- and X-class flare-CME associations spanning Solar Cycles 23, 24, and 25. For each event, the associated sunspot area, Hale magnetic classification, and McIntosh class were compiled based on the active region identified at the flare time, animated GOES X-ray flux plots, and movies from the Large Angle and Spectrometric Coronagraph. Contrary to operational forecasting expectations, we find that these traditional photospheric parameters are consistently poor predictors of CME speed. Across all three solar cycles and CME speed categories; Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients and multivariable regression models show that these metrics only account for less than 4% variance in CME speed. These results demonstrate that even large and magnetically complex active regions do not reliably produce fast CMEs, while some of the fastest events originate from small or simple regions. These results highlight the limitations of traditional sunspot indicators, which exclude key magnetic structures such as plages, in capturing the full eruptive potential of active regions and fail to capture coronal conditions that govern CME acceleration. Improved CME forecasting may require greater emphasis on coronal magnetic topology and non-spot magnetic environments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":777,"journal":{"name":"Solar Physics","volume":"301 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147336463","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Study of Spatiotemporal Evolution in Sunspot Area and Solar Flares for Cycles 24 and 25 太阳黑子区和太阳耀斑24和25周期的时空演化研究
IF 2.4 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS Pub Date : 2026-03-02 DOI: 10.1007/s11207-026-02631-3
Tisyagupta Pyne, Partha Chowdhury, Rajmal Jain, Yoichiro Hanaoka, Amlan Chakrabarti, Arun K. Awasthi

In order to investigate the temporal evolution of the solar magnetic field and different classes of solar flares, and to probe the relationship between them, we study the time-series of the sunspot area and solar flares of M and X class observed on the full solar disk during complete Solar Cycle 24 and the ascending phase of current Solar Cycle 25 i.e., from January 2009 to April 2025, following the new NOAA scaling system. We study periodic and quasi-periodic behavior of the solar indices. It has been established that the solar indices referring to the phenomena occurring at different solar layers exhibit different periodicities, which are confined to various phases of the solar cycle. Our investigation indicates that sunspot area as well as the flare index have higher amplitudes during Cycle 25 than Cycle 24. We noticed that both sunspot area (representing solar magnetic activity) and energetic flares show a number of short and intermediate term periodicities during both Cycle 24 and 25. During Cycle 24 and 25, in the high-frequency range, this covers the solar rotation periods as well as prominent 17 – 60-day periods in the flare data sets. On the other hand, in the intermediate-frequency range, we measured a series of significant quasi-periodicities of 76 – 85, 104 – 120, 147 – 176 days, 183 – 196, 237 – 243, 273 – 295, 328 – 392 days and 1.1 – 1.5 year and ∼ 2.7 year in different phases of Cycle 24 and 25. We have observed that the well-known Rieger-type of periods and Quasi-biennial oscillations of about 1.3 years reappeared during the maximum phase of Cycle 25 in both sunspot area and energetic flare data sets. The cross-correlation and cross-wavelet analysis reveal that both M and X class flares are positively correlated with the sunspot areas with phase mixing (asynchronicity) in both cycles. We discuss our results with the existing numerical models.

为了研究太阳磁场和不同类型太阳耀斑的时间演变及其相互关系,本文采用新的NOAA标度系统,研究了2009年1月至2025年4月,在完整的第24太阳周期和当前第25太阳周期上升阶段,即2009年1月至2025年4月,在全太阳盘观测到的太阳黑子面积和M、X级太阳耀斑的时间序列。我们研究了太阳指数的周期和准周期行为。研究表明,反映不同太阳层现象的太阳指数具有不同的周期性,这些周期性局限于太阳活动周期的不同阶段。我们的研究表明,太阳黑子面积和耀斑指数在第25周期比第24周期有更高的振幅。我们注意到太阳黑子区域(代表太阳磁活动)和高能耀斑在第24和第25周期都表现出一些短期和中期的周期性。在第24周期和第25周期,在高频范围内,这涵盖了太阳自转周期以及耀斑数据集中突出的17 - 60天周期。另一方面,在中频范围内,我们在Cycle 24和Cycle 25的不同阶段测量了一系列显著的准周期性,分别为76 ~ 85、104 ~ 120、147 ~ 176、183 ~ 196、237 ~ 243、273 ~ 295、328 ~ 392天以及1.1 ~ 1.5年和~ 2.7年。在太阳黑子区和高能耀斑数据集中,我们观察到众所周知的1.3年左右的rieger型周期和准两年周期振荡在第25周期的最大阶段再次出现。互相关分析和交叉小波分析表明,M级和X级耀斑在两个周期内都与太阳黑子的相位混合(不同步)区呈正相关。我们用现有的数值模型讨论了我们的结果。
{"title":"Study of Spatiotemporal Evolution in Sunspot Area and Solar Flares for Cycles 24 and 25","authors":"Tisyagupta Pyne,&nbsp;Partha Chowdhury,&nbsp;Rajmal Jain,&nbsp;Yoichiro Hanaoka,&nbsp;Amlan Chakrabarti,&nbsp;Arun K. Awasthi","doi":"10.1007/s11207-026-02631-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11207-026-02631-3","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In order to investigate the temporal evolution of the solar magnetic field and different classes of solar flares, and to probe the relationship between them, we study the time-series of the sunspot area and solar flares of M and X class observed on the full solar disk during complete Solar Cycle 24 and the ascending phase of current Solar Cycle 25 i.e., from January 2009 to April 2025, following the new NOAA scaling system. We study periodic and quasi-periodic behavior of the solar indices. It has been established that the solar indices referring to the phenomena occurring at different solar layers exhibit different periodicities, which are confined to various phases of the solar cycle. Our investigation indicates that sunspot area as well as the flare index have higher amplitudes during Cycle 25 than Cycle 24. We noticed that both sunspot area (representing solar magnetic activity) and energetic flares show a number of short and intermediate term periodicities during both Cycle 24 and 25. During Cycle 24 and 25, in the high-frequency range, this covers the solar rotation periods as well as prominent 17 – 60-day periods in the flare data sets. On the other hand, in the intermediate-frequency range, we measured a series of significant quasi-periodicities of 76 – 85, 104 – 120, 147 – 176 days, 183 – 196, 237 – 243, 273 – 295, 328 – 392 days and 1.1 – 1.5 year and ∼ 2.7 year in different phases of Cycle 24 and 25. We have observed that the well-known Rieger-type of periods and Quasi-biennial oscillations of about 1.3 years reappeared during the maximum phase of Cycle 25 in both sunspot area and energetic flare data sets. The cross-correlation and cross-wavelet analysis reveal that both M and X class flares are positively correlated with the sunspot areas with phase mixing (asynchronicity) in both cycles. We discuss our results with the existing numerical models.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":777,"journal":{"name":"Solar Physics","volume":"301 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147336265","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Quantifying Sunspot Group Nesting with Density-Based Unsupervised Clustering 基于密度的无监督聚类量化太阳黑子群嵌套
IF 2.4 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS Pub Date : 2026-02-27 DOI: 10.1007/s11207-026-02632-2
Nurdan Karapınar, Emre Işık, Natalie A. Krivova, Hakan V. Şenavcı

Sunspot groups often emerge in spatial–temporal clusters, known as nests or complexes of activity. Quantifying how frequently such nesting occurs is important for understanding the organisation and recurrence of solar magnetic fields. We introduce an automated approach based on kernel density estimation and DBSCAN clustering to identify nests in the longitude–time domain and to measure the fraction of sunspot groups that belong to them. The method combines a smooth representation of emergence patterns with a density-based clustering procedure, validated using synthetic solar-like cycles and corrected for variations in data density.

We apply this method to 151 years of sunspot-group observations from the Royal Greenwich Observatory Photoheliographic Results (RGO, 1874 – 1976) and Kislovodsk Mountain Astronomical Station (KMAS, 1955 – 2025) catalogues. Across all cycles and latitude bands, the mean nesting degree is (langle Drangle = 0.61 pm 0.12), implying that about 60 percent all sunspot groups emerge within nests. Nesting is strongest at mid-latitudes (10 – 20), and results from the two independent datasets agree in the period of overlap. The nesting degree significantly correlates with the solar activity level, with the correlation strengthening when small groups are excluded. The characteristic inter-nest spacing contracts from ∼ 200 – 500 Mm at low activity to ∼ 60 – 100 Mm at solar maximum, approaching typical sunspot-group dimensions. The identified nests range from compact clusters to long-lived, drifting structures, offering new quantitative constraints on the persistence and organisation of solar magnetic activity.

太阳黑子群经常以时空集群的形式出现,被称为“巢穴”或“活动综合体”。量化这种嵌套发生的频率对于理解太阳磁场的组织和重复是很重要的。本文提出了一种基于核密度估计和DBSCAN聚类的自动化方法来识别经度-时间域的太阳黑子巢,并测量属于这些巢的太阳黑子群的比例。该方法将出现模式的平滑表示与基于密度的聚类程序相结合,使用合成太阳周期进行验证,并校正数据密度的变化。我们将这种方法应用于151年的太阳黑子群观测,这些观测来自皇家格林威治天文台的日光照相结果(RGO, 1874 - 1976)和Kislovodsk山天文台(KMAS, 1955 - 2025)的目录。在所有周期和纬度带中,平均筑巢度为(langle Drangle = 0.61 pm 0.12),这意味着大约60%的太阳黑子群出现在巢穴中。在中纬度地区(10°- 20°)嵌套最强,两个独立数据集的结果在重叠期间一致。巢化程度与太阳活动水平显著相关,排除小群后相关性增强。典型的巢间间距从低活跃期的~ 200 ~ 500 Mm缩小到太阳活动极大期的~ 60 ~ 100 Mm,接近典型的太阳黑子群尺寸。已确定的巢穴范围从紧凑的集群到长期存在的漂流结构,为太阳磁场活动的持久性和组织提供了新的定量限制。
{"title":"Quantifying Sunspot Group Nesting with Density-Based Unsupervised Clustering","authors":"Nurdan Karapınar,&nbsp;Emre Işık,&nbsp;Natalie A. Krivova,&nbsp;Hakan V. Şenavcı","doi":"10.1007/s11207-026-02632-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11207-026-02632-2","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sunspot groups often emerge in spatial–temporal clusters, known as nests or complexes of activity. Quantifying how frequently such nesting occurs is important for understanding the organisation and recurrence of solar magnetic fields. We introduce an automated approach based on kernel density estimation and DBSCAN clustering to identify nests in the longitude–time domain and to measure the fraction of sunspot groups that belong to them. The method combines a smooth representation of emergence patterns with a density-based clustering procedure, validated using synthetic solar-like cycles and corrected for variations in data density.</p><p>We apply this method to 151 years of sunspot-group observations from the Royal Greenwich Observatory Photoheliographic Results (RGO, 1874 – 1976) and Kislovodsk Mountain Astronomical Station (KMAS, 1955 – 2025) catalogues. Across all cycles and latitude bands, the mean nesting degree is <span>(langle Drangle = 0.61 pm 0.12)</span>, implying that about 60 percent all sunspot groups emerge within nests. Nesting is strongest at mid-latitudes (10<sup>∘</sup> – 20<sup>∘</sup>), and results from the two independent datasets agree in the period of overlap. The nesting degree significantly correlates with the solar activity level, with the correlation strengthening when small groups are excluded. The characteristic inter-nest spacing contracts from ∼ 200 – 500 Mm at low activity to ∼ 60 – 100 Mm at solar maximum, approaching typical sunspot-group dimensions. The identified nests range from compact clusters to long-lived, drifting structures, offering new quantitative constraints on the persistence and organisation of solar magnetic activity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":777,"journal":{"name":"Solar Physics","volume":"301 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11207-026-02632-2.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147342377","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Solar Physics
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1