基于活动区磁能的太阳耀斑最大 X 射线等级短期预测模型

IF 0.7 4区 地球科学 Q4 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Geomagnetism and Aeronomy Pub Date : 2024-10-27 DOI:10.1134/S0016793224600541
I. V. Zimovets, I. N. Sharykin
{"title":"基于活动区磁能的太阳耀斑最大 X 射线等级短期预测模型","authors":"I. V. Zimovets,&nbsp;I. N. Sharykin","doi":"10.1134/S0016793224600541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The accuracy of the M. Aschwanden’s (2020) model for short-term (24 h) prediction of the maximum X-ray class of solar flares based on the power-law dependence on the energy of the potential magnetic field of active regions is checked and assessed. For this purpose, a sample of 275 flares (253 M-class and 22 X-class) in isolated active regions on the solar disk in 2010−2023 is analyzed. Magnetic field extrapolations are made in the nonlinear force-free and potential approximations using the GX Simulator based on photospheric vector magnetograms from the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) instrument onboard the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO). It is found that in 6% of cases, Aschwanden’s model underestimates the predicted maximum flare class with respect to the observed one (maximal underestimation by 4.4 times). The accuracy of this model (the average ratio of the observed to predicted maximum flare class) is 0.31 ± 0.47. Four other statistical models are proposed, two of which, like Aschwanden’s model, are based on the power-law dependence of the maximum flare class on the energy of potential magnetic field, and the other two are based on the power-law dependence on the free magnetic energy of active regions. These models give fewer (or no) underestimations of the maximum flare class, but two to three times lower forecast accuracy, ranging from 0.11 to 0.17. Additionally, based on the obtained statistical sample, estimates of the limiting X-ray class of solar flares are made. The five models give different limits ranging from ~X14 to ~X250. The realism of these values and the possibility of refining the models by expanding the sample of events is briefly discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":55597,"journal":{"name":"Geomagnetism and Aeronomy","volume":"64 5","pages":"603 - 614"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Models for Short-Term Forecast of Maximum X-ray Class of Solar Flares Based on Magnetic Energy of Active Regions\",\"authors\":\"I. V. Zimovets,&nbsp;I. N. Sharykin\",\"doi\":\"10.1134/S0016793224600541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The accuracy of the M. Aschwanden’s (2020) model for short-term (24 h) prediction of the maximum X-ray class of solar flares based on the power-law dependence on the energy of the potential magnetic field of active regions is checked and assessed. For this purpose, a sample of 275 flares (253 M-class and 22 X-class) in isolated active regions on the solar disk in 2010−2023 is analyzed. Magnetic field extrapolations are made in the nonlinear force-free and potential approximations using the GX Simulator based on photospheric vector magnetograms from the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) instrument onboard the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO). It is found that in 6% of cases, Aschwanden’s model underestimates the predicted maximum flare class with respect to the observed one (maximal underestimation by 4.4 times). The accuracy of this model (the average ratio of the observed to predicted maximum flare class) is 0.31 ± 0.47. Four other statistical models are proposed, two of which, like Aschwanden’s model, are based on the power-law dependence of the maximum flare class on the energy of potential magnetic field, and the other two are based on the power-law dependence on the free magnetic energy of active regions. These models give fewer (or no) underestimations of the maximum flare class, but two to three times lower forecast accuracy, ranging from 0.11 to 0.17. Additionally, based on the obtained statistical sample, estimates of the limiting X-ray class of solar flares are made. The five models give different limits ranging from ~X14 to ~X250. The realism of these values and the possibility of refining the models by expanding the sample of events is briefly discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geomagnetism and Aeronomy\",\"volume\":\"64 5\",\"pages\":\"603 - 614\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geomagnetism and Aeronomy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0016793224600541\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geomagnetism and Aeronomy","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0016793224600541","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

M.Aschwanden(2020 年)根据活动区潜在磁场能量的幂律依赖关系对太阳耀斑最大 X 射线等级进行短期(24 小时)预测的模型的准确性进行了检查和评估。为此,分析了 2010-2023 年太阳圆盘上孤立活动区的 275 个耀斑样本(253 个 M 级和 22 个 X 级)。根据太阳动力学观测台(SDO)搭载的日震和磁成像仪(HMI)的光层矢量磁图,使用 GX 模拟器按照非线性无作用力近似和电势近似进行了磁场外推。研究发现,在 6% 的情况下,Aschwanden 的模型低估了预测的最大耀斑等级(最大低估 4.4 倍)。该模型的准确度(观测值与预测值的平均比值)为 0.31 ± 0.47。还提出了其他四个统计模型,其中两个与阿施万登的模型一样,都是基于最大耀斑等级与潜在磁场能量的幂律依赖关系,另外两个是基于活动区自由磁能的幂律依赖关系。这些模型对最大耀斑等级的低估较少(或没有),但预报精度却低两到三倍,从 0.11 到 0.17 不等。此外,根据获得的统计样本,还对太阳耀斑的极限 X 射线等级进行了估计。五个模型给出了从 ~X14 到 ~X250 的不同限值。简要讨论了这些数值的现实性以及通过扩大事件样本来完善模型的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Models for Short-Term Forecast of Maximum X-ray Class of Solar Flares Based on Magnetic Energy of Active Regions

The accuracy of the M. Aschwanden’s (2020) model for short-term (24 h) prediction of the maximum X-ray class of solar flares based on the power-law dependence on the energy of the potential magnetic field of active regions is checked and assessed. For this purpose, a sample of 275 flares (253 M-class and 22 X-class) in isolated active regions on the solar disk in 2010−2023 is analyzed. Magnetic field extrapolations are made in the nonlinear force-free and potential approximations using the GX Simulator based on photospheric vector magnetograms from the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) instrument onboard the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO). It is found that in 6% of cases, Aschwanden’s model underestimates the predicted maximum flare class with respect to the observed one (maximal underestimation by 4.4 times). The accuracy of this model (the average ratio of the observed to predicted maximum flare class) is 0.31 ± 0.47. Four other statistical models are proposed, two of which, like Aschwanden’s model, are based on the power-law dependence of the maximum flare class on the energy of potential magnetic field, and the other two are based on the power-law dependence on the free magnetic energy of active regions. These models give fewer (or no) underestimations of the maximum flare class, but two to three times lower forecast accuracy, ranging from 0.11 to 0.17. Additionally, based on the obtained statistical sample, estimates of the limiting X-ray class of solar flares are made. The five models give different limits ranging from ~X14 to ~X250. The realism of these values and the possibility of refining the models by expanding the sample of events is briefly discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geomagnetism and Aeronomy
Geomagnetism and Aeronomy Earth and Planetary Sciences-Space and Planetary Science
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
65
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Geomagnetism and Aeronomy is a bimonthly periodical that covers the fields of interplanetary space; geoeffective solar events; the magnetosphere; the ionosphere; the upper and middle atmosphere; the action of solar variability and activity on atmospheric parameters and climate; the main magnetic field and its secular variations, excursion, and inversion; and other related topics.
期刊最新文献
Calculation of Geomagnetic Cutoff Rigidity Using Tracing Based on the Buneman–Boris Method Evaluation of Dynamic Attributes and Variability of Ionospheric Slant Total Electron Content Using NavIC Satellite System Predicting the Unpredictable: Advancements in Earthquake Forecasting Using Artificial Intelligence and LSTM Networks Ionospheric Whispers of the Earth’s Tremors: Decoding TEC Mysteries in the East Anatolian Fault Zone On the Possible Relationship of a Set of Statistically Revealed Quasi-Linear Local Trends of Variations in the Magnetic Field Parameters Prior to Earthquakes in Seismically Active Zones of the Black Sea, Caucasus, and Western Asia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1