Mortality rates in patients undergoing urgent versus elective transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background Patients with severe aortic stenosis (AoS) often present with acute heart failure and compensation, leading frequently to cardiogenic shock. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) has been recently performed as a bailout treatment in such patients. The aim of our meta-analysis is to compare urgent TAVR to elective procedures. Methods We systematically screened three databases searching for studies comparing urgent versus elective TAVR. Primary endpoint is the 30-days mortality. Secondary endpoints included in-hospital mortality, device success, periprocedural vascular complications, 30-day stroke, 30-day acute kidney injury (AKI), permanent pacemaker implantation (PPM), moderate or severe paravalvular leakage and 30-day bleedings. Results Seventeen studies were included, with a total of 84,495 patients. Urgent TAVR was associated with an increased risk for 30-days mortality (RR: 2.53, 95% CI: 1.81 – 3.54), in-hospital mortality (RR: 2.67, 95% CI: 1.94 – 3.68), periprocedural vascular complications (RR: 1.91, 95% CI: 1.28 – 2.85) and AKI (RR: 2.83, 95% CI: 1.93 – 4.14), compared to elective procedure. No differences were observed in the rest secondary endpoints. Conclusions Urgent TAVR was associated with higher in-hospital and 30-day mortality, possibly driven by the increased incidence of AKI and vascular complications in urgent TAVR. The results highlight the importance of early TAVR in stable AoS patients.