数字 AVATAR 疗法治疗精神病患者的痛苦声音:第 2/3 期 AVATAR2 试验

Philippa A. Garety, Clementine J. Edwards, Hassan Jafari, Richard Emsley, Mark Huckvale, Mar Rus-Calafell, Miriam Fornells-Ambrojo, Andrew Gumley, Gillian Haddock, Sandra Bucci, Hamish J. McLeod, Jeffrey McDonnell, Moya Clancy, Michael Fitzsimmons, Hannah Ball, Alice Montague, Nikos Xanidis, Amy Hardy, Thomas K. J. Craig, Thomas Ward
{"title":"数字 AVATAR 疗法治疗精神病患者的痛苦声音:第 2/3 期 AVATAR2 试验","authors":"Philippa A. Garety, Clementine J. Edwards, Hassan Jafari, Richard Emsley, Mark Huckvale, Mar Rus-Calafell, Miriam Fornells-Ambrojo, Andrew Gumley, Gillian Haddock, Sandra Bucci, Hamish J. McLeod, Jeffrey McDonnell, Moya Clancy, Michael Fitzsimmons, Hannah Ball, Alice Montague, Nikos Xanidis, Amy Hardy, Thomas K. J. Craig, Thomas Ward","doi":"10.1038/s41591-024-03252-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Distressing voices are a core symptom of psychosis, for which existing treatments are currently suboptimal; as such, new effective treatments for distressing voices are needed. AVATAR therapy involves voice-hearers engaging in a series of facilitated dialogues with a digital embodiment of the distressing voice. This randomized phase 2/3 trial assesses the efficacy of two forms of AVATAR therapy, AVATAR-Brief (AV-BRF) and AVATAR-Extended (AV-EXT), both combined with treatment as usual (TAU) compared to TAU alone, and conducted an intention-to-treat analysis. We recruited 345 participants with psychosis; data were available for 300 participants (86.9%) at 16 weeks and 298 (86.4%) at 28 weeks. The primary outcome was voice-related distress at both time points, while voice severity and voice frequency were key secondary outcomes. Voice-related distress improved, compared with TAU, in both forms at 16 weeks but not at 28 weeks. Distress at 16 weeks was as follows: AV-BRF, effect −1.05 points, 96.5% confidence interval (CI) = −2.110 to 0, <i>P</i> = 0.035, Cohen’s <i>d</i> = 0.38 (CI = 0 to 0.767); AV-EXT −1.60 points, 96.5% CI = −3.133 to −0.058, <i>P</i> = 0.029, Cohen’s <i>d</i> = 0.58 (CI = 0.021 to 1.139). Distress at 28 weeks was: AV-BRF, −0.62 points, 96.5% CI = −1.912 to 0.679, <i>P</i> = 0.316, Cohen’s <i>d</i> = 0.22 (CI = −0.247 to 0.695); AV-EXT −1.06 points, 96.5% CI = −2.700 to 0.586, <i>P</i> = 0.175, Cohen’s <i>d</i> = 0.38 (CI = −0.213 to 0.981). Voice severity improved in both forms, compared with TAU, at 16 weeks but not at 28 weeks whereas frequency was reduced in AV-EXT but not in AV-BRF at both time points. There were no related serious adverse events. These findings provide partial support for our primary hypotheses. AV-EXT met our threshold for a clinically significant change, suggesting that future work should be primarily guided by this protocol. ISRCTN registration: ISRCTN55682735.</p>","PeriodicalId":58,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Physical Chemistry ","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7810,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital AVATAR therapy for distressing voices in psychosis: the phase 2/3 AVATAR2 trial\",\"authors\":\"Philippa A. Garety, Clementine J. Edwards, Hassan Jafari, Richard Emsley, Mark Huckvale, Mar Rus-Calafell, Miriam Fornells-Ambrojo, Andrew Gumley, Gillian Haddock, Sandra Bucci, Hamish J. McLeod, Jeffrey McDonnell, Moya Clancy, Michael Fitzsimmons, Hannah Ball, Alice Montague, Nikos Xanidis, Amy Hardy, Thomas K. J. Craig, Thomas Ward\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41591-024-03252-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Distressing voices are a core symptom of psychosis, for which existing treatments are currently suboptimal; as such, new effective treatments for distressing voices are needed. AVATAR therapy involves voice-hearers engaging in a series of facilitated dialogues with a digital embodiment of the distressing voice. This randomized phase 2/3 trial assesses the efficacy of two forms of AVATAR therapy, AVATAR-Brief (AV-BRF) and AVATAR-Extended (AV-EXT), both combined with treatment as usual (TAU) compared to TAU alone, and conducted an intention-to-treat analysis. We recruited 345 participants with psychosis; data were available for 300 participants (86.9%) at 16 weeks and 298 (86.4%) at 28 weeks. The primary outcome was voice-related distress at both time points, while voice severity and voice frequency were key secondary outcomes. Voice-related distress improved, compared with TAU, in both forms at 16 weeks but not at 28 weeks. Distress at 16 weeks was as follows: AV-BRF, effect −1.05 points, 96.5% confidence interval (CI) = −2.110 to 0, <i>P</i> = 0.035, Cohen’s <i>d</i> = 0.38 (CI = 0 to 0.767); AV-EXT −1.60 points, 96.5% CI = −3.133 to −0.058, <i>P</i> = 0.029, Cohen’s <i>d</i> = 0.58 (CI = 0.021 to 1.139). Distress at 28 weeks was: AV-BRF, −0.62 points, 96.5% CI = −1.912 to 0.679, <i>P</i> = 0.316, Cohen’s <i>d</i> = 0.22 (CI = −0.247 to 0.695); AV-EXT −1.06 points, 96.5% CI = −2.700 to 0.586, <i>P</i> = 0.175, Cohen’s <i>d</i> = 0.38 (CI = −0.213 to 0.981). Voice severity improved in both forms, compared with TAU, at 16 weeks but not at 28 weeks whereas frequency was reduced in AV-EXT but not in AV-BRF at both time points. There were no related serious adverse events. These findings provide partial support for our primary hypotheses. AV-EXT met our threshold for a clinically significant change, suggesting that future work should be primarily guided by this protocol. ISRCTN registration: ISRCTN55682735.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":58,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Physical Chemistry \",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7810,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Physical Chemistry \",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-03252-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Physical Chemistry ","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-03252-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

恼人的声音是精神病的一种核心症状,目前现有的治疗方法并不理想,因此需要针对恼人声音的新的有效治疗方法。AVATAR 疗法是让声音聆听者与困扰声音的数字化身进行一系列协助对话。这项随机2/3阶段试验评估了两种形式的AVATAR疗法(AVATAR-Brief(AV-BRF)和AVATAR-Extended(AV-EXT))的疗效,两种疗法均与常规治疗(TAU)相结合,与单独使用TAU相比,并进行了意向治疗分析。我们招募了 345 名精神病患者,其中 300 人(86.9%)在 16 周时有数据,298 人(86.4%)在 28 周时有数据。两个时间点的主要结果都是与嗓音相关的痛苦,而嗓音严重程度和嗓音频率则是主要的次要结果。与 TAU 相比,两种形式的嗓音相关困扰在 16 周时都有所改善,但在 28 周时没有改善。16 周时的嗓音困扰情况如下AV-BRF,影响-1.05点,96.5%置信区间(CI)=-2.110至0,P=0.035,Cohen's d=0.38(CI=0至0.767);AV-EXT-1.60点,96.5%置信区间(CI)=-3.133至-0.058,P=0.029,Cohen's d=0.58(CI=0.021至1.139)。28 周时的痛苦程度为AV-BRF -0.62分,96.5% CI = -1.912 至 0.679,P = 0.316,Cohen's d = 0.22(CI = -0.247 至 0.695);AV-EXT -1.06分,96.5% CI = -2.700 至 0.586,P = 0.175,Cohen's d = 0.38(CI = -0.213 至 0.981)。与TAU相比,两种形式的嗓音严重程度在16周时都有所改善,但在28周时没有改善,而频率在AV-EXT中都有所降低,但在AV-BRF中没有降低。没有发生相关的严重不良事件。这些研究结果为我们的主要假设提供了部分支持。AV-EXT 达到了我们的临床显著变化阈值,这表明未来的工作应主要以该方案为指导。ISRCTN 注册:ISRCTN55682735。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Digital AVATAR therapy for distressing voices in psychosis: the phase 2/3 AVATAR2 trial

Distressing voices are a core symptom of psychosis, for which existing treatments are currently suboptimal; as such, new effective treatments for distressing voices are needed. AVATAR therapy involves voice-hearers engaging in a series of facilitated dialogues with a digital embodiment of the distressing voice. This randomized phase 2/3 trial assesses the efficacy of two forms of AVATAR therapy, AVATAR-Brief (AV-BRF) and AVATAR-Extended (AV-EXT), both combined with treatment as usual (TAU) compared to TAU alone, and conducted an intention-to-treat analysis. We recruited 345 participants with psychosis; data were available for 300 participants (86.9%) at 16 weeks and 298 (86.4%) at 28 weeks. The primary outcome was voice-related distress at both time points, while voice severity and voice frequency were key secondary outcomes. Voice-related distress improved, compared with TAU, in both forms at 16 weeks but not at 28 weeks. Distress at 16 weeks was as follows: AV-BRF, effect −1.05 points, 96.5% confidence interval (CI) = −2.110 to 0, P = 0.035, Cohen’s d = 0.38 (CI = 0 to 0.767); AV-EXT −1.60 points, 96.5% CI = −3.133 to −0.058, P = 0.029, Cohen’s d = 0.58 (CI = 0.021 to 1.139). Distress at 28 weeks was: AV-BRF, −0.62 points, 96.5% CI = −1.912 to 0.679, P = 0.316, Cohen’s d = 0.22 (CI = −0.247 to 0.695); AV-EXT −1.06 points, 96.5% CI = −2.700 to 0.586, P = 0.175, Cohen’s d = 0.38 (CI = −0.213 to 0.981). Voice severity improved in both forms, compared with TAU, at 16 weeks but not at 28 weeks whereas frequency was reduced in AV-EXT but not in AV-BRF at both time points. There were no related serious adverse events. These findings provide partial support for our primary hypotheses. AV-EXT met our threshold for a clinically significant change, suggesting that future work should be primarily guided by this protocol. ISRCTN registration: ISRCTN55682735.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lipid signatures of cardiometabolic risk in children and adolescents with obesity Seven-year performance of a clinical metagenomic next-generation sequencing test for diagnosis of central nervous system infections H5N1 from an infected dairy worker sheds light on viral transmission TRBC1-CAR T cell therapy in peripheral T cell lymphoma: a phase 1/2 trial Moving toward response-adapted trials in oncology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1