重新评估作为食品添加剂的氩气(E 938)和氦气(E 939)。

IF 3.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY EFSA Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2024.9048
EFSA FAF Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings), Laurence Castle, Monica Andreassen, Gabriele Aquilina, Maria Bastos, Polly Boon, Biagio Fallico, Reginald Fitzgerald, Maria Jose Frutos Fernandez, Bettina Grasl-Kraupp, Ursula Gundert-Remy, Rainer Gürtler, Eric Houdeau, Marcin Kurek, Henriqueta Louro, Patricia Morales, Sabina Passamonti, Salvatore Multari, Josef Daniel Rasinger, Ana Maria Rincon, Sam Vermeiren, Camilla Smeraldi
{"title":"重新评估作为食品添加剂的氩气(E 938)和氦气(E 939)。","authors":"EFSA FAF Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings),&nbsp;Laurence Castle,&nbsp;Monica Andreassen,&nbsp;Gabriele Aquilina,&nbsp;Maria Bastos,&nbsp;Polly Boon,&nbsp;Biagio Fallico,&nbsp;Reginald Fitzgerald,&nbsp;Maria Jose Frutos Fernandez,&nbsp;Bettina Grasl-Kraupp,&nbsp;Ursula Gundert-Remy,&nbsp;Rainer Gürtler,&nbsp;Eric Houdeau,&nbsp;Marcin Kurek,&nbsp;Henriqueta Louro,&nbsp;Patricia Morales,&nbsp;Sabina Passamonti,&nbsp;Salvatore Multari,&nbsp;Josef Daniel Rasinger,&nbsp;Ana Maria Rincon,&nbsp;Sam Vermeiren,&nbsp;Camilla Smeraldi","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2024.9048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) provides a scientific opinion re-evaluating the safety of the two food additives argon (E 938) and helium (E 939). Argon (Ar) and helium (He) are two noble gases, highly stable single atoms. Their chemical inertness is well known. Their physicochemical properties have served as a basis for their previous evaluations by SCF and JECFA, which have considered the use of these food additives safe even in the absence of a toxicological evaluation. No business operator or other interested party provided information in response to the call for data published by EFSA to support the re-evaluation of these two food additives with respect to their identity and specifications, manufacturing process (including the identification and quantification of potential impurities) and how they are applied to food to exert their technological function. One business operator replied to the call for data issued by EFSA reporting use levels of E 938 as a packaging gas in one food category. Based on their physicochemical properties, both gases are considered by the Panel to be of low toxicological concern when used as food additives. No information was available on the potential presence of impurities of toxicological concern resulting from the manufacturing process(es) applied to the production of the food additives E 938 and E 939. The Panel however noted that a minimum purity of 99.0% is required to comply with existing specifications. The Panel concluded that the use of argon (E 938) and helium (E 939) as food additives does not raise a safety concern. The Panel recommended an amendment of the existing EU specifications to introduce the respective CAS numbers.</p>","PeriodicalId":11657,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11515913/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-evaluation of argon (E 938) and helium (E 939) as food additives\",\"authors\":\"EFSA FAF Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings),&nbsp;Laurence Castle,&nbsp;Monica Andreassen,&nbsp;Gabriele Aquilina,&nbsp;Maria Bastos,&nbsp;Polly Boon,&nbsp;Biagio Fallico,&nbsp;Reginald Fitzgerald,&nbsp;Maria Jose Frutos Fernandez,&nbsp;Bettina Grasl-Kraupp,&nbsp;Ursula Gundert-Remy,&nbsp;Rainer Gürtler,&nbsp;Eric Houdeau,&nbsp;Marcin Kurek,&nbsp;Henriqueta Louro,&nbsp;Patricia Morales,&nbsp;Sabina Passamonti,&nbsp;Salvatore Multari,&nbsp;Josef Daniel Rasinger,&nbsp;Ana Maria Rincon,&nbsp;Sam Vermeiren,&nbsp;Camilla Smeraldi\",\"doi\":\"10.2903/j.efsa.2024.9048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) provides a scientific opinion re-evaluating the safety of the two food additives argon (E 938) and helium (E 939). Argon (Ar) and helium (He) are two noble gases, highly stable single atoms. Their chemical inertness is well known. Their physicochemical properties have served as a basis for their previous evaluations by SCF and JECFA, which have considered the use of these food additives safe even in the absence of a toxicological evaluation. No business operator or other interested party provided information in response to the call for data published by EFSA to support the re-evaluation of these two food additives with respect to their identity and specifications, manufacturing process (including the identification and quantification of potential impurities) and how they are applied to food to exert their technological function. One business operator replied to the call for data issued by EFSA reporting use levels of E 938 as a packaging gas in one food category. Based on their physicochemical properties, both gases are considered by the Panel to be of low toxicological concern when used as food additives. No information was available on the potential presence of impurities of toxicological concern resulting from the manufacturing process(es) applied to the production of the food additives E 938 and E 939. The Panel however noted that a minimum purity of 99.0% is required to comply with existing specifications. The Panel concluded that the use of argon (E 938) and helium (E 939) as food additives does not raise a safety concern. The Panel recommended an amendment of the existing EU specifications to introduce the respective CAS numbers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EFSA Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11515913/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EFSA Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.9048\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFSA Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.9048","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

食品添加剂和香料专家小组(FAF)提供了一份科学意见,重新评估了氩(E 938)和氦(E 939)这两种食品添加剂的安全性。氩(Ar)和氦(He)是两种惰性气体,是高度稳定的单原子。它们的化学惰性众所周知。它们的物理化学特性是 SCF 和 JECFA 以前对其进行评估的依据,即使没有进行毒理学评估,它们也认为使用这些食品添加剂是安全的。没有企业经营者或其他有关方面响应欧洲食品安全局的呼吁,提供数据支持对这 两种食品添加剂的特性和规格、生产过程(包括潜在杂质的鉴定和定量)以及如何应用 于食品以发挥其技术功能等方面进行重新评价。一家企业经营者答复了欧洲食品安全局发出的数据征集要求,报告了 E 938 作为包装气体在一种食品类别中的使用水平。根据其物理化学特性,专家小组认为这两种气体在用作食品添加剂时毒性较低。关于生产食品添加剂 E 938 和 E 939 所采用的生产工艺可能产生的毒性杂质,目前尚无相关资料。不过,专家小组注意到,要符合现有规格,最低纯度必须达到 99.0%。专家小组的结论是,使用氩气(E 938)和氦气(E 939)作为食品添加剂不会引起安全问题。专家小组建议修订欧盟现行规格,引入相应的化学文摘社编号。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Re-evaluation of argon (E 938) and helium (E 939) as food additives

The Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) provides a scientific opinion re-evaluating the safety of the two food additives argon (E 938) and helium (E 939). Argon (Ar) and helium (He) are two noble gases, highly stable single atoms. Their chemical inertness is well known. Their physicochemical properties have served as a basis for their previous evaluations by SCF and JECFA, which have considered the use of these food additives safe even in the absence of a toxicological evaluation. No business operator or other interested party provided information in response to the call for data published by EFSA to support the re-evaluation of these two food additives with respect to their identity and specifications, manufacturing process (including the identification and quantification of potential impurities) and how they are applied to food to exert their technological function. One business operator replied to the call for data issued by EFSA reporting use levels of E 938 as a packaging gas in one food category. Based on their physicochemical properties, both gases are considered by the Panel to be of low toxicological concern when used as food additives. No information was available on the potential presence of impurities of toxicological concern resulting from the manufacturing process(es) applied to the production of the food additives E 938 and E 939. The Panel however noted that a minimum purity of 99.0% is required to comply with existing specifications. The Panel concluded that the use of argon (E 938) and helium (E 939) as food additives does not raise a safety concern. The Panel recommended an amendment of the existing EU specifications to introduce the respective CAS numbers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EFSA Journal
EFSA Journal Veterinary-Veterinary (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
21.20%
发文量
422
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: The EFSA Journal covers methods of risk assessment, reports on data collected, and risk assessments in the individual areas of plant health, plant protection products and their residues, genetically modified organisms, additives and products or substances used in animal feed, animal health and welfare, biological hazards including BSE/TSE, contaminants in the food chain, food contact materials, enzymes, flavourings and processing aids, food additives and nutrient sources added to food, dietetic products, nutrition and allergies.
期刊最新文献
Guidance for establishing and applying tolerable upper intake levels for vitamins and essential minerals Scientific opinion on the extension of the authorisation of use of the food additive steviol glycosides (E 960a–d) and the modification of the acceptable daily intake (ADI) for steviol Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance fludioxonil Commodity risk assessment of Betula pendula and Betula pubescens plants from the UK Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of tartrazine for its use in baits for freshwater fish (GIFAP)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1