[关于益生菌预防婴幼儿抗生素相关性腹泻的前瞻性随机对照研究]。

Su-Wei Zhang, Xian Zhi, Meng-Yu Wang, Dong-Lin Shen
{"title":"[关于益生菌预防婴幼儿抗生素相关性腹泻的前瞻性随机对照研究]。","authors":"Su-Wei Zhang, Xian Zhi, Meng-Yu Wang, Dong-Lin Shen","doi":"10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2401129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the preventive effects of <i>Saccharomyces boulardii</i> powder and tetragenous viable <i>Bifidobacterium</i> tablets on antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) in infants and young children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Children under three years old admitted to the Department of Pediatrics, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University due to non-gastrointestinal infections and requiring antibiotic treatment from July to December 2023 were enrolled. The children were randomly divided into a control group (<i>n</i>=47), a <i>Saccharomyces boulardii</i> group (<i>n</i>=70), and a <i>Bifidobacterium</i> group (<i>n</i>=65) using a random number table method. The control group received antibiotics and symptomatic supportive treatment according to relevant clinical guidelines. In addition to the treatment given to the control group, the <i>Saccharomyces boulardii</i> group and the <i>Bifidobacterium</i> group were respectively administered with <i>Saccharomyces boulardii</i> powder and tetragenous viable <i>Bifidobacterium</i> tablets. Based on the duration of probiotic use (7 days, 14 days, and 21 days), the <i>Saccharomyces boulardii</i> group was further divided into 7 d, 14 d, and 21 d subgroups, and similarly for the <i>Bifidobacterium</i> group. The incidence of AAD and ratio of cocci to bacilli in feces were compared among the groups after treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence rate of AAD in both the <i>Saccharomyces boulardii</i> group and the <i>Bifidobacterium</i> group was lower than that in the control group (<i>P</i><0.017). The duration of AAD and the length of hospital stay were shorter in the <i>Saccharomyces boulardii</i> and <i>Bifidobacterium</i> groups compared to the control group (<i>P</i><0.05). In the control group, the ratio of cocci to bacilli in feces on days 7, 14, and 21 was higher than on day 1 (<i>P</i><0.05). Within-group comparisons showed that the ratio of cocci to bacilli in feces on day 14 in the <i>Bifidobacterium</i> 14 d and 21 d groups were lower than on day 1 (<i>P</i><0.05); and the ratios on day 14 in the control group, <i>Saccharomyces boulardii</i> 14 d group, <i>Saccharomyces boulardii</i> 21 d group, <i>Bifidobacterium</i> 14 d group, and <i>Bifidobacterium</i> 21 d group were lower than on day 7 (<i>P</i><0.05). The ratios on day 21 in the control group and the <i>Saccharomyces boulardii</i> 21 d group were lower than on days 7 and 14 (<i>P</i><0.05). Between-group comparisons indicated that on day 7, the ratios of cocci to bacilli in feces in the <i>Saccharomyces boulardii</i> 7 d, 14 d, 21 d groups, and <i>Bifidobacterium</i> 7 d, 14 d, 21 d groups were all lower than in the control group (<i>P</i><0.05); on day 14, the ratios of cocci to bacilli in feces 14 d and 21 d groups were lower than in the control group and the <i>Bifidobacterium</i> 7 d group (<i>P</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both <i>Saccharomyces boulardii</i> and tetragenous viable <i>Bifidobacterium</i> can effectively improve gut microbiota and prevent the occurrence of AAD in infants and young children. Compared to short-term treatment, appropriately extending the duration of probiotic therapy can further improve the structure of gut microbiota.</p>","PeriodicalId":39792,"journal":{"name":"中国当代儿科杂志","volume":"26 10","pages":"1108-1114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11527406/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[A prospective randomized controlled study on probiotics for the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhea in infants and young children].\",\"authors\":\"Su-Wei Zhang, Xian Zhi, Meng-Yu Wang, Dong-Lin Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2401129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the preventive effects of <i>Saccharomyces boulardii</i> powder and tetragenous viable <i>Bifidobacterium</i> tablets on antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) in infants and young children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Children under three years old admitted to the Department of Pediatrics, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University due to non-gastrointestinal infections and requiring antibiotic treatment from July to December 2023 were enrolled. The children were randomly divided into a control group (<i>n</i>=47), a <i>Saccharomyces boulardii</i> group (<i>n</i>=70), and a <i>Bifidobacterium</i> group (<i>n</i>=65) using a random number table method. The control group received antibiotics and symptomatic supportive treatment according to relevant clinical guidelines. In addition to the treatment given to the control group, the <i>Saccharomyces boulardii</i> group and the <i>Bifidobacterium</i> group were respectively administered with <i>Saccharomyces boulardii</i> powder and tetragenous viable <i>Bifidobacterium</i> tablets. Based on the duration of probiotic use (7 days, 14 days, and 21 days), the <i>Saccharomyces boulardii</i> group was further divided into 7 d, 14 d, and 21 d subgroups, and similarly for the <i>Bifidobacterium</i> group. The incidence of AAD and ratio of cocci to bacilli in feces were compared among the groups after treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence rate of AAD in both the <i>Saccharomyces boulardii</i> group and the <i>Bifidobacterium</i> group was lower than that in the control group (<i>P</i><0.017). The duration of AAD and the length of hospital stay were shorter in the <i>Saccharomyces boulardii</i> and <i>Bifidobacterium</i> groups compared to the control group (<i>P</i><0.05). In the control group, the ratio of cocci to bacilli in feces on days 7, 14, and 21 was higher than on day 1 (<i>P</i><0.05). Within-group comparisons showed that the ratio of cocci to bacilli in feces on day 14 in the <i>Bifidobacterium</i> 14 d and 21 d groups were lower than on day 1 (<i>P</i><0.05); and the ratios on day 14 in the control group, <i>Saccharomyces boulardii</i> 14 d group, <i>Saccharomyces boulardii</i> 21 d group, <i>Bifidobacterium</i> 14 d group, and <i>Bifidobacterium</i> 21 d group were lower than on day 7 (<i>P</i><0.05). The ratios on day 21 in the control group and the <i>Saccharomyces boulardii</i> 21 d group were lower than on days 7 and 14 (<i>P</i><0.05). Between-group comparisons indicated that on day 7, the ratios of cocci to bacilli in feces in the <i>Saccharomyces boulardii</i> 7 d, 14 d, 21 d groups, and <i>Bifidobacterium</i> 7 d, 14 d, 21 d groups were all lower than in the control group (<i>P</i><0.05); on day 14, the ratios of cocci to bacilli in feces 14 d and 21 d groups were lower than in the control group and the <i>Bifidobacterium</i> 7 d group (<i>P</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both <i>Saccharomyces boulardii</i> and tetragenous viable <i>Bifidobacterium</i> can effectively improve gut microbiota and prevent the occurrence of AAD in infants and young children. Compared to short-term treatment, appropriately extending the duration of probiotic therapy can further improve the structure of gut microbiota.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国当代儿科杂志\",\"volume\":\"26 10\",\"pages\":\"1108-1114\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11527406/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国当代儿科杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2401129\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国当代儿科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2401129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估布拉氏酵母菌粉和四元双歧杆菌片对婴幼儿抗生素相关性腹泻(AAD)的预防效果:方法:选取2023年7月至12月在徐州医科大学附属医院儿科就诊的因非消化道感染而需要抗生素治疗的3岁以下婴幼儿为研究对象。采用随机数字表法将患儿随机分为对照组(47 人)、布拉氏酵母菌组(70 人)和双歧杆菌组(65 人)。对照组根据相关临床指南接受抗生素和对症支持治疗。布拉氏酵母菌组和双歧杆菌组除了接受对照组的治疗外,还分别服用布拉氏酵母菌粉和四源双歧杆菌片剂。根据使用益生菌的时间(7 天、14 天和 21 天),布拉氏酵母菌组又分为 7 天、14 天和 21 天三个亚组,双歧杆菌组也是如此。比较各组治疗后 AAD 的发生率和粪便中球菌与杆菌的比例:结果:布拉氏酵母菌组和双歧杆菌组的AAD发病率均低于对照组(布拉氏酵母菌组和双歧杆菌组与对照组相比,布拉氏酵母菌14 d组和双歧杆菌21 d组的AAD发病率均低于第1天(布拉氏酵母菌14 d组,布拉氏酵母菌21 d组,双歧杆菌14 d组,布拉氏酵母菌21 d组)、双歧杆菌 14 d 组和双歧杆菌 21 d 组均低于第 7 天(布拉氏酵母菌 21 d 组),低于第 7 天和第 14 天(布拉氏酵母菌 7 d 组、布拉氏酵母菌 14 d 组和双歧杆菌 21 d 组均低于第 7 天和第 14 天),低于对照组(双歧杆菌 7 d 组、双歧杆菌 14 d 组和双歧杆菌 21 d 组均低于第 7 天和第 14 天):布拉氏酵母菌和四元双歧杆菌都能有效改善肠道微生物群,预防婴幼儿AAD的发生。与短期治疗相比,适当延长益生菌治疗时间可进一步改善肠道微生物群的结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[A prospective randomized controlled study on probiotics for the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhea in infants and young children].

Objectives: To evaluate the preventive effects of Saccharomyces boulardii powder and tetragenous viable Bifidobacterium tablets on antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) in infants and young children.

Methods: Children under three years old admitted to the Department of Pediatrics, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University due to non-gastrointestinal infections and requiring antibiotic treatment from July to December 2023 were enrolled. The children were randomly divided into a control group (n=47), a Saccharomyces boulardii group (n=70), and a Bifidobacterium group (n=65) using a random number table method. The control group received antibiotics and symptomatic supportive treatment according to relevant clinical guidelines. In addition to the treatment given to the control group, the Saccharomyces boulardii group and the Bifidobacterium group were respectively administered with Saccharomyces boulardii powder and tetragenous viable Bifidobacterium tablets. Based on the duration of probiotic use (7 days, 14 days, and 21 days), the Saccharomyces boulardii group was further divided into 7 d, 14 d, and 21 d subgroups, and similarly for the Bifidobacterium group. The incidence of AAD and ratio of cocci to bacilli in feces were compared among the groups after treatment.

Results: The incidence rate of AAD in both the Saccharomyces boulardii group and the Bifidobacterium group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.017). The duration of AAD and the length of hospital stay were shorter in the Saccharomyces boulardii and Bifidobacterium groups compared to the control group (P<0.05). In the control group, the ratio of cocci to bacilli in feces on days 7, 14, and 21 was higher than on day 1 (P<0.05). Within-group comparisons showed that the ratio of cocci to bacilli in feces on day 14 in the Bifidobacterium 14 d and 21 d groups were lower than on day 1 (P<0.05); and the ratios on day 14 in the control group, Saccharomyces boulardii 14 d group, Saccharomyces boulardii 21 d group, Bifidobacterium 14 d group, and Bifidobacterium 21 d group were lower than on day 7 (P<0.05). The ratios on day 21 in the control group and the Saccharomyces boulardii 21 d group were lower than on days 7 and 14 (P<0.05). Between-group comparisons indicated that on day 7, the ratios of cocci to bacilli in feces in the Saccharomyces boulardii 7 d, 14 d, 21 d groups, and Bifidobacterium 7 d, 14 d, 21 d groups were all lower than in the control group (P<0.05); on day 14, the ratios of cocci to bacilli in feces 14 d and 21 d groups were lower than in the control group and the Bifidobacterium 7 d group (P<0.05).

Conclusions: Both Saccharomyces boulardii and tetragenous viable Bifidobacterium can effectively improve gut microbiota and prevent the occurrence of AAD in infants and young children. Compared to short-term treatment, appropriately extending the duration of probiotic therapy can further improve the structure of gut microbiota.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中国当代儿科杂志
中国当代儿科杂志 Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5006
期刊介绍: The Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics (CJCP) is a peer-reviewed open access periodical in the field of pediatrics that is sponsored by the Central South University/Xiangya Hospital of Central South University and under the auspices of the Ministry of Education of China. It is cited as a source in the scientific and technological papers of Chinese journals, the Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD), and is one of the core Chinese periodicals in the Peking University Library. CJCP has been indexed by MEDLINE/PubMed/PMC of the American National Library, American Chemical Abstracts (CA), Holland Medical Abstracts (EM), Western Pacific Region Index Medicus (WPRIM), Scopus and EBSCO. It is a monthly periodical published on the 15th of every month, and is distributed both at home and overseas. The Chinese series publication number is CN 43-1301/R;ISSN 1008-8830. The tenet of CJCP is to “reflect the latest advances and be open to the world”. The periodical reports the most recent advances in the contemporary pediatric field. The majority of the readership is pediatric doctors and researchers.
期刊最新文献
[Berberine ameliorates coronary artery endothelial cell injury in Kawasaki disease through complement and coagulation cascades]. [Clinical characteristics and genetic analysis of maturity-onset diabetes of the young type 2 diagnosed in childhood]. [Clinical characteristics and long-term follow-up study of basal ganglia infarction after minor head trauma in infants and young children]. [Clinical characteristics and prognosis of acute erythroleukemia in children]. [Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of anemia of prematurity (2025)].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1