在全球范围内建立 PA 专业的益处和局限性:系统回顾与混合方法研究。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Jaapa-Journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-29 DOI:10.1097/01.JAA.0000000000000146
Arden R Turkewitz, Jane P Sallen, Rachel M Smith, Kandi Pitchford, Kimberly Lay, Scott Smalley
{"title":"在全球范围内建立 PA 专业的益处和局限性:系统回顾与混合方法研究。","authors":"Arden R Turkewitz, Jane P Sallen, Rachel M Smith, Kandi Pitchford, Kimberly Lay, Scott Smalley","doi":"10.1097/01.JAA.0000000000000146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Physician associates/assistants (PAs) and their equivalents offer a solution to the supply and demand crisis to alleviate global healthcare needs. This study investigated how PA and PA equivalents address global healthcare needs across different healthcare systems, revealing recommendations for their use. The study also sought to catalog the global healthcare needs that PAs and equivalents are successfully alleviating, the roles in which they function, and the barriers facing implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted from October 2021 to April 2022 and rerun in June 2023 following PRISMA 2020 guidelines; additionally, supporting interviews were conducted with PAs and global health experts. Primary outcomes were geographic region, economy, healthcare needs, and healthcare systems. Secondary outcomes were PA use, license recognition, and successes or barriers when implementing PAs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The literature and interviews focused on the global use of PAs and PA equivalents in six geographic regions, 63 countries, and five US territories where PAs or PA equivalents are employed, have been employed, are volunteering, or are being considered to support global healthcare needs. Most countries have a developing economy and an out-of-pocket healthcare system. PAs and PA equivalents hold 35 different practice titles, and most work in primary care. PAs alleviate healthcare shortages and economic disparities, specifically related to inequitable healthcare access. Globally, the profession is limited by a lack of legislation, regulation, and support.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PAs and PA equivalents worldwide belong to an adaptable profession that has well-documented success in alleviating the global healthcare shortage and addressing healthcare needs. Countries desiring PAs or PA equivalents should identify their specific needs, train their existing workforce, employ pilot programs, and focus on seeking early legislation and regulation. Broad support for existing PA and PA equivalent international organizations is recommended for global collaboration. This study serves as a guide for those advocating for the continued or future implementation of PAs and PA equivalents in their own country and provides a comprehensive resource to aid in the globalization of this profession. We offer recommendations to address the dire healthcare needs and workforce shortage faced across the globe.</p>","PeriodicalId":48728,"journal":{"name":"Jaapa-Journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The benefits and limitations of establishing the PA profession globally: A systematic review and mixed-methods study.\",\"authors\":\"Arden R Turkewitz, Jane P Sallen, Rachel M Smith, Kandi Pitchford, Kimberly Lay, Scott Smalley\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01.JAA.0000000000000146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Physician associates/assistants (PAs) and their equivalents offer a solution to the supply and demand crisis to alleviate global healthcare needs. This study investigated how PA and PA equivalents address global healthcare needs across different healthcare systems, revealing recommendations for their use. The study also sought to catalog the global healthcare needs that PAs and equivalents are successfully alleviating, the roles in which they function, and the barriers facing implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted from October 2021 to April 2022 and rerun in June 2023 following PRISMA 2020 guidelines; additionally, supporting interviews were conducted with PAs and global health experts. Primary outcomes were geographic region, economy, healthcare needs, and healthcare systems. Secondary outcomes were PA use, license recognition, and successes or barriers when implementing PAs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The literature and interviews focused on the global use of PAs and PA equivalents in six geographic regions, 63 countries, and five US territories where PAs or PA equivalents are employed, have been employed, are volunteering, or are being considered to support global healthcare needs. Most countries have a developing economy and an out-of-pocket healthcare system. PAs and PA equivalents hold 35 different practice titles, and most work in primary care. PAs alleviate healthcare shortages and economic disparities, specifically related to inequitable healthcare access. Globally, the profession is limited by a lack of legislation, regulation, and support.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PAs and PA equivalents worldwide belong to an adaptable profession that has well-documented success in alleviating the global healthcare shortage and addressing healthcare needs. Countries desiring PAs or PA equivalents should identify their specific needs, train their existing workforce, employ pilot programs, and focus on seeking early legislation and regulation. Broad support for existing PA and PA equivalent international organizations is recommended for global collaboration. This study serves as a guide for those advocating for the continued or future implementation of PAs and PA equivalents in their own country and provides a comprehensive resource to aid in the globalization of this profession. We offer recommendations to address the dire healthcare needs and workforce shortage faced across the globe.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jaapa-Journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jaapa-Journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JAA.0000000000000146\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jaapa-Journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JAA.0000000000000146","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:医生助理/助手(PA)及其同等人员为缓解全球医疗保健需求的供需危机提供了一种解决方案。本研究调查了助理医师和助理医师同等人员如何在不同的医疗保健系统中满足全球医疗保健需求,并提出了使用这些人员的建议。该研究还试图对助理医师和等同人员成功缓解的全球医疗保健需求、他们在其中发挥的作用以及实施过程中面临的障碍进行编目:方法:2021 年 10 月至 2022 年 4 月进行了系统性综述,并于 2023 年 6 月按照 PRISMA 2020 指南重新进行了综述;此外,还对助理医师和全球健康专家进行了支持性访谈。主要结果包括地理区域、经济、医疗保健需求和医疗保健系统。次要结果是 PA 的使用、许可证认可度以及实施 PA 时的成功经验或障碍:文献和访谈的重点是在六个地理区域、63 个国家和 5 个美国领土上的助理医师和等同于助理医师的人员的全球使用情况,在这些地区,助理医师或等同于助理医师的人员被雇用、已经被雇用、正在志愿服务或正在考虑支持全球医疗保健需求。大多数国家的经济都处于发展阶段,并拥有自费医疗系统。助理医师和相当于助理医师的人员拥有 35 种不同的执业头衔,大多数从事初级保健工作。助理医师可以缓解医疗保健短缺和经济差距,特别是与不公平的医疗保健获取有关的问题。在全球范围内,这一职业因缺乏立法、监管和支持而受到限制:全世界的助理医师和同等医师都属于适应性强的职业,在缓解全球医疗短缺和满足医疗需求方面取得了有据可查的成功。希望获得助理医师或助理医师同等职位的国家应确定其具体需求,培训现有劳动力,采用试点项目,并重点寻求早期立法和监管。建议广泛支持现有的助理医师和相当于助理医师的国际组织,以促进全球合作。本研究为那些倡导在本国继续或在未来实施助理医师和助理医师同等职位的人提供了指南,并为帮助这一职业的全球化提供了全面的资源。我们提出了一些建议,以解决全球面临的迫切的医疗保健需求和劳动力短缺问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The benefits and limitations of establishing the PA profession globally: A systematic review and mixed-methods study.

Objective: Physician associates/assistants (PAs) and their equivalents offer a solution to the supply and demand crisis to alleviate global healthcare needs. This study investigated how PA and PA equivalents address global healthcare needs across different healthcare systems, revealing recommendations for their use. The study also sought to catalog the global healthcare needs that PAs and equivalents are successfully alleviating, the roles in which they function, and the barriers facing implementation.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted from October 2021 to April 2022 and rerun in June 2023 following PRISMA 2020 guidelines; additionally, supporting interviews were conducted with PAs and global health experts. Primary outcomes were geographic region, economy, healthcare needs, and healthcare systems. Secondary outcomes were PA use, license recognition, and successes or barriers when implementing PAs.

Results: The literature and interviews focused on the global use of PAs and PA equivalents in six geographic regions, 63 countries, and five US territories where PAs or PA equivalents are employed, have been employed, are volunteering, or are being considered to support global healthcare needs. Most countries have a developing economy and an out-of-pocket healthcare system. PAs and PA equivalents hold 35 different practice titles, and most work in primary care. PAs alleviate healthcare shortages and economic disparities, specifically related to inequitable healthcare access. Globally, the profession is limited by a lack of legislation, regulation, and support.

Conclusions: PAs and PA equivalents worldwide belong to an adaptable profession that has well-documented success in alleviating the global healthcare shortage and addressing healthcare needs. Countries desiring PAs or PA equivalents should identify their specific needs, train their existing workforce, employ pilot programs, and focus on seeking early legislation and regulation. Broad support for existing PA and PA equivalent international organizations is recommended for global collaboration. This study serves as a guide for those advocating for the continued or future implementation of PAs and PA equivalents in their own country and provides a comprehensive resource to aid in the globalization of this profession. We offer recommendations to address the dire healthcare needs and workforce shortage faced across the globe.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
310
期刊介绍: ​​​JAAPA is the peer-reviewed clinical journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants (AAPA). Published for more than 25 years, its mission is to support the ongoing education and advancement of physician assistants (PAs) by publishing current information and research on clinical, health policy, and professional issues. Published monthly, JAAPA''s award-winning editorial includes: -Clinical review articles (with AAPA-approved Category I CME in each issue)- Case reports- Clinical departments- Original health services research- Articles on issues of professional interest to PAs
期刊最新文献
Novel gene therapies for sickle cell disease, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, and hemophilia A. Styles, strategies, and challenges of PA leaders nationally: An exploratory qualitative study. The PA profession: A worldwide phenomenon revisited. A rare case of peritoneal coccidioidomycosis. CME POST-TEST.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1